GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   WTF, intercosmos.com Threatening To Shut My TGP Sites Down (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=686213)

chief99 12-12-2006 09:16 PM

Can we get a response from Directnic. This is just plain wrong.

nation-x 12-12-2006 09:18 PM

Good luck with it Slick. If you decide to get a new registrar I recommend http://www.moniker.com.

Slick 12-12-2006 09:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nation-x (Post 11516877)
Good luck with it Slick. If you decide to get a new registrar I recommend http://www.moniker.com.

Thanks Nation-X, I'll keep that in mind :)

CDSmith 12-12-2006 09:35 PM

Sorry to hear this happening to you Slick, you've always been one of the good guys in my book. I hope it all works out for the best for you man.

Interested to hear MikeAI's take on this. I too have a few domains with directnic and have thus far been quite happy with their service.

Mike AI 12-12-2006 09:37 PM

I will be speaking to the person responsible about locking this domain tommorow. Until I know the facts I cannot comment on the specific issues, but I would tend to beleive there was something that caught our attention, and our threshold is very high.


There is no registrar out there who understands the issues that legit adult webmasters face better than directNIC.com.




Quote:

Originally Posted by DirtyProfits (Post 11516627)
Sorry to say that but to be honest it is your own fault that you're in this situation now! There are quite a lot of questionable thumbs on many of your tgps and if you crop 19 year old models in a way that they look like underage 14 year old girlies you cannot seriously wonder why DirectNic got complaints and reacts.
Furthermore at least one of your trades (teensss.com) has thumbnails of underage girls on it. To be exact, it is from a company named Holy Nature and I know for a fact that those russian girls were not of legal age when those photos got shot.

Don't get me wrong, I feel for you and I hope you get this solved asap because as we all know the content listed on your tgps is from famous sponsors and legal. This situation sucks for you and many of us could be in the same situation sooner or later but I hope some people will take this as a warning and change the way they crop their thumbs and find other ways to increase productivity and not just by making the girls appear to be as young as possible.


Joe Fredricks 12-12-2006 09:38 PM

If there is anything to directnic being directly involved in demanding answer to challenges regarding 2257, my crystal ball suggests a mass exodus from directnic is in their immediate future.

This doesn't make any sense. Their only remedy *Should* have been to turn a guy over to the relevent authorites for investigation, complaints or no complaints. I don't see anything in the statutes that would give a registar the authority to mount an investigation of that nature.

It's one thing to say they want no adult, it's quite another to attempt psuedo enforcement of a criminal code. Sounds like a lawsuit waiting to happen.

I am curious, was this an email, US Mail, or registered mail?

CDSmith 12-12-2006 09:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Slick (Post 11516036)
Ok, while I was typing my message, you mentioned they're part of DirectNic.

Here's my network of sites here http://www.slicksnetwork.com

I don't see anything wrong on my sites, everything is legal.

I see you still got amateurcurves.com.... that's the domain name I thought up for you years ago, remember? :D


With all that traffic you should just buy directnic and then fire everyone responsible for messing with your bidness.



Okay back to being serious --- looks like MIke is going to look into it. Time to wait on his findings.

Slick 12-12-2006 09:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mike AI (Post 11516978)
I will be speaking to the person responsible about locking this domain tommorow. Until I know the facts I cannot comment on the specific issues, but I would tend to beleive there was something that caught our attention, and our threshold is very high.


There is no registrar out there who understands the issues that legit adult webmasters face better than directNIC.com.

Mike, thanks for getting to this post. Hopefully we can get this cleared up. My attorney sent over an email to Juli on my behalf, so you can contact him if needed.

I do understand your concern for underage content, but I think that you're people are going about it all wrong.

Slick 12-12-2006 09:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joe Fredricks (Post 11516983)
If there is anything to directnic being directly involved in demanding answer to challenges regarding 2257, my crystal ball suggests a mass exodus from directnic is in their immediate future.

This doesn't make any sense. Their only remedy *Should* have been to turn a guy over to the relevent authorites for investigation, complaints or no complaints. I don't see anything in the statutes that would give a registar the authority to mount an investigation of that nature.

It's one thing to say they want no adult, it's quite another to attempt psuedo enforcement of a criminal code. Sounds like a lawsuit waiting to happen.

I am curious, was this an email, US Mail, or registered mail?

It was just a standard email. I do agree with you, it doesn't make any sense.

