GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   BBC Reported Building 7 Had Collapsed 20 Minutes Before It Fell (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=710115)

chshkt 02-27-2007 01:36 PM

BBC Reported Building 7 Had Collapsed 20 Minutes Before It Fell
 
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles...7building7.htm

Splum 02-27-2007 02:03 PM

I have exclusive video of chshkt right here!!
https://youtube.com/watch?v=zA1hyqA6UTY

Agent 488 02-27-2007 02:04 PM

enough of this junk.

Agent 488 02-27-2007 02:05 PM

it was fucking chaos that day. think news agencies and reporters were immune?

MattO 02-27-2007 02:13 PM

Yes, because the BBC was reading off the cue sheets the CIA had given them.

THE BBC WAS IN ON IT! THANK GAWD THE BBC IS ON THE CIA PAYROLL, ALL OF EM!

Agent 488 02-27-2007 02:20 PM

in any media events upon review there are going to be inconsistencies, anomalies and such - especially an event the scale of 9/11 - the existence of such is not proof of a conspiracy, just a reflection of human nature and limitations.

the 9/11 conspiracy movement - like all fanatical, cultish groups and ideologies - is generally a projection of their minds fears, desires and hopes than any objective reality.

there are many things in the world that could be termed "a conspiracy", but this isn't one of them.

stickyfingerz 02-27-2007 02:32 PM

ITS A CONSPIRACY!!! btw this was already posted days and days ago you fuckin nutso asswipe.

fetishblog 02-27-2007 02:44 PM

http://content.answers.com/main/cont.../200px-IIM.jpg

Nothing to see here, move along.

marcjacob 02-27-2007 02:53 PM

The only problem in presenting this as eveidence of a theory is that if the building was in the background, seen clearly, why would the producers allow it to go out. If they were told to say that by anyone they would say "dur, you can see it in the background" and change cam shots

The BBC dont read auto ques from the CIA or anyone else. They can and do criticise the UK and any government. They are independant as far as i can see and i watch the BBC news on a day in day out basis.

They must have been confused to report that when they could see the building. That proves that they didnt have a clue what they were reporting imo.

The Duck 02-27-2007 03:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kermey (Post 11983526)
The only problem in presenting this as eveidence of a theory is that if the building was in the background, seen clearly, why would the producers allow it to go out. If they were told to say that by anyone they would say "dur, you can see it in the background" and change cam shots

The BBC dont read auto ques from the CIA or anyone else. They can and do criticise the UK and any government. They are independant as far as i can see and i watch the BBC news on a day in day out basis.

They must have been confused to report that when they could see the building. That proves that they didnt have a clue what they were reporting imo.

Did you even see the video? They realise their mistake and pull the feed from the air in live television, its a very very suspicious video. And BBC being independent? Do some research.

soulbleed 02-27-2007 03:16 PM

lol yeh they trust the reporters/media with these big coverups.

marcjacob 02-27-2007 03:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kandah (Post 11983619)
Did you even see the video? They realise their mistake and pull the feed from the air in live television, its a very very suspicious video. And BBC being independent? Do some research.

I did see it yes. And i dont buy it.

If the BBC could prove that 9/11 was a cover up, it would be a superb story. The organisation may sit on that but individual employees will sell their former employers down the river for a new job pretty damb quick. They wouldnt sit on a huge story like that, theyd sell it for a small fortune.

I would.

pornguy 02-27-2007 03:47 PM

I believe that the US government was invloved, but I dont know how far it goes.

Dollarmansteve 02-27-2007 04:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chshkt (Post 11982999)

why dont you go crawl back into your hole, mmk?

Scott McD 02-27-2007 04:04 PM

http://i9.tinypic.com/2qjhs1j.jpg

Phoenix 02-27-2007 04:12 PM

this will never go away...in 100 years this will still be going on

I'd at least like to be allowed to see an investigation into the rubble from all the buildings..that would tell us something...but no..it is gone forever...that part is fucked up.

also..the "tape evidence" from the pentagon...you telling me a pentagon security booth has some shitty VHS quality security camera?

chaze 02-27-2007 04:15 PM

Here is my conclusion

http://factualtruth.com/faq.php?cate..._name=Politics

aico 02-27-2007 04:18 PM

Here is my conclusion:

Giving bldgs a number name can cause confusion. If the building was called "Bldg Tony Danza" they would know for sure they had the wrong building when reporting.

bizarrejan 02-27-2007 04:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phoenix (Post 11984033)
this will never go away...in 100 years this will still be going on

I'd at least like to be allowed to see an investigation into the rubble from all the buildings..that would tell us something...but no..it is gone forever...that part is fucked up.

also..the "tape evidence" from the pentagon...you telling me a pentagon security booth has some shitty VHS quality security camera?

yeah i agree

Splum 02-27-2007 04:33 PM

Only idiots believe it was a conspiracy, and thanks to the natural laws of nature idiots usually end up dieing early so it wont be around in 100 years, that is unless some of you idiots have children. Oh Flying Spaghetti monster help us all.

Phoenix 02-27-2007 04:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Splum (Post 11984135)
Only idiots believe it was a conspiracy, and thanks to the natural laws of nature idiots usually end up dieing early so it wont be around in 100 years, that is unless some of you idiots have children. Oh Flying Spaghetti monster help us all.

only fools swallow evreything a governement that sanctioned killing college students at a protest just a few short decades ago

Splum 02-27-2007 04:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phoenix (Post 11984033)
I'd at least like to be allowed to see an investigation into the rubble from all the buildings..that would tell us something...but no..it is gone forever...that part is fucked up.

Just interview the thousands of firefighters, police and emergency responders who initially cleaned up. Oh wait they work for the illuminati too so they are all obviously in on it. Prolly get extra bonus checks from the government as payment for their silence. :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Splum 02-27-2007 04:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phoenix (Post 11984145)
only fools swallow evreything a governement that sanctioned killing college students at a protest just a few short decades ago

They didnt SANCTION the killings you dumbass lol, the national guardsmen had no training in riot control and acted on their own. Good try tho you kooky ass fucker.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kent_State_shootings

baddog 02-27-2007 06:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phoenix (Post 11984145)
only fools swallow evreything a governement that sanctioned killing college students at a protest just a few short decades ago

yes, it was a government sanctioned shooting . . . WTF are you on Brad?

The National Guard is not federal. I know the name is probably confusing to you.

WarChild 02-27-2007 06:17 PM

Let's just pretend for a minute that it was all a conspiracy, it was all planned by the US government and you're all right.

It's still ridiculous to assume that anyone would send out information to news organizations, especially about the blatently obvious. Nobody needed to tell the news that the towers fell because it was live on television already. This is hardly any sort of smoking gun.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:26 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123