BBC Reported Building 7 Had Collapsed 20 Minutes Before It Fell - GoFuckYourself.com

chshkt · 02-27-2007, 01:36 PM

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles...7building7.htm

Splum · 02-27-2007, 02:03 PM

I have exclusive video of chshkt right here!!
https://youtube.com/watch?v=zA1hyqA6UTY

Agent 488 · 02-27-2007, 02:04 PM

enough of this junk.

Agent 488 · 02-27-2007, 02:05 PM

it was fucking chaos that day. think news agencies and reporters were immune?

MattO · 02-27-2007, 02:13 PM

Yes, because the BBC was reading off the cue sheets the CIA had given them.

THE BBC WAS IN ON IT! THANK GAWD THE BBC IS ON THE CIA PAYROLL, ALL OF EM!

Agent 488 · 02-27-2007, 02:20 PM

in any media events upon review there are going to be inconsistencies, anomalies and such - especially an event the scale of 9/11 - the existence of such is not proof of a conspiracy, just a reflection of human nature and limitations.

the 9/11 conspiracy movement - like all fanatical, cultish groups and ideologies - is generally a projection of their minds fears, desires and hopes than any objective reality.

there are many things in the world that could be termed "a conspiracy", but this isn't one of them.

stickyfingerz · 02-27-2007, 02:32 PM

ITS A CONSPIRACY!!! btw this was already posted days and days ago you fuckin nutso asswipe.

fetishblog · 02-27-2007, 02:44 PM

Nothing to see here, move along.

marcjacob · 02-27-2007, 02:53 PM

The only problem in presenting this as eveidence of a theory is that if the building was in the background, seen clearly, why would the producers allow it to go out. If they were told to say that by anyone they would say "dur, you can see it in the background" and change cam shots

The BBC dont read auto ques from the CIA or anyone else. They can and do criticise the UK and any government. They are independant as far as i can see and i watch the BBC news on a day in day out basis.

They must have been confused to report that when they could see the building. That proves that they didnt have a clue what they were reporting imo.

The Duck · 02-27-2007, 03:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kermey

The only problem in presenting this as eveidence of a theory is that if the building was in the background, seen clearly, why would the producers allow it to go out. If they were told to say that by anyone they would say "dur, you can see it in the background" and change cam shots

The BBC dont read auto ques from the CIA or anyone else. They can and do criticise the UK and any government. They are independant as far as i can see and i watch the BBC news on a day in day out basis.

They must have been confused to report that when they could see the building. That proves that they didnt have a clue what they were reporting imo.

Did you even see the video? They realise their mistake and pull the feed from the air in live television, its a very very suspicious video. And BBC being independent? Do some research.

soulbleed · 02-27-2007, 03:16 PM

lol yeh they trust the reporters/media with these big coverups.

marcjacob · 02-27-2007, 03:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kandah

Did you even see the video? They realise their mistake and pull the feed from the air in live television, its a very very suspicious video. And BBC being independent? Do some research.

I did see it yes. And i dont buy it.

If the BBC could prove that 9/11 was a cover up, it would be a superb story. The organisation may sit on that but individual employees will sell their former employers down the river for a new job pretty damb quick. They wouldnt sit on a huge story like that, theyd sell it for a small fortune.

I would.

pornguy · 02-27-2007, 03:47 PM

I believe that the US government was invloved, but I dont know how far it goes.

Dollarmansteve · 02-27-2007, 04:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chshkt

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles...7building7.htm

why dont you go crawl back into your hole, mmk?

