Why does the HUN post galleries like this? - GoFuckYourself.com

Brown Bear · 06-01-2002, 08:25 PM

http://www.22469.com/gallery/celeb015/thehun.htm

This was posted at the Hun.

These are video clips taken from major hollywood movies. This is 100% copyright violation. The Hun must know that, so why does he support it?

This really lowers my opinion of the hun, I've read some posts of his where he says some very intelligent things, but then I see him post shit like this and it makes me wonder what the hell is wrong with him?

Amputate Your Head · 06-01-2002, 08:26 PM

Pam suckin' Tommy's schlong was a major motion flick?

Brown Bear · 06-01-2002, 08:27 PM

AMP, have you heard of American Pie or American Beauty?

Amputate Your Head · 06-01-2002, 08:28 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Brown Bear
AMP, have you heard of American Pie or American Beauty?

nope.... enlighten me.

dipshit moron retard · 06-01-2002, 08:29 PM

why shouldn't the hun post it.

RedShoe · 06-01-2002, 08:29 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Amputate Your Head

nope.... enlighten me.

They are both movies.

Amputate Your Head · 06-01-2002, 08:31 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by RedShoe

They are both movies.

oh,..... okay..... so what was the question again?

why don't you ask the Hun why he posts it?

hyper · 06-01-2002, 08:33 PM

what angry the hun didnt post YOUR Gallery?

what he does is his business
what i do is my business
what you do is your business

take care of your business

Darkystar · 06-01-2002, 08:39 PM

It's funny to see that Hun posts the gallery in such a serious copyright violation and you think it's normal while you blame the other small guys for less serious things.
Ass kissers.

Brown Bear · 06-01-2002, 08:39 PM

Don't you guys care that he is supporting people who steal and cheat?

hyper · 06-01-2002, 08:42 PM

dude
it's his responsibility
just as it would be yours.

dont tell people how to run their business
just take care of yours

if he has a problem with listing that gallery. it's HIS responsibility NOT Yours.

Brown Bear · 06-01-2002, 08:42 PM

Yeah, you guys are totally kissing the hun's ass.

I don't like to see people supporting stealing content and cheating so I'm pointing it out to others. Meanwhile, you guys tell me to mind my own business.

Maybe I should go and steal some content and use it. Obviously the hun isn't going to mind.

Amputate Your Head · 06-01-2002, 08:44 PM

who's kissing ass? I don't see any ass kissing...

Fletch XXX · 06-01-2002, 08:46 PM

How was the movie?

hyper · 06-01-2002, 08:50 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Brown Bear
Yeah, you guys are totally kissing the hun's ass.

I don't like to see people supporting stealing content and cheating so I'm pointing it out to others. Meanwhile, you guys tell me to mind my own business.

Maybe I should go and steal some content and use it. Obviously the hun isn't going to mind.

that is your business.
if thats what you wish to do.. do it
i dont care.. it's not my business
just be prepared when some moron asks on GFY

"why did this guy use this content?"

hyper · 06-01-2002, 08:50 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Fletch XXX
How was the movie?

Darkystar · 06-01-2002, 08:52 PM

If we all mind only our own business there would be a lot more crap on the net like CP sites, sites with stolen content, rape etc etc and I'm not talking about real life.
how do you think most of these sites get caught and shut down?
People report them.
is it their business? no. Does it help the industry? yes
hyper when you mistakely hit one of these sites you probably think "Ahh these aren't my kids I don't care not my business"
That's trivial example, there are lots of examples in real life where we shouldn't mind only our own business.

hyper · 06-01-2002, 08:55 PM

then go report it..

its a simple solution

Darkystar · 06-01-2002, 08:58 PM

hyper you sound too narrow minded.
I was about to explain you why when posting this message but thougth you wouldn't understand a shit so I better save my time

Brown Bear · 06-01-2002, 09:05 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Darkystar
If we all mind only our own business there would be a lot more crap on the net like CP sites, sites with stolen content, rape etc etc and I'm not talking about real life.
how do you think most of these sites get caught and shut down?
People report them.
is it their business? no. Does it help the industry? yes
hyper when you mistakely hit one of these sites you probably think "Ahh these aren't my kids I don't care not my business"
That's trivial example, there are lots of examples in real life where we shouldn't mind only our own business.

I agree. When we see people stealing, hotlinking, using CP, etc... we should tell others about it.

The Hun should know better.

quiet · 06-01-2002, 09:05 PM

this thread uses the word 'business' alot.

pr0 · 06-01-2002, 09:06 PM

Looks like Kid Rock is posting galleries

dipshit moron retard · 06-01-2002, 09:12 PM

bah if it really isn't obvious enough: although there is no difference between pirated and stolen content in the eyes of the law, stealing someones set of pics or movies of adult content IS different conceptually and morally than cutting out a 1 minute nude scene from a mainstream movie that anyone can watch in any number of ways, dvd, hbo, blah blah blah. You steal someones adult content intended for that market you're directly fucking them, it's money comming right out of their pocket. A horny guy who wants to jerk it isn't going to wade through all of american pie just so he can spank it to the 5 seconds or so you can see of savari's tits. And someone who wants to see american pie isn't going to be satisfied with a 5 second flip of savari's tits. However, someone who wants to see an asian transvestite eat an amputee monkey will be plenty satisfied with stolen pics or those from a legitimate source in a very precise and exact way.
It has nothing to do with kissing the hun's ass and a lot more to do with:

Darkystar · 06-01-2002, 09:24 PM

dipshit moron retard I would agree with you if there were no banners at all on this page and guy wasn't making any money off it.
But he has banners on this page and he is making profit.
In this case I see no difference between stealing "an asian transvestite eat an amputee monkey" and mainstream movies.
Copyright violation in both cases.

Mr.Fiction · 06-01-2002, 09:25 PM

From what I read, in an article written by an IP lawyer, celebrity content is not illegal if you use only a small sample from a film, like a short clip or some captures, and if you make an editorial comment on it. Then it falls into the fair use category.

I have no idea if that's true, but it's the argument that lawyers representing celeb sites use, and apparently there is some stuff in the U.S. copyright laws to back that up.

However, that gallery really doesn't have any editorial content, so I doubt that they could claim fair use for that specific use. In fact, they're using celeb content to promote a site/product that isn't related to the creator of the content so it probably would be illegal.

If you have a problem with it, why not contact the guy who made the gallery, or the hun directly?

I nominate this as the weekly "mommy, look what the hun posted" thread.

Pipecrew · 06-01-2002, 09:25 PM

I got that exact gallery submitted to me and I denied it, thought the same thing as brown bear

hyper · 06-01-2002, 09:29 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by quiet
this thread uses the word 'business' alot.

umm its not?

dipshit moron retard · 06-01-2002, 09:30 PM

if you want to be anti copyright infringement in every sense of the word thats perfectly respectable. however there is a big market out there of surfers who would like to see a collection of naked famous people. where else can they go to get it? nowhere legitimately. someone will always fill this need, always. is it legal for them to be making money off this stuff? no. is it moral? all things considered, i think its a toss up. whos really being hurt by any of it? you can say "the adult industry's reputation", but gimmie a break, you know how much free advertising we've gotten due to the media broadcasting the fact that you can see so many celeberties nude online? you have to put celebrity sites in context, comparing them to joeblow hotlinker or whatever is like apples and oranges.

Brown Bear · 06-01-2002, 09:34 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Pipecrew
I got that exact gallery submitted to me and I denied it, thought the same thing as brown bear

Its nice to see that not all the people here support cheaters. Good job Pipecrew.

dipshit moron retard · 06-01-2002, 09:47 PM

brown bear out of curiousity, what do you think abotu all the surfers that want celeb content? do you think they should be ignored completely, or what? do you have a solution you wouldnt classify as 'cheating' ?

hyper · 06-01-2002, 09:49 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Brown Bear

Its nice to see that not all the people here support cheaters. Good job Pipecrew.

did anyone say or imply they support cheaters?
No

People just told you to mind you own fucking business
nobody gives a fuck cept you and whats his face

foe · 06-01-2002, 09:50 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by dipshit moron retard
bah if it really isn't obvious enough: although there is no difference between pirated and stolen content in the eyes of the law, stealing someones set of pics or movies of adult content IS different conceptually and morally than cutting out a 1 minute nude scene from a mainstream movie that anyone can watch in any number of ways, dvd, hbo, blah blah blah. You steal someones adult content intended for that market you're directly fucking them, it's money comming right out of their pocket. A horny guy who wants to jerk it isn't going to wade through all of american pie just so he can spank it to the 5 seconds or so you can see of savari's tits. And someone who wants to see american pie isn't going to be satisfied with a 5 second flip of savari's tits. However, someone who wants to see an asian transvestite eat an amputee monkey will be plenty satisfied with stolen pics or those from a legitimate source in a very precise and exact way.
It has nothing to do with kissing the hun's ass and a lot more to do with:

