![]() |
BBC Reported Building 7 Had Collapsed 20 Minutes Before It Fell
|
I have exclusive video of chshkt right here!!
https://youtube.com/watch?v=zA1hyqA6UTY |
enough of this junk.
|
it was fucking chaos that day. think news agencies and reporters were immune?
|
Yes, because the BBC was reading off the cue sheets the CIA had given them.
THE BBC WAS IN ON IT! THANK GAWD THE BBC IS ON THE CIA PAYROLL, ALL OF EM! |
in any media events upon review there are going to be inconsistencies, anomalies and such - especially an event the scale of 9/11 - the existence of such is not proof of a conspiracy, just a reflection of human nature and limitations.
the 9/11 conspiracy movement - like all fanatical, cultish groups and ideologies - is generally a projection of their minds fears, desires and hopes than any objective reality. there are many things in the world that could be termed "a conspiracy", but this isn't one of them. |
ITS A CONSPIRACY!!! btw this was already posted days and days ago you fuckin nutso asswipe.
|
|
The only problem in presenting this as eveidence of a theory is that if the building was in the background, seen clearly, why would the producers allow it to go out. If they were told to say that by anyone they would say "dur, you can see it in the background" and change cam shots
The BBC dont read auto ques from the CIA or anyone else. They can and do criticise the UK and any government. They are independant as far as i can see and i watch the BBC news on a day in day out basis. They must have been confused to report that when they could see the building. That proves that they didnt have a clue what they were reporting imo. |
Quote:
|
lol yeh they trust the reporters/media with these big coverups.
|
Quote:
If the BBC could prove that 9/11 was a cover up, it would be a superb story. The organisation may sit on that but individual employees will sell their former employers down the river for a new job pretty damb quick. They wouldnt sit on a huge story like that, theyd sell it for a small fortune. I would. |
I believe that the US government was invloved, but I dont know how far it goes.
|
Quote:
|
|
this will never go away...in 100 years this will still be going on
I'd at least like to be allowed to see an investigation into the rubble from all the buildings..that would tell us something...but no..it is gone forever...that part is fucked up. also..the "tape evidence" from the pentagon...you telling me a pentagon security booth has some shitty VHS quality security camera? |
|
Here is my conclusion:
Giving bldgs a number name can cause confusion. If the building was called "Bldg Tony Danza" they would know for sure they had the wrong building when reporting. |
Quote:
|
Only idiots believe it was a conspiracy, and thanks to the natural laws of nature idiots usually end up dieing early so it wont be around in 100 years, that is unless some of you idiots have children. Oh Flying Spaghetti monster help us all.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kent_State_shootings |
Quote:
The National Guard is not federal. I know the name is probably confusing to you. |
Let's just pretend for a minute that it was all a conspiracy, it was all planned by the US government and you're all right.
It's still ridiculous to assume that anyone would send out information to news organizations, especially about the blatently obvious. Nobody needed to tell the news that the towers fell because it was live on television already. This is hardly any sort of smoking gun. |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:26 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123