![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
View Poll Results: FHGs: Simple or Stylish? | |||
Simple |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
8 | 61.54% |
Stylish |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
5 | 38.46% |
Voters: 13. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() ![]() |
|
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed. |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,062
|
FHGs: Simple or Stylish?
Affiliates...
Do you prefer... Simple FHGs, focused on content, minimal to no graphics on them & lots of text? Or do you prefer, fancy, graphical FHGs that show off design style? When you see simple galleries in an affiliate program, does it seem cheap to you, or does it seem like the program knows what they are doing? In my experience, plain, simple, flat colored table galleries convert like crazy over fancy graphical galleries. But for some reason, I don't recall ever seeing simple FHGs in any program. What are your thoughts on this? |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,062
|
bump bump
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: StarlightBucks !
Posts: 5,404
|
i like stylish myself
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
FBOP Class Of 2013
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: bumfuck, ky
Posts: 35,562
|
both
sometimes where it is going calls for stylish,sometimes simple why not have both, same content,two different styles? |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Too lazy to set a custom title
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: pink adult dreams
Posts: 13,557
|
I don't really care.
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: www.lvpshosting.com
Posts: 7,512
|
i think Stylish is much better...
__________________
We are responsible for your hosting ... Enjoy in your life. Shared hosting from $3.95 Europe Linux VPS plans from $11.37 http://www.LVPSHosting.com |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 186
|
simple with no skim, obviously
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
I need a beer
![]() Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: ♠ Toiletville ♠
Posts: 133,943
|
Simple always works,surfers just want good content
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
HOMICIDAL TROLL KILLER
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sunnybrook Institution for the Criminally Insane
Posts: 20,419
|
simple works best!
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Too lazy to set a custom title
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2004
Location: West Coast, Canada.
Posts: 10,217
|
Quote:
Most people look to "competition", "saturation" as the reason for getting less sales these days. But in my experience, a lot of it has to do with forgetting that something like 30%-50% of the NA surfers are still on dial-up, not to mention the rest of the world. So basically they've left all that money on the table. If you want to make more money... do up your own galleries from the program provided ones and make them "simple". Host them on their free hosting or use one of the old time free hosts. You still get free hosted galleries but will make more money and if you use your head you can get some other benifits as well. |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |