CCBill is getting crazy with the AUP Violations - GoFuckYourself.com

Jensen · 05-20-2006, 10:48 AM

Just look what I just recieved:

http://www.unrealbank.com/members/
Terms, Themes, and Marketing (Bodily Excretions )
Comment: url to sweet members (hosted bonus content from sweet money)

The above link is under "sweet members." The above URL contains text references to scat. This is a violation of CCBill's AUP. All references of this nature must be removed.

----

Are they losing it over at CCBill? Only ref to scat I could find at sweet members is this "It looks like scat, feels like scat but man its just chocolate!"...

Feel free to jump in Max.. CCBill doesn't like your hosted content!

Rosie · 05-20-2006, 10:51 AM

Glad it's not just us then - seems like CCBill have been all over eveyone's asses all week. I wonder if they've had their wrists slapped by their bank or Visa?

Jensen · 05-20-2006, 10:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rosie

Glad it's not just us then - seems like CCBill have been all over eveyone's asses all week. I wonder if they've had their wrists slapped by their bank or Visa?

I have no idea.. but I sure hope they start thinking again.. feel free to comment ccbill

Jensen · 05-20-2006, 10:58 AM

and now they hit me with another one: (this one is good people)

http://www.unrealpass.com/
Commerce (False Advertising ) I could not locate these sites. The tour must reflect the actual members content.

----

Christ, who is the idiot that is working over there tonight? Joint members areas are pretty common these days...?

xxxjay · 05-20-2006, 11:10 AM

we got the same thing

Screaming · 05-20-2006, 11:11 AM

thats not good.

The Ghost · 05-20-2006, 11:11 AM

**Knocking on wood...

So far nothing but smooth sailing with CCbill

Dagwolf · 05-20-2006, 11:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jensen

Are they losing it over at CCBill? Only ref to scat I could find at sweet members is this "It looks like scat, feels like scat but man its just chocolate!"...

Feel free to jump in Max.. CCBill doesn't like your hosted content!

That's a reference to scat. Who's losing it?

Jensen · 05-20-2006, 11:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dagwolf

That's a reference to scat. Who's losing it?

I hope you're kidding..

Jensen · 05-20-2006, 11:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xxxjay

we got the same thing

with the sweet members feed or the joint members area?

CCBillJames · 05-20-2006, 11:37 AM

Jensen,

If there are any questions or concerns you might have regarding our AUP, please feel free to contact us at anytime. We will be happy to discuss any specific site issues with you.

Regards,

Jensen · 05-20-2006, 11:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CCBillJames

Jensen,

If there are any questions or concerns you might have regarding our AUP, please feel free to contact us at anytime. We will be happy to discuss any specific site issues with you.

Regards,

thanks, replied to the violation email and haven't heard back... any idea why you guys would send out something as stupid as that?

Brad Mitchell · 05-20-2006, 11:40 AM

I'm very impressed with CCBill. It's not often you see companies in our industry doing their job so thoroughly! If 3rd party billing companies had always so thoroughly reviewed porn sites for fraud, false advertising and prohibited content then we would all be much better off today but because they would have been pro-active... and pre-empted so many chargebacks.

Brad

King Adam · 05-20-2006, 11:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CCBillJames

Jensen,

If there are any questions or concerns you might have regarding our AUP, please feel free to contact us at anytime. We will be happy to discuss any specific site issues with you.

Regards,

How did I know that was coming

Webby · 05-20-2006, 11:47 AM

Ah... this explains some weird ICQ's from a couple of other webmasters. Some of em have had sites running since the 90's and without problems.

Once again the lesson is - never trust any one processor (or anyone) with your total biz. (And that is not specifically addressed to CCBill, but *any* processor)

Solution? Let em resolve it quick or walk with your feet.

Jensen · 05-20-2006, 11:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brad Mitchell

I'm very impressed with CCBill. It's not often you see companies in our industry doing their job so thoroughly! If 3rd party billing companies had always so thoroughly reviewed porn sites for fraud, false advertising and prohibited content then we would all be much better off today but because they would have been pro-active... and pre-empted so many chargebacks.

Brad

Right now, any owners that link to sweet members and have porn passes are violating ccbills aup and that is pretty insane if you ask me. Giving people access to all the content instead of a single site should be a good thing if you ask me, how can that possibly hurt?

CDSmith · 05-20-2006, 11:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dagwolf

That's a reference to scat. Who's losing it?

You, that's who.

