GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   The to 9/11 conspiracy freaks. (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=654351)

stickyfingerz 09-11-2006 04:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoodGuy
Good idea. I will request your ban for insulting me and for starting trolling around around this topic.

You are a fucking newbie --> Join Date: Oct 2005 :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Asshole newbie and fake nick. :mad:

30 minutes to go. Tick Tock Tick Tock.

GoodGuy 09-11-2006 04:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz
Proof please?

Btw see that blue name in this thread? Might want to heed to that.

http://www.adjab.com/images/2005/09/ban.jpg

You will be banned from the industry as soon as I show the proof on how you spam people and steal others peoples work..

Not to name that you are a cheater.. and you should be kicked out of this industry, asshole motherfucker...

I have the proof and i will show how you rip people off with your fucking services.

pocketkangaroo 09-11-2006 04:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hagbard
Wow. you know what blows me away? The 2 dozen or so people who worked on that plane prior to takeoff without noticing there was a massive weapon strapped to it. I'm with you man, it's certainly more likely that all of those people, and everyone else who was on the tarmac, the air traffic controllers, the baggage handlers and everyone else there were in on it and have amazing powers of restraint - given that they would make MILLIONS if they told the truth - are just covering for Bush. It's certainly more likely than some hijackers going nuts on us. Kudos for making occam's razor your bitch man. You rule.

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Scootermuze 09-11-2006 04:50 PM

Don't know if it was a missile on the plane, but when they slowed down
a video of the wtc event, this pops up .. (watch the right side of the video)..

stickyfingerz 09-11-2006 04:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoodGuy
You will be banned from the industry as soon as I show the proof on how you spam people and steal others peoples work..

Not to name that you are a cheater.. and you should be kicked out of this industry, asshole motherfucker...

I have the proof and i will show how you rip people off with your fucking services.

Well you better do it quick. Tick Tock Tick Tock.

Dirty Dane 09-11-2006 04:58 PM


John69 09-11-2006 05:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scootermuze
Don't know if it was a missile on the plane, but when they slowed down
a video of the wtc event, this pops up .. (watch the right side of the video)..

looks like a turd, no explosion with this vid.

Dirty F 09-11-2006 05:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Captain Tender Thighs
Now it is time for my one hour warning. Tick Tock!

:1orglaugh

stickyfingerz 09-11-2006 05:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoodGuy
You will be banned from the industry as soon as I show the proof on how you spam people and steal others peoples work..

Not to name that you are a cheater.. and you should be kicked out of this industry, asshole motherfucker...

I have the proof and i will show how you rip people off with your fucking services.


T- 16 minutes

Dirty F 09-11-2006 05:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hagbard
Wow. you know what blows me away? The 2 dozen or so people who worked on that plane prior to takeoff without noticing there was a massive weapon strapped to it. I'm with you man, it's certainly more likely that all of those people, and everyone else who was on the tarmac, the air traffic controllers, the baggage handlers and everyone else there were in on it and have amazing powers of restraint - given that they would make MILLIONS if they told the truth - are just covering for Bush. It's certainly more likely than some hijackers going nuts on us. Kudos for making occam's razor your bitch man. You rule.

Its amazing how they simply ignore this.

Matt 26z 09-11-2006 05:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NoCarrier
An attack of that size, would need thousands of people.

How many did al-qaeda need? If you really break it down, the attack was fairly simple.

MattO 09-11-2006 05:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Overload
there was NO debris of a jetplane found in the pentagon !!!

Eyewitness accounts

Eyewitness accounts

Eyewitness accounts

Eyewitness accounts

Rundown of the Evidence

Rundown of Evidence

http://www.adultnuke.com/images/13.jpg
http://www.adultnuke.com/images/pentagon1.jpg
http://www.adultnuke.com/images/pentagon1a.jpg
http://www.adultnuke.com/images/pentagon1b.jpg
http://www.adultnuke.com/images/pentagon1c.jpg
http://www.adultnuke.com/images/pentagon2.jpg
http://www.adultnuke.com/images/pentagon3.jpg

It is interesting how conspiracry theorists like to cite "experts" but never give a link to a credible source, other than occasional references to fellow conspiracists.

