![]() |
200 stole.. err, unverified signups.
:321GFY |
Quote:
|
PBucksJohn is repeating the same thing over and over again, and some stupid fucks still dont get it.
Go fuck yourself and start shit on the FC foruns! Idiots. |
Ok, read it all...again and again...and still don't 100% understand. I will say this though, if a program is using a feature that allows them to basically steal money from you...I would suggest an industry wide boycott of that sponsor. That's just some shady shit there, my friends.
|
ok, I have read this thread over and over again and I totally understand everything but one thing, when a signup is declared "unverified", does that mean the customer didn't pay any money? and if he did pay money why didn't the affiliate get the payout?
basically, who gets the money from an unverified sale? |
Quote:
Even if the customer pays and its marked as unverified the sponsor will keep the money unless by some miracle it goes into verified mode. Legal shaving. |
I have a solution (even though the can of worms has already been opened)...just remove that "unverified signups" column...totally make it go away
problem solved |
Quote:
its already out there, turning it off now wont make the problem go away |
Quote:
I know the flashcash guys, and they are good people, I can't see them taking advantage of this.....but still, that column shouod have never been there |
Quote:
I'm sure they're top notch guys however the percents I see some people have with unverified signups makes you wonder. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quick, somebody post some old pics of Halcyon and Tassy to distract the angry sheep with all the pink and fruityness! HURRY!!
|
Quote:
|
i don't have time to read the whole thread but if people are losing out on sign ups because of this 'instant payout' crap which obviously caters to mostly small webmasters who need money instantly to pay bills then that is just sad. if you can't wait 2 weeks to get paid, get out of the biz. you suck.
thedoc says processors don't scrub for shit. why do some program admns see so many declines in their stats in ccbill for example then? i always thought that webmasters should be able to see declines as well as approved sales, not sure that this is exactly what that is though. this seems like a scrub beyond the declines/approves and to cause everyone to suffer through it because some poor webmasters need the money right away, well sucks. |
Quote:
You've talked privately to other program owners? Who gives a flying fuck, that has nothing to do with this situation. You'll either talk to flashcash and work it out, or you won't and you can send your traffic elsewhere. All you're doing here is trying to make flashcash and nats look bad. You won't get shit resolved in a GFY thread and you know it. You're just a pathetic attention whore who likes to make program owners look bad. |
Quote:
Thank you for you gentle hint John. :thumbsup |
Hopefully John will make it back to this thread to answer some of the level headed and clear questions that have been posted.
|
WHat a fucking waste of money
We had installed the new Nats 4 The other day and it has been full of problems every since..will not allow us to change or add processors..... giving us code errors all over the place and must have ..tried to contact support on ICQ and with tickets about 30 times and they are just fucking plain useless...
So much hype about this bull shit program..... it not worth the fucking money they are charging,, just another piece of shit program with useless support |
Quote:
You fail at internetting, NATS is far from being worthless piece of shit, maybe you shouldn't suck so bad at installing it. :2 cents: |
cue the pic of doc & marty....
|
took me 20 min to find this thread, classic
|
Well since this thread was bumped, I have a slightly OT question....
Can program owners shave sales using NATS? |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:09 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123