WTC 2002: The new building ... - GoFuckYourself.com

Naughty · 07-17-2002, 04:48 AM

Anybody seen this yet?
www.wtc2002.com

That new design looks okay. I do think they will build something new there, it would be too expensive not to. You know it all boils down to $$ in the end. They miss out on a fortune by not selling offices and things like that.

bawdy · 07-17-2002, 04:51 AM

i think this has been posted a couple of times already.... it wasnt one of the successfull proposal....

check out:
http://www.cnn.com/2002/US/07/16/wtc...ans/index.html

Thomas N · 07-17-2002, 04:54 AM

I personally like some of the new building proposals. Looks like a good use of the space and also a tribute/memorial at the same time. I keep hearing people say that the only thing that should be there is a memorial and no commercial use of any of the space but that makes zero sense to me. Actually it seems to me it would be letting the terrorists win in a way.

We've got to remember what happened, pay tribute to those who lost their lives, and also rebuild and make productive use of the area again and not take any steps backwards.

07-17-2002, 05:03 AM

Hmm, four towers would require more airplanes to strike them all down...

Just fucking ... seriously though - the 2833 trees, for each victim one is cheesy. Why not plant a tree for each Jew killed in WWII ?

Bleh.

meRx · 07-17-2002, 05:04 AM

There are actually like 6 models of the trade center being decided upon. This is one of them.
Don't get your hopes up on this one , cause they could pick another one.

Mr.Fiction · 07-17-2002, 05:05 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Equinox
Hmm, four towers would require more airplanes to strike them all down...

Just fucking ... seriously though - the 2833 trees, for each victim one is cheesy. Why not plant a tree for each Jew killed in WWII ?

Bleh.

Light a candle.

[Labret] · 07-17-2002, 05:08 AM

Bah! Our majestic Quad Towers... Its just one more thing for the fucking Canadians to be jealous of us about.

Naughty · 07-17-2002, 05:25 AM

Do you think 'you' (Americans) should move on and build stuff up there, or put down a park and not build any big buildings at all?

I cannot imagine how big the sight is, never having been there, but is there a lot of space for both?

meRx · 07-17-2002, 05:30 AM

In a perfect world there would be a memorial and only that.
In americas corrupt political economy ...
we'll build over it with $$$ in mind.
They know they would take a huge loss with money . They will build and empire of stores/offices/appartments over it. Watch.

Morgan · 07-17-2002, 05:33 AM

no bro... its going to be the ultimate memorial.

Juge · 07-17-2002, 05:42 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Naughty
Anybody seen this yet?
www.wtc2002.com

Wow! I think it looks awesome! Nice web site, too.

RW316 · 07-17-2002, 06:26 AM

its a great building and i support it... New york does need another skyscraper... it will bring in more revenue and more tourism

SR · 07-17-2002, 06:41 AM

I think they should build a small park or something there.
Sad but true but if you build a new huge building there it would be a perfect target for those fucked up terrorists.

mjrools23 · 07-17-2002, 06:46 AM

yea quit wasting my fuckin tax dollars

FlyingIguana · 07-17-2002, 07:32 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by SwordFish
I personally like some of the new building proposals. Looks like a good use of the space and also a tribute/memorial at the same time. I keep hearing people say that the only thing that should be there is a memorial and no commercial use of any of the space but that makes zero sense to me. Actually it seems to me it would be letting the terrorists win in a way.

We've got to remember what happened, pay tribute to those who lost their lives, and also rebuild and make productive use of the area again and not take any steps backwards.

exactly. security would be a major concern tho. terrorists seem to be attracted to the wtc. maybe call it something different.

playa · 07-17-2002, 09:23 AM

nice website

but that elevator music gots to go

posh rat in hell · 07-17-2002, 10:38 AM

I think none of these options are bold enough. We need something at least as magnificent as the 1973-2001 Twin Towers were. Anything less is showing that we will allow terrorists to determine what we can build, and how we can build it. Building 4 small buildings on there is horrible, ie: building offices on people's graves. If you build something REALLY special, then the whole plaza becomes a monument to them, ie: a 110 story memorial.

volante · 07-17-2002, 12:48 PM

RW316 · 07-17-2002, 12:50 PM

thats an old article

.:Frog:. · 07-17-2002, 05:18 PM

LOL cool idea to add a huge hole at the top for the planes to go through.

