|
|
|
|
||||
|
Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
 |
|
|||||||
| Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed. |
|
|
Thread Tools |
07-22-2006, 10:55 PM
|
#1 |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Candy Apple Land :) EYECON
Posts: 449
|
Bucklin voting, Clone (voting), or Instant-runoff voting (IRV)
Bucklin voting (BV), Clone (voting)(CV), or Instant-runoff voting (IRV)??
Which system do you think is better?? -OR- Schulze method |
|
|
|
07-22-2006, 10:57 PM
|
#2 |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Candy Apple Land :) EYECON
Posts: 449
|
Procedure
Suppose d[V,W] is the number of voters who strictly prefer candidate V to candidate W. A path from candidate X to candidate Y of strength z is an ordered set of candidates C(1),...,C(n) with the following four properties: 1. C(1) is identical to X. 2. C(n) is identical to Y. 3. For i = 1,...,(n-1): d[C(i),C(i+1)] > d[C(i+1),C(i)]. 4. For i = 1,...,(n-1): d[C(i),C(i+1)] hahaha8805; z. If there is a p such that there is a path from candidate A to candidate B of strength p and no path from candidate B to candidate A of strength p, then candidate A disqualifies candidate B. Candidate D is a potential winner if and only if there is no candidate E such that candidate E disqualifies candidate D. Wikipediahahaha174; is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. Quotes are the worst.. Kid Wave /_\ |
|
|
|
