You bet Ev!

If it's one thing we both know more than most webmasters, it's the law. This is the law that protects every primary producer of adult material from being brought up on Pimping and Pandering charges or prostitution- I fel it's important for every one in this business to know the hsitory of it and pay homage to those who had to go to jail and were fined heavily by the government so that we may profit from what we do.

California v. Freeman was the criminal prosecution of Harold Freeman, a producer and director of pornographic films, by the U.S. state of California. Freeman was arrested in 1987 for hiring adult actors, which the prosecution interpreted as pandering, as part of an attempt by California to shut down the pornographic film industry. The prosecution's interpretation was ultimately rejected on appeal by the California Supreme Court. Prior to this decision, pornographic movies had often been shot in secret locations.

Freeman was initially convicted, and lost on appeal to the California Court of Appeal. The trial judge, however, thought jail would be an unreasonably harsh penalty for Freeman's conduct, and sentenced him to probation, despite the fact that this was explicitly contrary to the statute. The State appealed this sentence but lost.

Freeman appealed to the California Supreme Court, which subsequently overturned his conviction, finding that the California pandering statute was not intended to cover the hiring of actors who would be engaging in sexually explicit but non-obscene performances. Freeman could only have been lawfully convicted of pandering if he had paid the actors for the purpose of sexually gratifying himself or the actors. The court relied upon the language of the statute for this interpretation, as well as the need to avoid a conflict with the First Amendment right to free speech. The court viewed Freeman's conviction as "a somewhat transparent attempt at an 'end run' around the First Amendment and the state obscenity laws."

The State of California unsuccessfully tried to have this judgment overturned by the United States Supreme Court. Justice Sandra Day O'Connor denied a stay of the California Supreme Court's judgment, finding that its ruling was founded on an independent and adequate basis of state law. The full Court subsequently denied the petition for review.

As a result of this precedent, the making of hardcore pornography was effectively legalized in California.


[edit] Reference
California v. Freeman, 488 U.S. 1311 (1989)

nicely done, KB!

Great video, thanks for posting it.
WG

I have a TV Show coming out too.

It's called, "Fucked in the Ass".

A bunch of gay dudes get a bunch of straight dudes seriously drunk. Whichever gay man gets a straight dude to take it in the ass wins.

I'm calling FOX tomorrow with it.

hehehe, nice drop of XPays' domains kB ;)
WG

KB put out quite nicely, I also got a kick out of the the freeman act ownage lol

...dude is like the Mohamed Ali of adult PR

well done maing :upsidedow

KB you are the best dude...that std spelling bee idea had me in stitches...yer a riot man keep it up

Is that what Juicy was shooting in cali last month? :Oh crap

KB .. Nice work my man. I've been out of the office the last month a lot while having a bunch of work done on the house but when i get back next week we have to touch base. Good Job :thumbsup

I love Parents Council

Actually I owned onenightinparis.com, and recently sold it to the owner
of xnxxx.com, who should have it pointed to evan.

evan u shouldve bought it

it was a great fast plug though I noticed it right away and said
fuck why did I sell onenightinparis!

great interview

Bump for a dim-sum breakfast eating, Professional Internet Marketing Person's smoooooth march towards increasing media love...

:pimp :upsidedow

Let's not forget "number 3 picking"
Anyone with one of my old biz cards knows this inside joke
:-))

How are you The Jimmy?

Long time no see
Thanks for the props

Mohammed Ali of Porn PR is a bit much- but I feel ya
:pimp