Scott McD · 02-27-2007, 04:04 PM

Phoenix · 02-27-2007, 04:12 PM

this will never go away...in 100 years this will still be going on

I'd at least like to be allowed to see an investigation into the rubble from all the buildings..that would tell us something...but no..it is gone forever...that part is fucked up.

also..the "tape evidence" from the pentagon...you telling me a pentagon security booth has some shitty VHS quality security camera?

chaze · 02-27-2007, 04:15 PM

Here is my conclusion

http://factualtruth.com/faq.php?cate..._name=Politics

aico · 02-27-2007, 04:18 PM

Here is my conclusion:

Giving bldgs a number name can cause confusion. If the building was called "Bldg Tony Danza" they would know for sure they had the wrong building when reporting.

bizarrejan · 02-27-2007, 04:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phoenix

this will never go away...in 100 years this will still be going on

I'd at least like to be allowed to see an investigation into the rubble from all the buildings..that would tell us something...but no..it is gone forever...that part is fucked up.

also..the "tape evidence" from the pentagon...you telling me a pentagon security booth has some shitty VHS quality security camera?

yeah i agree

Splum · 02-27-2007, 04:33 PM

Only idiots believe it was a conspiracy, and thanks to the natural laws of nature idiots usually end up dieing early so it wont be around in 100 years, that is unless some of you idiots have children. Oh Flying Spaghetti monster help us all.

Phoenix · 02-27-2007, 04:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Splum

Only idiots believe it was a conspiracy, and thanks to the natural laws of nature idiots usually end up dieing early so it wont be around in 100 years, that is unless some of you idiots have children. Oh Flying Spaghetti monster help us all.

only fools swallow evreything a governement that sanctioned killing college students at a protest just a few short decades ago

Splum · 02-27-2007, 04:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phoenix

I'd at least like to be allowed to see an investigation into the rubble from all the buildings..that would tell us something...but no..it is gone forever...that part is fucked up.

Just interview the thousands of firefighters, police and emergency responders who initially cleaned up. Oh wait they work for the illuminati too so they are all obviously in on it. Prolly get extra bonus checks from the government as payment for their silence.

Splum · 02-27-2007, 04:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phoenix

only fools swallow evreything a governement that sanctioned killing college students at a protest just a few short decades ago

They didnt SANCTION the killings you dumbass lol, the national guardsmen had no training in riot control and acted on their own. Good try tho you kooky ass fucker.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kent_State_shootings

baddog · 02-27-2007, 06:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phoenix

only fools swallow evreything a governement that sanctioned killing college students at a protest just a few short decades ago

yes, it was a government sanctioned shooting . . . WTF are you on Brad?

The National Guard is not federal. I know the name is probably confusing to you.

WarChild · 02-27-2007, 06:17 PM

Let's just pretend for a minute that it was all a conspiracy, it was all planned by the US government and you're all right.

It's still ridiculous to assume that anyone would send out information to news organizations, especially about the blatently obvious. Nobody needed to tell the news that the towers fell because it was live on television already. This is hardly any sort of smoking gun.

02-27-2007, 01:36 PM	#1
chshkt Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2003 Posts: 1,500	BBC Reported Building 7 Had Collapsed 20 Minutes Before It Fell http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles...7building7.htm __________________ Start An Online Business, FREE!

02-27-2007, 02:44 PM	#8
fetishblog Confirmed User Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Your mom is my favorite pornstar!#% Posts: 5,995	Nothing to see here, move along. __________________ Fling.com doesn't steal your traffic and sales unlike some other dating companies. I promote them, and so should you!

02-27-2007, 02:53 PM	#9
marcjacob Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: England Posts: 1,063	The only problem in presenting this as eveidence of a theory is that if the building was in the background, seen clearly, why would the producers allow it to go out. If they were told to say that by anyone they would say "dur, you can see it in the background" and change cam shots The BBC dont read auto ques from the CIA or anyone else. They can and do criticise the UK and any government. They are independant as far as i can see and i watch the BBC news on a day in day out basis. They must have been confused to report that when they could see the building. That proves that they didnt have a clue what they were reporting imo. __________________ Free Site Express GFY Launch Offer Gay Demo Video - Straight Demo Video Icq: 191127710 Email: [email protected]

02-27-2007, 03:47 PM	#13
pornguy Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Homeless Posts: 62,911	I believe that the US government was invloved, but I dont know how far it goes. __________________ PornGuy skype me pornguy_epic AmateurDough The Hottes Shemales online! TChicks.com \| Angeles Cid \| Mariana Cordoba \| MAILERS WELCOME!

