ASACP Comments on Child Protection Provisions of Proposed .xxx TLD - GoFuckYourself.com

FightThisPatent · 03-09-2007, 08:17 PM

Lots of last minute posting to ICANN. ASACP posted their statement:
http://forum.icann.org/lists/xxx-icm.../msg01592.html

Highlights from the post:

Our organization has officially been neutral on the question of whether or
not ICANN should approve ICM's proposal for a .xxx top-level domain, since
we consider either endorsement or opposition to be outside of our mission.

SUMMARY

No doubt, considerations unrelated to child protection will influence your
decision about whether to approve the proposed .xxx TLD. However, ASACP's
position is that the existence of a .xxx TLD will not enhance the industry's
ongoing voluntary efforts to protect children.

ASACP therefore recommends that ICANN avoid taking any action based upon or influenced by the incorrect assumption that a .xxx TLD would further help to protect children online.

Fight the copy/paste!

tony286 · 03-09-2007, 08:28 PM

kudos to ASACP

TampaToker · 03-09-2007, 08:35 PM

very nice

Nodtveidt · 03-09-2007, 08:39 PM

Good to finally see them voice their stance this time around...

IllTestYourGirls · 03-09-2007, 08:43 PM

yup, it would not help. everyone knows that, its like saying, ban guns, then those who want to kill people will not use them because it is illegal. hmm someone who wants to kill someone will not use the gun because its illegal LOL

it is like saying, CP webmasters will not post CP on the net because they need to, or should, use dot xxx....its just stupid to think they would.

Its about money

Mark_E4A · 03-09-2007, 08:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FightThisPatent

ASACP therefore recommends that ICANN avoid taking any action based upon or influenced by the incorrect assumption that a .xxx TLD would further help to protect children online.

Now that right there HAS to pull some weight

JUST SAY NO

FightThisPatent · 03-09-2007, 08:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by IllTestYourGirls

it is like saying, CP webmasters will not post CP on the net because they need to, or should, use dot xxx....its just stupid to think they would.

Its about money

exactly, which is why ASACP is responding very clearly to ICANN that .XXX has been touted as protecting children and ICM has never proven any solid evidence or method that .XXX can do what it says.

.KIDS is the 100% best method for keeping kids from seeing adult material (other than having 100% parent supervision) , since their web browsers would ONLY be able to view sites that had the approved .KIDS extension.

Pedofiles are laughing too.. they don't need domains to post up their stuff, besides p2p, they just use free hosting sites, many of which are in the U.S. and some owned by publically traded companies.

Fight the CP!

OY · 03-09-2007, 09:56 PM

I think ASACP made it very clear what their view is on this matter and that the .XXX will NOT help in any way, shape or form to protect children from the most dominant threat of them all - Child Pornography.

My personal opinion is that the rest of the job of keeping legal porn away from children is THE PARENTS.

IMHO

davecummings · 03-09-2007, 11:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Oystein

I think ASACP made it very clear what their view is on this matter and that the .XXX will NOT help in any way, shape or form to protect children from the most dominant threat of them all - Child Pornography.

My personal opinion is that the rest of the job of keeping legal porn away from children is THE PARENTS.

IMHO

I agree, and I'm appreciative that ASACP posted their recommendation to REJECT .xxx

:-))

Dave

FightThisPatent · 03-10-2007, 07:51 AM

Fight the morning bump!

Jack_Daniels · 03-10-2007, 10:38 AM

This should end the .xxx initiative once and for all.

I mean, unless someone can disprove ASACP's assertion, there is no longer any legitimate reason to implement xxx.

Right?

Now, let's see how the rat bastards spin this one

mikeyddddd · 03-10-2007, 10:55 AM

This should be the knockout punch to end any chance ICM had of winning the fight.

Major (Tom) · 03-10-2007, 11:19 AM

thumbs up to the asacp!
Duke

Juilan · 03-10-2007, 11:20 AM

Holy crap that is positive news

Karupted Charles · 03-10-2007, 11:40 AM

Great to see and lets hope this ends the debate.

pornguy · 03-10-2007, 11:44 AM

Oh it can be used to stop children from seeing the sites. But it would be used to simply block the sites from being seen by anyone.

JFK · 03-10-2007, 11:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Oystein

I think ASACP made it very clear what their view is on this matter and that the .XXX will NOT help in any way, shape or form to protect children from the most dominant threat of them all - Child Pornography.

My personal opinion is that the rest of the job of keeping legal porn away from children is THE PARENTS.

IMHO

"My personal opinion is that the rest of the job of keeping legal porn away from children is THE PARENTS."
Absolutely Right On

DonkeyPunchProductions · 03-10-2007, 12:09 PM

interesting, bottom line ASACP needs no xxx even more than us.

Dirty Dane · 03-10-2007, 12:26 PM

hmmm....

03-09-2007, 08:17 PM	#1
FightThisPatent Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Austin, TX Posts: 4,090	ASACP Comments on Child Protection Provisions of Proposed .xxx TLD Lots of last minute posting to ICANN. ASACP posted their statement: http://forum.icann.org/lists/xxx-icm.../msg01592.html Highlights from the post: Our organization has officially been neutral on the question of whether or not ICANN should approve ICM's proposal for a .xxx top-level domain, since we consider either endorsement or opposition to be outside of our mission. SUMMARY No doubt, considerations unrelated to child protection will influence your decision about whether to approve the proposed .xxx TLD. However, ASACP's position is that the existence of a .xxx TLD will not enhance the industry's ongoing voluntary efforts to protect children. ASACP therefore recommends that ICANN avoid taking any action based upon or influenced by the incorrect assumption that a .xxx TLD would further help to protect children online. Fight the copy/paste! __________________ http://www.t3report.com (where's the traffic?) v5.0 is out! \| http://www.FightThePatent.com \| ICQ 52741957

03-09-2007, 08:39 PM	#4
Nodtveidt Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Camuy, PR Posts: 573	Good to finally see them voice their stance this time around... __________________ ICQ: 11541913

03-09-2007, 08:43 PM	#5
IllTestYourGirls Ah My Balls Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Under the gold leaf ICQ 388-454-421 Posts: 14,311	yup, it would not help. everyone knows that, its like saying, ban guns, then those who want to kill people will not use them because it is illegal. hmm someone who wants to kill someone will not use the gun because its illegal LOL it is like saying, CP webmasters will not post CP on the net because they need to, or should, use dot xxx....its just stupid to think they would. Its about money __________________

03-09-2007, 09:56 PM	#8
OY Industry Pioneer Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: USA/EU/ASIA Posts: 5,401	I think ASACP made it very clear what their view is on this matter and that the .XXX will NOT help in any way, shape or form to protect children from the most dominant threat of them all - Child Pornography. My personal opinion is that the rest of the job of keeping legal porn away from children is THE PARENTS. IMHO __________________ Around since 1997, and the company that introduced "Cascading Billing" in MPA3® Affiliate Management and Tracking Software Outsourcing With A Norwegian Twist - NordBits - Inquire within!

03-10-2007, 07:51 AM	#10
FightThisPatent Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Austin, TX Posts: 4,090	Fight the morning bump! __________________ http://www.t3report.com (where's the traffic?) v5.0 is out! \| http://www.FightThePatent.com \| ICQ 52741957

03-09-2007, 08:28 PM	#2
tony286 lurker Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: atlanta Posts: 57,021	kudos to ASACP

03-09-2007, 08:35 PM	#3
TampaToker Confirmed User Join Date: May 2006 Location: Tampa Posts: 5,827	very nice

03-10-2007, 10:38 AM	#11
Jack_Daniels Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Wherever I wake up, but not always for long. Posts: 161	This should end the .xxx initiative once and for all. I mean, unless someone can disprove ASACP's assertion, there is no longer any legitimate reason to implement xxx. Right? Now, let's see how the rat bastards spin this one __________________ My signature is almost invisible.

03-10-2007, 10:55 AM	#12
mikeyddddd Viva la vulva! Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: you can't please everyone, so you got to please yourself Posts: 16,557	This should be the knockout punch to end any chance ICM had of winning the fight. __________________ AdultStarProfits AmbyaCash AnilosCash AzianiGold ColdHardCash FlashTheMoney IdolBucks MediumPimpin NSCash Nubiles PussyCash ScoreCash Sextronix SpunkyCash TubeTitans Twistys

03-10-2007, 11:19 AM	#13
Major (Tom) White Pride Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Null Posts: 31,122	thumbs up to the asacp! Duke __________________ WHITE LIVES MATTER

03-10-2007, 11:20 AM	#14
Juilan Sultan of Swing Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: XXXodus Posts: 15,141	Holy crap that is positive news __________________ My Best Converting VOD Sponsor \|

03-10-2007, 11:40 AM	#15
Karupted Charles Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: MI Posts: 1,662	Great to see and lets hope this ends the debate. __________________ TPF 2010 "They are eating our sausages!"

03-10-2007, 11:44 AM	#16
pornguy Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Homeless Posts: 62,911	Oh it can be used to stop children from seeing the sites. But it would be used to simply block the sites from being seen by anyone. __________________ PornGuy skype me pornguy_epic AmateurDough The Hottes Shemales online! TChicks.com \| Angeles Cid \| Mariana Cordoba \| MAILERS WELCOME!

03-10-2007, 12:09 PM	#18
DonkeyPunchProductions Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: back in la Posts: 188	interesting, bottom line ASACP needs no xxx even more than us. __________________ donkey, donkey www.velvetdonkey.com

03-10-2007, 12:26 PM	#19
Dirty Dane Sick Fuck Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: www Posts: 9,491	hmmm....