Legal or not, content like this is made for pedos.

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • PMdave
    Confirmed User
    • Dec 2003
    • 1517

    #1

    Legal or not, content like this is made for pedos.

    Just checked some of slicks sites.

    Yadayada... legal content ... blablabla ... they have no right to ask for documents ... yadayada ... legit sponsors ...

    Now go to http://www.extremepink.com/ and tell me if most of these girls even look like they are 18./ I dont care if they are 18 or 45, fact is that they are there because they look -15. That's just encouraging pedos to rape their daughters, neices, students and so on.
  • polish_aristocrat
    Too lazy to set a custom title
    • Jul 2002
    • 40377

    #2
    when I was 18 I looked like 15 too

    it's completely legal and no reason to shut down sites like that
    ok, ethically dubious, but 100% legal and that's what should matter
    Last edited by polish_aristocrat; 12-14-2006, 10:50 AM.
    I don't use ICQ anymore.

    Comment

    • DutchTeenCash
      I like Dutch Girls
      • Feb 2003
      • 21684

      #3
      It doesnt matter if you have a point, they did something thats not allowed under US law.

      Thats not a personal opinion its a fact.

      ICQ 16 91 547 - SKYPE dutchteencash
      bob AT dutchteencash DOT com
      ... did you see our newest Sweet Natural Girl Priscilla (18)?

      Comment

      • PMdave
        Confirmed User
        • Dec 2003
        • 1517

        #4
        Originally posted by polish_aristocrat

        edit: i am referring to Slicks site, haven't clicked the link above
        That link is on his network page http://www.slicksnetwork.com/ so I think it's his

        Comment

        • scottybuzz
          Too lazy to set a custom title
          • May 2006
          • 14799

          #5
          this is a side point to the topic -
          Im not having a go at the company in hand here but its stuff like that the reason why i wont promote any of the teen revenue girls content. Ok all legal, but wow. they do look very, very young.


          I also have not clicked on the link
          $$$$$ MAKE HUGE MONEY IN CAMS - CLICK HERE $$$$$

          Comment

          • Cyber Fucker
            Hmm
            • Sep 2005
            • 12642

            #6
            http://bbp.juggcrew.com/m/racks/281p...ts=MzQ3OjM6MTg this babe is milf! lol

            Comment

            • CaptainHowdy
              Too lazy to set a custom title
              • Dec 2004
              • 94744

              #7
              You got a strong point there...

              Comment

              • dig420
                Confirmed User
                • May 2001
                • 9240

                #8
                next to be shut down: light speed

                after that?

                we're all a bunch of pedos to you huh PMDave? Maybe you're in the wrong line of work. I hear there's some televangelist stations looking for staffers.

                Comment

                • PMdave
                  Confirmed User
                  • Dec 2003
                  • 1517

                  #9
                  Originally posted by dig420
                  next to be shut down: light speed

                  after that?

                  we're all a bunch of pedos to you huh PMDave? Maybe you're in the wrong line of work. I hear there's some televangelist stations looking for staffers.
                  Sorry but lightspeedgirls all seem to be past puberty or atleast in it.

                  And if you dig girls that are 18 but look like 12-13... well yeah you are a pedo.

                  Comment

                  • Ninja Scripts
                    Confirmed User
                    • Jul 2005
                    • 1032

                    #10


                    This guy looks like a murderer.

                    "I'm not a murderer yadda yadda, I would never hurt a fly blah blah"

                    I don't care if he did anything illegal or not. Just look at him, he looks like a murderer even if he is the nicest guy in the world. His face just encourages other people to murder their wife, daughter, friends and so on.

                    Comment

                    • Fat Panda
                      Porn is Dead. Move along.
                      • Aug 2006
                      • 13296

                      #11
                      i agree thats some sick shit in my mind, but if they are 18+ then whatever, if fat white men enjoy that shit than fuckem

                      Comment

                      • Martin3
                        Confirmed User
                        • Oct 2005
                        • 1529

                        #12
                        Originally posted by PMdave
                        That's just encouraging pedos to rape their daughters, neices, students and so on.
                        Well shit. I better take down my mature site. I don't want it to make some one rape my grandma
                        264-543-302

                        Comment

                        • Ninja Scripts
                          Confirmed User
                          • Jul 2005
                          • 1032

                          #13
                          Originally posted by Martin3
                          Well shit. I better take down my mature site. I don't want it to make some one rape my grandma

                          Comment

                          • RawAlex
                            So Fucking Banned
                            • Oct 2003
                            • 9465

                            #14
                            My first click on that site got me:

                            http://obscenethumbs.com/

                            Hmmm.

