100.....

I wonder which is much harder to believe, that Jesus really existed and devoted his life for the benefit of the others or that your not adopted by your parents?
Can you remember the time during your birth? Why did you believed everyone says your not adopted.

The answer is simple, follow your heart and not your playful mind.

Respect everyones religion is very important.
That's how we can keep peace in this sinful world.

:thumbsup :thumbsup :thumbsup

Um, sorry dude...that was Jesus (pronounced Hey-Zeus), and he exists alright, but he's the guy that mows your lawn, and bangs your wife while you're at work...

http://www.westvegas.com/wunstell_co...OWING_LAWN.jpg

Merry Easter,

ADG Webmaster

Oooooh, spelling with words..................does that make you a witch too :winkwink:

Just like to share this quote: "It's always better to believe that there is a God and die finding there is none than not to believe in any God and die finding he existed."

I believe our prayers go to same GOD but of course you cannot serve 2 masters, "MONEY" or "GOD". :winkwink: :winkwink: :winkwink:

watch some of the coverage on tv this weekend about president dipshit and going to church to celebrate jesus' rising from the tomb and shit and then tell me how we still have separation of church and state. we don't. don't get me started, i could go on forever about religion and politics. fucking losers.

Sorry I'm late to the thread, but I just wanted to point out a couple of major glaring flaws in the whole Jesus concept. First of all, there are records of a man named Jesus born in the area when Christianity's Jesus was born. The problem here is, there were dozens of them...Jesus was a very popular name at the time. Secondly, the story of Jesus is little different than that of Horus. There's also a "Messiah" about a century after Jesus with a very similar story (I don't remember the name). And finally, anyone who knows their history knows that the various holidays regarding Christianity were copied from older religions, which is a whole other ball of wax entirely. Why would we be looking at December 25th as the "birth of Christ" yet not a specific day in the year for the "death of Christ"? How does that make any sense at all? When we look at death records, they always mention a specific date, even for deaths that predate Jesus' supposed death. So why is it that no one knows his real date of death, but instead relates it to this one particular Sunday? Oh wait, that's right...because they needed an Ostare cover-up holiday. Shit man, I used to get in trouble for asking these logical questions as a kid. It's no wonder I grew up to detest religion when the people who trumpet this stuff can't even answer a simple question.

The plain and simple truth about much of Christianity is that it is in fact a somewhat eclectic mix of much earlier belife systems and mystery school teachings edited, altered and re-hashed by the church fathers as something that was "invented" with and by JC.

Happy good friday to you as well llol

The Dec 25th date was set up hundreds of years later by the Chruch. Pagans at the time celebrated a winter holiday. By saying Christ was born at that time it was easier to convert the pagans. Actually some guys already figured out that Jeuss was really born sometime in late march early April.

The reason why Easter changes is because the Jewish Passover holiday changes and Jesus died durring Passover. Rememebr Jesus and his first followers were Jewish. They didn't abandon their jewish traditions right away. Also different sect celebrate easter at different times. some do in fact have it on the same day each year.

But we do have separation - Bush is the anti-christ :thumbsup He's not celebrating it - he's getting ready for the matchup

Stupid idiots that believe in any religion deserve to shoot each other up and die like they have for thousands of years :1orglaugh

It also changes because Easter was originally a Pagan holiday celebrating the equinox and spring with remembrences to Ester or whoever the Goddess of Spring was at the time (many different spellings) - they also had a legend of a person named Attis or something like that in 200 BC that was supposedly dead and resurrected and it is from that story that the christian stories of jesus came from - finally around 300 ad the christians finally wrote the full story of jesus and resurrection and got rid of the pagan story entirely - its all just a bunch of BS that each religion makes up to suit their needs

:1orglaugh
Oh sh*t my son mows our lawn.............that B*tch

Woohoo! Next holiday is homosexual soldier got murdered day on July 6th!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barry_Winchell

you mean like the christians did during the crusades? or like during the spanish inquisition? how about the religions today that kill gay people, hundreds of innocent people who happen to be in the way when a single cartoonist makes a toon that offends their religious beliefs - oh, and don't forget killing women who want an education or wear western clothing.

yup, those are obviously religions worthy of respect... showing them respect will obviously give us world peace :disgust

jesus christ was a homosexual

Pascals Wager. And it's already been debunked as a logical fallacy:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pascal's_Wager

Actually the Romans of that era used to execute criminals on a STAKE, NOT a cross. The cross part of the story evolved later. Wouldn't THAT throw a monkeywrench into religion Iconography. The symbol of the cross was yet another religious artifact that was around and in use thousands of years before the birth of christ. It was used in ancient Egypt, the symbol for venus is a circle and a cross, Saturn was a cross and a ram's horn. They took the symbolism of dying on the cross from the backgroudn of many other religions and as they have done with many of the ceremonies/symbols surrounding christianity, they've hacked them from pagan beliefs and jammed them into their own needs. (In fact most often the cross was used in ancient religions as a PHALLIC symbol, funny that, no?)

Jesus was a true historical figure who made an impact on many religions (even the Muslum religion sees Jesus as a prophet). However, like playing telephone, over the years the story changed and changed and became more and more glorified until suddenly he wasn't just a man, he was all these other things too. None of the scriptures in the bible were written exactly contemporary with Jesus's life... in fact the vast majority were written after Jesus was already dead and many years had passed. I'm sure there's NO embellishment there (like there is in every single set of religious texts since time immemmorial... religion IS ABOUT embellishment). There is lots of historical evidence that says that Jesus was a real man, and I'm sure no man since has left such an impact on millenia of people who followed him. He was still a man though after all. :)

You're quite an authorithy in the biz, but posts like this one puts you in the imbecil range. Perhaps you feel better there. Enjoy the journey.

well lets suppose that now that they have some DNA from those bones they found that they clone him into the physical realm and turn him into a real man back from the dead!

Cloning his DNA would not make him Jesus, it would make him an exact physical replica of the man without the world experience and knowledge. Most people just assume they'd come back with the knowledge, but last time I checked intelligence was in the brain, not the bones lol.

Obviously you missed the humor/satire based on the fact that hundreds of millions have been killed in the name of religion over the last 20 centurys or so - and by doing so have proven themselves to be idiots - so any thinking person would encourage this practice since it is obviously "accepted practice" within religion and makes less idiots in the long run which seems to be a win-win solution