Which came first? - GoFuckYourself.com

421Fill · 07-01-2002, 01:42 AM

The chicken or the egg? Seriously, have you ever considered that question?

SetTheWorldonFire · 07-01-2002, 01:44 AM

The Rooster

drunkmonkey · 07-01-2002, 01:47 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by SetTheWorldonFire
The Rooster

There is so much truth to that statement that my head hurts

willow · 07-01-2002, 02:13 AM

The egg. At the point the genetics of the bird changed into what we today call a chicken it would have been born from an egg.

sexmanic · 07-01-2002, 02:24 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by turbo
The chicken or the egg? Seriously, have you ever considered that question?

that strain of ooze that would evolve in to the chicken species began its reproductive process from an early primordal ooze point and has evolved ever since. whatever stage that ooze was in when it held the land for the first time and left the liquid would be technically first. everything else has been a process of evolution.

Firehorse · 07-01-2002, 02:30 AM

the egg rolled over in be, lit a cigarette and said:
well i guess we answered that one.

Buba_Smith2 · 07-01-2002, 02:55 AM

Don't know, don't care, but they both taste pretty good. Here's a question for you. What's healthier the 4-winged 4-legged chicken they mass produce for KFC or the new and improved 6-winged 6-legged chicken? This is why I don't eat chicken wings anymore.

421Fill · 07-01-2002, 03:05 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Buba_Smith2
Don't know, don't care, but they both taste pretty good. Here's a question for you. What's healthier the 4-winged 4-legged chicken they mass produce for KFC or the new and improved 6-winged 6-legged chicken? This is why I don't eat chicken wings anymore.

I haven't been to KFC since I saw the dateline( or whatever ) special on that. ewww.

gothweb · 07-01-2002, 03:16 AM

There is no multi-chicken. Urban legend.

Sex4it · 07-01-2002, 04:52 AM

I guess neither ...

hell I'm sleepy ...

LoveAsianChicks · 07-01-2002, 04:54 AM

The egg came first.

sternyduke · 07-01-2002, 05:56 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by turbo

I haven't been to KFC since I saw the dateline( or whatever ) special on that. ewww.

turbo - what happened on dateline? i just ate there two days ago... hope it aint that bad

mjrools23 · 07-01-2002, 08:49 AM

egg came first

Gary · 07-01-2002, 08:51 AM

I fucked the chicken and ate the egg

Cheshire · 07-01-2002, 09:30 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Gary
I fucked the chicken and ate the egg

Yes Gary, but which came first?

421Fill · 07-01-2002, 11:40 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by sternyduke

turbo - what happened on dateline? i just ate there two days ago... hope it aint that bad

well, honestly, now that the urban myth angle has been thrown out there, I'm starting to feel very easily swayed by propoganda... of which I can never be sure anymore... *madmans ravings* ( that reminds me... whatever happened to amadman here?)

anyways, it's been said that they have been genetically altering chickens to have them grow with no head, and multiple extemities... and multiple breasts... just made to eat, basically.. they never move from their nest... don't think they could if they wanted to... don't think they could want to (no head, and all that).

Now, I am old enough to know that the whole urban myth defense is just another form of propoganda, so maybe it is all true ;)

RW316 · 07-01-2002, 11:41 AM

the chick

salsbury · 07-01-2002, 11:49 AM

i'd say the chicken. the question is "which came first, the chicken or the egg?" it implies that they mean "which came first, the chicken or the chicken egg?" - otherwise, it would obviously be the egg since there were eggs long before there were chickens.

i personally believe that in order to call an egg a "chicken egg" it has to come out of a chicken. since not all chicken eggs become chickens ("stillborn?", etc) it wouldn't make sense to call an egg a chicken egg unless it came out of a chicken (since you can't know what it will become with 100% certainty).

therefore, the chicken came first, since it hatched out of an egg that came from whatever chickens evolved from.

i need a life.

mike503 · 07-01-2002, 01:37 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Cheshire

Yes Gary, but which came first?

sounds like gary came first, right before he ate the egg.

foe · 07-01-2002, 01:41 PM

I figured it out when I was stoned but then I forogt and just lit another blunt

421Fill · 07-01-2002, 01:55 PM

because I got High, because I got High-igh.. lol

for me it's the opposite. I have my epiphonies while high, and forget 'em when I sober up. then keep getting high to remember and well... where was I? LOL

BV · 07-01-2002, 01:56 PM

we come from eggs too! so what's the difference in asking what came first the human or the egg?
the only difference in the process --the way i see it-- is a hen incubates her egg externally and all the nutrients are self contained within that cell. (an unfertilized egg is on single cell the yoke being the nucleus)
where as homosapien females incubate and feed their eggs from within.

hmmmm...........

DrewKole · 07-01-2002, 02:04 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Cheshire

Yes Gary, but which came first?

Gary came first, he always does... he is no gentleman ladies.

