|
|
|
||||
|
Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed. |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,090
|
My .XXX post to ICANN
My post to ICANN. Post your own by emailing to: [email protected]
posts show up at: http://forum.icann.org/lists/xxx-tld-agreement/ subject: Reasons why .XXX TLD is a good idea With all the overwhelming posts rejecting the .XXX domain, I thought it might be good to have some voice of reason, some clarity as to why .XXX is a good idea. The .XXX TLD will open up the domain namespace. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Right now, websites have to be clever in creating new porn domains, concatenating words together, making them longer until they can find one that isn't taken. These longer names are harder to remember and longer to type. A urine fetish website can now get yellow.XXX that previously before .XXX, only a yellow pages website had the name. More and more porn sites can now open up, going for the names that were long-lost in the .COM namespace. There could be Muslim.XXX for Muslim specific sex preferences. Christian.XXX could be a porn site for the type that go to strip clubs on Saturday night, and church on Sunday morning. A .XXX extension will be an easy to spot warning for kids to stay away ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ When kids see the .XXX extension in a search result, their proper upbringing and parental guidance will be fully tested as the child will know not to even click on the link, for fear that mom would be watching and they would get less Christmas presents because Santa knew they were being naughty at looking at naughty websites. Those big warning messages about adult content and being over 18 to enter are just not clear enough for kids. Kids identify with characters like in cartoons, not lengthy legalese statements. .XXX would be like a cartoon character that tells them to be good boys and girls and to stay away because only big boys and girls should be looking in there. .XXX will stop the porn .COM websites ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Filtering software will be able to lookup the IP of the .XXX website and block by the IP. Since porn websites usually host many domains on the same IP, including their .COM equivalent, filtering software will be able to block them all. Some webmaster who decides that it is cool to get a .XXX domain and puts it on a virtual webhost like at GoDaddy (with thousands of non-adult websites hosted on the same IP) where he doesn't even have any porn pics, would all get blocked because his .XXX domain shared the same IP as others. Who cares if those other sites get blocked.. they shouldn't have been hosting on the same server as that deviant. Hopefully, the porners aren't that smart to catch on to this and won't put their .COM website on one IP and the .XXX website on another. The purchase of .XXX domains will help fund child protection organizations ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Some child protection organizations will be given grants/funding from the proceeds of .XXX domains to help with their laudable mission of protecting children. Maybe playgrounds and playscapes that are purchased with this .XXX money could have a sign put up that says 'Your porn dollars at work", or "This play area paid for by porn". .XXX will protect children ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone knows that the minute .XXX gets approved that every porn site in the world will switch to .XXX because it's the "responsible" thing to protect children. It is with this 100% shifting to .XXX, that filtering programs can easily identify a porn site since it would have the .XXX extension. No longer will websites that operate just on an IP number, or using other extensions or operating in countries that don't subscribe to US policies, cause problems. For once, there will be universal unity and agreement. Just by saying that .XXX will protect children makes it so. Better to tax the money making pornographers to pay for the .XXX domains than have non-porn websites pay to have a .KIDS TLD ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Since porn websites are making so much money, they should be the one to pay for the protection measures that .XXX afford. .KIDS would certainly be much more effective in its whitelisting approach, that only approved kid-friendly sites would get a .KIDS extension. But why tax the websites who already paid for their .COM domain names for the sins of the pornographers? The Robin Hood strategy of financing child protection is exactly what Senator Lincoln and other similar porn tax bills have proposed. .XXX will stop Child Porn websites because they wouldn't be allowed to get a .XXX domain ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ No one wants the Child Porn websites around, so those pedos will be excluded from .XXX and usually from .COM as well, since they use those free web hosting places to put their websites up one day and down another anyways. And we all know that its impossible to get a .COM name with the word Lolita or Beastility in it.. since that would just be too obvious what might be on that website, such that .COM registrars already offer us that level of protection. A .XXX registrar would allow us to all sleep at night, knowing they would be doing their jobs of making sure that the really bad stuff didn't get a domain name. .XXX will legitimize porn ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ With laws being proposed by Congress on the mandatory use of .XXX for porn sites, it will finally more "legitimize" porn, especially since porn is already "legit", but it's always good to have government approval. So the government will acknowledge the .XXX identifier and all those who don't like smut, won't be shocked the next time they visit an innocently looking .COM website and find porn. Conclusion ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- There are many reasons why .XXX is a good thing. There's something here for everyone. So ignore all those adult webmasters who are against .XXX Ignore the fact that one of the ICANN requirements for a TLD is that it must represent the wishes of the community, to have built up constituency over the group that the TLD presides over. There are many people outside of the porn industry who think .XXX is a good idea, so it makes perfect sense to use ICANN to corral them all into a virtual red light district and use the TLD as a way of controlling the content. Better to force one's personal moral and ethical standards onto another group of people, and the kicker, make them pay for that containment, and use the proceeds from the .XXX domain transactions to do good. For those that couldn't read into the satire of the actual commentary presented, the quick summary: .XXX SHOULD NOT BE APPROVED.
__________________
http://www.t3report.com (where's the traffic?) v5.0 is out! | http://www.FightThePatent.com | ICQ 52741957 |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
BANNED - SUPPORTING TUBES
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: I live in a pile of boogers
Posts: 11,913
|
you copied me word for word.
i am dissapointed. i've been had. going to buy Acacia stock now... |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Redmond, WA
Posts: 2,727
|
Sending sarcasm to them probably isn't the brightest thing you can do. Those guys ever do anything that gives you the impression they have a sense of humor?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,288
|
I love the tenacity you have man. Keep it up.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,090
|
Quote:
The comments posted in general, probably don't mean much to ICANN as a whole, but where it may matter, is the individual GAC members that have to weigh in on their vote. The points that I presented are ones that have been brought up in support of .XXX, and my satirical responses to those points actually hits the hot button nerve points of conservatives and religious groups, as well as international ICANN members. It is my hope that those voters who might be on the fence, will read my post, since all the rest are clearly against .XXX.. that they find some bit that drives the point home to them, where the satire is lost on them, because to them, a serious point may have been made that gives them that final reason to vote against .XXX Fight the humor-challenged!
__________________
http://www.t3report.com (where's the traffic?) v5.0 is out! | http://www.FightThePatent.com | ICQ 52741957 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
President, ePufferProfits
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,881
|
Nicely done, darling! ...At first I thought you'd finally lost your mind. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 334
|
Let me be the first to only read the first few sentances, and call you an asshat for supporting .xxx
But seriously, nice letter. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,090
|
Quote:
shhhh... i have Fight the insane in the membrane!
__________________
http://www.t3report.com (where's the traffic?) v5.0 is out! | http://www.FightThePatent.com | ICQ 52741957 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
So Fucking Banned
Industry Role:
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: the beach, SoCal
Posts: 107,089
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: In bed with Harley Girl....Not sleepin
Posts: 6,683
|
BUMP for the cause!
Post people....take your heads out of the sand, it wont go away until you help to make it..... .XXX = bad idea.
__________________
THE AMBUSH INTERVIEW |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,090
|
ICANN will be meeting on May 10th, to review .XXX again.
Some documents they posted up: http://www.icann.org/announcements/a...t1-18apr06.htm I just emailed my comments about an hour or so ago, and it's already posted there: http://forum.icann.org/lists/xxx-tld-agreement/ Fight the last minute rush!
__________________
http://www.t3report.com (where's the traffic?) v5.0 is out! | http://www.FightThePatent.com | ICQ 52741957 |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Too lazy to set a custom title
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Homeless
Posts: 62,911
|
I just hope that the people at Icann can follow what you were saying.
