Were would the adult industry be with out digital cameras ? - GoFuckYourself.com

SCOOTER · 09-09-2006, 08:58 PM

Man I Love my Cannon!

s2kcord · 09-09-2006, 08:59 PM

It would be the same.

MikeVega · 09-09-2006, 08:59 PM

they'd be scanning in playboy content like 1999 .. lol

Adult Warden · 09-09-2006, 09:00 PM

blazi · 09-09-2006, 09:17 PM

good question!!

GrouchyAdmin · 09-09-2006, 09:18 PM

Taking a hell of a lot less 'candid' shots?

..but seriously - dev time would take forever, it'd cost more to produce, and you sure as hell wouldn't have any daily blogs..

tony286 · 09-09-2006, 09:18 PM

you shoot with a cannon? Must get messy lol

DamageX · 09-09-2006, 09:32 PM

Yes, I mean WTF, how did they even take pictures, before digital cameras were invented? Shit, they must've had drawing artists put everything on paper meticulously, and each model shoot would take a week or two, in order to get a full 120-pic set... I mean, WTF where they thinking, not inventing the digital camera sooner?!?

Webby · 09-09-2006, 09:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DamageX

Yes, I mean WTF, how did they even take pictures, before digital cameras were invented? Shit, they must've had drawing artists put everything on paper meticulously, and each model shoot would take a week or two, in order to get a full 120-pic set... I mean, WTF where they thinking, not inventing the digital camera sooner?!?

Was there an adult industry before digital cameras?

Barefootsies · 09-09-2006, 10:18 PM

tony286 · 09-09-2006, 10:22 PM

there would be alot less amateur porn because the cost would too high to start.

cspdinc · 09-09-2006, 10:44 PM

we'd still be making money like crazy cause all the crappy sites wouldnt exist and it would be just those that really really were dedicated in the biz. Photography was a art form. Does any one know what med. format even is anymore?

I like digi too. its fast easy and lets you take those questionable shots becasue it doesnt really cost you a darn thing. But it makes for a lot of junk too.

so its good and bad.
But I'd say I quess I'd have to lean toward good. Its a quainty world versus quailty it seems.

And no I didnt spell check this....

Im just surfin between photoshop 3d work

Mutt · 09-09-2006, 10:49 PM

ATK, DDGirls, Suze and others did great with film. Film still gives a quality digital doesn't but there aren't many using it anymore - think FTV Girls might shoot some on film - or did anyway.

venus · 09-09-2006, 10:51 PM

Still using crappy webcams... check the date stamp on my webcam shots

Paul Markham · 09-09-2006, 10:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cspdinc

we'd still be making money like crazy cause all the crappy sites wouldnt exist and it would be just those that really really were dedicated in the biz. Photography was a art form. Does any one know what med. format even is anymore?

I like digi too. its fast easy and lets you take those questionable shots becasue it doesnt really cost you a darn thing. But it makes for a lot of junk too.

so its good and bad.
But I'd say I quess I'd have to lean toward good. Its a quainty world versus quailty it seems.

And no I didnt spell check this....

Im just surfin between photoshop 3d work

Someone who understands.

We used film before digital and it was a little harder to get it right, but it seems more of us did.

For those who can use film and shoot porn it would be great, for those who think they can it would be "Are MacDees hiring?"

SCOOTER · 09-09-2006, 11:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tony404

you shoot with a cannon? Must get messy lol

I don't shoot content - it's for family and fun.

Made me think, how it would suck to scan content for updates ..LOL

AsianDivaGirlsWebDude · 09-10-2006, 01:43 AM

I started my first web site shooting on film. What a pain in the butt! I didn't develop my own film, so the cost for developing was not cheap, and then I had to spend hours and hours scanning in photos.

Shooting on 8mm video meant having to convert from analog to digital, but that was hardly worth it considering the limited hard drive space and processing power of computers back then.

Of course, since most surfers were on 28k or 56k dial up modems, video was not much of a factor back then either.

God, I love digital...

ADG Webmaster

LiveDose · 09-10-2006, 02:41 AM

Interesting topic.

SGS · 09-10-2006, 02:59 AM

We started online before digital cameras. We used to spend hours scanning pics but when the first Nikon Coolpix came out and we used it for the first time it was a very special moment.

Grapesoda · 09-10-2006, 06:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cspdinc

we'd still be making money like crazy cause all the crappy sites wouldnt exist and it would be just those that really really were dedicated in the biz. Photography was a art form. Does any one know what med. format even is anymore?

I like digi too. its fast easy and lets you take those questionable shots becasue it doesnt really cost you a darn thing. But it makes for a lot of junk too.

so its good and bad.
But I'd say I quess I'd have to lean toward good. Its a quainty world versus quailty it seems.

And no I didnt spell check this....

Im just surfin between photoshop 3d work

that's the truth . . wouldn't affect me at all. I started with film and I can still shoot film . .

aico · 09-10-2006, 06:23 AM

Would be shooting on a Nikon F5 using Kodak 160VC & paying a buck a scan. Cuz that's exactly where I was before digital.

Quotealex · 09-10-2006, 06:26 AM

So you were online before 1991? That's when they started making them

Quote:

Originally Posted by SGS

We started online before digital cameras. We used to spend hours scanning pics but when the first Nikon Coolpix came out and we used it for the first time it was a very special moment.

=^..^= · 09-10-2006, 06:35 AM

i wish there were no digital cameras
there werent so many of us providing contnt and quality n dollrs were higher

our umax scanner cost 5 figures, and all photos were scanned from slides
video was a long process

but i miss those days like crazy

E$_manager · 09-10-2006, 07:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SCOOTER

I don't shoot content - it's for family and fun.

Made me think, how it would suck to scan content for updates ..LOL

I have Sony R1 for my familly and friends. I like it very much. And not costy.

Peaches · 09-10-2006, 10:06 AM

If there were no digital cameras and I wanted to make big $$$ in the industry, I'd be selling darkroom materials ;)

My brother LOVES to take pictures. Before digital, he'd take 1000 for every 50 he showed of his trips. When we were in Alaska he took over 2000 digital pics.

But now he's getting into antique cameras and is setting up a darkroom in his basement. You can really get some interesting effects w/o the use of a computer with the antique cameras

baddog · 09-10-2006, 10:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by venus

Still using crappy webcams... check the date stamp on my webcam shots

Webcams are digital

baddog · 09-10-2006, 10:10 AM

There would be a lot more scanners sold, that is for sure.

E$_manager · 09-10-2006, 10:44 AM

My friend took her old Zenith and sarted shooting. Amazing! She made great pics, not those that a small digit do/

09-09-2006, 08:58 PM	#1
SCOOTER Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2001 Posts: 4,010	Were would the adult industry be with out digital cameras ? Man I Love my Cannon! __________________ Scooter [email protected]

09-09-2006, 08:59 PM	#3
MikeVega Porntrepreneur Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: New York Posts: 12,788	they'd be scanning in playboy content like 1999 .. lol __________________ Mike Vega-ICQ:253868499-AIM:mikeydicevega

09-09-2006, 09:17 PM	#5
blazi Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Closer now Posts: 4,321	good question!! __________________ makingcoin.com - 100% payouts coinscuties.com

09-09-2006, 09:32 PM	#8
DamageX Marketing & Strategy Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2001 Location: Former nomad Posts: 14,293	Yes, I mean WTF, how did they even take pictures, before digital cameras were invented? Shit, they must've had drawing artists put everything on paper meticulously, and each model shoot would take a week or two, in order to get a full 120-pic set... I mean, WTF where they thinking, not inventing the digital camera sooner?!? __________________ Whitehat is for chumps If you don't do it, somebody else will - true story!

09-09-2006, 10:18 PM	#10
Barefootsies Choice is an Illusion Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Land of Obama Posts: 42,635	__________________ Should You Email Your Members? Link1 \| Link2 \| Link3 Enough Said. "Would you rather live like a king for a year or like a prince forever?"

09-09-2006, 08:59 PM	#2
s2kcord Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2006 Posts: 581	It would be the same.

09-09-2006, 09:00 PM	#4
Adult Warden So Fucking Banned Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Orlando, FL Posts: 1,822

09-09-2006, 09:18 PM	#6
GrouchyAdmin Now choke yourself! Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2006 Posts: 12,085	Taking a hell of a lot less 'candid' shots? ..but seriously - dev time would take forever, it'd cost more to produce, and you sure as hell wouldn't have any daily blogs..