421Fill · 07-01-2002, 02:05 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by BV
we come from eggs too! so what's the difference in asking what came first the human or the egg?
the only difference in the process --the way i see it-- is a hen incubates her egg externally and all the nutrients are self contained within that cell. (an unfertilized egg is on single cell the yoke being the nucleus)
where as homosapien females incubate and feed their eggs from within.

hmmmm...........

But it still doesn't answer the question... just makes it more of a tangent to mentally follow. Thanks, dude. lol

BV · 07-01-2002, 02:17 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by turbo

But it still doesn't answer the question... just makes it more of a tangent to mentally follow. Thanks, dude. lol

no problem
here is another little tid bit of info that might help in your discussion:

Did you know that a pullet (baby hen) when hatched is --preloaded-- with all the eggs it will ever lay in it's whole life.

clickpimp · 07-01-2002, 03:33 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by BV

Did you know that a pullet (baby hen) when hatched is --preloaded-- with all the eggs it will ever lay in it's whole life.

so you're saying the egg?

Trolleater · 07-01-2002, 03:47 PM

To be asking that question I hope you're stoned out of your mind!

BV · 07-01-2002, 03:56 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by clickpimp

so you're saying the egg?

No,

Depending on your beliefs,
the chicken with it's eggs inside evolved or was created all at the same instance in time........

meRx · 07-01-2002, 03:58 PM

The infamous Roach came first.
Lets take a minute to celebrate in thier name.
Roach motels have the best conversion rate in a dirty kitchen.
Talk about major traffic...

kmanrox · 07-01-2002, 04:10 PM

the egg, from the big bang? shrug

UnseenWorld · 07-01-2002, 06:10 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by SetTheWorldonFire
The Rooster

Do roosters actually cum?

And if a hen is really bad, does a rooster call her a cloaca?

dodo · 07-01-2002, 07:35 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by turbo
The chicken or the egg? Seriously, have you ever considered that question?

It depends.... do you believe in God? I was'nt there but don't think God hatched the eggs.

Scootermuze · 07-01-2002, 07:50 PM

Actually, this question is more anthropological than evolutionary, since the chicken (Gallus domesticus) didn't exist until its domestication around 2000 BC in Indochina. The first chicken came from the first chicken egg, which was laid by a red junglefowl (Gallus gallus). Whether you argue creation or evolution, the fact that humanity predates and is responsible for the speciation of chickens from red junglefowl should lay the "chicken or the egg" question to rest. From an evolutionary perspective, this answer holds for all species: the first member(s) of any species were the offspring of another very similar species, i.e. evolution argues that the egg always comes first. From a creationist perspective, this answer is anomalous, since all species that predate humanity originated as adults around 4004 BCE, i.e. creationism argues that the red junglefowl came before the red junglefowl egg.

Michael Onken, Admin, MadSci Network

421Fill · 07-01-2002, 08:40 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Trolleater
To be asking that question I hope you're stoned out of your mind!

I'd had a few beers.

Interesting shit from BV and Scootermuze. See this is the type of shit I was hoping to learn.

turbo

foe · 07-01-2002, 08:46 PM

who cares

421Fill · 07-01-2002, 09:23 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by pornopete

Who cares? Just grab another beer!

way ahead of ya' on that one, bro.

but in answer to your question... I do. That's why I asked.

h0st · 07-02-2002, 02:06 AM

Indeed, who fuckin cares???

421Fill · 07-02-2002, 02:34 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by h0st
Indeed, who fuckin cares???

again... I do. That's why I asked.

07-01-2002, 01:42 AM	#1
421Fill Super Mario Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: Swenson's Avatar Posts: 19,749	Which came first? The chicken or the egg? Seriously, have you ever considered that question? __________________ RELEASE THE EPSTEIN FILES!!!

07-01-2002, 01:44 AM	#2
SetTheWorldonFire Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: California Posts: 7,444	The Rooster __________________ www.STWOFDesign.com hit me up on icq 154206276 or Skype: JaimeGizzle

07-01-2002, 02:30 AM	#6
Firehorse Desire it and have it!!! Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: www.fuckwithfire.com ICQ 512915 Posts: 30,767	the egg rolled over in be, lit a cigarette and said: well i guess we answered that one. __________________ MySweetEbony

07-01-2002, 02:55 AM	#7
Buba_Smith2 Registered User Join Date: Jun 2002 Posts: 76	Don't know, don't care, but they both taste pretty good. Here's a question for you. What's healthier the 4-winged 4-legged chicken they mass produce for KFC or the new and improved 6-winged 6-legged chicken? This is why I don't eat chicken wings anymore. __________________ <a href="http://www.albertaamateurs.ca" target="_new"><img src="http://www.albertaamateurs.ca/logo_black.jpg" border=0 width=70 height=40></a><a href="mailto:[email protected]">e-mail</a><br> <hr color=blue width=85% align=left> <b><i><font color=blue>Reverand Bob</b></i></font>

07-01-2002, 03:16 AM	#9
gothweb Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Back in the USSA Posts: 8,849	There is no multi-chicken. Urban legend. __________________ Photos by Ian X.: Distinctive photos of goth babes. Blood Money:Your traffic, my sites, our money. MojoHost: Still the best.