I'm sure they'll see this post as a wealth of government planted misinformation and faked evidence, anything to keep their hopes alive that there is some massive plot behind it all so they can feel like they're smart.

Oh and here's a gem from Loose Change:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Loose Change Movie
"Rumor has it that over $160 billion in gold was stored in the World Trade Center." The film later refines this figure to $167 billion.

In 2001, gold was about $300 per troy ounce... At this price, $160 billion in gold would require 160,000,000,000/300 = 556,666,666 troy ounces, or in other words, approximately 19,085 tons... But it gets better than that. Gold has a density of 19.3 grams per cubic centimeter. 556,666,666 troy ounces is equivalent to about 1.73 x 1010 grams. At 19.3 grams to the cubic centimeter, that weight of gold would occupy approximately 897 million cc. At 1 million cc to the cubic meter, we are looking about 897 cubic meters of solid gold that was allegedly stored in the WTC.
By comparison, the total amount of gold ever mined by the human species is estimated at 410 cubic meters. Loose Change asks us to believe that the World Trade Center, at the time of 9/11, stored an amount of gold that is more than twice the amount the human race has mined throughout its entire history.

Taken from HERE

Eric 09-11-2006 05:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoodGuy
You will be banned from the industry as soon as I show the proof on how you spam people and steal others peoples work..

Not to name that you are a cheater.. and you should be kicked out of this industry, asshole motherfucker...

I have the proof and i will show how you rip people off with your fucking services.

Good bye! It is well known that making allegations without providing proof is against GFY rules.

Enjoy your vacation

bushwacker 09-11-2006 05:53 PM

www.fromthewilderness.com these guys r the ultimate conspiracy theorists

Dirty F 09-11-2006 05:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Captain Tender Thighs
Good bye! It is well known that making allegations without providing proof is against GFY rules.

Enjoy your vacation

:1orglaugh

Dirty F 09-11-2006 05:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MattO
Eyewitness accounts

Eyewitness accounts

Eyewitness accounts

Eyewitness accounts

Rundown of the Evidence

Rundown of Evidence

http://www.adultnuke.com/images/13.jpg
http://www.adultnuke.com/images/pentagon1.jpg
http://www.adultnuke.com/images/pentagon1a.jpg
http://www.adultnuke.com/images/pentagon1b.jpg
http://www.adultnuke.com/images/pentagon1c.jpg
http://www.adultnuke.com/images/pentagon2.jpg
http://www.adultnuke.com/images/pentagon3.jpg

It is interesting how conspiracry theorists like to cite "experts" but never give a link to a credible source, other than occasional references to fellow conspiracists.

I'm sure they'll see this post as a wealth of government planted misinformation and faked evidence, anything to keep their hopes alive that there is some massive plot behind it all so they can feel like they're smart.

Oh and here's a gem from Loose Change:



In 2001, gold was about $300 per troy ounce... At this price, $160 billion in gold would require 160,000,000,000/300 = 556,666,666 troy ounces, or in other words, approximately 19,085 tons... But it gets better than that. Gold has a density of 19.3 grams per cubic centimeter. 556,666,666 troy ounces is equivalent to about 1.73 x 1010 grams. At 19.3 grams to the cubic centimeter, that weight of gold would occupy approximately 897 million cc. At 1 million cc to the cubic meter, we are looking about 897 cubic meters of solid gold that was allegedly stored in the WTC.
By comparison, the total amount of gold ever mined by the human species is estimated at 410 cubic meters. Loose Change asks us to believe that the World Trade Center, at the time of 9/11, stored an amount of gold that is more than twice the amount the human race has mined throughout its entire history.

Taken from HERE

Funny enough these pics don't mean anything to these people. They just ignore it and continue with their loose change shit.

stickyfingerz 09-11-2006 06:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Franck
Funny enough these pics don't mean anything to these people. They just ignore it and continue with their loose change shit.