09-09-2006, 09:18 PM	#7
tony286 lurker Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: atlanta Posts: 57,021	you shoot with a cannon? Must get messy lol

09-09-2006, 10:22 PM	#11
tony286 lurker Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: atlanta Posts: 57,021	there would be alot less amateur porn because the cost would too high to start.

09-09-2006, 10:44 PM	#12
cspdinc Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: USA land of the oppressed Posts: 724	we'd still be making money like crazy cause all the crappy sites wouldnt exist and it would be just those that really really were dedicated in the biz. Photography was a art form. Does any one know what med. format even is anymore? I like digi too. its fast easy and lets you take those questionable shots becasue it doesnt really cost you a darn thing. But it makes for a lot of junk too. so its good and bad. But I'd say I quess I'd have to lean toward good. Its a quainty world versus quailty it seems. And no I didnt spell check this.... Im just surfin between photoshop 3d work

09-09-2006, 10:49 PM	#13
Mutt Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 34,431	ATK, DDGirls, Suze and others did great with film. Film still gives a quality digital doesn't but there aren't many using it anymore - think FTV Girls might shoot some on film - or did anyway. __________________ I moved my sites to Vacares Hosting. I've saved money, my hair is thicker, lost some weight too! Thanks Sly!

09-09-2006, 10:51 PM	#14
venus Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Phoenix, Az Posts: 3,112	Still using crappy webcams... check the date stamp on my webcam shots __________________ Muscle/Fitness Adult Affiliate Program Since 1997 www.venuscash.com

09-10-2006, 01:43 AM	#17
AsianDivaGirlsWebDude Purveyor, Fine Asian Porn Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: San Francisco Bay Area Posts: 38,323	I started my first web site shooting on film. What a pain in the butt! I didn't develop my own film, so the cost for developing was not cheap, and then I had to spend hours and hours scanning in photos. Shooting on 8mm video meant having to convert from analog to digital, but that was hardly worth it considering the limited hard drive space and processing power of computers back then. Of course, since most surfers were on 28k or 56k dial up modems, video was not much of a factor back then either. God, I love digital... ADG Webmaster __________________ Asian Diva Girls - Exclusive Photos and Videos Asian Diva Girls Affiliate Program (50% ccBill Revshare)

09-10-2006, 02:41 AM	#18
LiveDose Show Yer Tits! Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Somewhere Out there... Posts: 25,792	Interesting topic. __________________ Scammer Alert: acer19 acer [email protected] [email protected] Money stolen using PayPal

09-10-2006, 02:59 AM	#19
SGS Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Mallorca - Nottingham Posts: 5,176	We started online before digital cameras. We used to spend hours scanning pics but when the first Nikon Coolpix came out and we used it for the first time it was a very special moment. __________________ See sig...

09-10-2006, 06:23 AM	#21
aico Moo Moo Cow Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Washington State Posts: 14,748	Would be shooting on a Nikon F5 using Kodak 160VC & paying a buck a scan. Cuz that's exactly where I was before digital.

09-10-2006, 06:35 AM	#23
=^..^= Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: ICQ 380-366 Posts: 6,935	i wish there were no digital cameras there werent so many of us providing contnt and quality n dollrs were higher our umax scanner cost 5 figures, and all photos were scanned from slides video was a long process but i miss those days like crazy __________________ #RememberYourRoots #AaronMForGFYHOF

09-10-2006, 10:06 AM	#25
Peaches Old broad Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Away Posts: 13,933	If there were no digital cameras and I wanted to make big $$$ in the industry, I'd be selling darkroom materials ;) My brother LOVES to take pictures. Before digital, he'd take 1000 for every 50 he showed of his trips. When we were in Alaska he took over 2000 digital pics. But now he's getting into antique cameras and is setting up a darkroom in his basement. You can really get some interesting effects w/o the use of a computer with the antique cameras

09-10-2006, 10:10 AM	#27
baddog So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: the beach, SoCal Posts: 107,089	There would be a lot more scanners sold, that is for sure.

09-10-2006, 10:44 AM	#28
E$_manager Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: pink adult dreams Posts: 13,557	My friend took her old Zenith and sarted shooting. Amazing! She made great pics, not those that a small digit do/ __________________ Enjoy more sales with EnjoyBucks! Homemade: Asian : Ebony : GFs : Voyeur : Nudist : Public : 3D