Im sure many people would wade through all of american pie to see 5 seconds or so of savari's tits

Brown Bear · 06-01-2002, 09:52 PM

I'm sure there are a lot of surfers that want celeb content, but stealing clips from hollywood movies isn't the answer.

dipshit moron retard · 06-01-2002, 09:57 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Brown Bear
I'm sure there are a lot of surfers that want celeb content, but stealing clips from hollywood movies isn't the answer.

do you have an answer, or even a suggestion? anything at all? what do you think should done with the current surfer who wants celebrity content?

Brown Bear · 06-01-2002, 10:00 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by dipshit moron retard

do you have an answer, or even a suggestion? anything at all? what do you think should done with the current surfer who wants celebrity content?

Here is my suggestion:

Offer them some legal celeb content.

If you can't find any legal celeb content to use. Then I guess you're out of luck.

Darkystar · 06-01-2002, 10:04 PM

dipshit moron retard if there is not enough narcotic for drug addicted people in your city would you approve guys who sell narcotic?

dipshit moron retard · 06-01-2002, 10:08 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Darkystar
dipshit moron retard if there is not enough narcotic for drug addicted people in your city would you approve guys who sell narcotic?

i think you missed the part earlier where i asked where the harm was? why waste a post comparing dicks to watermelons.

Brown Bear · 06-01-2002, 10:13 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by dipshit moron retard

i think you missed the part earlier where i asked where the harm was? why waste a post comparing dicks to watermelons.

Here is where the harm is:

Its a copyright violation. (ie: its illegal)

The person who posted that gallery does not own that content, and does not have the legal right to be using it.

foe · 06-01-2002, 10:17 PM

Ever think he just made a mistake the guy approves more than 100 galleries per day

Brown Bear · 06-01-2002, 10:20 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by foe
Ever think he just made a mistake the guy approves more than 100 galleries per day

No, I don't think he made a mistake because I've seen stuff like this on the hun before.

baddog · 06-01-2002, 10:24 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Mr.Fiction
From what I read, in an article written by an IP lawyer, celebrity content is not illegal if you use only a small sample from a film, like a short clip or some captures, and if you make an editorial comment on it. Then it falls into the fair use category.

This hardly falls under the category of editorial comment. It is a clear example of copyright infringement if the site owner does not have license to use it, which I would be very surprised if he does.

I have a feeling that the only reason it got accepted is because of who submitted it, and how much they pay thehun to get their galleries listed.

Just my

dipshit moron retard · 06-01-2002, 10:26 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Brown Bear

Here is where the harm is:

Its a copyright violation. (ie: its illegal)

The person who posted that gallery does not own that content, and does not have the legal right to be using it.

blah blah blah went over all this earlier, you people are so obtuse.

seven · 06-01-2002, 10:31 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Pipecrew
I got that exact gallery submitted to me and I denied it, thought the same thing as brown bear

Didn't know Ken submits to TGPs/MGPs where he doesn't buy slots on. However, I just saw owner of celeb skin on national TV the other day. He told the interviewer that he just cuts out movie clips off movies and I still don't see his site taken down

Maybe some loop holes we are not aware of?

Darkystar · 06-01-2002, 10:31 PM

img src The Hun

Amputate Your Head · 06-01-2002, 10:32 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Darkystar
img src The Hun

probly not gonna win "Idea of The Year" with that one.

dipshit moron retard · 06-01-2002, 10:35 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Darkystar
img src The Hun

you're smart

Darkystar · 06-01-2002, 10:38 PM

seriously dipshit moron retard if there is no direct harm in it it's still wrong.

dipshit moron retard · 06-01-2002, 10:42 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Darkystar
seriously dipshit moron retard if there is no direct harm in it it's still wrong.

img srcing people you disagree with is right however

duhhhhhhh. why talk at all?

baddog · 06-01-2002, 11:03 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by dipshit moron retard
if you want to be anti copyright infringement in every sense of the word thats perfectly respectable. however there is a big market out there of surfers who would like to see a collection of naked famous people. where else can they go to get it? nowhere legitimately. someone will always fill this need, always. is it legal for them to be making money off this stuff? no. is it moral? all things considered, i think its a toss up. whos really being hurt by any of it? you can say "the adult industry's reputation", but gimmie a break, you know how much free advertising we've gotten due to the media broadcasting the fact that you can see so many celeberties nude online? you have to put celebrity sites in context, comparing them to joeblow hotlinker or whatever is like apples and oranges.

all I can say is that you obviously put a lot of thought into the choice of your screen name with that response.

