Quote:
Originally Posted by Aussie Rebel
(Post 11960134)
|
I don't know if it's just me who doesn't understand some things or if i just don't get them right.
So i see Lord Ago beginning this thread against AFF because they advertise on file sharing programs, i also read a thread on the netpond forum against badoink again for file sharing. Which is really good because i think all that file sharing/torrent and pirate sites hurt us a lot.
But how does it come that netpondads and etology to whom he is affilated somehow is full with file sharing program adds to broker???
If someone is against filesharing and similar illegal and pirated shit than he shouldn't have it in his own house in first place or someone could argue that it has something to do with competition (what i don't hope).
Just some interesting facts as well which i just saw on the xbiz news mail.
Quote:
NEWS STORY
Titan Reports $30M Loss From P2P Sharing
By Anne Winter
Thursday, February 22, 2007
SAN FRANCISCO ? Keith Webb, vice president of sales and marketing at Titan Media, said he sent out 318,000 cease-and-desist orders in 2006 and reported a revenue loss of up to $30 million from illegal or stolen content.
Webb told XBIZ he uses the same outside company that major motion picture studios hire to monitor peer-to-peer networks, and that the spidering service found more than 3 million Titan Media films were illegally downloaded last year.
Titan?s online video-on-demand and pay-per-view content costs between $2.99 and $9.99; Webb multiplied these numbers by 3 million and called the loss in revenue ?devastating.?
?At the very least we lost $8 million or $9 million. At worst we lost close to $30 million.? Webb said.
Webb said this number doesn?t include revenue loss from offline trading or pirated DVDs.
Of the 318,000 cease-and-desist orders sent out, Webb said there was an 80 percent compliance rate, though only 10 percent of those sharing Titan Media content were eventually caught.
Webb attributes declining DVD sales in the adult industry to file sharing and pirated DVDs. He reported that for every legal VOD/PPV Titan Media film sold, he had 10 or more stolen or downloaded illegally.
?DVD sales are down and the number of sales from VOD are not making up for the loss,? Webb said. ?Something?s going on.?
Webb said his findings might prompt him to move all Titan Media content online using DRM sooner than he had planned. As long as he provides his films at a reasonable price and a mass scale, he said it?s the safest way to prevent future revenue loss.
Webb continues to urge other adult studios to ?band together and realize what?s going on.? He said if larger VOD providers like AEBN or Maleflixxx set aside two percent of revenue to pay for in-house legal council, more P2P sharers and pirates could be caught.
?We need to work harder to try to stop this,? Webb said.
|
And than just read some statements from the Etology guy i had a small discussion on another board (in context for supporting and having a partnership with rapidshare.de):
Quote:
They complied with all legal requests in good faith and in a timely manner
|
==> anybody believing this?
Quote:
We cannot be responsible for what the hosts users upload to their sites
|
==> in other words, they don't care.
Quote:
NetpondAds & Etology share the same system, but we have different purposes
|
==> can't see much difference but ok..
Quote:
The particular thread you're referencing is what caused us to modify NetpondAds to have the ability to remove specific websites from their listing. Etology is a general marketplace where users sign up on their own or where we approach them.
|
==> i referred him to this thread. So Netpondads can remove sites but etology can't now? Or does it mean that they don't care at etology what adds they broker as it's just a general market place?
Quote:
I was not aware of the heated nature on the subject.
|
==> So they spam daily tgp and adult site owners but aren't aware that filesharing decreases sales more and more?
Quote:
NetpondAds caters to webmasters in that particular industry. NetpondAds is a whitelabel brand where requirements are specified by Netpond and we host an advertising network for them. So while we control the domain, Lorg Aga can dictate what he accepts and what he doesn't. He knows the industry better than we do.
Etology is an open marketplace in which anyone with a legal website can come and register. We don't place restrictions on websites we only require that they are legal and complete with full navigation and do not violate any known laws.
We support far more TGP, Photo, Video, Entertainment, and Informational sites than we do filesharing sites those are actually very limited in number. Etology supports webmasters in general and we try to help webmasters who have traffic monetize it. This model usually works out for both parties. The problem is that filesharing sites are more visible due to the amount of traffic they receive.
We're actually not very different than any open source ad package, we're open for anyone to try us out. Granted some may not agree with certain people who use our service but in short we are an open service available to all. Our service was not tailored to be industry specific, that was one of the reasons NetpondAds was launched.
|
==> At least more or less a honest statement ..
Quote:
There are legitimate uses of torrents and fileshares out there otherwise the technology would've been blacklisted like Napster.
The DMCA act is not unregulated and is fairly powerful in the U.S. Many people get shutdown for copyright infringement all the time due to this act. This is also the regulation we abide by, it gives webmasters a good faith rule to remove content first before they are shutdown. As mentioned in the very early posts, if we receive complaints about certain sites due to content we forward the message to the webmaster. If we continually receive complaints we remove them.
|
==> That part should be interesting for Program Owners, Content Providers or people which content get's illegaly up/downloaded 1000's of times daily. I guess they have a different POV on this.
Quote:
We check sites but its not our responsibility to police content that's what lawyers are for. It's the copyright owners responsibility to file a report or report the file. This was and is exactly the case what happened with rapidshare.de & the E.U. and with a well known video sharing website in the U.S right now.
|
==> Doesn't that simply mean they are well aware with what's going on with rapidshare.de but just continue selling their ads as usually??