They tied all those jet pieces onto the missle with some barbedwire and ductape. At impact it evenly distributed it self in stratigically placed areas. Just enough to make it appear plausible that it might not be a plane. Too bad the Government couldnt plan it better and get larger chunks of the plane on the lawn...

I mean if I was faking a plane crash Id of used a real plane. Just me though. :winkwink:

Scootermuze 09-11-2006 06:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Franck
Its amazing how they simply ignore this.

I haven't ignored it..

Again.. it just brings up more questions..

The object is on the undercarriage.. It isn't on any other plane of that type..
So what is it?

Could be that the plane that hit wasn't the plane that left the airport..

I'm open to other possibilities.. feel free to bring em..

TheHatchet 09-11-2006 06:12 PM

I've been watching those demolition shows on the Discovery Channel for years. It?s interesting to see all the effort put into making buildings fall correctly insuring there is no damage to neighboring buildings. It just raises an eyebrow to how the 5th and 6th tallest buildings in the world fell right on top of each other from being struck by airplanes. Surely the damage created by the planes would create some sort of weakness on one side of the other, yet they fell perfectly. I know I'm no demolition expert, but it sure looks like one was behind it.:2 cents:

stickyfingerz 09-11-2006 06:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scootermuze
I haven't ignored it..

Again.. it just brings up more questions..

The object is on the undercarriage.. It isn't on any other plane of that type..
So what is it?

Could be that the plane that hit wasn't the plane that left the airport..

I'm open to other possibilities.. feel free to bring em..

Why must I always do other peoples research?

http://www.popularmechanics.com/scie...tml?page=2&c=y

Quote:

Where's The Pod?
CLAIM: Photographs and video footage shot just before United Airlines Flight 175 hit the South Tower of the World Trade Center (WTC) show an object underneath the fuselage at the base of the right wing. The film "911 In Plane Site" and the Web site LetsRoll911.org claim that no such object is found on a stock Boeing 767. They speculate that this "military pod" is a missile, a bomb or a piece of equipment on an air-refueling tanker. LetsRoll911.org points to this as evidence that the attacks were an "inside job" sanctioned by "President George Bush, who planned and engineered 9/11."

FACT: One of the clearest, most widely seen pictures of the doomed jet's undercarriage was taken by photographer Rob Howard and published in New York magazine and elsewhere (opening page). PM sent a digital scan of the original photo to Ronald Greeley, director of the Space Photography Laboratory at Arizona State University. Greeley is an expert at analyzing images to determine the shape and features of geological formations based on shadow and light effects. After studying the high-resolution image and comparing it to photos of a Boeing 767-200ER's undercarriage, Greeley dismissed the notion that the Howard photo reveals a "pod." In fact, the photo reveals only the Boeing's right fairing, a pronounced bulge that contains the landing gear. He concludes that sunlight glinting off the fairing gave it an exaggerated look. "Such a glint causes a blossoming (enlargement) on film," he writes in an e-mail to PM, "which tends to be amplified in digital versions of images--the pixels are saturated and tend to 'spill over' to adjacent pixels." When asked about pods attached to civilian aircraft, Fred E. Culick, professor of aeronautics at the California Institute of Technology, gave a blunter response: "That's bull. They're really stretching.

John69 09-11-2006 06:25 PM

http://thebiggestsecretpict.online.f...andinggear.jpg

http://thebiggestsecretpict.online.fr/nwo.htm
this can go on forever

MattO 09-11-2006 06:27 PM

If someone had the ability to stick a big-ass'd pod to the underside of a plane you'd think that they would also have the power to put inside the plane.

stickyfingerz 09-11-2006 06:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MattO
If someone had the ability to stick a big-ass'd pod to the underside of a plane you'd think that they would also have the power to put inside the plane.