Yeah, there is a solution for the surfer that wants celeb content, get a fucking license to use it. Who knows, maybe Ken did, he makes a lot of money. If he did not, then he is breaking the law, no ifs, ands or buts about it.

SNOW · 06-01-2002, 11:24 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by hyper
dude
it's his responsibility
just as it would be yours.

dont tell people how to run their business
just take care of yours

if he has a problem with listing that gallery. it's HIS responsibility NOT Yours.

BRAVO BRAVO STANDING OVATION

06-01-2002, 08:25 PM	#1
Brown Bear Confirmed User Join Date: May 2002 Posts: 4,982	Why does the HUN post galleries like this? http://www.22469.com/gallery/celeb015/thehun.htm This was posted at the Hun. These are video clips taken from major hollywood movies. This is 100% copyright violation. The Hun must know that, so why does he support it? This really lowers my opinion of the hun, I've read some posts of his where he says some very intelligent things, but then I see him post shit like this and it makes me wonder what the hell is wrong with him? __________________ Surrender all your independent thinking and Click Here for re-programming.

06-01-2002, 08:26 PM	#2
Amputate Your Head There can be only one Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: Somewhere else Posts: 39,075	Pam suckin' Tommy's schlong was a major motion flick? __________________ SIG TOO BIG

06-01-2002, 08:27 PM	#3
Brown Bear Confirmed User Join Date: May 2002 Posts: 4,982	AMP, have you heard of American Pie or American Beauty? __________________ Surrender all your independent thinking and Click Here for re-programming.

06-01-2002, 08:33 PM	#8
hyper Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Mass Ass Posts: 5,294	what angry the hun didnt post YOUR Gallery? what he does is his business what i do is my business what you do is your business take care of your business __________________

06-01-2002, 08:39 PM	#10
Brown Bear Confirmed User Join Date: May 2002 Posts: 4,982	Don't you guys care that he is supporting people who steal and cheat? __________________ Surrender all your independent thinking and Click Here for re-programming.

06-01-2002, 08:29 PM	#5
dipshit moron retard Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2002 Posts: 667	why shouldn't the hun post it.

06-01-2002, 08:39 PM	#9
Darkystar Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2002 Posts: 273	It's funny to see that Hun posts the gallery in such a serious copyright violation and you think it's normal while you blame the other small guys for less serious things. Ass kissers.

06-01-2002, 08:42 PM	#11
hyper Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Mass Ass Posts: 5,294	dude it's his responsibility just as it would be yours. dont tell people how to run their business just take care of yours if he has a problem with listing that gallery. it's HIS responsibility NOT Yours. __________________

06-01-2002, 08:44 PM	#13
Amputate Your Head There can be only one Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: Somewhere else Posts: 39,075	who's kissing ass? I don't see any ass kissing... __________________ SIG TOO BIG

06-01-2002, 08:46 PM	#14
Fletch XXX GFY HALL OF FAME DAMMIT!!! Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: that 504 Posts: 60,840	How was the movie? __________________ Want an Android App for your tube, membership, or free site? Need banners or promo material? Hit us up (ICQ Fletch: 148841377) or email me fletchxxx at gmail.com - recent work - About me

06-01-2002, 08:52 PM	#17
Darkystar Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2002 Posts: 273	If we all mind only our own business there would be a lot more crap on the net like CP sites, sites with stolen content, rape etc etc and I'm not talking about real life. how do you think most of these sites get caught and shut down? People report them. is it their business? no. Does it help the industry? yes hyper when you mistakely hit one of these sites you probably think "Ahh these aren't my kids I don't care not my business" That's trivial example, there are lots of examples in real life where we shouldn't mind only our own business.

06-01-2002, 08:55 PM	#18
hyper Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Mass Ass Posts: 5,294	then go report it.. its a simple solution __________________

06-01-2002, 08:58 PM	#19
Darkystar Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2002 Posts: 273	hyper you sound too narrow minded. I was about to explain you why when posting this message but thougth you wouldn't understand a shit so I better save my time Last edited by Darkystar; 06-01-2002 at 09:06 PM..

