**Program Owners** Do you side with Xclusive Cash or Too Much Media - GoFuckYourself.com

BlueWire · 08-25-2006, 03:45 AM

Is there any private fraternity aspect of who you guys side with on this case.

I dont side with anyone yet; but i'll admit that I'm hoping that Too Much Media was in the right (had proof). We're in the software industry so i'm thinking maybe that is why.

John did something that everyone fantasizes about doing to a real asshole client. I however would personally never do anything like that nomatter how rude a client is.

devilspost · 08-25-2006, 03:46 AM

interesting

studiocritic · 08-25-2006, 03:50 AM

I hope NATS is in the right because the industry would be upsidedown if they went bankrupt in a suit..

Disclaimer: I'm not in *ANY* position to even speculate on TMM's finances.

BlueWire · 08-25-2006, 03:50 AM

Its like that seinfeld where jerry went and heckled the heckler at work

With that being said; if there was not CLEAR evidence that Xclusive Cash was shaving....Then John should have kept his mouth shut without question and most likely acted implusively.

On the other end....If they do have proof...then i really have a lot of respect for John.

Either way somebody made an extremely PRICEY mistake

BlueWire · 08-25-2006, 03:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by studiocritic

I hope NATS is in the right because the industry would be upsidedown if they went bankrupt in a suit..

Disclaimer: I'm not in *ANY* position to even speculate on TMM's finances.

hmmm...opportunity for a fellow software company?

Adult Warden · 08-25-2006, 03:51 AM

No program owner will side with either company...Its not professional for them to take a stance for either...They might feel one way...But they won't publically post it...Everyone will just have to wait to see how this fans out as far as if it goes to court or not...

studiocritic · 08-25-2006, 03:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlueWire

hmmm...opportunity for a fellow software company?

heh.. if you fill that gap, I *REQUIRE* you to implement some of my suggestions to NATS that they ignore.

I'll even pay for the labor.

BlueWire · 08-25-2006, 03:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Adult Warden

No program owner will side with either company...Its not professional for them to take a stance for either...They might feel one way...But they won't publically post it...Everyone will just have to wait to see how this fans out as far as if it goes to court or not...

Your lawyer isn't reading the board right now...so come on...tell me what you REALLY think

...just for shits and giggles

Paul Markham · 08-25-2006, 04:01 AM

IMO and to my failing memory;

John Albright did not have PROOF anything was wrong.
He suspected sompething was wrong.
He made a phone call.
He got abused.
He suspended their access to their stats.
He went to the boards.

Am I right?

BlueWire · 08-25-2006, 04:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham

IMO and to my failing memory;

John Albright did not have PROOF anything was wrong.
He suspected sompething was wrong.
He made a phone call.
He got abused.
He suspended their access to their stats.
He went to the boards.

Am I right?

I would say you may or may not be right. I dont think we know for sure yet. I doubt this will make it to court so we may never know

Kenny B! · 08-25-2006, 06:23 AM

There will be only one winner from all this, the lawyers!

08-25-2006, 03:45 AM	#1
BlueWire Confirmed User Join Date: Nov 2004 Posts: 4,628	Program Owners Do you side with Xclusive Cash or Too Much Media Is there any private fraternity aspect of who you guys side with on this case. I dont side with anyone yet; but i'll admit that I'm hoping that Too Much Media was in the right (had proof). We're in the software industry so i'm thinking maybe that is why. John did something that everyone fantasizes about doing to a real asshole client. I however would personally never do anything like that nomatter how rude a client is.

08-25-2006, 03:46 AM	#2
devilspost Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Tampa yomebe -at- hotmail Posts: 3,980	interesting __________________ Brothels and Escorts Worldwide.

08-25-2006, 03:50 AM	#3
studiocritic Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Irvine, CA Posts: 2,442	I hope NATS is in the right because the industry would be upsidedown if they went bankrupt in a suit.. Disclaimer: I'm not in ANY position to even speculate on TMM's finances. __________________ 254342256

08-25-2006, 04:01 AM	#9
Paul Markham Too old to care Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2001 Location: On the sofa, watching TV or doing my jigsaws. Posts: 52,943	IMO and to my failing memory; John Albright did not have PROOF anything was wrong. He suspected sompething was wrong. He made a phone call. He got abused. He suspended their access to their stats. He went to the boards. Am I right? __________________ Blowout deal. 880 videos, 2,400 image sets, plus many RAW videos. $500. PM me for a deal. Skype Paulmarkham70

08-25-2006, 06:23 AM	#11
Kenny B! Confirmed Abuser Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Montreal Posts: 5,717	There will be only one winner from all this, the lawyers! __________________ Kenny -at- YourPaysitePartner.com Skype: kennyb514 Do business with us: Your Paysite Partner Kenny's Pennies Sticky Dollars Radical Cash Indie Bucks Stand Ahead Read My Ambush Interview Here

08-25-2006, 03:51 AM	#6
Adult Warden So Fucking Banned Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Orlando, FL Posts: 1,822	No program owner will side with either company...Its not professional for them to take a stance for either...They might feel one way...But they won't publically post it...Everyone will just have to wait to see how this fans out as far as if it goes to court or not...