                            Comment

                            • RawAlex
                              So Fucking Banned
                              • Oct 2003
                              • 9465

                              #15
                              A great list of top referals"

                              Little Teen Collection 6563 - 12311 ExtremePink.com 5209 - 7384 Teen Palace TGP 3439 - 3172
                              Alex-thumbs.com 2317 - 2472 Vestal Girls TGP 1547 - 1356 Gals.girlstested.com 1278 - 2903
                              Teen Girl Holes 720 - 788 XXX-Teens-XXX 670 - 851 Brutal INCEST TGP 339 - 332
                              Agenthun 316 - 300 Go Girls 265 - 302 Teen Tonic 265 - 417
                              So-So-Young.com 165 - 367 PICS 4 ALL 164 - 169 Incest Paradise 164 - 193
                              NoShameGirls 155 - 161 Allure Teen 155 - 130 Tgp 2 Post 148 - 208
                              Yoho Teenies 147 - 348 TeenSmoreTeenS 130 - 210 Daily Incest 129 - 157
                              Sexy Schoolgirl 117 - 97 SweetSchoolGirls 114 - 119 Raw Teen Thumbs 112 - 150
                              Daughter Next Door 93 - 185 Sweet-Girls 93 - 112 Ae Teen Pages 82 - 122
                              Pussy Cute 79 - 181 Teen Sweet 77 - 139 Just Barely Legal 72 - 166
                              Nobull Hardcore 64 - 155 Secret Teen Video 61 - 111 Young-and-virgin.com 58 - 98
                              Xtreme Orgy 58 - 49 Atg-art 54 - 160 Go To Nu 53 - 115
                              Hourly Pic 43 - 31 Lucky Virginz 43 - 86 school virgins 40 - 76
                              Russian Virgins 39 - 89 teensart.com 39 - 79 Meet 4 Sex 37 - 84
                              Incest Next Door 36 - 48 Young Nymphs 34 - 110 Real Russian Teens 31 - 59

                              Comment

                              • Loryn
                                Super Connector
                                • Jul 2003
                                • 12853

                                #16
                                Originally posted by PMdave
                                Just checked some of slicks sites.

                                Yadayada... legal content ... blablabla ... they have no right to ask for documents ... yadayada ... legit sponsors ...

                                Now go to http://www.extremepink.com/ and tell me if most of these girls even look like they are 18./ I dont care if they are 18 or 45, fact is that they are there because they look -15. That's just encouraging pedos to rape their daughters, neices, students and so on.
                                If someone is going to become a rapist I seriously doubt a fucking picture is the cause of it. That is like saying people who look at porn will all one day rape hot women, it is ridiculous. If they have rape tendencies it is in THEM not because they looked at a picture. Just like people saying Heavy Metal music caused people to kill themselves. BULLSHIT if a person kills themselves they had issues before they heard the music. Those issues needed to be dealt with not the music. The fact that people blame music for the actions of the person shows they weren't very observant in the first place of the person’s problems and if they were THEY might have been able to save their life.

                                And I know in some cases people show NO SIGNS of wanting to kill themselves. My best friend’s father shot himself. There were NO signs that he was depressed or wanted to die. So there are exceptions to that, but my point being music or looking at a picture does not make people commit suicide or rape someone. There is something deeper to deal with.

                                I am not in anyway saying I support pedo shit, I think they should all be shot there is no cure for people like that. I am saying that a picture does not cause people with deep issues like that to commit rape. It is in them and they are going to do it whether they see a pic or not. The thing I do not like about it is what the actual taking of the pictures does to the actual child in the picture and so on. Some could argue that seeing those pics helps them not to commit rape on a child. I saw a TV show, I believe 60 minutes or something, when a guy was saying that by looking at porn it was actually helping him to stop wanting to commit rape. That is bullshit too. THE GUY HAS ISSUES and any photo is not the reason.

