Cloning - GoFuckYourself.com

mrkris · 04-16-2006, 12:37 PM

If we successfully cloned a human, what do you think would happen to the world? How would religious zealots deal with it? I was just reading a magazine that had an article about the progression of cloning and the only reason we haven't cloned humans is because of 'ethical' concerns. I think the only way, with how our governments are run by religious nazis, is if it is done underground then brought to the public after success. Opinions?

Twisted Dave · 04-16-2006, 12:39 PM

Don't care ...

As long as we're not doing it for evil ... like ... you know, cloning drones for armies... :P

smashface · 04-16-2006, 12:41 PM

I can see the need for creating limbs and other parts but other than to say that we can, what is the need to clone a human?

grumpy · 04-16-2006, 12:42 PM

wow, nice sigs.
And you guys dont know eachother and NO you are not
bumbing eachother threads

mrkris · 04-16-2006, 12:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by grumpy

wow, nice sigs.
And you guys dont know eachother and NO you are not
bumbing eachother threads

Bumping* -- Our sigs have nothing to do with this thread, he's a friend, perhaps you should get one.

dissipate · 04-16-2006, 12:45 PM

I don't see the need to clone humans. You just simply shouldn't mess with nature like that.

mrkris · 04-16-2006, 12:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dissipate

I don't see the need to clone humans. You just simply shouldn't mess with nature like that.

Why not?

MarkMan · 04-16-2006, 12:55 PM

what would make your clone less human then you?

and if your answer is nothing.. then why should he/she be killed for parts for you and not you cut for parts for him/her?

and if you clone not for parts .. then why do it? whats the need

pornguy · 04-16-2006, 12:59 PM

The problem with the cloning, is that there is really no way to control it, and eventually it WILL get out of hand. in some aspects I agree with not cloning a human. But I also see the need to be able to clone an EXACT match of a heart, or liver. etc.

mrkris · 04-16-2006, 01:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MarkMan

what would make your clone less human then you?

and if your answer is nothing.. then why should he/she be killed for parts for you and not you cut for parts for him/her?

and if you clone not for parts .. then why do it? whats the need

Being able to clone would mean we have the given technology to make changes. They would be able to remove flaws such as cancer or diabetes from newborns, guarantee someone has a child with blonde hair and blue eyes. There are unlimited possibilities.

mrkris · 04-16-2006, 01:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pornguy

The problem with the cloning, is that there is really no way to control it, and eventually it WILL get out of hand. in some aspects I agree with not cloning a human. But I also see the need to be able to clone an EXACT match of a heart, or liver. etc.

I agree, the success rate of transplants is not what it should be.

dissipate · 04-16-2006, 01:04 PM

Have you ever seen the movie "the island"

smashface · 04-16-2006, 01:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mrkris

Being able to clone would mean we have the given technology to make changes. They would be able to remove flaws such as cancer or diabetes from newborns, guarantee someone has a child with blonde hair and blue eyes. There are unlimited possibilities.

I think Hitler had the same thing in mind, as far as the blonde hair/blue eyes. As for unlimited possibilities, that is what exists in nature although lesser traits are forced out.

elitetec · 04-16-2006, 01:27 PM

But there could show up some crazy scientist that will clone people, like create a Frankenstein

mrkris · 04-16-2006, 01:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by smashface

I think Hitler had the same thing in mind, as far as the blonde hair/blue eyes. As for unlimited possibilities, that is what exists in nature although lesser traits are forced out.

Blonde hair and blue eyes was just an example

as for nature, I agree, but humans are naturally lazy and impatient.

mrkris · 04-16-2006, 01:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by elitetec

But there could show up some crazy scientist that will clone people, like create a Frankenstein

Mary Shelley's Frankenstein or Van Helsing Frankenstein?

smashface · 04-16-2006, 10:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mrkris

Mary Shelley's Frankenstein or Van Helsing Frankenstein?

Id prefer Mel Brooks' Young Frankenstein

SlamDesigns · 04-17-2006, 12:10 AM

I am totally against cloning...unless I can get a sample of Raven Riley's DNA.

JD · 04-17-2006, 12:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SlamDesigns

I am totally against cloning...unless I can get a sample of Raven Riley's DNA.

or Gianna from BTRA

reynold · 04-17-2006, 01:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dissipate

Have you ever seen the movie "the island"

I saw that film and I like it but I just don't like the ending.

04-16-2006, 12:37 PM	#1
mrkris Confirmed User Join Date: May 2005 Posts: 2,737	Cloning If we successfully cloned a human, what do you think would happen to the world? How would religious zealots deal with it? I was just reading a magazine that had an article about the progression of cloning and the only reason we haven't cloned humans is because of 'ethical' concerns. I think the only way, with how our governments are run by religious nazis, is if it is done underground then brought to the public after success. Opinions? __________________ PHP-MySQL-Rails \| ICQ: 342500546

04-16-2006, 12:39 PM	#2
Twisted Dave Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2006 Posts: 3,635	Don't care ... As long as we're not doing it for evil ... like ... you know, cloning drones for armies... :P __________________ Custom Cartoon Mascots - ICQ: 243355699, Email: [email protected] or Click Sig - 15% referrals. Send me clients, make money!

04-16-2006, 12:42 PM	#4
grumpy Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Holland Posts: 9,870	wow, nice sigs. And you guys dont know eachother and NO you are not bumbing eachother threads __________________ Don't let greediness blur your vision \| You gotta let some shit slide icq - 441-456-888

04-16-2006, 12:59 PM	#9
pornguy Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Homeless Posts: 62,911	The problem with the cloning, is that there is really no way to control it, and eventually it WILL get out of hand. in some aspects I agree with not cloning a human. But I also see the need to be able to clone an EXACT match of a heart, or liver. etc. __________________ PornGuy skype me pornguy_epic AmateurDough The Hottes Shemales online! TChicks.com \| Angeles Cid \| Mariana Cordoba \| MAILERS WELCOME!

04-16-2006, 01:27 PM	#14
elitetec Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: New York Posts: 4,944	But there could show up some crazy scientist that will clone people, like create a Frankenstein __________________ Add Your Site To My PR4 Blog Selling Sig ICQ-200636146

04-16-2006, 12:41 PM	#3
smashface Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: San Francisco, California Posts: 991	I can see the need for creating limbs and other parts but other than to say that we can, what is the need to clone a human?

04-16-2006, 12:45 PM	#6
dissipate The Dirty Frenchman Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Lost Angeles Posts: 8,904	I don't see the need to clone humans. You just simply shouldn't mess with nature like that.

04-16-2006, 12:55 PM	#8
MarkMan Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Money Land Posts: 1,370	what would make your clone less human then you? and if your answer is nothing.. then why should he/she be killed for parts for you and not you cut for parts for him/her? and if you clone not for parts .. then why do it? whats the need

04-16-2006, 01:04 PM	#12
dissipate The Dirty Frenchman Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Lost Angeles Posts: 8,904	Have you ever seen the movie "the island"

04-17-2006, 12:10 AM	#18
SlamDesigns Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 2,339	I am totally against cloning...unless I can get a sample of Raven Riley's DNA.