Chris R · 07-17-2002, 05:53 PM

It is a great site, but this just isn't right:

""My answer is this "Our New Cyber City Design Concept for The New World Trade Center 2002 will be impervious to attack'"

Such ideas are what get us into trouble. The idea that we won't let the terrorists "win" is fine and dandy, until another 3K people die.

The security needed to secure this site - which has been successfully attacked on two dates would greatly outweigh the costs lost in terms of revenue. There is no such thing as 100% security.

It is sad to note that the old monument that stood for the early attack was swept away during the 9/11 attack.

quiet · 07-17-2002, 05:57 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Naughty

I cannot imagine how big the sight is, never having been there, but is there a lot of space for both?

i checked it out when i was in NYC a couple weeks ago. the site is pretty fucking massive.

Naughty · 07-17-2002, 06:03 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by quiet
i checked it out when i was in NYC a couple weeks ago. the site is pretty fucking massive.

I heard it was about 20 soccerfields. Is that about right?

Trolleater · 07-17-2002, 06:19 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by [Labret]
Bah! Our majestic Quad Towers... Its just one more thing for the fucking Canadians to be jealous of us about.

LOL...man you hit that nail right on the head...you dumb fuck.

Living in the most corrupt nation in the world would certainly be something to be proud of.

michaelw · 07-17-2002, 06:55 PM

the pyramid looks stupid..

07-17-2002, 04:48 AM	#1
Naughty Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Utopia Posts: 6,484	WTC 2002: The new building ... Anybody seen this yet? www.wtc2002.com That new design looks okay. I do think they will build something new there, it would be too expensive not to. You know it all boils down to $$ in the end. They miss out on a fortune by not selling offices and things like that. __________________ seks.ai for sale - ping me

07-17-2002, 05:04 AM	#5
meRx Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: Oahu , Hawaii Posts: 362	There are actually like 6 models of the trade center being decided upon. This is one of them. Don't get your hopes up on this one , cause they could pick another one. __________________ <a href="http://www.freeezinebucks.com/ps.php?s=feb&u=merxxx"><font size="2">FreeZineBucks</font></a> <font size="2"> EASY MONEY! Earn $1.00/email address! NO DEDUCTIONS!</font> <a href="http://www.contentlotto.com/index.php?account=merx"><font size="2">ContentLotto</font></a> <font size="2"> Win Free Content , Hosting , Traffic , Site Designs & more! Why pay?</font>

07-17-2002, 05:30 AM	#9
meRx Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: Oahu , Hawaii Posts: 362	In a perfect world there would be a memorial and only that. In americas corrupt political economy ... we'll build over it with $$$ in mind. They know they would take a huge loss with money . They will build and empire of stores/offices/appartments over it. Watch. __________________ <a href="http://www.freeezinebucks.com/ps.php?s=feb&u=merxxx"><font size="2">FreeZineBucks</font></a> <font size="2"> EASY MONEY! Earn $1.00/email address! NO DEDUCTIONS!</font> <a href="http://www.contentlotto.com/index.php?account=merx"><font size="2">ContentLotto</font></a> <font size="2"> Win Free Content , Hosting , Traffic , Site Designs & more! Why pay?</font>

07-17-2002, 05:18 PM	#20
.:Frog:. Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: ~ C A N A D A ~ Posts: 2,123	LOL cool idea to add a huge hole at the top for the planes to go through. __________________ <a href="http://www.pornopayouts.com/?rid=pp3076">PornoPayouts</a> Tons of Hosted Galleries.