There's a big difference between talking about a thing and actually having that thing on your site.

Is CCBill concerned with mere words or with actual content violations?

andrej_NDC · 05-20-2006, 11:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jensen

Commerce (False Advertising )

What do they mean with false advertising? I don't see anything like that on the site.

Jensen · 05-20-2006, 11:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by andrej_NDC

What do they mean with false advertising? I don't see anything like that on the site.

me neither.. what they wrote: "once logged in, I could not locate these sites"

edit: all the content from all the sites are of course present and you've gotta be pretty drunk not to find it all

CDSmith · 05-20-2006, 12:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jensen

Are they losing it over at CCBill? Only ref to scat I could find at sweet members is this "It looks like scat, feels like scat but man its just chocolate!"...

That is utterly retarded of CCBill. The site ASACP talks about Child Porn, and has the words "child porn" right on their website. Does that mean we should all stop linking to ASACP?

Fact is, ASACP's site contains no CP, and the site here in question doesn't appear to have any actual scat content on it.

So what's the problem? Looks as though someone over at CCBill is the problem.

andrej_NDC · 05-20-2006, 12:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jensen

me neither.. what they wrote: "once logged in, I could not locate these sites"

edit: all the content from all the sites are of course present and you've gotta be pretty drunk not to find it all

weird, I hope you work it out with ccbill, fast

GoNe · 05-20-2006, 12:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CDSmith

That is utterly retarded of CCBill. The site ASACP talks about Child Porn, and has the words "child porn" right on their website. Does that mean we should all stop linking to ASACP?

Fact is, ASACP's site contains no CP, and the site here in question doesn't appear to have any actual scat content on it.

So what's the problem? Looks as though someone over at CCBill is the problem.

Good comparison. I would hit up someone at ccbill and discuss this right away beacuse it doesnt make much sense to me.

MaddCaz · 05-20-2006, 12:36 PM

hehehehehe

x3guide · 05-20-2006, 12:40 PM

Oh I hope they start thinking and allow fecal matter soon. What ken heppen if they's dont's. ?? NATS only o'rly??!?

Jensen · 05-20-2006, 12:51 PM

reply from ccbill (Emmanuel A)

"Unfortunately, our AUP does not allow any references to scat at all."

hitting james up..

CDSmith · 05-20-2006, 12:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jensen

reply from ccbill (Emmanuel A)

"Unfortunately, our AUP does not allow any references to scat at all."

hitting james up..

Tell him to change his ad copy from "scat" to "poo"

Jensen · 05-20-2006, 12:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CDSmith

Tell him to change his ad copy from "scat" to "poo"

hoping max from sweet members will be around here soon.. I sent him an icq about the thread..

Hinc · 05-20-2006, 01:15 PM

Yes. Seems theyhahaha180;ve gone through alot of sites this week. They had me change a couple of things too.

TheSenator · 05-20-2006, 01:24 PM

CCBill is in the small bus.

Jensen · 05-20-2006, 01:25 PM

ok.. I've had a chat with ccbill james and it seemes like the scat issue is up to max and sweet .. the false advertising issue will be discussed on monday within ccbill

tedwinters · 05-20-2006, 01:34 PM

or start the move the other processors...

Hinc · 05-21-2006, 07:44 AM

Its always good to have secondary processors ready.
But, wonder what made ccbill go at it so much, heard of alot of sites being contacted.

Choppa · 05-21-2006, 09:30 AM

No qualms here with CCBill, Hiya to Doug @ CCBill

maxsweet · 05-22-2006, 01:20 PM

Hey Jensen.. just got your message. From what I'm understanding the problem is with the text that's in your members area that links to our site? If that's the issue, that's easy enough to change.

If you guys look at our site: It's Just Chocolate there is no reference whatsoever to scat. This is considered a WAM fetish site

Or am I missing something?

Jensen · 05-22-2006, 01:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by maxsweet

Hey Jensen.. just got your message. From what I'm understanding the problem is with the text that's in your members area that links to our site? If that's the issue, that's easy enough to change.