02-27-2007, 04:04 PM	#15
Scott McD Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Glasgow, Scotland Posts: 67,795	__________________ I Buy My High Quality Traffic Here, You Should Too!

02-27-2007, 02:03 PM	#2
Splum Confirmed User Join Date: May 2003 Location: USA Posts: 6,195	I have exclusive video of chshkt right here!! https://youtube.com/watch?v=zA1hyqA6UTY

02-27-2007, 02:04 PM	#3
Agent 488 Registered User Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 22,511	enough of this junk.

02-27-2007, 02:05 PM	#4
Agent 488 Registered User Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 22,511	it was fucking chaos that day. think news agencies and reporters were immune?

02-27-2007, 02:13 PM	#5
MattO The O is for Oohhh Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: AUSTIN TEJAS Posts: 10,861	Yes, because the BBC was reading off the cue sheets the CIA had given them. THE BBC WAS IN ON IT! THANK GAWD THE BBC IS ON THE CIA PAYROLL, ALL OF EM!

02-27-2007, 02:20 PM	#6
Agent 488 Registered User Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 22,511	in any media events upon review there are going to be inconsistencies, anomalies and such - especially an event the scale of 9/11 - the existence of such is not proof of a conspiracy, just a reflection of human nature and limitations. the 9/11 conspiracy movement - like all fanatical, cultish groups and ideologies - is generally a projection of their minds fears, desires and hopes than any objective reality. there are many things in the world that could be termed "a conspiracy", but this isn't one of them.

02-27-2007, 02:32 PM	#7
stickyfingerz Doin fine Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2005 Posts: 24,983	ITS A CONSPIRACY!!! btw this was already posted days and days ago you fuckin nutso asswipe.

02-27-2007, 03:16 PM	#11
soulbleed Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Australia Posts: 2,606	lol yeh they trust the reporters/media with these big coverups.

02-27-2007, 04:12 PM	#16
Phoenix BACON BACON BACON Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Poems everybody, the laddie fancies himself a poet Posts: 35,462	this will never go away...in 100 years this will still be going on I'd at least like to be allowed to see an investigation into the rubble from all the buildings..that would tell us something...but no..it is gone forever...that part is fucked up. also..the "tape evidence" from the pentagon...you telling me a pentagon security booth has some shitty VHS quality security camera? __________________ Skype Phoenixskype1 Telegram PhoenixBrad https://quantads.io

02-27-2007, 04:15 PM	#17
chaze Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2002 Posts: 9,752	Here is my conclusion http://factualtruth.com/faq.php?cate..._name=Politics

02-27-2007, 04:18 PM	#18
aico Moo Moo Cow Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Washington State Posts: 14,748	Here is my conclusion: Giving bldgs a number name can cause confusion. If the building was called "Bldg Tony Danza" they would know for sure they had the wrong building when reporting.

02-27-2007, 04:33 PM	#20
Splum Confirmed User Join Date: May 2003 Location: USA Posts: 6,195	Only idiots believe it was a conspiracy, and thanks to the natural laws of nature idiots usually end up dieing early so it wont be around in 100 years, that is unless some of you idiots have children. Oh Flying Spaghetti monster help us all.

02-27-2007, 06:17 PM	#25
WarChild Let slip the dogs of war. Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Bermuda Posts: 17,263	Let's just pretend for a minute that it was all a conspiracy, it was all planned by the US government and you're all right. It's still ridiculous to assume that anyone would send out information to news organizations, especially about the blatently obvious. Nobody needed to tell the news that the towers fell because it was live on television already. This is hardly any sort of smoking gun. __________________ .