Non-nude modeling sites - GoFuckYourself.com

sweetcuties · 08-06-2002, 07:02 PM

On Dateline in a few minutes

cybermike · 08-06-2002, 07:04 PM

Just saw it mentioned on tv too

Hawkeye · 08-06-2002, 07:25 PM

Missed it. Anything interesting?

roseyrid · 08-06-2002, 07:56 PM

i just watched it...there was some 17 year old girl and her mother during an interview. She said when she was 15 she was approaced by a man that told her he could get her modeling jobs. He made a site for her, one of those under age non-nude sites. Charge $21 a month. She said by the 4 month, the site was generating 6 figures, and she got 70%. She said by the 4-5 month she had $200,000. The guy who started the site turned out to be a registered sex offender. He had her make videos that members requested (non-nude) but had her make wet tee shirt videos and other custom videos. During the interview she was crying and said how she felt embarrased and was upset she did it. Eventually the guy who started the site was arrested for making a child porn tape of a 12 year old. Her and her mother said how bad they felt about the site and everything. The ironic part is now that she no longer works for the guy who was arrested, she decided to open her own site, which is the same as the one she had for the guy. The site is non-nude. They also said how congress is trying to pass a law to make the non-nude sites illegal but will face first ammendment advocates.

I think its sick...the people who are purchasing the memberships know how old the girls are. They are fucking perverts, and should be arrested along with her mother for allowing her to do the site. The girl said she was doing it to pay for college. Get a fucking job at the mall, and take out loans like the rest of the population.

Its stupid sites like these that give the legit webmasters a bad rap.

So to the girl, her mother, and all the people who purchase memberships to these under age sites

UnseenWorld · 08-06-2002, 08:59 PM

Well, a lot of these sites appeal to pervs, for sure. However, there are beautiful fifteen year old girls and beauty can be appreciated for beauty. Let's not be thought police, eh? Let's only prosecute people who do actual factual harm and not presume to know what goes on in other people's minds. What next? Throwing people in jail for thinking about robbery or imagining a murder? How many times have I imagined myself machine gunning certain members of this board?

But if they break the law against CP in any way, sure let's do 'em in!

As a lot of free speech advocates have pointed out re: the laws being considered against underage model non-nude sites, it will probably be impossible to define this activity without also including some young modeling activities we wouldn't want to prohibit.

Jamdin · 08-06-2002, 09:03 PM

Damn, now I know why she didn't make that video of her wearing a chainmail bikini holding a sword to the photographer's neck

beemk · 08-06-2002, 09:34 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by roseyatrid
She said by the 4-5 month she had $200,000.

Quote:

Originally posted by roseyatrid
The ironic part is now that she no longer works for the guy who was arrested, she decided to open her own site, which is the same as the one she had for the guy

Quote:

Originally posted by roseyatrid
The girl said she was doing it to pay for college

i dont know where the hell she is from, but around here college doesnt cost more than $200k

sexygoat · 08-06-2002, 09:37 PM

congrats

titmowse · 08-06-2002, 09:45 PM

perhaps these sites should be examined by those who enforce child labor laws

SykkBoy · 08-06-2002, 11:44 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by roseyatrid
I think its sick...the people who are purchasing the memberships know how old the girls are. They are fucking perverts, and should be arrested along with her mother for allowing her to do the site.

ok, so let's say the age of consent is changed to 16 tomorrow...does that make it less sick? Are you going to be one of the thousands of webmasters who'd flocked to register domains like barely16.com and create sites proclaiming "she just turned 16 yeaterday and is posing naked for us today" So are you speaking from a position of morality or legality?

The reason we don't have any naked 16 or 17 year olds on our sites is purely due to legality...

even though "non-nude" sites may not necessarily be illegal, I don't really want to have to explain that to the stormtroopers who'd be at my door....

again, legality, not morality...which side is yours?

mike503 · 08-06-2002, 11:50 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by SykkBoy2

ok, so let's say the age of consent is changed to 16 tomorrow...does that make it less sick? Are you going to be one of the thousands of webmasters who'd flocked to register domains like barely16.com and create sites proclaiming "she just turned 16 yeaterday and is posing naked for us today" So are you speaking from a position of morality or legality?

The reason we don't have any naked 16 or 17 year olds on our sites is purely due to legality...

even though "non-nude" sites may not necessarily be illegal, I don't really want to have to explain that to the stormtroopers who'd be at my door....

again, legality, not morality...which side is yours?

exactly. i'd say almost every straight male here has checked out some girl in a public place sometime.. do you know how old she is when you check her out? no. would it surprise you half of them are "underage"? instantly it's "sick" because the law says 18, and no one wants to admit to that.

the existing child pornography laws are quite short and don't deal with this kind of stuff explicitly. it's a lot of vagueness and is subject to one's personal opinion.

i.e. what exactly is ''sexually explicit conduct'' to you?

Dugmor · 08-07-2002, 12:36 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by roseyatrid

Its stupid sites like these that give the legit webmasters a bad rap.