07-17-2002, 06:55 PM	#25
michaelw Confirmed User Join Date: May 2002 Location: Calgary, Canada Posts: 1,342	the pyramid looks stupid.. __________________ <b><a href="http://www.hotlinkprotector.com"><font color="yellow">Hotlink Protector</font></a> - Protect all your file types from hotlinking the professional way. <br> See a demo <a href="http://www.hotlinkprotector.com/demo.html"><font color="yellow">here</font></a>, and testimonials <a href="http://www.hotlinkprotector.com/testimonials.html"><font color="yellow">here</font></a><br>ICQ: 146423631

07-17-2002, 04:51 AM	#2
bawdy Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2002 Posts: 1,424	i think this has been posted a couple of times already.... it wasnt one of the successfull proposal.... check out: http://www.cnn.com/2002/US/07/16/wtc...ans/index.html

07-17-2002, 04:54 AM	#3
Thomas N Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2001 Posts: 973	I personally like some of the new building proposals. Looks like a good use of the space and also a tribute/memorial at the same time. I keep hearing people say that the only thing that should be there is a memorial and no commercial use of any of the space but that makes zero sense to me. Actually it seems to me it would be letting the terrorists win in a way. We've got to remember what happened, pay tribute to those who lost their lives, and also rebuild and make productive use of the area again and not take any steps backwards.

07-17-2002, 05:03 AM	#4
X37375787 Guest Posts: n/a	Hmm, four towers would require more airplanes to strike them all down... Just fucking ... seriously though - the 2833 trees, for each victim one is cheesy. Why not plant a tree for each Jew killed in WWII ? Bleh.

07-17-2002, 05:08 AM	#7
[Labret] Registered User Industry Role: Join Date: May 2001 Location: Са́нкт-Петербу́рг Posts: 10,945	Bah! Our majestic Quad Towers... Its just one more thing for the fucking Canadians to be jealous of us about.

07-17-2002, 05:25 AM	#8
Naughty Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Utopia Posts: 6,484	Do you think 'you' (Americans) should move on and build stuff up there, or put down a park and not build any big buildings at all? I cannot imagine how big the sight is, never having been there, but is there a lot of space for both?

07-17-2002, 05:33 AM	#10
Morgan Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: May 2002 Location: Corona Del Mar, CA Posts: 10,520	no bro... its going to be the ultimate memorial.

07-17-2002, 06:26 AM	#12
RW316 Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2002 Posts: 1,103	its a great building and i support it... New york does need another skyscraper... it will bring in more revenue and more tourism

07-17-2002, 06:41 AM	#13
SR Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: The Netherlands Posts: 2,239	I think they should build a small park or something there. Sad but true but if you build a new huge building there it would be a perfect target for those fucked up terrorists.

07-17-2002, 06:46 AM	#14
mjrools23 Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: NYC Posts: 1,604	yea quit wasting my fuckin tax dollars

07-17-2002, 09:23 AM	#16
playa Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: atlanta, GA Posts: 6,432	nice website but that elevator music gots to go

07-17-2002, 10:38 AM	#17
posh rat in hell Confirmed User Join Date: May 2002 Location: New York City Posts: 403	I think none of these options are bold enough. We need something at least as magnificent as the 1973-2001 Twin Towers were. Anything less is showing that we will allow terrorists to determine what we can build, and how we can build it. Building 4 small buildings on there is horrible, ie: building offices on people's graves. If you build something REALLY special, then the whole plaza becomes a monument to them, ie: a 110 story memorial.

07-17-2002, 12:48 PM	#18
volante Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: LAX Immigration Posts: 2,940

07-17-2002, 12:50 PM	#19
RW316 Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2002 Posts: 1,103	thats an old article

07-17-2002, 05:53 PM	#21
Chris R Confirmed User Join Date: May 2001 Location: Baltimore, MD USA Posts: 1,151	It is a great site, but this just isn't right: ""My answer is this "Our New Cyber City Design Concept for The New World Trade Center 2002 will be impervious to attack'" Such ideas are what get us into trouble. The idea that we won't let the terrorists "win" is fine and dandy, until another 3K people die. The security needed to secure this site - which has been successfully attacked on two dates would greatly outweigh the costs lost in terms of revenue. There is no such thing as 100% security. It is sad to note that the old monument that stood for the early attack was swept away during the 9/11 attack.