GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Cloning (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=598725)

mrkris 04-16-2006 12:37 PM

Cloning
 
If we successfully cloned a human, what do you think would happen to the world? How would religious zealots deal with it? I was just reading a magazine that had an article about the progression of cloning and the only reason we haven't cloned humans is because of 'ethical' concerns. I think the only way, with how our governments are run by religious nazis, is if it is done underground then brought to the public after success. Opinions?

Twisted Dave 04-16-2006 12:39 PM

Don't care ... :) As long as we're not doing it for evil ... like ... you know, cloning drones for armies... :P

smashface 04-16-2006 12:41 PM

I can see the need for creating limbs and other parts but other than to say that we can, what is the need to clone a human?

grumpy 04-16-2006 12:42 PM

wow, nice sigs.
And you guys dont know eachother and NO you are not
bumbing eachother threads :321GFY

mrkris 04-16-2006 12:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by grumpy
wow, nice sigs.
And you guys dont know eachother and NO you are not
bumbing eachother threads :321GFY

Bumping* -- Our sigs have nothing to do with this thread, he's a friend, perhaps you should get one. :321GFY

dissipate 04-16-2006 12:45 PM

I don't see the need to clone humans. You just simply shouldn't mess with nature like that.

mrkris 04-16-2006 12:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dissipate
I don't see the need to clone humans. You just simply shouldn't mess with nature like that.

Why not?

MarkMan 04-16-2006 12:55 PM

what would make your clone less human then you?

and if your answer is nothing.. then why should he/she be killed for parts for you and not you cut for parts for him/her?

and if you clone not for parts .. then why do it? whats the need

pornguy 04-16-2006 12:59 PM

The problem with the cloning, is that there is really no way to control it, and eventually it WILL get out of hand. in some aspects I agree with not cloning a human. But I also see the need to be able to clone an EXACT match of a heart, or liver. etc.

mrkris 04-16-2006 01:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MarkMan
what would make your clone less human then you?

and if your answer is nothing.. then why should he/she be killed for parts for you and not you cut for parts for him/her?

and if you clone not for parts .. then why do it? whats the need

Being able to clone would mean we have the given technology to make changes. They would be able to remove flaws such as cancer or diabetes from newborns, guarantee someone has a child with blonde hair and blue eyes. There are unlimited possibilities.

mrkris 04-16-2006 01:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pornguy
The problem with the cloning, is that there is really no way to control it, and eventually it WILL get out of hand. in some aspects I agree with not cloning a human. But I also see the need to be able to clone an EXACT match of a heart, or liver. etc.

I agree, the success rate of transplants is not what it should be.

dissipate 04-16-2006 01:04 PM

Have you ever seen the movie "the island"

smashface 04-16-2006 01:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mrkris
Being able to clone would mean we have the given technology to make changes. They would be able to remove flaws such as cancer or diabetes from newborns, guarantee someone has a child with blonde hair and blue eyes. There are unlimited possibilities.

I think Hitler had the same thing in mind, as far as the blonde hair/blue eyes. As for unlimited possibilities, that is what exists in nature although lesser traits are forced out.

elitetec 04-16-2006 01:27 PM

But there could show up some crazy scientist that will clone people, like create a Frankenstein

mrkris 04-16-2006 01:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by smashface
I think Hitler had the same thing in mind, as far as the blonde hair/blue eyes. As for unlimited possibilities, that is what exists in nature although lesser traits are forced out.

Blonde hair and blue eyes was just an example :winkwink: as for nature, I agree, but humans are naturally lazy and impatient.

mrkris 04-16-2006 01:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by elitetec
But there could show up some crazy scientist that will clone people, like create a Frankenstein

Mary Shelley's Frankenstein or Van Helsing Frankenstein? :1orglaugh

smashface 04-16-2006 10:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mrkris
Mary Shelley's Frankenstein or Van Helsing Frankenstein? :1orglaugh

Id prefer Mel Brooks' Young Frankenstein

SlamDesigns 04-17-2006 12:10 AM

I am totally against cloning...unless I can get a sample of Raven Riley's DNA.

JD 04-17-2006 12:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SlamDesigns
I am totally against cloning...unless I can get a sample of Raven Riley's DNA.

or Gianna from BTRA :Graucho

reynold 04-17-2006 01:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dissipate
Have you ever seen the movie "the island"

I saw that film and I like it but I just don't like the ending.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:59 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123