Originally Posted by CDSmith (Post 11528334)

Although I do still see your mult-threaded campaign on here today as very opportunistic and spammish in nature.

I'm sure you will get a sizeable chunk of Directnic's adult business from it though, which seems to be what you were going for, right?

Originally Posted by MonikerChris (Post 11528435)

CD, I have been largely focused on this particular thread because of the importance of the subject. There is no opportunism there, just a different writing style than me. I believe that Jrzeygirl was just answering in her own way, and hadn't had the opportunity to see this thread... thanks for the caution on it! Our intention is NOT to be opportunistic, but instead to be supportive of or clients, and respectfully present the differences between Moniker and other registrar's policies.

Originally Posted by RawAlex (Post 11526951)

Then there is no issue, because Slick would have all the needed documents to say the model was 18 when the stuff was shot, and would even pass a 2257 inspection... THINK!

Are you suggesting that Slick is a victim of content producers trying to sneak CP onto his site?