DRAMA: Bush haters and Bush lovers aboard! - GoFuckYourself.com

marketsmart · 03-25-2007, 07:44 PM

Whether you like or hate President Bush, how many of you think that if Iran doesn't release the sailors seized a few days ago and Britain decides on military action; should the US get involved?

seeric · 03-25-2007, 07:45 PM

they shouldnt but of course they will.

stickyfingerz · 03-25-2007, 07:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by marketsmart

Whether you like or hate President Bush, how many of you think that if Iran doesn't release the sailors seized a few days ago and Britain decides on military action; should the US get involved?

Im thinking alot of good glasswear could come out of the area....

crockett · 03-25-2007, 07:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by marketsmart

Whether you like or hate President Bush, how many of you think that if Iran doesn't release the sailors seized a few days ago and Britain decides on military action; should the US get involved?

Well I can't stand Bush, but I've always thought Iran should have been the original target. They are and always have been the real threat and supporters of terrorism.

I wouldn't want to go into another war with Bush as president he's fucked up so much already it's not ever funny. On a side note, one thing I can say about Bush. Is if those had been US sailors we likely would have lobbed a few cruise missiles at them already.

Iran is one of the few nations that's I'd agree with attacking first. North Korea is another.

dissipate · 03-25-2007, 08:02 PM

Splum in 5...4..3...2..1...

chupacabra · 03-25-2007, 08:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dissipate

Splum in 5...4..3...2..1...

lol, true enough... and to the posted above, bush doesn't have the balls to go into n. korea (because china isn't going to share a border w/ a us colony)..

he-fox · 03-25-2007, 08:11 PM

no, US should not get involved.

besides this, the british sailors will be released.

LiveDose · 03-25-2007, 08:13 PM

If those soldiers are hurt or executed the retaliation should be massive and yes the US should help its ally if asked.

BusterBunny · 03-25-2007, 08:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LiveDose

If those soldiers are hurt or executed the retaliation should be massive and yes the US should help its ally if asked.

yup, we would expect the same of them

marketsmart · 03-25-2007, 09:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BusterBunny

yup, we would expect the same of them

Thank you... although i think that Iraq has always been a losing proposition for the US, I appreciate the fact that Britain has been with us since the beginning.

agian, i think we have tried and failed with iraq, if iran fucks with britain, we have to have their back....

DaddyHalbucks · 03-25-2007, 10:00 PM

Bush hasn't "fucked up" anything. Our country has gone soft. We have unrealistic expectations. Critics blast Bush for taking years, but the real timetable for changing that area is several decades, if not longer.

There are so many reasons to hit Iraq it isn't even funny. The abduction of the UK sailors is just another in a long list.

chupacabra · 03-25-2007, 10:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaddyHalbucks

There are so many reasons to hit Iraq it isn't even funny. The abduction of the UK sailors is just another in a long list.

do you even read? it was IRANIANS who took the british servicemen into custody, not iraqis..

TheSenator · 03-25-2007, 10:10 PM

Fuck no... I want my soliders back..... The British should be savvy enough to handle this kind of conundrum.

Negotiation is a bitch but it always happen even with the worst of them.

DaddyHalbucks · 03-25-2007, 10:27 PM

I meant Iran. It is late. I am tired.

mikeyddddd · 03-26-2007, 12:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaddyHalbucks

Bush hasn't "fucked up" anything.

frank7799 · 03-26-2007, 12:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by marketsmart

Whether you like or hate President Bush, how many of you think that if Iran doesn't release the sailors seized a few days ago and Britain decides on military action; should the US get involved?

Sooner or later you have to decide to convert to Islam, give up porn or get stoned versus nuke Iran.