Mike AI 12-12-2006 09:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joe Fredricks (Post 11516983)
If there is anything to directnic being directly involved in demanding answer to challenges regarding 2257, my crystal ball suggests a mass exodus from directnic is in their immediate future.

This doesn't make any sense. Their only remedy *Should* have been to turn a guy over to the relevent authorites for investigation, complaints or no complaints. I don't see anything in the statutes that would give a registar the authority to mount an investigation of that nature.

It's one thing to say they want no adult, it's quite another to attempt psuedo enforcement of a criminal code. Sounds like a lawsuit waiting to happen.

I am curious, was this an email, US Mail, or registered mail?

Hmm 4 posts.

Funny. If adult webmasters are slinging CP or anything that panders on the line of CP and we get a complaint ( in most cases we are contacted by the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children or the FBI) the domain is going to be locked until the issue is resolved.

If you feel a mass exodus is warranted, then by all means transfer your domains ASAP I am sure godaddy or moniker would love your business.

Slick 12-12-2006 09:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CDSmith (Post 11517035)
I see you still got amateurcurves.com.... that's the domain name I thought up for you years ago, remember? :D


With all that traffic you should just buy directnic and then fire everyone responsible for messing with your bidness.



Okay back to being serious --- looks like MIke is going to look into it. Time to wait on his findings.

Ha ha ha, yeah, that's right :) That was like 7 years ago, boy time sure flies by.

That's a good idea about buying directnic, ha ha ha.

One thing that kinda does get me though is that I've been a DirectNic customer for 7 years now, you'd think they'd at least take that into consideration before threatening to shut me down. It's a damn good thing I wasn't on a long vacation without my laptop, I would've came back Monday to dead sites, OUCH.

BoyAlley 12-12-2006 09:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joe Fredricks (Post 11516983)
It's one thing to say they want no adult, it's quite another to attempt psuedo enforcement of a criminal code. Sounds like a lawsuit waiting to happen.

I agree 100% on this. NO registrar should be requesting 2257 docs from ANYBODY.

I don't remember the Attorney General of the United States designating directNIC as an authority to conduct 2257 inspections on his behalf. If I'm not mistaken, he chose the FBI to conduct that task.

In fact, I'm fairly certain that it wouldn't even be legal for a company like directNIC to be requesting personal information of people depicted on a website, period. Most states have pretty strict laws about sharing that type of data, and website owners can be held accountable for not abiding by any privacy policies that they have in place as well.

Telling a domain owner that you no longer wish to be the registrar of record and asking them to transfer is one thing. Reporting someone to the ISP and the proper authorities is one thing.

A god damn REGISTRAR trying to police content is absolutely ridiculous, and is WAY outside the scope of their responsibilities.

boneprone 12-12-2006 10:02 PM

Ok.. Great to see MikeAI is here!!

Wheeew.. The fact that he didnt point at me and say "YOU'RE NEXT" makes me feel better.. LOL....

I hope this gets resolved..

Glad to see Mike AI here..

RawAlex 12-12-2006 10:04 PM

boneprone, your next.

Feel better?

:)

Alex

Quick Buck 12-12-2006 10:14 PM

MikeAI is the absolute last person on the Internet I would want monitoring whether my "content" is ok or not. He has a history, I won't bring it up here out of respect for his wife, but it's not the kind of history that warrants playing "web cop".

Who the fuck appointed you or your company as the Internet Police?

If it's something illegal then turn it over to the proper authorities, they'll arrest him if it's illegal and you'll be he "good guy" in this situation, but this guy paid you to register his domain... not to register his domain AND play internet police.

You guys are walking a really slippery slope... and a poorly chosen one in my opinion.

Fuck me once, shame on you... Fuck me twice... Shame on me!

KrisKross 12-12-2006 10:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sly (Post 11516164)
How so? I have over 700 adult domains with Go Daddy. No problems.

I always hear people saying stay away from Go Daddy, but I've never seen any actual reasons or experiences to make me stay away. Its always hearsay.

