Child Model Sites Story is on Dateline - GoFuckYourself.com

Spoonie Luv · 08-06-2002, 07:03 PM

Finally got on the media's radar

BumpinBetty · 08-09-2002, 06:31 AM

now your first post got a reply

now you are not a loser anymore

YAY!

Gator · 08-09-2002, 07:30 AM

People running those sites are sick.

So what did they say on Dateline?

Sleepy · 08-09-2002, 08:49 AM

If this about that Molly-model site then I saw that. The mom and daughter condemned their site which they ran with a known "adult pornographer". Of course later in the interview they admit they started their own version of the same site. When asked what the difference is between their old site and the new one they told the reporter that they market to a different traffic source. Whatever.. they exploit that 17 year old kid and the money goes to her college fund. Is that wrong or right ? I guess if she becomes a doctor the end justifies the means.. or does it ? If the Olsen Twins can do all those bikini shots when they were underage I figure this girl Molly isnt any worse.

Yourfreehost · 08-09-2002, 09:40 AM

People running those sites are sick.
-------------------------------------------------
fucking perverts they should be ass raped by donkeys

Fletch XXX · 08-09-2002, 09:46 AM

I love it, on this board when I voiced my concern for this type of site, some were all pro non nude.

Now they are not.

http://gofuckyourself.com/showthread...threadid=56226

hahaha

You guys didnt believe me eh? Thought semi nude 14 year old girls was okay?

HAHAHAHAH

GFED · 08-09-2002, 09:50 AM

Yeah, it's fucked up how CCBill ignored all my heeds to get rid of that fucking MET (among many others) but didn't do anything, but they are gonna search all of our sites and terminate us for a fucking MasterXXXX logo or name anywhere on the site, and they are taking the time to go through all of our sites for THAT!

.:Frog:. · 08-09-2002, 09:53 AM

So its against the law to take a picture of a child / teenager wearing clothing?

If the girls get naked I can see a problem, but aren't the ones in these 'model sites' wearing clothing?

Fletch XXX · 08-09-2002, 09:56 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by .:Frog:.
So its against the law to take a picture of a child / teenager wearing clothing?

If the girls get naked I can see a problem, but aren't the ones in these 'model sites' wearing clothing?

Make a gallery of 6 year olds and put it on the HUn see what happens.

its what you use the pic FOR not what they are of.

Learn more about cp.

In a given test in a Court Of Law they are fighting for a 14 step process to identify Child Porn for people like you who think of, pictures like this are in Sears catalog, yeah well clip out the pics and make a site about it. When you start charging people to jerk off to them, its illegal.

Ive argued this too long on the board.

read those 6+ pages in linked threads about it.

Fletch XXX · 08-09-2002, 09:58 AM

this guy is doing the 14 step identification process...

http://lawrencewalters.com

So you cant just say... oh its just a pic of my daughter etc...

After 14 identifying variables, you cant beat the system.

Fletch XXX · 08-09-2002, 10:03 AM

I found a site one day that was selling VHS tapes of their daughter playing in her kiddie pool in her backyard.

Those videos are quite harmless I am sure when viewed by family and friends, but when you put that on the net and sell it to guys who are paying 35 bucks a month to log into a member protected section of a site, it no longer is priceless family memorabilia and becomes Entertainment, and if they are jerking their cocks its Sexual Entertainment, not good.

So yeah a VHS of your daughter in the backyard is legal too... but you cant charge people to jerk off to it.

Sleepy · 08-09-2002, 10:03 AM

The we are talking about is nonude.
I can think of alot of mainstream movies that were more suggestive but it doesnt mean its right. Still a good topic for argument

Fletch XXX · 08-09-2002, 10:13 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Sleepy
The we are talking about is nonude.
I can think of alot of mainstream movies that were more suggestive but it doesnt mean its right. Still a good topic for argument

Well of course its non nude kids, if it were nude kids it wouldnt even be an issue.

Yeah its a good argument, thing is folks like me get tired of arguing the same thing in thread after thread about non nude teens hehehe I am done with it you guys can read the threads hehehehe

http://gofuckyourself.com/showthread...threadid=56407

.:Frog:. · 08-09-2002, 10:27 AM

Fletch - I don't like those child model sites.
I was just asking a question since I was unclear what the law was saying on the subject. Don't imply I'm Pro-Child sites cause I asked about the law.
Sheesh.

Fletch XXX · 08-09-2002, 10:30 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by .:Frog:.
Fletch - I don't like those child model sites.
I was just asking a question since I was unclear what the law was saying.

Tis cool froggy, I didnt think ya did, just maybe sounded that way...

;)

.:Frog:. · 08-09-2002, 10:32 AM

Any way I agree if guys are jerking off to children the site needs to be shutdown.

Fletch XXX · 08-09-2002, 10:36 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by .:Frog:.
Any way I agree if guys are jerking off to children the site needs to be shutdown.

Thats the thing, all these sites hide behind "its just a pic of my daughter....etc" and for the genuine pics of chilodren, sure those are great and everyone with children knows how precious some pics are. But my mom doesnt have pics of me online (i hope not) and I know she has pics of me in the tub as a child, doesnt make her into cp.

But let her put them online and who do you think will be viewing them? Other "would be" mothers? Or soon to be weded teen girls?

No, guys with one hand on their credit card, the other on their cock, logging in to see little jessicas first steps, its horrible.

Some parent should have been the kids on the block to get the Candy Apple with the razor blades.

SykkBoy · 08-09-2002, 10:53 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Sleepy
they exploit that 17 year old kid and the money goes to her college fund.

exactly...I prefer to wait until they are 18 before I exploit them..........

Enchantress · 08-09-2002, 11:00 AM

Her mother was a real piece of work. She tried to act like she was conned and just a victim, but she never did anything to stop it. She didn't even go to the photo shoots. What kind of Mom sends her 15 year old daughter out with a guy they barely know to do a photo shoot in a bathing suit and doesn't even go to watch out for her? She even knew that the guy was a convicted sex offender. What a worthless excuse for a parent.

Sleepy · 08-09-2002, 11:46 AM

You could tell the mom and daughter were both full of shit. They were in on it and knew what they were doing but the photog took the heat for the whole deal. The photog was a real scumbag and he deserved it but it pisses me off the mom and daughter can walk away free and clear.

RATBOY · 08-09-2002, 11:54 AM

I saw it. The mother saw the bling-bling. She was in denial or just saw the sales drop and decided to drop the hammer on the guy after the fact. My opinion.

08-06-2002, 07:03 PM	#1
Spoonie Luv Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Crankerville Posts: 1,003	Child Model Sites Story is on Dateline Finally got on the media's radar

08-09-2002, 09:40 AM	#5
Yourfreehost Registered User Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Mars Posts: 53	People running those sites are sick. ------------------------------------------------- fucking perverts they should be ass raped by donkeys __________________ Referback - Make Money Promoting Online Casinos

08-09-2002, 09:46 AM	#6
Fletch XXX GFY HALL OF FAME DAMMIT!!! Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: that 504 Posts: 60,840	I love it, on this board when I voiced my concern for this type of site, some were all pro non nude. Now they are not. http://gofuckyourself.com/showthread...threadid=56226 hahaha You guys didnt believe me eh? Thought semi nude 14 year old girls was okay? HAHAHAHAH __________________ Want an Android App for your tube, membership, or free site? Need banners or promo material? Hit us up (ICQ Fletch: 148841377) or email me fletchxxx at gmail.com - recent work - About me

08-09-2002, 09:50 AM	#7
GFED Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: May 2002 Posts: 8,120	Yeah, it's fucked up how CCBill ignored all my heeds to get rid of that fucking MET (among many others) but didn't do anything, but they are gonna search all of our sites and terminate us for a fucking MasterXXXX logo or name anywhere on the site, and they are taking the time to go through all of our sites for THAT! __________________ https://www.flow.page/savethechildren

08-09-2002, 09:58 AM	#10
Fletch XXX GFY HALL OF FAME DAMMIT!!! Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: that 504 Posts: 60,840	this guy is doing the 14 step identification process... http://lawrencewalters.com So you cant just say... oh its just a pic of my daughter etc... After 14 identifying variables, you cant beat the system. __________________ Want an Android App for your tube, membership, or free site? Need banners or promo material? Hit us up (ICQ Fletch: 148841377) or email me fletchxxx at gmail.com - recent work - About me

08-09-2002, 06:31 AM	#2
BumpinBetty So Fucking Banned Join Date: Aug 2002 Posts: 125	now your first post got a reply now you are not a loser anymore YAY!

