Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Post New Thread Reply

Register GFY Rules Calendar
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed.

 
Thread Tools
Old 05-10-2006, 02:26 PM   #1
milambur
Mainstream since 2010
 
milambur's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,327
What if we paid for .kids?

What if the adult entertainment industry took the initiative to create a non profit organization that ran the .kids tld. We could make it a priority to keep commercial interests to a minimum and have the organization join up with the open source community to create informative and entertaining sites.

I think we need to do something to show that the adult entertainment industry care as much as everybody else for the welfare of children.
__________________
Alea iacta est
milambur is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2006, 02:29 PM   #2
Fresh
 
Fresh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: LA
Posts: 4,920
i disagree. I dont think we need to start a non profit anything to prove anything. Keep in mind the adult industry is the victim.
__________________


Promote ONE Legal Tube Site, Collect Checks from 19 Sponsors

Fresh Dave | Email: [email protected] | ICQ: 317160390


Fresh is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2006, 02:37 PM   #3
milambur
Mainstream since 2010
 
milambur's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,327
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave Guru
i disagree. I dont think we need to start a non profit anything to prove anything. Keep in mind the adult industry is the victim.
We saturate the internet with free porn, barely lift our finger to protect the children from it and we are the victim?
__________________
Alea iacta est
milambur is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2006, 03:09 PM   #4
Fresh
 
Fresh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: LA
Posts: 4,920
Quote:
Originally Posted by milambur
We saturate the internet with free porn, barely lift our finger to protect the children from it and we are the victim?

stay focused here. you are in the business of helping someone jack-off, not parenting someone elses children. If parents played their role as they should and jackasses didnt spam porn to children on Instant Messenger, we would be doing alright. The way i see it, if you are doing legitimate business, then yes you are the victim.
__________________


Promote ONE Legal Tube Site, Collect Checks from 19 Sponsors

Fresh Dave | Email: [email protected] | ICQ: 317160390


Fresh is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2006, 03:23 PM   #5
milambur
Mainstream since 2010
 
milambur's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,327
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave Guru
stay focused here. you are in the business of helping someone jack-off, not parenting someone elses children. If parents played their role as they should and jackasses didnt spam porn to children on Instant Messenger, we would be doing alright. The way i see it, if you are doing legitimate business, then yes you are the victim.
It's not about parenting, it about taking responsiblity for products that are harmful too children. We need to help the parents with the tools to protect children from our sites.
__________________
Alea iacta est
milambur is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2006, 03:28 PM   #6
L0rdJuni0r
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Cancun, Mexico
Posts: 5,883
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave Guru
stay focused here. you are in the business of helping someone jack-off, not parenting someone elses children. If parents played their role as they should and jackasses didnt spam porn to children on Instant Messenger, we would be doing alright. The way i see it, if you are doing legitimate business, then yes you are the victim.


i agree with you 100%
__________________
Affordable video and picture editing.
junior[at]jampackproductions[DOT]com
ICQ: 605429331
L0rdJuni0r is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2006, 03:30 PM   #7
=^..^=
Confirmed User
 
=^..^='s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: ICQ 380-366
Posts: 6,935
becauase if started a .KIDS then the pedos would have INSTANT AUDIENCE!!!!
makes it to easy for the sickos
__________________
#RememberYourRoots #AaronMForGFYHOF
=^..^= is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2006, 03:32 PM   #8
Major (Tom)
White Pride
 
Major (Tom)'s Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Null
Posts: 32,065
Quote:
Originally Posted by milambur
What if the adult entertainment industry took the initiative to create a non profit organization that ran the .kids tld. We could make it a priority to keep commercial interests to a minimum and have the organization join up with the open source community to create informative and entertaining sites.

I think we need to do something to show that the adult entertainment industry care as much as everybody else for the welfare of children.

I think its a good idea.
maybe if the asacp were more proactive with ideas like this, instead of wanting 10 dollar kick backs per domain on .xxx we'd have a .kids already and we could let the little children of the world surf a safe web.

Duke
__________________
WHITE LIVES MATTER
Major (Tom) is online now   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2006, 03:32 PM   #9
Big John
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Never never land
Posts: 470
Are you serious? You haven't thought this through have you? Can you seriously, for even one second, believe that porn producers would be allowed to manage children's Internet surfing?

Once the press have finished rolling about on the floor laughing they'd have a field day.

As was said - try to stay focused.
__________________
Big John is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2006, 03:34 PM   #10
NoCarrier
We need more free porn
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Montreal
Posts: 16,356
WE?!?!?

Who is "WE"?!