If you guys look at our site: It's Just Chocolate there is no reference whatsoever to scat. This is considered a WAM fetish site

Or am I missing something?

its the text on sweet members (see the itsjustchocolate box) actually.. ccbill denies me linking to anything that has scat mentioned.. so its not on my site and they deny me linking to it..

maxsweet · 05-22-2006, 02:17 PM

Ok gotcha. Well its probably better that was changed for the good of all our affiliates. The text has been updated now.. check it out and see what you think

Trixie · 05-22-2006, 02:23 PM

Last year I had a frustrating experience with this type of thing by linking to Margaret Cho's blog (the comedian? gay rights activist?) which apparently CCBill blacklisted for using banned words. Here's more info:

http://tastytrixie.com/blog/2005/09/...garet-cho.html

I learned that it does no good to reply to those emails, and you need to go over those guys' heads to someone at CCBill who can actually make a decision otherwise you are beating your head against a brick wall. When I talked to someone higher up they stopped bugging us.

Another one of my favorites is someone who got a violation notice for bestiality because of a photo set where a guy was dressed as the easter bunny fucking his girlfriend.

Jensen · 05-22-2006, 02:44 PM

max: thanks for helping me out.. guess that "violation" is out the window

trixie: thanks for posting the blog.. do read it folks

05-20-2006, 10:48 AM	#1
Jensen Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: Norway Posts: 3,790	CCBill is getting crazy with the AUP Violations Just look what I just recieved: http://www.unrealbank.com/members/ Terms, Themes, and Marketing (Bodily Excretions ) Comment: url to sweet members (hosted bonus content from sweet money) The above link is under "sweet members." The above URL contains text references to scat. This is a violation of CCBill's AUP. All references of this nature must be removed. ---- Are they losing it over at CCBill? Only ref to scat I could find at sweet members is this "It looks like scat, feels like scat but man its just chocolate!"... Feel free to jump in Max.. CCBill doesn't like your hosted content!

05-20-2006, 11:10 AM	#5
xxxjay Tube groupie. Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: LoScandalous, CA Posts: 13,482	we got the same thing __________________ http://donttellmehowtoruinmylife.com/ - http://www.jmdigitalmarketing.com/my...s-and-reviews/ - http://www.wouldyouhitit.org - http://shinyobjectreviews.com/

05-20-2006, 11:11 AM	#6
Screaming I can change this!!!!! Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 18,972	thats not good. __________________

05-20-2006, 11:11 AM	#7
The Ghost IslandDollars.com Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Icq: 176176 Posts: 12,188	**Knocking on wood... So far nothing but smooth sailing with CCbill __________________ ISLAND DOLLARS 1000's of Exclusive TS scenes / Constant Updates Best TS Network your surfers will ever join

05-20-2006, 11:37 AM	#11
CCBillJames Registered User Join Date: Nov 2005 Posts: 74	Jensen, If there are any questions or concerns you might have regarding our AUP, please feel free to contact us at anytime. We will be happy to discuss any specific site issues with you. Regards, __________________ - James

05-20-2006, 10:51 AM	#2
Rosie Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Denmark Posts: 369	Glad it's not just us then - seems like CCBill have been all over eveyone's asses all week. I wonder if they've had their wrists slapped by their bank or Visa?

05-20-2006, 10:58 AM	#4
Jensen Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: Norway Posts: 3,790	and now they hit me with another one: (this one is good people) http://www.unrealpass.com/ Commerce (False Advertising ) I could not locate these sites. The tour must reflect the actual members content. ---- Christ, who is the idiot that is working over there tonight? Joint members areas are pretty common these days...?

05-20-2006, 11:40 AM	#13
Brad Mitchell Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: Southfield, MI Posts: 9,812	I'm very impressed with CCBill. It's not often you see companies in our industry doing their job so thoroughly! If 3rd party billing companies had always so thoroughly reviewed porn sites for fraud, false advertising and prohibited content then we would all be much better off today but because they would have been pro-active... and pre-empted so many chargebacks. Brad __________________ President at MojoHost \| brad at mojohost dot com \| Skype MojoHostBrad 71 industry awards for hosting and professional excellence since 1999

05-20-2006, 11:47 AM	#15
Webby Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Far far away - as possible Posts: 14,956	Ah... this explains some weird ICQ's from a couple of other webmasters. Some of em have had sites running since the 90's and without problems. Once again the lesson is - never trust any one processor (or anyone) with your total biz. (And that is not specifically addressed to CCBill, but any processor) Solution? Let em resolve it quick or walk with your feet. __________________ XXX TLD's - Another mosquito to swat.

05-20-2006, 12:36 PM	#23
MaddCaz Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Illinois Posts: 9,483	hehehehehe __________________ BigCocks.com - MatureWomen.com - Tranny.com - DrunkGirls.com - TeenGirls.com - MonsterCock.com and many more... Click here to see them all!

