Originally Posted by JP-pornshooter (Post 12041049)

Hmm I thought there was recent news that PB recently restructured their entire online/adult.com business as they were losing business shares in the market ?

Originally Posted by Eric (Post 12041207)

You read that wrong. Try again.

Originally Posted by JFK (Post 12041244)

maybe its not the reading , its the comprehension?:winkwink:

Originally Posted by WhiplashDug (Post 12041268)

ohhh. now things are beginning to make sense.

Originally Posted by Eric (Post 12041207)

You read that wrong. Try again.

Originally Posted by Eric (Post 12041264)

Both are common with GFYers

Originally Posted by AsianDivaGirlsWebDude (Post 12040838)

Damn, you ARE good!!! :winkwink:

I don't wear pants to mainstream meetings with prospective clients, and if they have a problem with that, then I figure it wasn't going to work out anyway.

ADG Webmaster

Originally Posted by TheLegacy (Post 12040988)

RocHard is one of those amazing characters that will always be looking for whats best for his family and those webmasters who trust themselves to his care. I have the greatest amount of respect for him and no doubt he is moving into something that will be worthy of his abilities and talents.

Love ya man - keep in touch.

Originally Posted by tony404 (Post 12041355)

If you look at the past 12 months for the stock its not a banner time.

Originally Posted by A1R3K (Post 12040704)

thats not true.

i get inquiries all the time from the mainstream sector to build or rebuild networks because the mainstream market knows that much of the technology that they use on the web today started in the adult sector. maybe its jsut that i hang out with the young 20-30 somethings that are running and making decisions in the companies that hire me, but i have found 0 issues with anyone caring about adult. many of them so far have thought its cool.

i'm starting a new project next week for a wealth advisement and estate trust company to redo their entire web presence and internal network and they love it that we are so deeply involved in technology in our area of work. granted my "whiz kids" are going to do most of the work and they are college graduates, but i am the point man and own the new company.

with the adult thing i put it out there right in the front. i think the issue is do you try to hide it and look like you're hiding something or do you know how to "sell" it to the mainstream market? try it out. sell your adult experience from a technology leader angle and watch their eyes light up. i've had no issues with anyone caring whatsoever.

i wont be announcing the mainstream technology company to the adult space. something to fall back on when i get sick of this cesspool of an industry.

:1orglaugh

Originally Posted by tony404 (Post 12041355)

If you look at the past 12 months for the stock its not a banner time.

Originally Posted by polish_aristocrat (Post 12041793)

ive been gone all day, no way im reading a 5 pager on this, cliff notes please


:helpme

Originally Posted by Funbrunette (Post 12042420)

That was quick...Well good luck Richard! :thumbsup

Originally Posted by Peaches (Post 12040883)

We had a guy at Sprint who wore motorcycle leather every day (and rode a motorcycle to work - it wasn't just a "look" ;) ) while the rest of us were wearing suits. But he was a genius tech guy. I think they would have let him work naked or wearing a diaper :) But they DID put him in an office 2 floors down from our "control room" that we showed current and prospective clients.

Originally Posted by mikeyddddd (Post 12042820)

Was it in the Sacramento data center and his name was Dennis?

Originally Posted by AsianDivaGirlsWebDude (Post 12038815)

That's heartwarming - Dean gets fired by Twisty's (and the thread mysteriously disappears), and he immediately starts brown-nosing on the newly departed Rochard...

The drama on GFY beats the heck out of TV. :thumbsup

ADG Webmaster

Originally Posted by Jace (Post 12041694)

it still ain't bad though, but that decline is definitely something to be worried about

Originally Posted by JakeR (Post 12044278)

it's hilarious when sigwhores try to interpret "lines on a graph" without putting research into a company and try to understand what causes certain trends.

Originally Posted by JakeR (Post 12044278)

it's hilarious when sigwhores try to interpret "lines on a graph" without putting research into a company and try to understand what causes certain trends.