GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Which sponsors are really "clean"? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=715880)

webgeek 03-19-2007 06:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Ghost (Post 12107231)
Island Dollars <-- Zero traffic leaks

Affiliate tours
Joon Mali
Asha Kumara
Lily Koh


There isn't one single traffic leak on our tours. Feel free to check :)

Other than the webmaster's linking code not working at
http://www.lilykoh.com/tour2/index.p...OjI6Mg,0,0,0,0
(http://nats.islanddollars.com/track/%3C?=($_GET['nats']?$_GET['nats']:'MDowOjM')?%3E/)
you're site looks really cool... congrats!

Quick Buck 03-19-2007 06:52 AM

shouldnt be a single leak on any quickbuck tour. if anybody finds one we'd love to know so we can plug it.

webmasterchecks 03-19-2007 06:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jayeff (Post 12105173)
In reality that is rarely true. The cliché derives from the very narrow perspective that if a given transaction would legitimately earn - say - $30 and via a "trick" of some kind, that can be turned into $50, that equates to "more money".

And of course, on that single transaction it does and all those extra $20 dollars mount up to reinforce the illusion. But now compare the number of scams big enough for people to remember, against the number of regular businesses making profits year in and year out.

A few scammers think on a large scale (and are smart enough to pull something off and get away with it), but the majority are small-time, unambitious and short-sighted. How can they be anything else, when by their nature, most scams are ways to cut a bigger slice of the existing cake. Scammers rarely try to bake a bigger cake and even fail to notice when their activities make the cake smaller.

Right now quite a lot of the people center-stage in this industry use dubious methods of one kind or another. But that is less an endorsement of their tactics than because this industry is in its infancy. Check back in 5 years or so and see how many are still around...

let me make a few points, the line drawn is subjective, and by scam, i was not only referring to the huge blow-outs like xpics that are cemented in peoples minds, but in the common little tricks you mentioned in your first paragraph

2 prechecked crossells, in some cases with little to no information on how to cancel anything other than the initial sale. bear in mind that the crossell information does not get translated for foreign surfers, so they have no idea what that is, or if its any different than the opt-in "i am 18 or older" txt

companies have done this for years and continue to do so, i can name 10 off the top of my head right now

10 step, non-intuative cancellation process

a sponsor that pays on trials, but makes their trials impossible to cancel until after the first rebill

just a few examples, all those people are still around and they will be years from now.

ive learned that there is not always justice in this world. i used to thing that people that do scams will get caught and stop. ive learned, in most cases, that not to be true. if they have to, they change, they make arguments, and they do what they have to to stay in business, but they stay

the problem is that i like business, and those are the big cats, so im not willing to name names :)

SkeetSkeet 03-19-2007 07:01 AM

we are fucking spotless www.starlightbucks.com ... all affiliate links carry your code too ... and your surfers can browse through our family of sites at the bottom of all of our tours, and yes, your unique code carries endlessly through all of them.

xcitecash 03-19-2007 07:12 AM

we are dirty....

CDSmith 03-19-2007 07:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xcitecash (Post 12107985)
we are dirty....

That would make for a good t-shirt slogan.

jayeff 03-19-2007 07:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by THEMASKEDRIDER (Post 12107943)
i used to thing that people that do scams will get caught and stop. ive learned, in most cases, that not to be true. if they have to, they change, they make arguments, and they do what they have to to stay in business, but they stay

It doesn't really have much to do with justice, people getting caught, etc. And sometimes there is a fine line between a scam and legitimately pushing the envelope. There will always be people doing both.

The fundamental difference is one of attitude. I think almost everyone who approaches their business with the belief that the sky is the limit and he/she is capable of taking the ride, will tell you that the big picture comes first and that in a sense, the details fall into place naturally. Scammers, just to keep using a convenient term, are small-minded and unambitious because the details are their business. They have no big picture except to keep milking whatever they have for as long as it lasts.

Which isn't to say they never make any money, only that what they achieve will almost always be relatively limited and usually quite short-lived. When scammers are caught, in theory they could change and a handful do. But it comes back to that attitude thing again. Most who go that route in the first place, don't have it in them to go any other route. And in many ways it's a tougher route, because every time a scam has run its course, there has to be another to replace it, you likely can't make a profit any other way. All a straight business has to do, is keep on doing whatever it is doing.

RawAlex 03-19-2007 08:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JamesK (Post 12107100)
99% of the paysites links to its affiliate program. It's a standard. You are going way to far, go out and find real leaks like a join page link with no code on it, a refresh or simple affiliate id removal from the url would make the affiliate lose its credit :2 cents:

James, just because webmasters in the past have tolerated this ongoing traffic leak, there is no reason it should be tolerated going forward. Quite simply, it is MY traffic, I should get paid for it, no matter what it does (at least up to any exit consoles).

It is a low percentage number, but what does it hurt the program to have it coded with my affiliate link? To me that would just show a program working hard to make sure everything is 100% for their affiliates.

Sexsitesurfer 03-19-2007 08:27 AM

www.ddfcash.com

zibril 03-19-2007 08:28 AM

Pussycash is the cleanest one for sure...

adamneve 03-19-2007 08:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tempest (Post 12104429)
PussyCash only has the affiliate code in "some" of their links thus relying on cookies to really do all the tracking. Since we all know some cookies won't be getting set, it's actually a small shave.

Given I'm not impressed with their "technical" expertice (based on all the various errors/issues I've seen), I simply have no faith that they have any sort of strong session tracking (to try an minimize any cookie loss) that you would get with a system like ccbill. But that's just my opinion.

Pussycash has always been a clean and fair company and we never had any problem with the tracking system and it has been working very well.

If you think you have any problem you are welcome to do a test or contact our reps.

RuthB 03-19-2007 08:52 AM

Feel free to check out WEGCash! We're clean and our sites convert! :thumbsup

will76 03-19-2007 09:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by p1mpdogg (Post 12107078)
if i put cams.com there, what does that tell you?

idiot.

if... if.... if....


So you sell 404 traffic off of your site to another site?

Ditosta 03-19-2007 09:39 AM

we are 100% clean,
We also have a leak free tour option in our WM area

xxxice 03-19-2007 09:51 AM

jayeff wanted to know your thoughts on this post
https://gfy.com/12101309-post21.html

from this thread
https://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-business-discussion/596416-cookies.html

I tried out what was talked about with my links and got the same thing.

Seems if they want to be clean they should fix this :)

Brad 03-19-2007 09:59 AM

Adult Lounge is as clean as a whistle (a new whistle of course because a used whistle probably isn't really all that clean).

jayeff 03-19-2007 10:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vanderweb (Post 12108672)
Seems if they want to be clean they should fix this

Certainly... although as per a post I made earlier in this thread, it's a shame so many are focused more on ripping into those who are almost clean than on congratulating them for setting a good example.

It's not that I don't agree with someone who replied before, that it would be good to see all these guys taking the last few steps. But we have had a lot of - often long - threads lately on some of the current "tricks". It has become really difficult to keep track of who hasn't shown up in them and I know I could use a simple reference :)

To be honest I feel bad that some of the people who are way ahead in the "doing the right thing" stakes have ended up getting knocked. A couple of self-promos in this thread are close to taking the p*ss, but otherwise these are the good guys for now at least.

RawAlex 03-19-2007 10:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jayeff (Post 12108807)
Certainly... although as per a post I made earlier in this thread, it's a shame so many are focused more on ripping into those who are almost clean than on congratulating them for setting a good example.

Well, Jayeff, with due respect, why not post up say 5 good examples to the types of traffic leaks that bother you? Rather than beating around the bush and not naming names, why not get to it and take some clean shots. Obviously the programs that you think are fudging it aren't going to come charging into this thread.

My personal issue is that there are programs calling "clean" that aren't totally clean - but they are a version of clean that for some dumbass reason affiliates are suppose to accept because "it's the norm".