Stop with the logic. :1orglaugh

John69 09-11-2006 06:31 PM

they did not need a pod, the explosives were allready set in place month's prior

stickyfingerz 09-11-2006 06:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by John69
they did not need a pod, the explosives were allready set in place month's prior

Sure they were. Everything was set in place..... :uhoh

pocketkangaroo 09-11-2006 06:36 PM

Does anyone realize that the guy who created Loose Change was doing it as a fictional story at first and only decided to call it a documentary after he realized it would get more attention and potentially more money?

He is the L. Ron Hubbard of 9/11.

MattO 09-11-2006 06:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by John69
they did not need a pod, the explosives were allready set in place month's prior


More like years if that were true. The largest building demo'd was I believe 40 floors and took 7 months of full-time preparation to drill and place explosives.

Assuming you were able to find expert demolitionists who are willing to murder and destroy for whatever cause they think they believe in, get these people into the towers without anyone noticing them, get them access to supports by ripping out the walls, then putting the walls back up in time for the WTC workers' arrival in the morning, running miles of wiring to the charges, setting detonators, then repeat for a very very long time, then hope that the large crew of demolitionists don't talk.

I don't think so.

John69 09-11-2006 06:50 PM

it was nice how building 7 came down, the video on that one is amazing!

Scootermuze 09-11-2006 07:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MattO
It is interesting how conspiracry theorists like to cite "experts" but never give a link to a credible source, other than occasional references to fellow conspiracists.

I'm not a theorist because I've never presented a theory, nor really agreed with any.. Just can accept the governments, "theory" as being the gospel..

Interesting how some people rely on a guy writing an essay as proof..

I gave a link to a credible source that showed flt 77 never departed, but that didn't seem to be good enough..

More experts? Maybe an Army general who worked on such scenarios..

Probably still not good enough..

American Airlines Flight 77, a Boeing 757, is alleged to have punched through 6 blast-resistant concrete walls, a total of nine feet of reinforced concrete before exiting through this hole.
It is physically impossible for the wall to have failed in a neat clean cut circle, period. When I first saw this hole, a chill went down my spine because I knew it was not possible to have a reinforced concrete wall fail in this manner, it should have caved in, in some fashion.
How do you create a nice clean hole in a reinforced concrete wall? with an explosive shaped charge.

Michael Meyer, Mechanical Engineer who spent many years in Aerospace.
Dang.. still not good enough no doubt..

Well.. how 'bout these??

Robert Ballan
Norwood, NY, USA
MSc & JD: Clarkson College
Chemistry & Law

Kevin Barrett
Lone Rock WI, USA
PhD U of Wisconsin
Islamic Studies
Walter Davis

Kent, OH, USA
PhD: U of Connecticut
Kinesiology

A. K. Dewdney
London, Canada
PhD: U of Waterloo
Mathematics

Derrick Grimmer
Ames, IA, USA
PhD: Washington University
Physics

David Heller
Berkeley, CA
BS: Physics Bard College
MA: S. F. Inst. Architecture
Architect and Builder

Annie Higgins
Gainesville, FL
PhD University of Chicago
Arabic Language & Literature

Timothy P. Howell
Upsala, Sweden
PhD: U. of Edinburgh
Computer Science

Don Trent (Four Arrows) Jacobs
Sequim, WA
Ed. D. Boise State University
Professor, Fielding Graduate U

Steven E. Jones
Provo, Utah
PhD: Vanderbilt University
Physicist, Brigham Young U.

Peter J. Kirsch
Western Cape, South Africa
MD: University of Witwatersrand
Forensic Pathology

Karen Kwiatkowski
Mt. Jackson, VA
PhD Catholic University
Lieut. Col. USAF (ret.)

Jerry Longspaugh
Fort Worth, TX, USA
MSc: Brooklyn Polytechnic
Aerospace Engineer

Brad Mayeaux
Kenner, LA, USA
Electr. &Tech. Inst. of New Orleans
Cellphone Engineer
George F. Nelson

Huntsville, AL, USA
FAA A&P Licence
US Airforce Colonel (ret.)