                                Porn does not make EVERY SINGLE PERSON behave in the same manor. If a person is going to hurt someone it's because they have it in THEM and if it isn't a picture it could be something as easy as watching a little girl or boy getting off the school bus. THEY ARE SICK AND NEED TO BE BANNED FROM SOCITEY FOR LIFE OR JUST FUCKING KILLED. THEY ARE A WASTE OF LIFE. (The rapist not the people with the site in this thread, just wanted to make that clear hehe)
                                Last edited by Loryn; 12-14-2006, 11:17 AM.
                                ~ loryn@loryntaylor . com ~




                                RIP TD

                                Comment

                                • Corona
                                  Confirmed User
                                  • Feb 2002
                                  • 2185

                                  #17
                                  Originally posted by PMdave
                                  Sorry but lightspeedgirls all seem to be past puberty or atleast in it.

                                  And if you dig girls that are 18 but look like 12-13... well yeah you are a pedo.
                                  I believe some of the 14 thumbs they questioned were Lightspeed Girls.
                                  I was looking for a job, and then I found a job
                                  And heaven knows I'm miserable now

                                  Comment

                                  • Brujah
                                    Beer Money Baron
                                    • Jan 2001
                                    • 22157

                                    #18
                                    Alex.. Which is the "illegal content"? The thumbs or the text links?

                                    If it's the sponsor gallery thumbs, why aren't the sponsors who shot the content being questioned too? Should they be?

                                    Comment

                                    • RawAlex
                                      So Fucking Banned
                                      • Oct 2003
                                      • 9465

                                      #19
                                      Corona, the thumbs rotate, there is no way of knowing which 14 thumbs were there when the screencaps were made.

                                      Comment

                                      • Loryn
                                        Super Connector
                                        • Jul 2003
                                        • 12853

                                        #20
                                        Originally posted by Martin3
                                        Well shit. I better take down my mature site. I don't want it to make some one rape my grandma
                                        I like the way you said it better. I took the long route. LOL That made me laugh out loud. Thank you!
                                        ~ loryn@loryntaylor . com ~




                                        RIP TD

                                        Comment

                                        • RawAlex
                                          So Fucking Banned
                                          • Oct 2003
                                          • 9465

                                          #21
                                          Brujah, it isn't clear that any of the content in and of itself is illegal. But the dwelling on "tiny parts", "hairless parts" and "extremely underdeveloped girls", combined with terms like "so so young" "incest paradise" and "young and virgin" creates an atmosphere and an implication that some or all of the models are not of age. It is pandering to pedophiles.

                                          Did you know it is illegal to sell sugar and claim it is cocaine? you get the same sentence, intent to sell narcotics... even if there were no drugs.

                                          More importantly, it is all questionable enough to look really bad on Foxnews or on the Senate floor.

                                          Comment

                                          • Martin3
                                            Confirmed User
                                            • Oct 2005
                                            • 1529

                                            #22
                                            Originally posted by Loryn-Adult.com
                                            I like the way you said it better. I took the long route. LOL That made me laugh out loud. Thank you!
                                            I had four paragraphs typed out equating his statement to the same used by many groups who are against porn altogether.

                                            Then, I remembered this is GFY, so I changed it to a one liner before submitting.
                                            264-543-302

                                            Comment

                                            • directfiesta
                                              Too lazy to set a custom title
                                              • Oct 2002
                                              • 30137

                                              #23
                                              Originally posted by Loryn-Adult.com
                                              If someone is going to become a rapist I seriously doubt a fucking picture is the cause of it. That is like saying people who look at porn will all one day rape hot women, it is ridiculous. If they have rape tendencies it is in THEM not because they looked at a picture. Just like people saying Heavy Metal music caused people to kill themselves. BULLSHIT if a person kills themselves they had issues before they heard the music. Those issues needed to be dealt with not the music. The fact that people blame music for the actions of the person shows they weren't very observant in the first place of the person?s problems and if they were THEY might have been able to save their life.

