Whether you like or hate President Bush, how many of you think that if Iran doesn't release the sailors seized a few days ago and Britain decides on military action; should the US get involved?
DRAMA: Bush haters and Bush lovers aboard!
Collapse
X
-
Tags: None
-
Comment
-
Well I can't stand Bush, but I've always thought Iran should have been the original target. They are and always have been the real threat and supporters of terrorism.
I wouldn't want to go into another war with Bush as president he's fucked up so much already it's not ever funny. On a side note, one thing I can say about Bush. Is if those had been US sailors we likely would have lobbed a few cruise missiles at them already.
Iran is one of the few nations that's I'd agree with attacking first. North Korea is another.In November, you can vote for America's next president or its first dictator.Comment
-
Comment
-
If those soldiers are hurt or executed the retaliation should be massive and yes the US should help its ally if asked.Comment
-
Comment
-
Thank you... although i think that Iraq has always been a losing proposition for the US, I appreciate the fact that Britain has been with us since the beginning.
agian, i think we have tried and failed with iraq, if iran fucks with britain, we have to have their back....Comment
-
Bush hasn't "fucked up" anything. Our country has gone soft. We have unrealistic expectations. Critics blast Bush for taking years, but the real timetable for changing that area is several decades, if not longer.
There are so many reasons to hit Iraq it isn't even funny. The abduction of the UK sailors is just another in a long list.Comment
-
...promise her a defamation, tell her where the rain will fall..Comment
-
Fuck no... I want my soliders back..... The British should be savvy enough to handle this kind of conundrum.
Negotiation is a bitch but it always happen even with the worst of them.ISeekGirls.com since 2005Comment
-
-
Comment
-
Sooner or later you have to decide to convert to Islam, give up porn or get stoned versus nuke Iran.
Comment
-
the US can't nuke them for the exact same reason they went into Iraq. They don't want to pay 150 dollars for oil.
if they nuke the area you wouldn't be able to get any oil from the ground for the next 150 years or so so that's out.
the reason they took UK sailors is because they know if they did this to the US it would be considered an act of war by the US and there would be far greater sections in the UN although I don't think the US would have attacked until necessary (such as a soldier getting hurt or killed) because the arm forces are stretched out as much as they can at this time.
the US should get involved if the UK asked them because the UK was there when the US asked them for support in Iraq. if they don't it would mean that no country would trust them again when it comes to needing support in return.
and just for the record no matter what Iran says about water this or that the reason they are doing this is to find out how far they can go before retaliation is done.
think about it, they know the world needs their oil so unless we stop oil flow from Iran to the world and are willing to pay for higher prices to show them we don't need them they will continue to have not only the western world but the entire world around their little finger.
if china and other countries supported not buying oil from Iran they would wake up and say SHIT WE ARE IN TROUBLE, LETS PLAY BALL WITH THOSE GUYS CAUSE WE CAN'T PLAY GAMES WITH THEM ANYMORE. THEY FOUND OTHER PLACES TO BUY THE OIL THEY NEED AND WE ARE NO LONGER HOLDING THE BALL.
Comment
-
Nothing will happen. Iran will release he sailers for sure. They know if they don't that they will get blasted.
TWISTYSCASH.com - Proven to be One of the BEST Adult Programs Around
Promote These Sites : Twistys ~ Busty Ones ~ Nicole Graves
ICQ : 9 6 4 4 0 2 2 1Comment
-
Comment
-
where is splum? normally he would be all over this kind of thing like a fat kid on a smartie.
And no, I don't think that the US should get involved, but like many have already pointed out they probably will.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
There's a fine line between fishing and standing on the shore like an idiot.Artifical Intelligence AIM Bot ~ $199.00
[email protected]
238102273Comment
-
I know that Asspimple is stoopid ... As he says, it is a FACT !
But I can't figure out how he can breathe or type , at the same time ....Comment
-
-
What terrorism activity has iran been helping?Well I can't stand Bush, but I've always thought Iran should have been the original target. They are and always have been the real threat and supporters of terrorism.
I wouldn't want to go into another war with Bush as president he's fucked up so much already it's not ever funny. On a side note, one thing I can say about Bush. Is if those had been US sailors we likely would have lobbed a few cruise missiles at them already.
Iran is one of the few nations that's I'd agree with attacking first. North Korea is another.Comment
-
United States of Terrorism has killed more people then good ol´ CCCP
And they keep talking about freedom, L O L!
How many children died in the sanctions against Iraq?
And Bush whine´s about Saddam killing a few thousand ppl here and there.
Haha. Stupidity.Comment
-
The war on Iraq is illegal, its not terrorism killing US soldiers in Iraq.
You went into Iraq illegaly. But then again, you are to stupid to see this issue.
Iraq war was illegal -Kofi Annan
US should stop doing Israel´s dirtywork.
You have nothing to gain from this.Comment
-
It will play *much* better with the British public if the British gov't are seen to be the ones that fix this.Comment
-
US shouldnt have been involved in the last couple of wars.
But for money, it stuck its nose in other countries' biz.
I suppose Bush will wipe the queens wrinkly ass and 'propose to help'MAKE MORE MONEY FROM YOUR WEB TRAFFIC - 15% BONUS

