![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
![]() ![]() |
|
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed. |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: FL
Posts: 1,767
|
2257 now Adam Walsh Act? Hollywood off the hook?
Thu Jul 20, 3:07 AM ET
WASHINGTON (Hollywood Reporter) - The Senate could vote as early as Thursday on legislation that would increase Hollywood's record-keeping requirements for movies and TV shows carrying steamy love scenes. While the central focus of the legislation is the establishment of a national sex offender registry, it includes a provision that would require Hollywood studios to ensure that they keep records of the ages of the actors who pretend to have sex in motion pictures and TV programs. According to Senate leadership aides, approval of what is now being called the Adam Walsh Act is expected to come as early as Thursday. The House is expected to accept the Senate's version of the bill with an eye toward getting President Bush to sign it into law July 27, the aides said. More From Yahoo |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: FL
Posts: 1,767
|
I guess it's true. Business threads on GFY are useless.
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
So Fucking Gay
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 19,714
|
If I'm not mistaken, the Supreme Court already ruled on simulated sexual conduct related issues?
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: FL
Posts: 1,767
|
Quote:
"Also removed is language that would have subjected makers of movies and TV shows to specific criminal penalties for failing to maintain records of performers' ages." |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
..........
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: ..........
Posts: 41,917
|
good, all it does is help legitimize the industry. make hollywood a little closer to us cant hurt. shit the cores of both industries are within 10 miles of each other.
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: FL
Posts: 1,767
|
But it looks like the gov is giving a lot of favoritism towards Hollywood. Where is the FSC when it comes to these 2257 updates?
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
So Fucking Gay
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 19,714
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
..........
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: ..........
Posts: 41,917
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: FL
Posts: 1,767
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |