Lolita/Pre-Teen Webmaster Interview Today on Wired.com - GoFuckYourself.com

Mr.Fiction · 05-08-2002, 02:05 PM

Behind the Kid 'Erotica' Scenes
By Julia Scheeres
2:00 a.m. May 8, 2002 PDT

Lets just post the URL to the article and let those who want read about that crap.

The rest is here:
http://www.wired.com/news/culture/0,1284,52371,00.html

Mr.Fiction · 05-08-2002, 02:10 PM

Another related article:

When Kid Porn Isn't Kid Porn
By Julia Scheeres
2:00 a.m. May 8, 2002 PDT

Same here.

http://www.wired.com/news/business/0,1367,52345,00.html

Lane · 05-08-2002, 03:39 PM

Darren · 05-08-2002, 03:44 PM

sick shit.

Seaz · 05-08-2002, 03:46 PM

Scootermuze · 05-08-2002, 03:47 PM

Hmm.. why would they focus on affiliate sites instead of the actual sites that these sponsors have? Looks like someone had a hand in getting this story published. What better advertising for this type of sponsor???

Scootermuze · 05-08-2002, 03:50 PM

Well well.. they even have a link to one of the sites' faq pages discussing their program.. now why would they do this if they weren't trying to promote the affiliate program??? This is way too weird for a typical news story...

dipshit moron retard · 05-08-2002, 03:51 PM

im confused, how is boys with erections not sexually oriented?!?!

Mr.Fiction · 05-08-2002, 04:02 PM

Hey! My post was edited. Just so you know, it's legal to quote part of the article under fair use laws, just not all of it. I never quote all of it!

Not big deal but I thought it strange that I was edited.

DTK · 05-08-2002, 04:04 PM

Too f*&king disgusting

eroswebmaster · 05-08-2002, 04:48 PM

See this is the kind of shit our congressmen and lawmakers need to be addressing and attacking.

Theo · 05-08-2002, 05:00 PM

who is this Rick Wallin asshole? Do a favour to humanity and blow his minds.

RAM · 05-08-2002, 05:04 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Mr.Fiction
Hey! My post was edited. Just so you know, it's legal to quote part of the article under fair use laws, just not all of it. I never quote all of it!

Not big deal but I thought it strange that I was edited.

I edited your post not because of Legal resons but for the fact that it named some of the sponsors. Also the part about how to search for them. We do not support CP in any form.

Mr.Fiction · 05-08-2002, 05:26 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by RAM

I edited your post not because of Legal resons but for the fact that it named some of the sponsors. Also the part about how to search for them. We do not support CP in any form.

Now I get it. Thanks for letting me know!

wired1 · 05-08-2002, 05:35 PM

Sick shit!

What a sick fuck, especially how he goes about justifying it by the fact that the kids are homeless and how they now get money, like hes doing them a fucken service or something... but the parasite fails to mention how he makes $$$ off of there homelesness.

darnit · 05-08-2002, 06:27 PM

what more can i say.

chodadog · 05-08-2002, 06:35 PM

What gets to me is this. I can understand nude photography being art.. But not when these sites are being promoted on sex orientated websites. It's obvious as to what their market is. Men, over the age of 18, with credit cards, who are looking at porn, and also want to see naked boys.

You can bet your ass it's not for art appreciation either.

It's disgusting.

05-08-2002, 02:05 PM	#1
Mr.Fiction Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Free Speech Land Posts: 9,484	Lolita/Pre-Teen Webmaster Interview Today on Wired.com Behind the Kid 'Erotica' Scenes By Julia Scheeres 2:00 a.m. May 8, 2002 PDT Lets just post the URL to the article and let those who want read about that crap. The rest is here: http://www.wired.com/news/culture/0,1284,52371,00.html Last edited by RAM; 05-08-2002 at 03:24 PM..

05-08-2002, 02:10 PM	#2
Mr.Fiction Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Free Speech Land Posts: 9,484	Another related article: When Kid Porn Isn't Kid Porn By Julia Scheeres 2:00 a.m. May 8, 2002 PDT Same here. http://www.wired.com/news/business/0,1367,52345,00.html Last edited by RAM; 05-08-2002 at 03:25 PM..

05-08-2002, 03:39 PM	#3
Lane Will code for food... Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: Buckeye, AZ Posts: 8,496	sick __________________

05-08-2002, 03:44 PM	#4
Darren Confirmed User Join Date: Sep 2001 Posts: 5,994	sick shit. __________________ Penis enlargement / male enhancement pills - earn up to $229.48 per signup ICQ: 46335817

05-08-2002, 04:48 PM	#11
eroswebmaster March 1st, 2003 Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Seat 4 @ Venetian Poker Room Posts: 20,295	See this is the kind of shit our congressmen and lawmakers need to be addressing and attacking. __________________ For rent - ICQ 127-027-910 Click here for more details

05-08-2002, 03:46 PM	#5
Seaz Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Montreal Posts: 773

05-08-2002, 03:47 PM	#6
Scootermuze Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2001 Posts: 4,513	Hmm.. why would they focus on affiliate sites instead of the actual sites that these sponsors have? Looks like someone had a hand in getting this story published. What better advertising for this type of sponsor???

05-08-2002, 03:50 PM	#7
Scootermuze Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2001 Posts: 4,513	Well well.. they even have a link to one of the sites' faq pages discussing their program.. now why would they do this if they weren't trying to promote the affiliate program??? This is way too weird for a typical news story...

05-08-2002, 03:51 PM	#8
dipshit moron retard Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2002 Posts: 667	im confused, how is boys with erections not sexually oriented?!?!

05-08-2002, 04:02 PM	#9
Mr.Fiction Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Free Speech Land Posts: 9,484	Hey! My post was edited. Just so you know, it's legal to quote part of the article under fair use laws, just not all of it. I never quote all of it! Not big deal but I thought it strange that I was edited.

05-08-2002, 04:04 PM	#10
DTK Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: The 510 Posts: 4,545	Too f*&king disgusting

05-08-2002, 05:00 PM	#12
Theo HAL 9000 Industry Role: Join Date: May 2001 Posts: 34,515	who is this Rick Wallin asshole? Do a favour to humanity and blow his minds.

05-08-2002, 05:35 PM	#15
wired1 Registered User Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: North Posts: 279	Sick shit! What a sick fuck, especially how he goes about justifying it by the fact that the kids are homeless and how they now get money, like hes doing them a fucken service or something... but the parasite fails to mention how he makes $$$ off of there homelesness.

05-08-2002, 06:27 PM	#16
darnit Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Teh Interweb Posts: 2,439	what more can i say.

05-08-2002, 06:35 PM	#17
chodadog Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2002 Posts: 9,736	What gets to me is this. I can understand nude photography being art.. But not when these sites are being promoted on sex orientated websites. It's obvious as to what their market is. Men, over the age of 18, with credit cards, who are looking at porn, and also want to see naked boys. You can bet your ass it's not for art appreciation either. It's disgusting.