There is no industry coalition. Internet porn is all about individuals who think they are a big family because they have parties at conventions with naked chicks humiliated in front of fat webmasters taking pictures of them like savages.
__________________
NoCarrier is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2006, 03:37 PM   #11
FetishWeb
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 390
Quote:
Originally Posted by milambur
What if the adult entertainment industry took the initiative to create a non profit organization that ran the .kids tld. We could make it a priority to keep commercial interests to a minimum and have the organization join up with the open source community to create informative and entertaining sites.

I think we need to do something to show that the adult entertainment industry care as much as everybody else for the welfare of children.

Surely, a pornographer backed .KIDS extention will attract no heat from religious nut jobs, the average idiot, the republican party, and the Bush administration.
FetishWeb is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2006, 03:41 PM   #12
milambur
Mainstream since 2010
 
milambur's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,327
[QUOTEhahahaha^..^=]becauase if started a .KIDS then the pedos would have INSTANT AUDIENCE!!!!
makes it to easy for the sickos[/QUOTE]
I disagree, if implemented right it would be easier to enforce. As an example you could require stricter rules and monitoring for chat sites on tld lvl.
__________________
Alea iacta est
milambur is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2006, 03:43 PM   #13
Fresh
 
Fresh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: LA
Posts: 4,920
Quote:
Originally Posted by milambur
It's not about parenting, it about taking responsiblity for products that are harmful too children. We need to help the parents with the tools to protect children from our sites.

wow dude, you should work for ASACP or something. Im not trying to be a dick about it or anything but i know my role and i play my role to the best of my abilities. Parents should play their roles and do what they need to do to make sure their children are not exposed to porn. Like, maybe, WATCHING them for a fucking change. Just like they should not be exposed to alcohol or drugs. Same concept. It's Netnannys, Surfwatchs, Cybersitters, Cyberpatrols role make sure kids are not exposed. If i worked for one of those companies, I would be all about protecting the kids, but thats not my role.

I dunno, maybe one day when ive made enough money to focus on something that dosnt make me any money, protecting other peoples children may be a possibility. Till then, my focus is on what my role is.


and just for the record, I have 3 nephews and 1 niece that i visit on a day to day basis.
__________________


Promote ONE Legal Tube Site, Collect Checks from 19 Sponsors

Fresh Dave | Email: [email protected] | ICQ: 317160390


Fresh is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2006, 03:49 PM   #14
milambur
Mainstream since 2010
 
milambur's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,327
Quote:
Originally Posted by Big John
Are you serious? You haven't thought this through have you? Can you seriously, for even one second, believe that porn producers would be allowed to manage children's Internet surfing?
I didn't say porn producers should manage children's Internet surfing.

Quote:
Originally Posted by FetishWeb
Surely, a pornographer backed .KIDS extention will attract no heat from religious nut jobs, the average idiot, the republican party, and the Bush administration.
Doing something to address the concerns these groups have would undermine their attempts to rid the internet of porn.
__________________
Alea iacta est
milambur is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2006, 03:53 PM   #15
FetishWeb
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 390
Quote:
Originally Posted by milambur
Doing something to address the concerns these groups have would undermine their attempts to rid the internet of porn.


It would only strengthen their accusation that pornographers want to victimize kids. Possibly to the point where sane people might start agreeing with them.
FetishWeb is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2006, 04:56 PM   #16
milambur
Mainstream since 2010
 
milambur's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,327
Quote:
Originally Posted by FetishWeb
It would only strengthen their accusation that pornographers want to victimize kids. Possibly to the point where sane people might start agreeing with them.
Isn't it they who say the children are victims of easy accessible porn? And I think they are right. The only question is what to do about it. Since blacklisting don't work isn't whitelisting the only viable metod?

I think alot of people would be very glad to see the adult entertainment industry taking steps to protect children from porn.
__________________
Alea iacta est
milambur is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2006, 05:00 PM   #17
Alex
So Fucking Banned (YEA!!)
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 10,963
Quote:
Originally Posted by NoCarrier
WE?!?!?

Who is "WE"?!

There is no industry coalition. Internet porn is all about individuals who think they are a big family because they have parties at conventions with naked chicks humiliated in front of fat webmasters taking pictures of them like savages.


I like you.
__________________
Care about me?
Who?
Me!
Who?
Alex is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Post New Thread Reply
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >

Bookmarks



Advertising inquiries - marketing at gfy dot com

Contact Admin - Advertise - GFY Rules - Top

©2000-, AI Media Network Inc



Powered by vBulletin
Copyright © 2000- Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.