And contact me if you need high quality translating and writing work done - angelo22 (AT) gmail (DOT) comComment
-
Comment
-
MAKE MORE MONEY FROM YOUR WEB TRAFFIC - 15% BONUS

And contact me if you need high quality translating and writing work done - angelo22 (AT) gmail (DOT) comComment
-
Democrats introduce a bill to bring the troops home next year and suddenly this happens. Odd, don't you think?
They were ordered to sail where they did, and Iran was tipped off where they'd be. Are we really expected to believe that Iran captured British forces at sea on their own and took them back to Iran? Please. Backup would have been called and there would have been a conflict right there.Comment
-
-
Just have to wait and see what proof the Iranians present to the UN this week that the sailors were in Iranian waters - they say they have it - of course that waterway has had a border dispute as to where Iraq and Iran border actually is for years - long before this war.
If the British were indeed in the Iranian territorial waters then they have every right to arrest them - just as the US does if someone does something within the 12 mile limit we impose around our country - Maritime law is pretty cut and dry and if Iran has the proof they will show it - if not - they were just lobbying for some weakness in the European coalition at the UN prior to the sanctions vote that backfired on them - no big deal - they just will come out and say they had a navigational error and release them without losing face. If they have the proof then they will detain them and have a trial - no big deal.Comment
-
BTW - Im not really sure why this is getting so much attention this time - the same thing happened 3 years ago with 8 British soldiers and Sailors - and Iran released them after 3 days when Britain finally admitted they had been in Iranian territorial waters - of note this time - the British refuse to give out the geographical location these soldiers were at this time - maybe the same issue again?Comment
-
Comment
-
source of your novel ... ???Democrats introduce a bill to bring the troops home next year and suddenly this happens. Odd, don't you think?
They were ordered to sail where they did, and Iran was tipped off where they'd be. Are we really expected to believe that Iran captured British forces at sea on their own and took them back to Iran? Please. Backup would have been called and there would have been a conflict right there.
BTW, look up... they were not at sea, but in a RIVER ......
I sale tin foil hats ( new ) very cheap ....I know that Asspimple is stoopid ... As he says, it is a FACT !
But I can't figure out how he can breathe or type , at the same time ....Comment
-
was in another thread, so here it is again to educate you a bit:

now, write a new novelI know that Asspimple is stoopid ... As he says, it is a FACT !
But I can't figure out how he can breathe or type , at the same time ....Comment
-
I have mixed feelings on this. Allow them to get away with it, and they will do something just like it again to see how far they can go.PornGuy skype me pornguy_epic
AmateurDough The Hottes Shemales online!
TChicks.com | Angeles Cid | Mariana Cordoba | MAILERS WELCOME!Comment
-
Well they did it before they're doing it again same goes for everyone.. already bush's ass bleeding still wants to have more analsex. Gotta love that man! Go Bush Go!Comment
-




Comment