Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Post New Thread Reply

Register GFY Rules Calendar Mark Forums Read
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed.

 
Thread Tools
Old 11-07-2006, 03:45 AM   #1
xxxjay
Tube groupie.
 
xxxjay's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: LoScandalous, CA
Posts: 13,482
do you think google ditched the sandbox?

I am seeing newer domains kill google while the older ones (that traditionally did) well are not moving...do you think google stopped sandboxing new domains?
xxxjay is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2006, 03:46 AM   #2
$5 submissions
I help you SUCCEED
 
$5 submissions's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: The Pearl of the Orient Seas
Posts: 32,195
I'm not sure but one thing I did notice was that almost all my domains went up a notch in PR
$5 submissions is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2006, 03:48 AM   #3
fallenmuffin
Confirmed User
 
fallenmuffin's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 8,170
That's what has always happened. The new domains get insane rankings for 3 months then drop out of the results all together.. then a month later turn up on page 15...
fallenmuffin is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2006, 03:48 AM   #4
munki
Do Fun Shit.
 
munki's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: OC
Posts: 13,393
Not sure... but I did notice throwing their analytics on a newer domain for me got me record indexing time, and decent organics within days.
__________________

I have the simplest tastes. I am always satisfied with the best.” -Oscar Wilde
munki is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2006, 04:45 AM   #5
Nicky
Confirmed User
 
Nicky's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Sweden
Posts: 30,069
Have gained some PR but not much in the rankings
totally fucking sandboxed on my oldest blogs
__________________

gfynicky @ gmail.com
Nicky is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2006, 05:04 AM   #6
J.P.
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 689
sandbox never existed... IMHO an effect often called a sandbox is just a side effect of their ranking method based on historical stats...
__________________
Webmasters! Looking for new affiliate programs to promote?
Affiliate Program Search <-- Search for programs with FHGs, RSS feed, specific niche sponsors, ...
J.P. is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2006, 06:08 AM   #7
studiocritic
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 2,442
it has recently been hypothesized that the sandbox never technically existed, it's just an effect of a combination of some of their filters..

who knows how accurate that is.. i have seen opinions that most "sandboxing" would occur after "overoptimization".

the whole thing pisses me off, and drives me to blackhat rather than creating decent content..

from syndk8.net:
Quote:
Google is drowning under a spam problem they created!

Black hat seo `v` White hat seo and why do one or the other?

Well that's an interesting question because of course white hat seo is really nice and you are playing by the rules the search engines imposed and invented but its just so hard after google brought in the sandbox.

Back in 2003 you could launch a site, put some nice content on it and then get some traffic.
In 2003 Google decided to punish the content builders and white hat seo`s by creating something that has commonly being known as the sandbox.

I personally would have never touched black hat seo and was strictly a white hat seo guy but i suddenly found my new clean content sites were getting no traffic.

I joined an seo forum to find out why i was having problems getting traffic and it turned out that google decided to screw the white hat seo that was making the internet clean and full of content by putting a penalty on new domains, content and links.

The option to build content rich sites was no longer there for most people unless you had a real fat wallet or you were prepared to eat bread and water while the sandbox released you.

Would i build white hat content if google hadn't implemented the sandbox?

You bet i would and they would be fresh rich content and very pretty sites.

The option for the seo and webmaster to build nice clean content was stolen away from us and google forced us into the era of the black hat seo / search engine spammer.

When you see a spam sub domain or a site and you see the low down scum bags on forums outing people, please don't just think you want them hung drawn and quartered but more think that there would be none of this happening if google hadn't brought in the sandbox.

So to sum it up

Google created the spam problem they are drowning in and nobody dare admit it.
__________________
254342256
studiocritic is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2006, 11:34 AM   #8
J.P.
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 689
Google did not create this, they just failed in their fight against spammers and they're failing for quite some time now. I agree with you, their fight against spam does nothing good, their new filters just cause more and more good sites' drop in rankings.
__________________
Webmasters! Looking for new affiliate programs to promote?
Affiliate Program Search <-- Search for programs with FHGs, RSS feed, specific niche sponsors, ...
J.P. is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2006, 11:36 AM   #9
squishypimp
PostMaster General
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 10,781
Quote:
Originally Posted by munki View Post
Not sure... but I did notice throwing their analytics on a newer domain for me got me record indexing time, and decent organics within days.
thanks for the tip, ill have to do that
__________________
squishypimp is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2006, 11:42 AM   #10
gooddomains
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 10,127
I love the sandbox
gooddomains is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2006, 11:43 AM   #11
Raven Core
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 45
the sandbox is a myth
like a shitload of other things related to google
__________________
You suck at the interweb
Raven Core is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2006, 11:52 AM   #12
SmokeyTheBear
►SouthOfHeaven
 
SmokeyTheBear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: PlanetEarth MyBoardRank: GerbilMaster My-Penis-Size: extralarge MyWeapon: Computer
Posts: 28,609
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.P. View Post
Google did not create this, they just failed in their fight against spammers and they're failing for quite some time now. I agree with you, their fight against spam does nothing good, their new filters just cause more and more good sites' drop in rankings.
i tend to think google did create this . I would say more than half of the content on the entire internet is based soley on manipulating google.

i.e. the page was created for google rank , not created then google found it..

Imagine how nice sites would look and how easy they would be to navigate if they didnt have to rely on "seo"
__________________
hatisblack at yahoo.com
SmokeyTheBear is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2006, 05:31 AM   #13
J.P.
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 689
I agree with you Smokey... But I think this is also some sort of a chicken and the egg thing
__________________
Webmasters! Looking for new affiliate programs to promote?
Affiliate Program Search <-- Search for programs with FHGs, RSS feed, specific niche sponsors, ...
J.P. is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Post New Thread Reply
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >

Bookmarks
Thread Tools



Advertising inquiries - marketing at gfy dot com

Contact Admin - Advertise - GFY Rules - Top

©2000-, AI Media Network Inc



Powered by vBulletin
Copyright © 2000- Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.