                                              And I know in some cases people show NO SIGNS of wanting to kill themselves. My best friend?s father shot himself. There were NO signs that he was depressed or wanted to die. So there are exceptions to that, but my point being music or looking at a picture does not make people commit suicide or rape someone. There is something deeper to deal with.

                                              I am not in anyway saying I support pedo shit, I think they should all be shot there is no cure for people like that. I am saying that a picture does not cause people with deep issues like that to commit rape. It is in them and they are going to do it whether they see a pic or not. The thing I do not like about it is what the actual taking of the pictures does to the actual child in the picture and so on. Some could argue that seeing those pics helps them not to commit rape on a child. I saw a TV show, I believe 60 minutes or something, when a guy was saying that by looking at porn it was actually helping him to stop wanting to commit rape. That is bullshit too. THE GUY HAS ISSUES and any photo is not the reason.

                                              Porn does not make EVERY SINGLE PERSON behave in the same manor. If a person is going to hurt someone it's because they have it in THEM and if it isn't a picture it could be something as easy as watching a little girl or boy getting off the school bus. THEY ARE SICK AND NEED TO BE BANNED FROM SOCITEY FOR LIFE OR JUST FUCKING KILLED. THEY ARE A WASTE OF LIFE. (The rapist not the people with the site in this thread, just wanted to make that clear hehe)
                                              Nice post
                                              I know that Asspimple is stoopid ... As he says, it is a FACT !

                                              But I can't figure out how he can breathe or type , at the same time ....

                                              Comment

                                              • Brujah
                                                Beer Money Baron
                                                • Jan 2001
                                                • 22157

                                                #24
                                                Originally posted by RawAlex
                                                Did you know it is illegal to sell sugar and claim it is cocaine? you get the same sentence, intent to sell narcotics... even if there were no drugs.
                                                No, I didn't know that. That's pretty fucked up too IMO.

                                                So in this case you're saying it's likely the context of his sites that are "illegal content" and not the actual content itself?

                                                What's your take on the sponsors who have all this young looking content on their tours and hosted galleries?

                                                Comment

                                                • PMdave
                                                  Confirmed User
                                                  • Dec 2003
                                                  • 1517

                                                  #25
                                                  So glad we all agree that contont like that is made to please pedos.
                                                  If it encourages pedos or not was actually not the point I was trying to make.

                                                  Comment

                                                  • bohous
                                                    Confirmed User
                                                    • Dec 2005
                                                    • 608

                                                    #26
                                                    i agree with it

                                                    Comment

                                                    • BoyAlley
                                                      So Fucking Gay
                                                      • Nov 2004
                                                      • 19714

                                                      #27
                                                      Originally posted by Brujah
                                                      So in this case you're saying it's likely the context of his sites that are "illegal content" and not the actual content itself?

                                                      What's your take on the sponsors who have all this young looking content on their tours and hosted galleries?
                                                      The supreme court has already ruled on this issue specifically, and said that young looking models, or models that are made to look young, or models that are put in "situations that look young", is speech protected by the first amendment, so long as the models are actually of age in reality.

                                                      Granted, I'd never intentionally try to make a model look younger than they actually are, or use language that suggested such, but that's my personal decision. The law is the law, and it's the common ground all of us walk on, no matter what our personal opinions may be.

                                                      Comment

                                                      • heywood
                                                        So Fucking Banned
                                                        • Jun 2003
                                                        • 468

                                                        #28
                                                        Legal or not, I wont touch any of that shit. Even a porn guy has to draw the line somewhere.

                                                        Comment

                                                        • BitAudioVideo
                                                          Confirmed User
                                                          • Jul 2005
                                                          • 1246

                                                          #29
                                                          slick = guilty until proven innocent and the sentance has already been served. nice to live in china isnt it.
                                                          Hi-Quality Encoding - Bulk Orders - On Time!
                                                          http://bitaudiovideo.com
                                                          icq 50476697 - aim n3r0xXx

                                                          Comment

                                                          • bdld
                                                            $100,000
                                                            • Dec 2001
                                                            • 11452

                                                            #30
                                                            that type of shit should be illegal, i thought it was illegal already.

                                                            Comment

                                                            • PMdave
                                                              Confirmed User
                                                              • Dec 2003
                                                              • 1517

                                                              #31
                                                              Originally posted by bdld
                                                              that type of shit should be illegal, i thought it was illegal already.
                                                              It is illegal if you don't have the docs to prove it's legal.

                                                              Comment

                                                              • woj
                                                                <&(©¿©)&>
                                                                • Jul 2002
                                                                • 47882

                                                                #32
                                                                Originally posted by BitAudioVideo
                                                                slick = guilty until proven innocent and the sentance has already been served. nice to live in china isnt it.
                                                                I didn't follow the whole story, but it seems it has been going for a few days now, so he had a few days to prove himself innocent...
                                                                Custom Software Development, email: woj#at#wojfun#.#com to discuss details or skype: wojl2000 or gchat: wojfun or telegram: wojl2000
                                                                Affiliate program tools: Hosted Galleries Manager Banner Manager Video Manager
                                                                Wordpress Affiliate Plugin Pic/Movie of the Day Fansign Generator Zip Manager

                                                                Comment

                                                                • CDSmith
                                                                  Too lazy to set a custom title
                                                                  • May 2001
                                                                  • 51460

                                                                  #33
                                                                  Remember guys, that is all sponsor-owned content, much of it if not all of it from sponsors that many of you also promote. Slick is just an affiliate using that content in good faith like any other affiliate, and the 2257 statements from ALL of those sponsors I've looked at all say that their content is legal and their models of legal age at the time of production.

                                                                  If you want to call someone's ethics into question you best include the sponsors themselves in this little tirade, Slick seems to be taking quite a fall all by himself here.
                                                                  Last edited by CDSmith; 12-14-2006, 12:08 PM.
                                                                  Promote Wildmatch, ImLive, Sexier.com, and more!!

                                                                  ALWAYS THE HIGHEST PAYOUTS: Big Bux/ImLive SIGNUP ON NOW!!!

                                                                  Put some PUSSYCA$H in your pocket.
                                                                  ICQ me at: 31024634

                                                                  Comment

                                                                  • Makaveli
                                                                    Confirmed User
                                                                    • Feb 2001
                                                                    • 1027

                                                                    #34
                                                                    I don't see where anybody can mistake the girls as under age. Some look young but none of them look sick young.

                                                                    Comment

                                                                    • PMdave
                                                                      Confirmed User
                                                                      • Dec 2003
                                                                      • 1517

                                                                      #35
                                                                      Originally posted by Makaveli
                                                                      I don't see where anybody can mistake the girls as under age. Some look young but none of them look sick young.
                                                                      The thumbs I see now are ok for the most part but when I first made my post there were alot of thumbs where the girls looked like 12-15.

                                                                      Comment

                                                                      • StarkReality
                                                                        Confirmed User
                                                                        • May 2004
                                                                        • 4444

                                                                        #36
                                                                        Originally posted by Makaveli
                                                                        I don't see where anybody can mistake the girls as under age. Some look young but none of them look sick young.
                                                                        It maybe the overexposure to porn, webmasters get used to look at girls that look very young but aren't, but it's common sense to think they are underage.

                                                                        For a short reality check: A friend of mine told me that he hates totally shaved pussies because they'd not look like a woman's pussy. That was after his 34 year old girlfriend shaved her beaver ! So, try not to look at it with the "webmaster eyes" only

                                                                        Comment

                                                                        • Arab_Sex
                                                                          Confirmed User
                                                                          • Dec 2006
                                                                          • 221

                                                                          #37
                                                                          So then its ok for mainstream media to produce so called " family" orientated programming with the kid actresses running around in bellyshirts,tight jeans,etc etc etc.?



                                                                          Originally posted by PMdave
                                                                          Just checked some of slicks sites.

                                                                          Yadayada... legal content ... blablabla ... they have no right to ask for documents ... yadayada ... legit sponsors ...

                                                                          Now go to http://www.extremepink.com/ and tell me if most of these girls even look like they are 18./ I dont care if they are 18 or 45, fact is that they are there because they look -15. That's just encouraging pedos to rape their daughters, neices, students and so on.
                                                                          Send Your Middle Eastern/Arab traffic here!