05-20-2006, 12:40 PM	#24
x3guide Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: lake titicaca Posts: 735	Oh I hope they start thinking and allow fecal matter soon. What ken heppen if they's dont's. ?? NATS only o'rly??!? __________________ Shomer fuckin shabbas

05-20-2006, 12:51 PM	#25
Jensen Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: Norway Posts: 3,790	reply from ccbill (Emmanuel A) "Unfortunately, our AUP does not allow any references to scat at all." hitting james up..

05-20-2006, 01:15 PM	#28
Hinc Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2004 Posts: 2,577	Yes. Seems theyhahaha180;ve gone through alot of sites this week. They had me change a couple of things too. __________________ webmaster @ adultlist. com AdultList.com - Directory Listings, Advertisements, Hardlinks Loasex.com - Directory and old school TGP - taking submits A few sales/opportunities: High Quality Guest Posts For Sale Network of Aged sites for sales. Get in touch on the email above for info.

05-20-2006, 01:24 PM	#29
TheSenator Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: NJ Posts: 13,336	CCBill is in the small bus. __________________ ISeekGirls.com since 2005

05-20-2006, 01:25 PM	#30
Jensen Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: Norway Posts: 3,790	ok.. I've had a chat with ccbill james and it seemes like the scat issue is up to max and sweet .. the false advertising issue will be discussed on monday within ccbill

05-20-2006, 01:34 PM	#31
tedwinters Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Montreal/Calgary Posts: 672	or start the move the other processors...

05-21-2006, 07:44 AM	#32
Hinc Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2004 Posts: 2,577	Its always good to have secondary processors ready. But, wonder what made ccbill go at it so much, heard of alot of sites being contacted. __________________ webmaster @ adultlist. com AdultList.com - Directory Listings, Advertisements, Hardlinks Loasex.com - Directory and old school TGP - taking submits A few sales/opportunities: High Quality Guest Posts For Sale Network of Aged sites for sales. Get in touch on the email above for info.

05-21-2006, 09:30 AM	#33
Choppa Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Webmasters send sexyads.com your dating traffic and live the webmaster dream!! sexyads.com = $$$$$$$$$$ Sexyads adult personals at their greatest since 1997 Earn $$$$$$ today and become one of the thousands of Sexyads Affiliates Posts: 4,079	No qualms here with CCBill, Hiya to Doug @ CCBill __________________ SexyAds: 10 years in business and still going strong. Become an affiliate today! Choppas ICQ: 283 090 747 Want to know more? [email protected]

05-22-2006, 01:20 PM	#34
maxsweet Confirmed User Join Date: May 2002 Location: Vangroovy Posts: 310	Hey Jensen.. just got your message. From what I'm understanding the problem is with the text that's in your members area that links to our site? If that's the issue, that's easy enough to change. If you guys look at our site: It's Just Chocolate there is no reference whatsoever to scat. This is considered a WAM fetish site Or am I missing something? __________________ Sweet Money - 9 Years worth of EXTREME EXCLUSIVE CONTENT Sweet Erotica - Your ONLY source for Pissing and Fisting Video Feeds

05-22-2006, 02:17 PM	#36
maxsweet Confirmed User Join Date: May 2002 Location: Vangroovy Posts: 310	Ok gotcha. Well its probably better that was changed for the good of all our affiliates. The text has been updated now.. check it out and see what you think __________________ Sweet Money - 9 Years worth of EXTREME EXCLUSIVE CONTENT Sweet Erotica - Your ONLY source for Pissing and Fisting Video Feeds

05-22-2006, 02:23 PM	#37
Trixie Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: near Seattle, WA Posts: 1,850	Last year I had a frustrating experience with this type of thing by linking to Margaret Cho's blog (the comedian? gay rights activist?) which apparently CCBill blacklisted for using banned words. Here's more info: http://tastytrixie.com/blog/2005/09/...garet-cho.html I learned that it does no good to reply to those emails, and you need to go over those guys' heads to someone at CCBill who can actually make a decision otherwise you are beating your head against a brick wall. When I talked to someone higher up they stopped bugging us. Another one of my favorites is someone who got a violation notice for bestiality because of a photo set where a guy was dressed as the easter bunny fucking his girlfriend. __________________ WebWhoreBucks: Girls, a guy and a tranny -- unique indie porn!

05-22-2006, 02:44 PM	#38
Jensen Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: Norway Posts: 3,790	max: thanks for helping me out.. guess that "violation" is out the window trixie: thanks for posting the blog.. do read it folks