You should not judger every Non Nude webmaster the same. There are alot of Non Nude websites that promote girls that are over 18 years old. There is nothing wrong with making a Non Nude site with a girl who is over 18 years old.

Sweet Dominique does very well and is making her affiliate webmasters a lot of money with out posing nude. She is well over 18 years old and carries it well. God Bless Sweet Dominique !

Amputate Your Head · 08-07-2002, 12:38 AM

fuckin' Dateline bastards are trying to make it sound like owning an adult site is some kinda crime.....

"he used to operate an adult website!"

oh heavens no! Say it isn't so!!

fucking pretentious cocksmokers.

kmanrox · 08-07-2002, 12:52 AM

what amp sed

Erik Estrada · 08-07-2002, 12:59 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by roseyatrid
The girl said she was doing it to pay for college. Get a fucking job at the mall, and take out loans like the rest of the population.

How ironic is that to hear that from someone who sits home all day making pornsites for $.

a1ka1ine · 08-07-2002, 01:32 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Erik Estrada

How ironic is that to hear that from someone who sits home all day making pornsites for $.

what the fuck are you doing here?

08-06-2002, 07:02 PM	#1
sweetcuties Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Somewhere Posts: 5,859	Non-nude modeling sites On Dateline in a few minutes __________________

08-06-2002, 08:59 PM	#5
UnseenWorld Confirmed User Join Date: May 2001 Location: Portland, OR, USA Posts: 5,279	Well, a lot of these sites appeal to pervs, for sure. However, there are beautiful fifteen year old girls and beauty can be appreciated for beauty. Let's not be thought police, eh? Let's only prosecute people who do actual factual harm and not presume to know what goes on in other people's minds. What next? Throwing people in jail for thinking about robbery or imagining a murder? How many times have I imagined myself machine gunning certain members of this board? But if they break the law against CP in any way, sure let's do 'em in! As a lot of free speech advocates have pointed out re: the laws being considered against underage model non-nude sites, it will probably be impossible to define this activity without also including some young modeling activities we wouldn't want to prohibit. __________________ SIG TOO BIG! Maximum 120x60 button and no more than 3 text lines of DEFAULT SIZE and COLOR. Unless your sig is for a GFY top banner sponsor, then you may use a 624x80 instead of a 120x60.

08-06-2002, 09:45 PM	#9
titmowse Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: TEXAS Posts: 5,320	perhaps these sites should be examined by those who enforce child labor laws __________________ I still love everybody

08-07-2002, 12:52 AM	#14
kmanrox aka K-Man Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: The Gutter Posts: 29,292	what amp sed __________________ Crypto HODLr Crypto mining Angel investor

08-06-2002, 07:04 PM	#2
cybermike Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Ny Posts: 4,113	Just saw it mentioned on tv too

08-06-2002, 07:25 PM	#3
Hawkeye Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Los Angeles Posts: 1,291	Missed it. Anything interesting?

08-06-2002, 07:56 PM	#4
roseyrid Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: LA Posts: 1,058	i just watched it...there was some 17 year old girl and her mother during an interview. She said when she was 15 she was approaced by a man that told her he could get her modeling jobs. He made a site for her, one of those under age non-nude sites. Charge $21 a month. She said by the 4 month, the site was generating 6 figures, and she got 70%. She said by the 4-5 month she had $200,000. The guy who started the site turned out to be a registered sex offender. He had her make videos that members requested (non-nude) but had her make wet tee shirt videos and other custom videos. During the interview she was crying and said how she felt embarrased and was upset she did it. Eventually the guy who started the site was arrested for making a child porn tape of a 12 year old. Her and her mother said how bad they felt about the site and everything. The ironic part is now that she no longer works for the guy who was arrested, she decided to open her own site, which is the same as the one she had for the guy. The site is non-nude. They also said how congress is trying to pass a law to make the non-nude sites illegal but will face first ammendment advocates. I think its sick...the people who are purchasing the memberships know how old the girls are. They are fucking perverts, and should be arrested along with her mother for allowing her to do the site. The girl said she was doing it to pay for college. Get a fucking job at the mall, and take out loans like the rest of the population. Its stupid sites like these that give the legit webmasters a bad rap. So to the girl, her mother, and all the people who purchase memberships to these under age sites

08-06-2002, 09:03 PM	#6
Jamdin Registered User Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: Kansas Posts: 3,560	Damn, now I know why she didn't make that video of her wearing a chainmail bikini holding a sword to the photographer's neck

08-06-2002, 09:37 PM	#8
sexygoat So Fucking Banned Join Date: Aug 2002 Posts: 357	congrats

08-07-2002, 12:38 AM	#13
Amputate Your Head There can be only one Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: Somewhere else Posts: 39,075	fuckin' Dateline bastards are trying to make it sound like owning an adult site is some kinda crime..... "he used to operate an adult website!" oh heavens no! Say it isn't so!! fucking pretentious cocksmokers.