                                                                          Comment

                                                                          • Mediachick
                                                                            Confirmed User
                                                                            • May 2006
                                                                            • 897

                                                                            #38
                                                                            Originally posted by Loryn-Adult.com
                                                                            If someone is going to become a rapist I seriously doubt a fucking picture is the cause of it. That is like saying people who look at porn will all one day rape hot women, it is ridiculous. If they have rape tendencies it is in THEM not because they looked at a picture. Just like people saying Heavy Metal music caused people to kill themselves. BULLSHIT if a person kills themselves they had issues before they heard the music. Those issues needed to be dealt with not the music. The fact that people blame music for the actions of the person shows they weren't very observant in the first place of the person?s problems and if they were THEY might have been able to save their life.

                                                                            And I know in some cases people show NO SIGNS of wanting to kill themselves. My best friend?s father shot himself. There were NO signs that he was depressed or wanted to die. So there are exceptions to that, but my point being music or looking at a picture does not make people commit suicide or rape someone. There is something deeper to deal with.

                                                                            I am not in anyway saying I support pedo shit, I think they should all be shot there is no cure for people like that. I am saying that a picture does not cause people with deep issues like that to commit rape. It is in them and they are going to do it whether they see a pic or not. The thing I do not like about it is what the actual taking of the pictures does to the actual child in the picture and so on. Some could argue that seeing those pics helps them not to commit rape on a child. I saw a TV show, I believe 60 minutes or something, when a guy was saying that by looking at porn it was actually helping him to stop wanting to commit rape. That is bullshit too. THE GUY HAS ISSUES and any photo is not the reason.

                                                                            Porn does not make EVERY SINGLE PERSON behave in the same manor. If a person is going to hurt someone it's because they have it in THEM and if it isn't a picture it could be something as easy as watching a little girl or boy getting off the school bus. THEY ARE SICK AND NEED TO BE BANNED FROM SOCITEY FOR LIFE OR JUST FUCKING KILLED. THEY ARE A WASTE OF LIFE. (The rapist not the people with the site in this thread, just wanted to make that clear hehe)

                                                                            I totally agree with this although what gets under my skin is to keep hearing webmasters bitching at underaged content providers (im talking girls that ARE underaged but dont necessarely look 12 years old) when in the meantime legit webmasters and guys get hard ons over 18 and older that DO look like they are 12...

                                                                            If an underaged girl that looks 25 hits on a guy the same age in a club and dont tell him the truth, does that make that guy a pedo? A guy that looks at an 18 years old that looks exactly like a child and gets a hard on is okay though. Im not saying that really young looking girls on a picture will influence the pedophiles, but those who jerks off on that content should stfu when they say they would never get attracted by a girl under 18.

                                                                            SOme 16 years old girls ARE and LOOK like women and guys are as turned on by them then any other hot chick and that is just a fact. I DO find it disturbing that some solo girls have so much success to look like pre-puberts.
                                                                            --MC--
                                                                            Live High Def Video Chat Converts!



                                                                            ICQ: 276456001

                                                                            The Complete Live Video Chat Solution

                                                                            Comment

                                                                            • RawAlex
                                                                              So Fucking Banned
                                                                              • Oct 2003
                                                                              • 9465

                                                                              #39
                                                                              Originally posted by CDSmith
                                                                              Remember guys, that is all sponsor-owned content, much of it if not all of it from sponsors that many of you also promote. Slick is just an affiliate using that content in good faith like any other affiliate, and the 2257 statements from ALL of those sponsors I've looked at all say that their content is legal and their models of legal age at the time of production.

                                                                              If you want to call someone's ethics into question you best include the sponsors themselves in this little tirade, Slick seems to be taking quite a fall all by himself here.
                                                                              The sponsors bear very little if any responsiblity in this because it isn't the content itself, but the presentation. The thumbs on these sites dwelled specifically on the "tiny" parts and rarely presented the whole model (many of the lightspeed links were closeups of smooth shave pubis, without any contect), or scenes where the model appeared to be in distress or otherwise uncomfortable with the situation. Not all of them certainly but a large percentage of them.