Azoy? · 03-26-2007, 07:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz

Im thinking alot of good glasswear could come out of the area....

the US can't nuke them for the exact same reason they went into Iraq. They don't want to pay 150 dollars for oil.
if they nuke the area you wouldn't be able to get any oil from the ground for the next 150 years or so so that's out.
the reason they took UK sailors is because they know if they did this to the US it would be considered an act of war by the US and there would be far greater sections in the UN although I don't think the US would have attacked until necessary (such as a soldier getting hurt or killed) because the arm forces are stretched out as much as they can at this time.
the US should get involved if the UK asked them because the UK was there when the US asked them for support in Iraq. if they don't it would mean that no country would trust them again when it comes to needing support in return.
and just for the record no matter what Iran says about water this or that the reason they are doing this is to find out how far they can go before retaliation is done.
think about it, they know the world needs their oil so unless we stop oil flow from Iran to the world and are willing to pay for higher prices to show them we don't need them they will continue to have not only the western world but the entire world around their little finger.
if china and other countries supported not buying oil from Iran they would wake up and say SHIT WE ARE IN TROUBLE, LETS PLAY BALL WITH THOSE GUYS CAUSE WE CAN'T PLAY GAMES WITH THEM ANYMORE. THEY FOUND OTHER PLACES TO BUY THE OIL THEY NEED AND WE ARE NO LONGER HOLDING THE BALL.

King Adam · 03-26-2007, 07:59 AM

Nothing will happen. Iran will release he sailers for sure. They know if they don't that they will get blasted.

Dirty Dane · 03-26-2007, 08:01 AM

who cares? Millions have died already because of the Bushes.................................

Brad · 03-26-2007, 08:08 AM

where is splum? normally he would be all over this kind of thing like a fat kid on a smartie.

And no, I don't think that the US should get involved, but like many have already pointed out they probably will.

Azoy? · 03-26-2007, 08:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dirty Dane

who cares? Millions have died already because of the Bushes.................................

yep. they are just as dirty if not more so then the Kennedy's were.

uno · 03-26-2007, 08:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaddyHalbucks

I meant Iran. It is late. I am tired.

Must have been a Freudian slip.

StuartD · 03-26-2007, 08:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaddyHalbucks

Bush hasn't "fucked up" anything.

Dvae · 03-26-2007, 08:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dirty Dane

who cares? Millions have died already because of the Bushes.................................

Millions?
Where do you get those statistics?

Domain Distribution · 03-26-2007, 09:02 AM

There's a fine line between fishing and standing on the shore like an idiot.

porno jew · 03-26-2007, 09:03 AM

should have nuked those cunts a long time ago.

directfiesta · 03-26-2007, 09:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chupacabra

do you even read? it was IRANIANS who took the british servicemen into custody, not iraqis..

why would he need to read ? just a mouthpiece

Splum · 03-26-2007, 09:40 AM

Phoenix · 03-26-2007, 09:42 AM

wag the dog...you guys should watch that movie

Splum · 03-26-2007, 09:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phoenix

wag the dog...you guys should watch that movie

Yes because we know that movies are reality, or at least to you they are. Isnt that movie based on Bill Clintons life?

Shakula · 03-26-2007, 09:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett

Well I can't stand Bush, but I've always thought Iran should have been the original target. They are and always have been the real threat and supporters of terrorism.

I wouldn't want to go into another war with Bush as president he's fucked up so much already it's not ever funny. On a side note, one thing I can say about Bush. Is if those had been US sailors we likely would have lobbed a few cruise missiles at them already.

Iran is one of the few nations that's I'd agree with attacking first. North Korea is another.

What terrorism activity has iran been helping?

porno jew · 03-26-2007, 09:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shakula

What terrorism activity has iran been helping?

killing US soldiers in iraq, raghead.

Shakula · 03-26-2007, 09:55 AM

United States of Terrorism has killed more people then good ol´ CCCP
And they keep talking about freedom, L O L!

How many children died in the sanctions against Iraq?
And Bush whine´s about Saddam killing a few thousand ppl here and there.

Haha. Stupidity.

Shakula · 03-26-2007, 09:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by porno jew

killing US soldiers in iraq, raghead.

The war on Iraq is illegal, its not terrorism killing US soldiers in Iraq.
You went into Iraq illegaly. But then again, you are to stupid to see this issue.