Anyway, so who is on your shitlist? Cite some examples!

xxxice 03-19-2007 10:49 AM

My intention is not to bash them for doing a good job. It is hard to congratulate a sponsor for good work when I see my affiliate id disappearing on yes a more minor of an issue. But now we are commending sponsors that are almost clean and not holding them accountable for the small stuff. Seems to me all should be evaluated and when the are clean; they are clean; before that they can continue to make changes until they are. I am with you that their should be more focus on the really bad ones though as well, but just wanted to explain why I was posting what I did.

xxxice 03-19-2007 10:58 AM

Also I made an error above and used their instead of there lol. Wanted to add there is a chance with the issue of the members login issue that the sponsor does not realize it is a potential problem. I guess it is best just to inform them and see what they do :)

Reak AGV 03-19-2007 11:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RawAlex (Post 12108222)
Just because webmasters in the past have tolerated this ongoing traffic leak, there is no reason it should be tolerated going forward. Quite simply, it is MY traffic, I should get paid for it, no matter what it does (at least up to any exit consoles).

It is a low percentage number, but what does it hurt the program to have it coded with my affiliate link? To me that would just show a program working hard to make sure everything is 100&#37; for their affiliates.

Alex, it's been going on for ages just like you said. Im confident that almost any of the programs you promote have the same traffic leaks you bashing other programs in this thread for. The programs that always pay on time, track stats honestly and so on. What would be bad if like i said before, you can make a affiliate sale dissapear by changing the link or url, or that a 404 ends up with a exit chain of 5. That would make a program not ''clean'' in my eyes.

jayeff 03-19-2007 11:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RawAlex (Post 12108899)
Anyway, so who is on your shitlist?

If I wanted to produce a "sh*tlist", I would simply have added to an existing thread. I'm not trolling for post-count, sig-views or whatever, so I have no reason to open new threads to cover the same ground as topics already open. And if I had wanted to start a thread about traffic leaks from tours, I would have come right out and said so.

I thought my opening post was fairly clear. Lots of sponsors have rightly been taking a pasting lately on a variety of fronts (and plenty more probably are just as bad). Which sponsors are "clean"?

I'm not exactly shy about stating my opinions, so it's a fairly safe bet that what I write is what I mean. I have said three times now that we shouldn't settle for 99&#37;, but I guess I was hoping for a fairly positive thread for a change and I do have a hard time getting energized about sponsors who almost have it right, when so many others are deliberately (in some cases) going out of their way to screw us and/or surfers across a whole range of issues. That's it...

JayDeeZee 03-19-2007 11:52 AM

AdultRentalCash is 100% Clean

See my sig!

lagwagon 03-19-2007 11:56 AM

were clean as a mo fugger

RRRED 03-19-2007 12:06 PM

NSCash is squeaky clean

That is a fact :thumbsup

Redmanthatcould 03-19-2007 12:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thehand (Post 12105419)
At Video Secrets, we take pride in running a "clean" program:-)

And we shower daily!

Well, at least most of us do...

_Rush_ 03-19-2007 12:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VS_Jeff (Post 12109584)
And we shower daily!

Well, at least most of us do...

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh

RawAlex 03-19-2007 01:06 PM

jayeff, so why not have a thread called "sponsors that are somewhat close to clean"?

The reasons we are in such a fucked up position now with many sponsors taking huge advantage of affiliate traffic is because for too long we all made enough money to tolerate the bullshit. But with conversion rates dropping like stones, more and more of us are getting concerned about what is happening with our traffic - ALL OF IT. That includes every link on the tour page.

I wasn't trying to beat on programs that are already pretty good, but I was taking exception to some who say "we are clean" yet I could easily find leaks right on page one of their tours. "relatively clean", yes... but clean, well... no.

darling2 03-19-2007 01:22 PM

KM Bucks is 100&#37; clean and we use NATS to track our traffic.

Feel free to check out our tour at

http://in.keithmanheim.com/track/kmb...:keithmanheim/

Jakke PNG 03-19-2007 01:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RawAlex (Post 12110041)
I wasn't trying to beat on programs that are already pretty good, but I was taking exception to some who say "we are clean" yet I could easily find leaks right on page one of their tours. "relatively clean", yes... but clean, well... no.

Your idea of 'relatively clean' isn't what mine is. In order to call my tour NOT clean would mean that the surfer would have to go through my webmasters link, NOT click on enter, but the webmasters link again, and then sign-up to become a webmaster for you to lose that customer. In ALL other scenarios you'd still be credited with the sale.. in essence you would be credited for the SALE no matter what. You're being way way too strict with your idea of 'clean'.:2 cents:

anne 03-19-2007 02:20 PM

We are clean MooCash.com :)

RawAlex 03-19-2007 02:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TeenGodFather (Post 12110219)
Your idea of 'relatively clean' isn't what mine is. In order to call my tour NOT clean would mean that the surfer would have to go through my webmasters link, NOT click on enter, but the webmasters link again, and then sign-up to become a webmaster for you to lose that customer. In ALL other scenarios you'd still be credited with the sale.. in essence you would be credited for the SALE no matter what. You're being way way too strict with your idea of 'clean'.:2 cents:


If I am not getting paid for webmaster referals, why is that link on the page? If you get a new webmaster and he makes you 10k next year, are you going to reward me for finding him? Nope. So therefore, it is a leak.

How hard is it to understand that a leak is a leak, regardless of how little you think it is.

RawAlex 03-19-2007 02:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by darling2 (Post 12110172)
KM Bucks is 100% clean and we use NATS to track our traffic.

Feel free to check out our tour at

http://in.keithmanheim.com/track/kmb...:keithmanheim/

I didn't look too closely but I will give credit where it is due: The affiliate code is on every link and on every item on that page. On that alone, you are ahead of most.

martinsc 03-19-2007 10:55 PM

this thread needs more clean sponsors...

p1mpdogg 03-19-2007 11:25 PM

this guy is just too strict like teengodfather said.

calling my kiddie porn and adult surfer links to report kp as traffic leaks? give me a fukin break lol

get a clue man

RawAlex 03-19-2007 11:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by p1mpdogg (Post 12113789)
this guy is just too strict like teengodfather said.

calling my kiddie porn and adult surfer links to report kp as traffic leaks? give me a fukin break lol

get a clue man

Get a clue yourself. All you have to do is make them open in a new window, and they aren't leaks anymore (because the tour remains). They are VERY VERY small leaks, but there is no reason to give your affiliate traffic any way to leave that makes them not spend money.

Plus, there is no reason to have a KP reporting link on your site, unless you are selling KP. Think about it.

jesse_adultdatingdollars 03-19-2007 11:48 PM

HUGE PROMO FOR 2007!!
ADULT DATING DOLLARS!!


I always pay $40 per join, but for 2007 I will be using a sliding scale...
up to $50 Per Trial Join!!!

Send 10 joins per day (140 total) in any 14 day pay period (1st -15th) (16th -30th) You get $45 per $1 trial.
Send 20 joins per day
(280 total) in any 14 day pay period (1st -15th) (16th -30th) You get $50 per$1 trial.


Currently I have 3 Niche Dating sites...
1) Cyber Cheating Wives
2) Marry Me Sugar Daddy
3) Asian Cyber Dating


Average Conversion 1:100


I will be releasing a "Swingers" dating site in the next two weeks.

THE RULES ARE... NO EMAIL TRAFFIC. NO TOOLBAR TRAFFIC. NO SPYWARE.

No shave, No spyware, No Zango, No pops, just great conversions and high payouts.


Sign up at Adult Dating Dollars and start making cash now!

RawAlex 03-19-2007 11:51 PM

wow, that is pretty darn spammy.

CDSmith 03-20-2007 12:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RawAlex (Post 12113834)
wow, that is pretty darn spammy.

Indeed. :D

KMBucks 03-20-2007 12:11 AM

KMBucks is 100% clean (http://www.kmbucks.com)
Converts great with gay twink traffic, even better from review sites! *hint hint*


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:56 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123