07-01-2002, 02:13 AM	#4
willow Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: NY, NY, USA Posts: 131	The egg. At the point the genetics of the bird changed into what we today call a chicken it would have been born from an egg.

07-01-2002, 04:52 AM	#10
Sex4it Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2001 Posts: 784	I guess neither ... hell I'm sleepy ... __________________ I'm back and happy about it.

07-01-2002, 04:54 AM	#11
LoveAsianChicks Registered User Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: -CANADA- Posts: 1,464	The egg came first.

07-01-2002, 08:49 AM	#13
mjrools23 Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: NYC Posts: 1,604	egg came first

07-01-2002, 08:51 AM	#14
Gary Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: Kimmykims couch Posts: 6,110	I fucked the chicken and ate the egg __________________ Up to 35$ per join...!

07-01-2002, 11:41 AM	#17
RW316 Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2002 Posts: 1,103	the chick

07-01-2002, 11:49 AM	#18
salsbury Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Seattle Posts: 1,070	i'd say the chicken. the question is "which came first, the chicken or the egg?" it implies that they mean "which came first, the chicken or the chicken egg?" - otherwise, it would obviously be the egg since there were eggs long before there were chickens. i personally believe that in order to call an egg a "chicken egg" it has to come out of a chicken. since not all chicken eggs become chickens ("stillborn?", etc) it wouldn't make sense to call an egg a chicken egg unless it came out of a chicken (since you can't know what it will become with 100% certainty). therefore, the chicken came first, since it hatched out of an egg that came from whatever chickens evolved from. i need a life. __________________

07-01-2002, 01:41 PM	#20
foe Confirmed User Join Date: May 2002 Location: CT Posts: 5,246	I figured it out when I was stoned but then I forogt and just lit another blunt

07-01-2002, 01:55 PM	#21
421Fill Super Mario Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: Swenson's Avatar Posts: 19,749	because I got High, because I got High-igh.. lol for me it's the opposite. I have my epiphonies while high, and forget 'em when I sober up. then keep getting high to remember and well... where was I? LOL __________________ RELEASE THE EPSTEIN FILES!!!

07-01-2002, 01:56 PM	#22
BV wtf Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: Bikini State, FL USA Posts: 10,914	we come from eggs too! so what's the difference in asking what came first the human or the egg? the only difference in the process --the way i see it-- is a hen incubates her egg externally and all the nutrients are self contained within that cell. (an unfertilized egg is on single cell the yoke being the nucleus) where as homosapien females incubate and feed their eggs from within. hmmmm...........

07-01-2002, 03:47 PM	#27
Trolleater Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Canada Posts: 1,441	To be asking that question I hope you're stoned out of your mind!

07-01-2002, 03:58 PM	#29
meRx Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: Oahu , Hawaii Posts: 362	The infamous Roach came first. Lets take a minute to celebrate in thier name. Roach motels have the best conversion rate in a dirty kitchen. Talk about major traffic... __________________ <a href="http://www.freeezinebucks.com/ps.php?s=feb&u=merxxx"><font size="2">FreeZineBucks</font></a> <font size="2"> EASY MONEY! Earn $1.00/email address! NO DEDUCTIONS!</font> <a href="http://www.contentlotto.com/index.php?account=merx"><font size="2">ContentLotto</font></a> <font size="2"> Win Free Content , Hosting , Traffic , Site Designs & more! Why pay?</font>

07-01-2002, 04:10 PM	#30
kmanrox aka K-Man Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: The Gutter Posts: 29,292	the egg, from the big bang? shrug __________________ Crypto HODLr Crypto mining Angel investor

07-01-2002, 07:50 PM	#33
Scootermuze Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2001 Posts: 4,513	Actually, this question is more anthropological than evolutionary, since the chicken (Gallus domesticus) didn't exist until its domestication around 2000 BC in Indochina. The first chicken came from the first chicken egg, which was laid by a red junglefowl (Gallus gallus). Whether you argue creation or evolution, the fact that humanity predates and is responsible for the speciation of chickens from red junglefowl should lay the "chicken or the egg" question to rest. From an evolutionary perspective, this answer holds for all species: the first member(s) of any species were the offspring of another very similar species, i.e. evolution argues that the egg always comes first. From a creationist perspective, this answer is anomalous, since all species that predate humanity originated as adults around 4004 BCE, i.e. creationism argues that the red junglefowl came before the red junglefowl egg. Michael Onken, Admin, MadSci Network

07-01-2002, 08:46 PM	#35
foe Confirmed User Join Date: May 2002 Location: CT Posts: 5,246	who cares

07-02-2002, 02:06 AM	#37
h0st Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Finland Posts: 1,216	Indeed, who fuckin cares??? __________________ Did you say Pimp My Sexlife?