Quote:

Iraq war was illegal -Kofi Annan

US should stop doing Israel´s dirtywork.
You have nothing to gain from this.

Sarah_Jayne · 03-26-2007, 10:21 AM

It will play *much* better with the British public if the British gov't are seen to be the ones that fix this.

Angelo22 · 03-26-2007, 10:24 AM

US shouldnt have been involved in the last couple of wars.
But for money, it stuck its nose in other countries' biz.

I suppose Bush will wipe the queens wrinkly ass and 'propose to help'

Sarah_Jayne · 03-26-2007, 10:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Angelo22

US shouldnt have been involved in the last couple of wars.
But for money, it stuck its nose in other countries' biz.

I suppose Bush will wipe the queens wrinkly ass and 'propose to help'

yeah because it isn't like they are there to help the US or anything *rolls eyes*

Angelo22 · 03-26-2007, 10:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sarah_MaxCash

yeah because it isn't like they are there to help the US or anything *rolls eyes*

What do you mean?
whom are you referring to with that 'they'?

Matt 26z · 03-26-2007, 10:53 AM

Democrats introduce a bill to bring the troops home next year and suddenly this happens. Odd, don't you think?

They were ordered to sail where they did, and Iran was tipped off where they'd be. Are we really expected to believe that Iran captured British forces at sea on their own and took them back to Iran? Please. Backup would have been called and there would have been a conflict right there.

czarina · 03-26-2007, 10:54 AM

Bush hater here, big time!

seven · 03-26-2007, 10:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shakula

US should stop doing Israel´s dirtywork.
You have nothing to gain from this.

no can't do:

shoeaholicanon · 03-26-2007, 10:56 AM

who knows but yeah, wouldn't be surprised if he did.
nice kissy picture

lol

Linkster · 03-26-2007, 11:10 AM

Just have to wait and see what proof the Iranians present to the UN this week that the sailors were in Iranian waters - they say they have it - of course that waterway has had a border dispute as to where Iraq and Iran border actually is for years - long before this war.
If the British were indeed in the Iranian territorial waters then they have every right to arrest them - just as the US does if someone does something within the 12 mile limit we impose around our country - Maritime law is pretty cut and dry and if Iran has the proof they will show it - if not - they were just lobbying for some weakness in the European coalition at the UN prior to the sanctions vote that backfired on them - no big deal - they just will come out and say they had a navigational error and release them without losing face. If they have the proof then they will detain them and have a trial - no big deal.

Linkster · 03-26-2007, 11:32 AM

BTW - Im not really sure why this is getting so much attention this time - the same thing happened 3 years ago with 8 British soldiers and Sailors - and Iran released them after 3 days when Britain finally admitted they had been in Iranian territorial waters - of note this time - the British refuse to give out the geographical location these soldiers were at this time - maybe the same issue again?

Sarah_Jayne · 03-26-2007, 11:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Angelo22

What do you mean?
whom are you referring to with that 'they'?

The British soldiers that are now being held.

directfiesta · 03-26-2007, 12:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Matt 26z

Democrats introduce a bill to bring the troops home next year and suddenly this happens. Odd, don't you think?

They were ordered to sail where they did, and Iran was tipped off where they'd be. Are we really expected to believe that Iran captured British forces at sea on their own and took them back to Iran? Please. Backup would have been called and there would have been a conflict right there.

source of your novel ... ???

BTW, look up... they were not at sea, but in a RIVER ......

I sale tin foil hats ( new ) very cheap ....

directfiesta · 03-26-2007, 12:55 PM

was in another thread, so here it is again to educate you a bit:

now, write a new novel

pornguy · 03-26-2007, 12:58 PM

I have mixed feelings on this. Allow them to get away with it, and they will do something just like it again to see how far they can go.

seven · 03-26-2007, 02:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pornguy

I have mixed feelings on this. Allow them to get away with it, and they will do something just like it again to see how far they can go.