__________________
PornGuy skype me pornguy_epic AmateurDough The Hottes Shemales online! TChicks.com | Angeles Cid | Mariana Cordoba | MAILERS WELCOME! |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,090
|
Quote:
http://forum.icann.org/lists/xxx-tld...ent/index.html Here is the non-satirical version: The .XXX TLD will create domain speculation, duplication, and squatting issues. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- There are literally millions of adult domains on the internet already. Many additional TLDs including country TLDs and things like .info have been overwhelmed with adult names. Many seek these additional TLDs to attempt to profit from the names of existing .COM domains, and to mislead the public, search engines, and such. Confusion between the legitimacy of porn.com and porn.xxx would create new and overwhelming commercial issues for those who have create a brand on their .com domains, and lead to more and more domain disputes to be handled by authorities. It would also lead to another round of trademark disputes and other issues that could potentially overload the dispute ssytems. A .XXX extension will make it even easier for children to find porn ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- When kids see the .XXX extension in a search result, their absent parents, normal curiosity, peer pressure, and ragins hormones will have them clicking on the links faster than ever. They could type anything.xxx into the address bar of their browsers and be 100% sute to get a porn site. I can picture young teenagers in their room alone with their computers, finding new porn at every turn without any effort required, and with 100% certainty of hitting porn every try. .XXX will stop the porn .COM websites when cows fly ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Simplistic reverse lookups will not stop porn from appearing on .com or any other TLD. If the filter is by IP address, then you can be certain that adult webmasters will not have the .xxx and .com domains on the same IP. Further, there is no mechanism or legal process to move porn off of any tld, and any modification to the rules of the .COM TLD would surely meet with very strong resistance and reactions from those people who have invested heavily in .COM domains. The purchase of .XXX domains will bring a great profit to the TLD operator ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- While the TLD operator may potentially offer some money to "protect the children", the net effects of this new TLD would nothing more than a large and immediate windfall profit, by attempting to get the .xxx domain mandated and then overcharging for the rights to register these domains. Further, it has been made clear that many of the prefered "best" domains would not be sold on a first come first served basis, but rather in an auction type situation which could bring literally tens of millions of dollars to the TLD operator. It is a very unnatural process where adult site operators would be effectively force at electronic gunpoint to scrap it out for the .xxx versions of the .com domains they own, promote, and market. .XXX will just add to the confusion ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Everyone knows that the minute .XXX gets approved that huge domain speculation will occur, and not a single .COM adult site will disappear unless made the law of every land using the internet. If the US (example) requires it, then all those .COM domains will suddenly be owned in Canada or Peru or some other country, and will continue to offer porn. .XXX will do nothing but create millions more adult oriented domain names. US based free speech advocates would likely take this move to court, and this whole process could be tied up for years. There is no mechanism to force adult material onto a specific TLD, in the same manner that .org and country TLDs have little or no control over the content on those TLDs. Creating .XXX will not magically make porn move away from it's existing domain base, but rather will create more domains displaying porn as a percentage of the total domains on the internet. Better to tax the money making pornographers to pay for the .XXX domains than have non-porn websites pay to have a .KIDS TLD ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Since porn websites are making so much money, they should be the one to pay for the protection measures that .XXX afford. .KIDS would certainly be much more effective in its whitelisting approach, that only approved kid-friendly sites would get a .KIDS extension. But why tax the websites who already paid for their .COM domain names for the sins of the pornographers? The Robin Hood strategy of financing child protection is exactly what Senator Lincoln and other similar porn tax bills have proposed. .XXX won't Child Porn websites because child porn is already illegal. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Child porn creators and distributors wouldn't let a silly little thing like a TLD designation stop them from distributing their sick products. Very little of the CP in the world is actually on a domain anyway, most of it appears to be traded in chat rooms, through private websites, and email. There is nothing to say that they wouldn't register a .XXX domain, put an acceptable front page on the site, and bury child porn inside protected directories. A TLD does nothing to stop child porn. Child porn is illegal already. TLD changes isn't going to stop a single child from being abused. .XXX will move porn into a ghetto ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- AG Gonzales has already admitted that some adult material is protected speech. A TLD will do nothing to legitimize the already legit adult industry, but if every porn site went onto a .XXX domain, a porn ghetto would be created. It would take little or no effort for anti-porn crusaders to force some ISPs and common carriers to block .XXX domains, which would seriously impede free speech and in fact removed legitimacy from the adult industry. Don't think so? It would just take a group of strongly christian investors to take a controlling stake in a major common carrier, and they could use their financial influence to force that carrier to stop handling .XXX traffic. Worse, using misleading routing information, they could create apparent routes that would make it appear that a user could connect to the site, but in the end discarding all of the traffic or blocking the site. Putting all the porn in one place makes it very, very easy for these groups to take aim and disrupt legal and protected free speech. Conclusion ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------- There are few reasons why .XXX is a good thing. There's little here for anyone except the anti-porn groups and the companies who seek to profit from this new TLD. You cannot ignore the adult webmasters, this TLD will greatly limit their free speech and affect their businesses in many ways. You cannot ignore the fact that one of the ICANN requirements for a TLD is that it must represent the wishes of the community, to have built up constituency over the group that the TLD presides over. ICANN is not in the business of deciding what is acceptable and not acceptable content on the internet. That is an issue of law in the individual countries. ICANN should not even consider being the thought police, giving in to the anti-porn crusaders who seek to limit free speech where the US courts have already ruled nothing can be done. It is the equivilant of using zoning bylaws to limit adult businesses, running all the porn out of town on a rail to satisfy a small puritanical group that cannot accept the rulings of the top court of the US on the matter. Interestingly, the conclusion is the same: .XXX SHOULD NOT BE APPROVED.