06-01-2002, 09:05 PM	#21
quiet we'll miss you our friend. RIP Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: Fernie, BC Posts: 25,115	this thread uses the word 'business' alot.

06-01-2002, 09:06 PM	#22
pr0 rockin tha trailerpark Industry Role: Join Date: May 2001 Location: ~Coastal~ Posts: 23,088	Looks like Kid Rock is posting galleries

06-01-2002, 09:12 PM	#23
dipshit moron retard Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2002 Posts: 667	bah if it really isn't obvious enough: although there is no difference between pirated and stolen content in the eyes of the law, stealing someones set of pics or movies of adult content IS different conceptually and morally than cutting out a 1 minute nude scene from a mainstream movie that anyone can watch in any number of ways, dvd, hbo, blah blah blah. You steal someones adult content intended for that market you're directly fucking them, it's money comming right out of their pocket. A horny guy who wants to jerk it isn't going to wade through all of american pie just so he can spank it to the 5 seconds or so you can see of savari's tits. And someone who wants to see american pie isn't going to be satisfied with a 5 second flip of savari's tits. However, someone who wants to see an asian transvestite eat an amputee monkey will be plenty satisfied with stolen pics or those from a legitimate source in a very precise and exact way. It has nothing to do with kissing the hun's ass and a lot more to do with:

06-01-2002, 09:24 PM	#24
Darkystar Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2002 Posts: 273	dipshit moron retard I would agree with you if there were no banners at all on this page and guy wasn't making any money off it. But he has banners on this page and he is making profit. In this case I see no difference between stealing "an asian transvestite eat an amputee monkey" and mainstream movies. Copyright violation in both cases.

06-01-2002, 09:25 PM	#25
Mr.Fiction Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Free Speech Land Posts: 9,484	From what I read, in an article written by an IP lawyer, celebrity content is not illegal if you use only a small sample from a film, like a short clip or some captures, and if you make an editorial comment on it. Then it falls into the fair use category. I have no idea if that's true, but it's the argument that lawyers representing celeb sites use, and apparently there is some stuff in the U.S. copyright laws to back that up. However, that gallery really doesn't have any editorial content, so I doubt that they could claim fair use for that specific use. In fact, they're using celeb content to promote a site/product that isn't related to the creator of the content so it probably would be illegal. If you have a problem with it, why not contact the guy who made the gallery, or the hun directly? I nominate this as the weekly "mommy, look what the hun posted" thread.

06-01-2002, 09:25 PM	#26
Pipecrew Master of Gfy.com Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2002 Posts: 14,887	I got that exact gallery submitted to me and I denied it, thought the same thing as brown bear

06-01-2002, 09:30 PM	#28
dipshit moron retard Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2002 Posts: 667	if you want to be anti copyright infringement in every sense of the word thats perfectly respectable. however there is a big market out there of surfers who would like to see a collection of naked famous people. where else can they go to get it? nowhere legitimately. someone will always fill this need, always. is it legal for them to be making money off this stuff? no. is it moral? all things considered, i think its a toss up. whos really being hurt by any of it? you can say "the adult industry's reputation", but gimmie a break, you know how much free advertising we've gotten due to the media broadcasting the fact that you can see so many celeberties nude online? you have to put celebrity sites in context, comparing them to joeblow hotlinker or whatever is like apples and oranges.

06-01-2002, 09:47 PM	#30
dipshit moron retard Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2002 Posts: 667	brown bear out of curiousity, what do you think abotu all the surfers that want celeb content? do you think they should be ignored completely, or what? do you have a solution you wouldnt classify as 'cheating' ?

06-01-2002, 09:52 PM	#33
Brown Bear Confirmed User Join Date: May 2002 Posts: 4,982	I'm sure there are a lot of surfers that want celeb content, but stealing clips from hollywood movies isn't the answer. __________________ Surrender all your independent thinking and Click Here for re-programming.

06-01-2002, 10:04 PM	#36
Darkystar Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2002 Posts: 273	dipshit moron retard if there is not enough narcotic for drug addicted people in your city would you approve guys who sell narcotic?

06-01-2002, 10:17 PM	#39
foe Confirmed User Join Date: May 2002 Location: CT Posts: 5,246	Ever think he just made a mistake the guy approves more than 100 galleries per day

06-01-2002, 10:31 PM	#44
Darkystar Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2002 Posts: 273	img src The Hun

06-01-2002, 10:38 PM	#47
Darkystar Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2002 Posts: 273	seriously dipshit moron retard if there is no direct harm in it it's still wrong.