Three years ago, GoDaddy suspended WEGCash.com

At the time, all their webmasters' join4free links ran through that domain. It was a big headache for a while until they worked things out. So it's not just hearsay.

http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showthread.php?t=182555

Domain Name: WEGCASH.COM
Registrar: GO DADDY SOFTWARE, INC.
Whois Server: whois.godaddy.com
Referral URL: http://registrar.godaddy.com
Name Server: NS1.SUSPENDED-FOR.SPAM-AND-ABUSE.COM
Name Server: NS2.SUSPENDED-FOR.SPAM-AND-ABUSE.COM
Status: ACTIVE
Updated Date: 03-oct-2003
Creation Date: 19-jul-2000
Expiration Date: 19-jul-2005

CDSmith 12-12-2006 11:06 PM

Well, whatever the outcome of this, someone needs to underline the fact that Slick is an affiliate only. The content in question isn't even his, it belongs to and was produced by his sponsors. If anyone has to be made to answer as to the legality of the content it should be the programs that own it, not some affiliate trying to run his TGPs and using said content in good faith.

I'm sure there are 100's of other webmasters using that same or similar promotional material as well, as I'm sure many of us are affiliates of the same programs Slick is. I can't see it being a fair idea to single out Slick as the culprit.

Any pics or vids in question will have to be identified as to which program they came from, and from there it should be a snap to have that program (or programs) provide 2257 information on it. Should be a simple process to solve the issue, and not something that requires ceizing and locking and shutting down of a guy's domains and business.

But I will say this... I think I would much rather answer to someone who is adult-friendly (like Mike AI) than to have him pass the complaint along to some convoluted beaurocratic branch of the government and have to then deal with THEM and their red tape, anal probes, etc.

edgeprod 12-12-2006 11:48 PM

Hoping for an update on this. There are three sides to every story, and I'll wait to make up my mind until I hear at least one more side.

borked 12-13-2006 12:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mike AI (Post 11517074)
Hmm 4 posts.

Funny. If adult webmasters are slinging CP or anything that panders on the line of CP and we get a complaint ( in most cases we are contacted by the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children or the FBI) the domain is going to be locked until the issue is resolved.

If you feel a mass exodus is warranted, then by all means transfer your domains ASAP I am sure godaddy or moniker would love your business.

Are you and your company for real???

Yes, if you are contacted by NCMEP or the FBI and someone is under investigation then lock the domain, but what the fuck gives you the right to ask to personally see evidence of age verification documents?

You and your company are not a legal investigative body, so stop trying to be one.:2 cents:

spacedog 12-13-2006 12:24 AM

Directnic fucked up big time..

I'd be filing papers in court, then I'd be on the phone with the board of bar oversears to get juli criminally charged for false & deceptive representation. She is not an attorney & should not be acting in a legal capacity. Further, ALL legal communication MUST be served on PAPER, not fucking email..


Sue the fucking pants off these assholes.

will76 12-13-2006 12:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spacedog (Post 11517622)
Directnic fucked up big time..

I'd be filing papers in court, then I'd be on the phone with the board of bar oversears to get juli criminally charged for false & deceptive representation. She is not an attorney & should not be acting in a legal capacity. Further, ALL legal communication MUST be served on PAPER, not fucking email..


Sue the fucking pants off these assholes.

It seems everyone wants to debate whether or not a register has the authority to shut down a domain for what they believe is illegal activities.

That is fine, but I think you people are missing the bigger issue here. [WHAT IF] it is CP. Forget about directnic and your domain, your ass is fucked.

The bigger picture I think here is that affiliates "trust" people and companies they do not know on questionable content. You income, business, and freedom is a lot to put in someone else's hands. What do you tell the police on when they knock on t he door. " but there is an injuction" not against CP. And if the sponsors fucked up and their photographer or the photographer they bought the content from fucked up or slipped in some young shit, lost paper work, whatever, and the girl turns out to be 16 where does that leave you?

the bigger issue I think people should be worrying about --> http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showth...7#post11517607

DavieVegas 12-13-2006 12:45 AM

man this shit is fucked up......

en21 12-13-2006 02:39 AM

I hope u get your problem solved asap... keep us updated slick

boneprone 12-13-2006 03:11 AM

keep us posted

polish_aristocrat 12-13-2006 04:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sly (Post 11516164)
How so? I have over 700 adult domains with Go Daddy. No problems.

I always hear people saying stay away from Go Daddy, but I've never seen any actual reasons or experiences to make me stay away. Its always hearsay.

I know a guy who has been having unprotected sex with hookers for the last 5 years. He is still alive and doing great. STD's don't exist !

polish_aristocrat 12-13-2006 04:22 AM

not to mention that GoDaddy should be boycotted for openly supporting the .xxx domain idea

looks like people have a short memory

sarettah 12-13-2006 04:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BoyAlley (Post 11517091)
I agree 100% on this. NO registrar should be requesting 2257 docs from ANYBODY.