__________________
http://www.t3report.com (where's the traffic?) v5.0 is out! | http://www.FightThePatent.com | ICQ 52741957 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,090
|
I just submitted this post to ICANN
subject: .KIDS is a better way to protect children In my previous post titled: "Reasons why .XXX TLD is a good idea", I made satirical commentary that actually expressed why .XXX is a bad idea. All joking aside, the .XXX TLD has been positioned and propositioned by ICM as "protecting children", but yet there is not tangible method or explanation of how that would actually occur. Blocking the .XXX IP in order to block the .COM IP is a swiss cheese solution, filled with so many holes. A web browser could block if it sees .XXX, or an ISP could do the same, but unless .XXX is mandatory world-wide, the "protections" are non-existant. Black List filtering methods are largely ineffective. The common methods to filter by filtering software today, is to create a list of known bad websites, and if the web browser is going to visit a domain on the list, then it is blocked. Black Lists are ineffective because they can only block for the KNOWN domain names. New domains that surface won't be blocked. Black Lists have to be highly maintained and is always a constant battle to keep up. White List filtering is 100% effective, because it works the opposite of Black List filtering. If a website/domain is on the list, it is allowed in. If it is not, it is blocked. Only websites that have been approved to be on a White List are accessible. .KIDS would be an international White List. IFFOR has defined many policies for .XXX that are perfectly suited for .KIDS IFFOR could ensure that only kid-friendly websites are approved for .KIDS This would mean that there would be disney.kids, aol.kids, etc. Any website that wanted to cater towards kids, would find the economic and marketing reasons to purchase a .KIDS domain. US CAN-SPAM laws can be amended to include penalities for emailing to a .KIDS address (ie. [email protected]) without proper opt-in by the parent (there are state laws being proposed and passed such as with Utah and Michigan that are attempting to protect children from email solicitations). The major defense against a .KIDS TLD by ICM, is that there is no money to be made from it. Besides that being a telling answer that .XXX isn't really about protecting children, there is an alternate solution. While .XXX is looking to charge $75/domain, it is not without reason that a .KIDS domain could cost like $125/domain per year. yes, it's a high number, but there are logistical costs of validating and ensuring that the .KIDS applicant is a good one. Also, there wouldn't be millions of .KIDS domains, but a sufficient quantity to cover the costs of operations. If ICM feels that the expense to running .KIDS is too great, that there is more profit in .XXX, then the answer is simple. Allow Network Solutions to administer and maintain the .KIDS TLD Network Solutions already has the infrastructure in place, that the .KIDS TLD should not impact it. The IFFOR component of ICM's proposal could still be applied, having child protection experts be on the board, maintaing the integrity of the .KIDS TLD, etc. where IFFOR can service Network Solutions. Another solution, though more drastic, is that if ICANN is failing to serve the needs of ALL internet communities, and choosing to IMPOSE .XXX on the adult online entertainment community that DOESN'T WANT IT, then it seems clear that ICANN has lost touch with reality and with the international members, that maybe the ICANN duties should just be rolled in under the United Nations. -brandon Fight the .XXX!
__________________
http://www.t3report.com (where's the traffic?) v5.0 is out! | http://www.FightThePatent.com | ICQ 52741957 |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,090
|
bump. more posters needed to ICANN to make it very clear, there is an overwhelming show of NON-SUPPORT for .XXX
Fight the divided we fall!
__________________
http://www.t3report.com (where's the traffic?) v5.0 is out! | http://www.FightThePatent.com | ICQ 52741957 |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 212
|
alot of people support it
__________________
![]() See how woman just give me their Money! you too can make easy money with GGWCash. join off my sig and get a free GGW Trucker hat or shirt now! http://www.ggwcash.com/?wmid=957 Also when you get a chance check out www.PornoPushers.com ICQ: 161759738 AIM:RemoteRoger |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: In bed with Harley Girl....Not sleepin
Posts: 6,683
|
Quote:
http://forum.icann.org/lists/xxx-tld-agreement/ Who in there right mind would support this? unless they will make so much money, then i guess its ok, to sell us down the river? ![]()
__________________
THE AMBUSH INTERVIEW |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
CHECK MY SIG-AMAZING SITE
Join Date: May 2006
Location: ICQ: 210-874-419
Posts: 12,870
|
They all work fine for me....
|
|
|
|