08-09-2002, 07:30 AM	#3
Gator Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Don't live on GFY Posts: 1,119	People running those sites are sick. So what did they say on Dateline?

08-09-2002, 08:49 AM	#4
Sleepy Confirmed User Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: Porn Peddler Posts: 679	If this about that Molly-model site then I saw that. The mom and daughter condemned their site which they ran with a known "adult pornographer". Of course later in the interview they admit they started their own version of the same site. When asked what the difference is between their old site and the new one they told the reporter that they market to a different traffic source. Whatever.. they exploit that 17 year old kid and the money goes to her college fund. Is that wrong or right ? I guess if she becomes a doctor the end justifies the means.. or does it ? If the Olsen Twins can do all those bikini shots when they were underage I figure this girl Molly isnt any worse.

08-09-2002, 09:53 AM	#8
.:Frog:. Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: ~ C A N A D A ~ Posts: 2,123	So its against the law to take a picture of a child / teenager wearing clothing? If the girls get naked I can see a problem, but aren't the ones in these 'model sites' wearing clothing?

08-09-2002, 10:03 AM	#11
Fletch XXX GFY HALL OF FAME DAMMIT!!! Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: that 504 Posts: 60,840	I found a site one day that was selling VHS tapes of their daughter playing in her kiddie pool in her backyard. Those videos are quite harmless I am sure when viewed by family and friends, but when you put that on the net and sell it to guys who are paying 35 bucks a month to log into a member protected section of a site, it no longer is priceless family memorabilia and becomes Entertainment, and if they are jerking their cocks its Sexual Entertainment, not good. So yeah a VHS of your daughter in the backyard is legal too... but you cant charge people to jerk off to it. __________________ Want an Android App for your tube, membership, or free site? Need banners or promo material? Hit us up (ICQ Fletch: 148841377) or email me fletchxxx at gmail.com - recent work - About me

08-09-2002, 10:27 AM	#14
.:Frog:. Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: ~ C A N A D A ~ Posts: 2,123	Fletch - I don't like those child model sites. I was just asking a question since I was unclear what the law was saying on the subject. Don't imply I'm Pro-Child sites cause I asked about the law. Sheesh. Last edited by .:Frog:.; 08-09-2002 at 10:31 AM..

08-09-2002, 10:32 AM	#16
.:Frog:. Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: ~ C A N A D A ~ Posts: 2,123	Any way I agree if guys are jerking off to children the site needs to be shutdown.

08-09-2002, 11:00 AM	#19
Enchantress Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: Wa. U.S.A Posts: 121	Her mother was a real piece of work. She tried to act like she was conned and just a victim, but she never did anything to stop it. She didn't even go to the photo shoots. What kind of Mom sends her 15 year old daughter out with a guy they barely know to do a photo shoot in a bathing suit and doesn't even go to watch out for her? She even knew that the guy was a convicted sex offender. What a worthless excuse for a parent.

08-09-2002, 11:46 AM	#20
Sleepy Confirmed User Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: Porn Peddler Posts: 679	You could tell the mom and daughter were both full of shit. They were in on it and knew what they were doing but the photog took the heat for the whole deal. The photog was a real scumbag and he deserved it but it pisses me off the mom and daughter can walk away free and clear.

08-09-2002, 11:54 AM	#21
RATBOY Confirmed User Join Date: May 2002 Location: Seattle, WA Posts: 1,592	I saw it. The mother saw the bling-bling. She was in denial or just saw the sales drop and decided to drop the hammer on the guy after the fact. My opinion.