Well they did it before they're doing it again same goes for everyone.. already bush's ass bleeding still wants to have more analsex. Gotta love that man! Go Bush Go!

BusterBunny · 03-26-2007, 02:25 PM

50......

03-25-2007, 07:44 PM	#1
marketsmart HOMICIDAL TROLL KILLER Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Sunnybrook Institution for the Criminally Insane Posts: 20,419	DRAMA: Bush haters and Bush lovers aboard! Whether you like or hate President Bush, how many of you think that if Iran doesn't release the sailors seized a few days ago and Britain decides on military action; should the US get involved?

03-25-2007, 08:13 PM	#8
LiveDose Show Yer Tits! Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Somewhere Out there... Posts: 25,792	If those soldiers are hurt or executed the retaliation should be massive and yes the US should help its ally if asked. __________________ Scammer Alert: acer19 acer [email protected] [email protected] Money stolen using PayPal

03-25-2007, 10:00 PM	#11
DaddyHalbucks A freakin' legend! Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Las Vegas, Nevada USA Posts: 18,975	Bush hasn't "fucked up" anything. Our country has gone soft. We have unrealistic expectations. Critics blast Bush for taking years, but the real timetable for changing that area is several decades, if not longer. There are so many reasons to hit Iraq it isn't even funny. The abduction of the UK sailors is just another in a long list. __________________ Boner Money

03-25-2007, 10:10 PM	#13
TheSenator Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: NJ Posts: 13,340	Fuck no... I want my soliders back..... The British should be savvy enough to handle this kind of conundrum. Negotiation is a bitch but it always happen even with the worst of them. __________________ ISeekGirls.com since 2005

03-25-2007, 10:27 PM	#14
DaddyHalbucks A freakin' legend! Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Las Vegas, Nevada USA Posts: 18,975	I meant Iran. It is late. I am tired. __________________ Boner Money

03-25-2007, 07:45 PM	#2
seeric .......... Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: .......... Posts: 41,917	they shouldnt but of course they will.

03-25-2007, 08:02 PM	#5
dissipate The Dirty Frenchman Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Lost Angeles Posts: 8,904	Splum in 5...4..3...2..1...

03-25-2007, 08:11 PM	#7
he-fox Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Playa del Carmen, Mexico Posts: 2,884	no, US should not get involved. besides this, the british sailors will be released.

03-26-2007, 07:59 AM	#18
King Adam Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Valley of the Sun Posts: 5,408	Nothing will happen. Iran will release he sailers for sure. They know if they don't that they will get blasted. __________________ TWISTYSCASH.com - Proven to be One of the BEST Adult Programs Around Promote These Sites : Twistys ~ Busty Ones ~ Nicole Graves ICQ : 9 6 4 4 0 2 2 1

03-26-2007, 08:01 AM	#19
Dirty Dane Sick Fuck Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: www Posts: 9,491	who cares? Millions have died already because of the Bushes.................................

03-26-2007, 08:08 AM	#20
Brad Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Toronto Posts: 2,510	where is splum? normally he would be all over this kind of thing like a fat kid on a smartie. And no, I don't think that the US should get involved, but like many have already pointed out they probably will. __________________ Affiliate Manager/Media Buyer ICQ 376 978 529 Skype: bradleyjwscott [email protected]

03-26-2007, 09:02 AM	#25
Domain Distribution Ask me about negative cash flow Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 539	There's a fine line between fishing and standing on the shore like an idiot. __________________ Artifical Intelligence AIM Bot ~ $199.00 [email protected] 238102273

03-26-2007, 09:03 AM	#26
porno jew Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 10,166	should have nuked those cunts a long time ago.

03-26-2007, 09:40 AM	#28
Splum Confirmed User Join Date: May 2003 Location: USA Posts: 6,195

03-26-2007, 09:42 AM	#29
Phoenix BACON BACON BACON Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Poems everybody, the laddie fancies himself a poet Posts: 35,472	wag the dog...you guys should watch that movie __________________ Skype Phoenixskype1 Telegram PhoenixBrad https://quantads.io

03-26-2007, 09:55 AM	#33
Shakula So Fucking Banned Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 948	United States of Terrorism has killed more people then good ol´ CCCP And they keep talking about freedom, L O L! How many children died in the sanctions against Iraq? And Bush whine´s about Saddam killing a few thousand ppl here and there. Haha. Stupidity.