                                                                              Example, a picture of Josie Junior cropped to show only from her neck to her belly button only would suggest, well, very young. The full frame might not.

                                                                              The content is likely legal. But I can tell you without any real doubt that I was exactly one click away from what I felt were real CP images on those sites. That adds to the problem, because it makes this into a doorway to CP.

                                                                              I don't think Slick intended bad directly, but I suspect he followed the cash without paying strict attention to where it was coming from.

                                                                              Comment

                                                                              • Penrod
                                                                                Confirmed User
                                                                                • Aug 2001
                                                                                • 3580

                                                                                #40
                                                                                I just looked at a pic of 2 guys kissing.........I think I am going out tonight and pick up a bear.

                                                                                Comment

                                                                                • The Ghost
                                                                                  IslandDollars.com
                                                                                  • Oct 2004
                                                                                  • 12188

                                                                                  #41
                                                                                  VOICE OF REASON

                                                                                  Either the performer is over the age of 18 or they're not. Period. "Looks like" is a subjective term. Let's stick with the law (at least that of the U.S. for this argument) everyone.



                                                                                  Pretty simple.
                                                                                  ISLAND DOLLARS
                                                                                  1000's of Exclusive TS scenes / Constant Updates
                                                                                  Best TS Network your surfers will ever join

                                                                                  Comment

                                                                                  • Mediachick
                                                                                    Confirmed User
                                                                                    • May 2006
                                                                                    • 897

                                                                                    #42
                                                                                    Originally posted by The Ghost
                                                                                    VOICE OF REASON

                                                                                    Either the performer is over the age of 18 or they're not. Period. "Looks like" is a subjective term. Let's stick with the law (at least that of the U.S. for this argument) everyone.



                                                                                    Pretty simple.

                                                                                    When I was recruiting for ifriends we had a young gay guy (19) that looked REALLY young. When I submitted his form ifriends refused him because of his looks even though they had the proof that he was not underaged (and it was clear).

                                                                                    I was wondering at the time if this guy could've bust them for discrimination? After all they refused him because of how he looked which is not under his control...
                                                                                    --MC--
                                                                                    Live High Def Video Chat Converts!



                                                                                    ICQ: 276456001

                                                                                    The Complete Live Video Chat Solution

                                                                                    Comment

                                                                                    • PMdave
                                                                                      Confirmed User
                                                                                      • Dec 2003
                                                                                      • 1517

                                                                                      #43
                                                                                      Ok I know they will last for about 60 seconds but here is a random selection of my cache:

                                                                                      http://206.161.206.211/extremepink/th4180.jpg
                                                                                      http://206.161.206.211/extremepink/th4147.jpg
                                                                                      http://207.226.163.35/hornyteddy/th218738.jpg
                                                                                      http://207.226.163.35/hornyteddy/th230667.jpg
                                                                                      http://207.226.163.35/hornyteddy/th26591.jpg
                                                                                      http://206.161.206.211/extremepink/th73262.jpg
                                                                                      http://206.161.206.211/extremepink/th71571.jpg
                                                                                      http://206.161.206.211/extremepink/th149065.jpg
                                                                                      http://206.161.206.211/extremepink/th2.jpg
                                                                                      http://206.161.206.211/extremepink/th560399.jpg
                                                                                      http://206.161.206.211/extremepink/th369449.jpg

                                                                                      Comment

                                                                                      • CDSmith
                                                                                        Too lazy to set a custom title
                                                                                        • May 2001
                                                                                        • 51460

                                                                                        #44
                                                                                        Originally posted by RawAlex
                                                                                        The sponsors bear very little if any responsiblity in this because it isn't the content itself, but the presentation. The thumbs on these sites dwelled specifically on the "tiny" parts and rarely presented the whole model (many of the lightspeed links were closeups of smooth shave pubis, without any contect), or scenes where the model appeared to be in distress or otherwise uncomfortable with the situation. Not all of them certainly but a large percentage of them.

                                                                                        Example, a picture of Josie Junior cropped to show only from her neck to her belly button only would suggest, well, very young. The full frame might not.

                                                                                        The content is likely legal. But I can tell you without any real doubt that I was exactly one click away from what I felt were real CP images on those sites. That adds to the problem, because it makes this into a doorway to CP.

