how does "ruthless tyrant" mean "terrorist" "

funny how one moment you are pulling out the definitions to teach "the trailer trash" as you put it and the next moment, you can't speak english.

you have to steer away from what Saddam was and shine the light on Bush because even in the state you are in, with the weakened little gerbils, spinning the shoddy, squeaking wheels of deductive reasoning and logic in your so called "mind".. you know you can't defend Saddam because he was evil personified.

and he was only "supported by western governments" because it was in their interest AT THAT PARTICULAR MOMENT IN TIME to support him. of course you dont condemn france, china, russia or anyone else for doing their own oil deals under the table, breaking all agreements under the oil for food program and filling his pockets with billions in cash, while he does nothing but build billion dollar palaces at the expense of his own dying people, creating a 15% mortality rate for children under 5... because afterall, they aren't "america" so they are ok.

in your simple mind, "interests" and doing whats in a nations best interest is ok ... as long as it isn't the US doing it.

This is good you are "learning this boy". I'm too tired to stay up. Have fun, although it is a little like making fun of the kid that wears the helmet on the short bus. Its not all that rewarding. I give up.

PleasurePays, you are okay in my book.

it does not.... read.


it means dictator, like Pinochet, Idi Amin Dadda, and so on


Terrorists: Kadafi ( now a friend , yesterday a foe ) , Bin Laden, ...

Dictator : abuses his own people ( you should recognize that phrase , lives like a king )

Terrorist: attacks and blow up targets in and out of his country ... does it for religious reasons mainly ( think Ireland )..

Stay tuned for the next teaching tomorrow.

If Bush fits the mold, why not ... because he is the teflon president ?

And I did not defend Saddam, I just labelled him properly .

Fuck your either dumb or blind ...

WESTERN COUNTRIES included the so hated France The UK, and so on ... Otherwise, I would have typed USA ...

You are pathetic ...

i am pathetic? i am not the one turning a blind eye to how the world actually works, defending an irrational view of the world with horrible logic and repetitive arguments that get shot down everytime you make them.

i am beginning to suspect that your one true goal is not to sway opinions about the US or Bush or to "vent" - but its just to kill pixels. i underestimated you... you're doing it brilliantly.

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh

terrorism dipshit, is using violence to sway political views, opinion and shape policy... ooops! you can call me an idiot... but then you would have to argue that the IRA was bombing London for jesus!

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Shot down .. you didn t even address them ....

If it makes you happy : Saddam was not a Dictator, but a Terrorist ....


Maybe he was also a STATE ....:1orglaugh

Really ....


BTW, Ireland did blowup bombs in London, but that is probably also hate propaganda.

You win, you are right, you are the smartest... after Degenerate :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

LOL... :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Go fuck yourself you fucking idiot, your fucking gov can't even touch me..

But they will investigate you due of 2257... :pimp

And, yes, your nationalist population should be destroyed and their women violated..

American soldiers violated asian women in Vietnam and killed them after that.

They did the same shit in Iraq

Now, american bitches should feel the consequences, i hope they kidnape bush girls and violate them.. FUCK BUSH AND FUCK YOU. :321GFY

Fuck you nazi. :1orglaugh

Did someone drop you on your fucking head?

Wow funny how you are on directfiesta's side... wow.... moron.

Nazi? LOL... I don't even know how to respond to that.... you are insane brotha.

Why do you rednecks automatically play that same card the minute you hear someone question our government?

As BoyAlley stated, Saddam is on trial for killing a handful of people, not "hundreds of thousands". Prosecution is unsure of what the verdict will be, and there are plans in place for what will happen if he is found not guilty (which is a good possibility considering the FACTS of the case against him). If he really did kill xxx,xxx people then don't you think such claims and supporting evidence would be made by the prosecution to lock the guilty verdict in?

Saddam himself does not deny that he was involved in the gassing deaths. His side of the story is that they got caught in the crossfire in the war against Iran. This is believable, especially considering the CIA gave him those very weapons to use on Iran back when we were on Saddam's side during that war.


He has another trial coming up after this one concerning mass graves that were found. It is believed these Iraqi's were aiding and abetting Iran in the war. In other words, treason, which is punishable by DEATH even here in the USA.

And before someone brings up the fact that the bodies of children were found in those graves, let me remind you that the US is the only major country in the world to send children to death row.

thats not correct in the way you are making it sound. he is being tried for specific crimes... not all crimes he ever committed. just because he has not been tried for other crimes or been formally charged and tried does not mean he won't be.. further, i doubt that anyone will see a need given the seriousness of the crimes he is being tried for, the penalties and the fact that the only real reason for the trial is for closure to victems.

trying a 16 year old as an adult and convicting him for a capital crime that he committed is now the same as rounding up families and children who were just in the wrong place at the wrong time and summarily shooting them in the face?

Odd in that same story it also said.
Thanks so much for clearing it up that ONLY 5,000 where gassed to death and 300,000 Iraqis killed during Saddams rule.

Funny how that killed the thread....

I can just copy and paste that until eternity. Proves the only point I tried to make on page 1.

trying to force a very different culture into our way of live is not ever going to work. people like degenerate would support anything as long as it was 'american'. can you say baahh?

I love:

1. New York
2. Our National Parks system
3. Our freedom to say what we want
4. Our entrepreneurial spirit
5. Our colleges, universities, hospitals, and museums
6. The fact that the internet was developed here
7. Our freedom of religion
8. Our generosity in helping other countries
9. Our current President who deeply cares about the security of our country
10. The US DOJ's policy on adult entertainment

OK, so scratch the last one.

THe article, that I posted and that nastynun quotes, says:

I will take the time to explain to you that Saddam , as a dictator, was in power, thanks to the backing of western civilisations, during 20 years or so.

So, during ( that is the word used and quoted ) those years, 300 000 Iraquis have been killed ...

FYI, there was a war with Iran , backed on both sides by the USA , war that killed most of them ...

A bit like if you attributed to Lyndon Johnson the number of killed in Vietnam ...

Anyway, obviously, you are not interested in facts ( none have ben brought up by your clan, but only with what makes you feel goog and justified to rape young girls, destroy a country, abuse prisonners, kidnap for export torture , and so on ...


So go to your local Walmart ( not so far from your trailer park shed ), buy a few Made in China Flags, and wish to liberate the poor Cubans or the poor North Koreans ... I know you really care for them...

:1orglaugh

What kind of stupid comparison is that? He also ruled Iraq longer than Bush did.