I don't remember the Attorney General of the United States designating directNIC as an authority to conduct 2257 inspections on his behalf. If I'm not mistaken, he chose the FBI to conduct that task.

In fact, I'm fairly certain that it wouldn't even be legal for a company like directNIC to be requesting personal information of people depicted on a website, period. Most states have pretty strict laws about sharing that type of data, and website owners can be held accountable for not abiding by any privacy policies that they have in place as well.




Unless of course you agreed to allow them to do all that. :thumbsup

From Directnic's terms of service:

https://secure.directnic.com/legal/index.php#CP


9 CONTENT OBTAINED WITHOUT RELIABLE CONSENT.

a You agree that if we determine that your use of our Services or System is in any way connected or affiliated with the display, promotion, or dissemination of content obtained without reliable consent from each participant-e.g., sexual or nude images involving children under the age of 18, bestiality, murder, rape-we may charge your account a penalty in the amount of US $1,000.00 for every domain name in violation of this section. You further agree that we may collect these penalties by any means we deem necessary, including but not limited to charging any credit card you have on file with us or auctioning your domains.

b You agree that we reserve the right to immediately discontinue your use of our Services or System and seize control of your account(s) and all domain names within your account(s) immediately and without notice to you upon a determination that you have violated this section. You further agree that if you fail to pay us any penalties assessed under this section, we may auction off any and all of the domain names within your account(s) to satisfy your debt to us.

c You agree that we may take all necessary steps to investigate, document, and report any findings that you have violated this section, including but not limited to disclosing your account information to any and all appropriate law enforcement agencies.

Romeo GaySearch4Sex 12-13-2006 04:41 AM

this also seems to be a bit of a hint from their website:

http://www.intercosmos.com/site/index.html
Quote:

Founded in February 1999, Intercosmos is an online, family-oriented community of Web users and developers.
In the future its probably better to stick with hosts that actively seek out adult clients, like the ones that advertise on GFY or other webmaster boards, etc...

good luck!

darksoul 12-13-2006 05:00 AM

wtf
I have my most important domains with directnic for a reason, so I can sleep well at night
seems this is about to change.

BlackCrayon 12-13-2006 06:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Romeo GaySearch4Sex (Post 11518354)
this also seems to be a bit of a hint from their website:

http://www.intercosmos.com/site/index.html


In the future its probably better to stick with hosts that actively seek out adult clients, like the ones that advertise on GFY or other webmaster boards, etc...

good luck!

funny, i always thought directnic was started by some former adult webmasters.

PRaskind 12-13-2006 06:16 AM

Yeh, this is not funny, im in the process of changing registrar now :)

sarettah 12-13-2006 06:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackCrayon (Post 11518631)
funny, i always thought directnic was started by some former adult webmasters.

It was and is generally adult friendly.

darksoul 12-13-2006 06:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackCrayon (Post 11518631)
funny, i always thought directnic was started by some former adult webmasters.

I can see a trend here, companies starting in adult getting big with the help of adult webmasters and the ditching adult.

Dirty F 12-13-2006 06:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FreeFastHost (Post 11516305)
Same here, I have 450 adult domains with godaddy and have never had the slightest problem with them.

Same here. Never had a single problem with them.

Za Ha 12-13-2006 06:40 AM

Slick is a legit, and very helpful guy.

Hope everything gets resolved well for you soon.
Good luck buddy.

Mr.Right - Banned For Life 12-13-2006 06:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by polish_aristocrat (Post 11516007)
do you have a picture of ebus_dk on your server?

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Bozena X 12-13-2006 06:55 AM

bump.....

pradaboy 12-13-2006 07:13 AM

Slick, I hope you get it worked out. You're a good guy in my book.

I'd seriously consider keeping all your domains at Moniker.com, they're the safest registrar these days and I highly doubt they'd pull something like this.

DamageX 12-13-2006 07:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by darksoul (Post 11518392)
wtf
I have my most important domains with directnic for a reason, so I can sleep well at night
seems this is about to change.

I'd hate to pay double the regfee for a service that pulls shit like that on me. :)

stickyfingerz 12-13-2006 07:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by polish_aristocrat (Post 11518322)
I know a guy who has been having unprotected sex with hookers for the last 5 years. He is still alive and doing great. STD's don't exist !

EbusDk can afford hookers? :1orglaugh


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:15 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123