                                                                                        I don't think Slick intended bad directly, but I suspect he followed the cash without paying strict attention to where it was coming from.
                                                                                        So some of you are raising a fuss because of how the script Slick is running auto-crops the thumbs and not the content itself?

                                                                                        rubbish.

                                                                                        The content certainly IS coming under scrutiny here, in which case the sponsors or those who created it should be bearing at least some of the responsibility. The good news is that According to Slick, several of his sponsors have told him they are willing to pony up with whatever info he needs to solve this dilema.

                                                                                        In fact, I noticed a few of the program owners posting in his thread. I think I saw Nick Baauw in there last night.
                                                                                        Promote Wildmatch, ImLive, Sexier.com, and more!!

                                                                                        ALWAYS THE HIGHEST PAYOUTS: Big Bux/ImLive SIGNUP ON NOW!!!

                                                                                        Put some PUSSYCA$H in your pocket.
                                                                                        ICQ me at: 31024634

                                                                                        Comment

                                                                                        • Scott McD
                                                                                          Too lazy to set a custom title
                                                                                          • Nov 2002
                                                                                          • 67798

                                                                                          #45
                                                                                          Originally posted by PMdave
                                                                                          That's just encouraging pedos to rape their daughters, neices, students and so on.
                                                                                          By that calculation, someone who looks at pics of chicks who look say 25/30 yrs old, wants to go out and rape them aswell ??


                                                                                          I Buy My High Quality Traffic Here, You Should Too!

                                                                                          Comment

                                                                                          • PMdave
                                                                                            Confirmed User
                                                                                            • Dec 2003
                                                                                            • 1517

                                                                                            #46
                                                                                            Originally posted by Scott McD
                                                                                            By that calculation, someone who looks at pics of chicks who look say 25/30 yrs old, wants to go out and rape them aswell ??
                                                                                            read thread

                                                                                            Comment

                                                                                            • Bossman
                                                                                              Confirmed User
                                                                                              • Jun 2006
                                                                                              • 1263

                                                                                              #47
                                                                                              Originally posted by PMdave
                                                                                              Now go to http://www.extremepink.com/ and tell me if most of these girls even look like they are 18./ I dont care if they are 18 or 45, fact is that they are there because they look -15. That's just encouraging pedos to rape their daughters, neices, students and so on.
                                                                                              Whoever own that site better check its trades - several of the urls are registred as potential CP in Denmark! Fucked Up!
                                                                                              Live Sex

                                                                                              Buying membership sites
                                                                                              E-mail: support AT epcrew.com

                                                                                              Comment

                                                                                              • Aneros Josh
                                                                                                Confirmed User
                                                                                                • Aug 2005
                                                                                                • 2038

                                                                                                #48
                                                                                                Originally posted by BoyAlley
                                                                                                The supreme court has already ruled on this issue specifically, and said that young looking models, or models that are made to look young, or models that are put in "situations that look young", is speech protected by the first amendment, so long as the models are actually of age in reality.

                                                                                                Granted, I'd never intentionally try to make a model look younger than they actually are, or use language that suggested such, but that's my personal decision. The law is the law, and it's the common ground all of us walk on, no matter what our personal opinions may be.
                                                                                                This is actually Max Hardcore's biggest contribution to the adult industry. He went up against the law and won. The law says 18, it's 18. Just like the door guy at the bar...he's not going to let a 19 year old guy into the club because he looks 30. He's going to go by the law and make sure he has ID that shows he's over 21.

                                                                                                Comment

                                                                                                • hmmmmmm
                                                                                                  Registered User
                                                                                                  • Dec 2006
                                                                                                  • 13

                                                                                                  #49
                                                                                                  hmmmmmmmmm ......

                                                                                                  Comment

                                                                                                  • madawgz
                                                                                                    8.8.8.8
                                                                                                    • Mar 2006
                                                                                                    • 30509

                                                                                                    #50
                                                                                                    the girls in those thumbs do look very young...but if they are 18+ i dont see the problem
                                                                                                    TAEMDLRMSKRJIXMRLSMRJ.

                                                                                                    Comment

                                                                                                    Working...