Ralph W. Omholt
Kirkland, WA, USA
AAPP University of Alaska
Professional Airline Pilot

Morgan Reynolds
Arkansas, USA
PhD: U of Wisconsin
former Chief Economist,
United States Department of Labor

Kevin Ryan
Bloomington, IN, USA
BSc Indiana University
Chemistry
ASQ Certified Quality Engineer

Nila Sagadevan
Laguna Hills, CA, USA
HBS U. of Edinburgh.
Aeronautical Engineer and Qualified Pilot

David Shayler
Eastbourne, Great Britain
Hon MA Lit. & Linguistics
MI5 (former)

Helen Stace
Perth, Australia
PhD: U of Sydney
Biology

Bernard Windham
Tallahassee, FL, USA
MS Florida State
MS Louisiana State
Statistician

Russ Wittenberg
Carefree, AZ
BBA U. of Miami FL
US Airforce Capt. (ret)
Captain for PAA & UAL

All found at physics911.net

But I'm sure that won't work either... Then again, I dount if anyone here will read much there because they would rather just say it's all bullshit.. :)

Scootermuze 09-11-2006 07:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz
Why must I always do other peoples research?

http://www.popularmechanics.com/scie...tml?page=2&c=y

Please don't do my research for me... PM has had to retract much of what was printed... The head researcher of that stuff is a cousin to the head of homeland security.. and the magazine has been labeled as becoming a propoganda machine..

Do that research.. :)

stickyfingerz 09-11-2006 07:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scootermuze
Please don't do my research for me... PM has had to retract much of what was printed... The head researcher of that stuff is a cousin to the head of homeland security.. and the magazine has been labeled as becoming a propoganda machine..

Do that research.. :)

boy thats some bs. lol

pocketkangaroo 09-11-2006 07:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scootermuze
Please don't do my research for me... PM has had to retract much of what was printed... The head researcher of that stuff is a cousin to the head of homeland security.. and the magazine has been labeled as becoming a propoganda machine..

Do that research.. :)

Can you show me where Popular Mechanics retracted much of what was printed?

Scootermuze 09-11-2006 07:29 PM

Oh dang.. forgot to respond to your eyewitness thing...

He was there.. he saw it.. soooo whatcha think?? :)

Thomas N 09-11-2006 07:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scootermuze
Please don't do my research for me... PM has had to retract much of what was printed... The head researcher of that stuff is a cousin to the head of homeland security.. and the magazine has been labeled as becoming a propoganda machine..

Do that research.. :)

Sure they did. They just didn't bother to take the original article down, right? Sheep.

Scootermuze 09-11-2006 07:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz
boy thats some bs. lol


Again.. do the research.. that was too typical of a reply from someone who hasn't done so..

Thomas N 09-11-2006 07:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scootermuze
Oh dang.. forgot to respond to your eyewitness thing...

He was there.. he saw it.. soooo whatcha think?? :)

http://www.debunking911.com/quotes.htm

Thomas N 09-11-2006 07:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scootermuze
I haven't ignored it..

Again.. it just brings up more questions..

The object is on the undercarriage.. It isn't on any other plane of that type..
So what is it?

Could be that the plane that hit wasn't the plane that left the airport..

I'm open to other possibilities.. feel free to bring em..

Those claims are completely untrue and have been thoroughly debunked.

http://www.911myths.com/html/757_wreckage.html

stickyfingerz 09-11-2006 07:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scootermuze
Again.. do the research.. that was too typical of a reply from someone who hasn't done so..

So the removed the article then right? :winkwink: :1orglaugh

pocketkangaroo 09-11-2006 07:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scootermuze
Please don't do my research for me... PM has had to retract much of what was printed... The head researcher of that stuff is a cousin to the head of homeland security.. and the magazine has been labeled as becoming a propoganda machine..

Do that research.. :)

Can you please show me where they retracted much of what they printed? You seem to be very into research and this should be something you could easily show the rest of us.

John69 09-11-2006 07:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SwordFish
Those claims are completely untrue and have been thoroughly debunked.

http://www.911myths.com/html/757_wreckage.html

where's the video tapes of this so called 757 plane ?

why did the FBI take all video tapes and not show the public ?


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:36 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123