03-26-2007, 10:21 AM	#35
Sarah_Jayne Now with more Jayne Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Los Angeles Posts: 40,077	It will play much better with the British public if the British gov't are seen to be the ones that fix this.

03-26-2007, 10:24 AM	#36
Angelo22 Writer Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2007 Posts: 3,123	US shouldnt have been involved in the last couple of wars. But for money, it stuck its nose in other countries' biz. I suppose Bush will wipe the queens wrinkly ass and 'propose to help' __________________ MAKE MORE MONEY FROM YOUR WEB TRAFFIC - 15% BONUS And contact me if you need high quality translating and writing work done - angelo22 (AT) gmail (DOT) com

03-26-2007, 10:53 AM	#39
Matt 26z So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: ¤ª"˜¨๑۩۞۩๑¨˜"ª¤ Posts: 18,481	Democrats introduce a bill to bring the troops home next year and suddenly this happens. Odd, don't you think? They were ordered to sail where they did, and Iran was tipped off where they'd be. Are we really expected to believe that Iran captured British forces at sea on their own and took them back to Iran? Please. Backup would have been called and there would have been a conflict right there.

03-26-2007, 10:54 AM	#40
czarina Webmaster Extraordinaire Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: A beautiful beach... Posts: 10,748	Bush hater here, big time!

03-26-2007, 10:56 AM	#42
shoeaholicanon Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2007 Posts: 1,003	who knows but yeah, wouldn't be surprised if he did. nice kissy picture lol

03-26-2007, 11:10 AM	#43
Linkster Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: DeltaHell Posts: 3,216	Just have to wait and see what proof the Iranians present to the UN this week that the sailors were in Iranian waters - they say they have it - of course that waterway has had a border dispute as to where Iraq and Iran border actually is for years - long before this war. If the British were indeed in the Iranian territorial waters then they have every right to arrest them - just as the US does if someone does something within the 12 mile limit we impose around our country - Maritime law is pretty cut and dry and if Iran has the proof they will show it - if not - they were just lobbying for some weakness in the European coalition at the UN prior to the sanctions vote that backfired on them - no big deal - they just will come out and say they had a navigational error and release them without losing face. If they have the proof then they will detain them and have a trial - no big deal. __________________ Porn Links Crak for your bank account - Get Addicted FREE LIVE CAM SHOWS

03-26-2007, 11:32 AM	#44
Linkster Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: DeltaHell Posts: 3,216	BTW - Im not really sure why this is getting so much attention this time - the same thing happened 3 years ago with 8 British soldiers and Sailors - and Iran released them after 3 days when Britain finally admitted they had been in Iranian territorial waters - of note this time - the British refuse to give out the geographical location these soldiers were at this time - maybe the same issue again? __________________ Porn Links Crak for your bank account - Get Addicted FREE LIVE CAM SHOWS

03-26-2007, 12:55 PM	#47
directfiesta Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Punta Cana, DR Posts: 29,964	was in another thread, so here it is again to educate you a bit: now, write a new novel __________________ I know that Asspimple is stoopid ... As he says, it is a FACT ! But I can't figure out how he can breathe or type , at the same time ....

03-26-2007, 12:58 PM	#48
pornguy Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Homeless Posts: 62,911	I have mixed feelings on this. Allow them to get away with it, and they will do something just like it again to see how far they can go. __________________ PornGuy skype me pornguy_epic AmateurDough The Hottes Shemales online! TChicks.com \| Angeles Cid \| Mariana Cordoba \| MAILERS WELCOME!

03-26-2007, 02:25 PM	#50
BusterBunny perverted justice decoy Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: unborn still in the womb connected via blackberry Posts: 19,291	50...... __________________ my sig caught gonoherpasyphilaids and died