|
100........
|
Quote:
who cares about wtc? youre writing like someone who dies there... you died there? no? so stfu and take care about your job... rednecks from america hehe... even not real peoples from there... where are indians/redskins now you wtc psycho? the real peoples of america you stupid motherfucker? hehe stfu biatch, dont post anymore please :pimp |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Linkster You might want to check your facts before you post stupid shit - like Article 1 Section 8 of the Constitution and the War Powers Act of 1973 which both lay down the exact requirements the President must follow in wars. I dont know where you got your misunderstanding of the law but its way off base Of course every president that has been involved with a war since Truman has neglected to follow the Constitution - most of them got around it by never actually declaring a "war" Also your "fact" about the time requirements is wrong - if the President does use force he must inform Congress within 48 HOURs and Congress must then either declare a war or disapprove of it within 90 days - again something they havent done but thats just because most Americans are just as misinformed as you are I am cognizant of Article I Section 8 and I am cognizant of the 1973 "resolution" known as the War Powers Act. The War Powers act is a non binding "resolution" as is the nature of a "resolution". Many constitutional legal scholars believe that the "resolution" is not within the Constitutional powers of Congress and I would assume that is why it was passed as a resolution. Many constitutional scholars maintain that the Congress does not have the power to over ride Article II Section II of the constitution which designates the President to be the Commander in Chief of the military. Maybe you can point out the "48 HOURS" that the "resolution" states the President must report to congress as I cannot seem to find it. As for me being misinformed, maybe you should rethink that position. |
Quote:
they said the fire wasn't hot enough to melt steel.. Which is what I've said.. Oh no.. that means if you agree with that site, you agree with me! :) As for the rest of it... Lots of could have's and may have's.. like I responded earlier... You're right.. simple terms.. Keep digging :) |
Quote:
The difference between me and you is i post facts , you post nothing but your own ignorance.. Heres your first clue.. dead people dont write anything moron. Who knows what the fuck indians and redskins have to do with your fantasy , i think your on some serious wrong meds. i suggest you tell your doctor the pills aren't working Instead of showing any proof of even one of the things mentioned you bablle on like an incoherent idiot... Please do us a favour and dont breed. |
Quote:
duh driving a car is the same as a plane lol I nominate that for inbred statement of the year award |
"The way the building collapsed must have been caused by explosions
One demolition expert on the day of the collapse said it looked like implosion but this is not very strong evidence. Implosion firstly requires a lot of explosives placed in strategic areas all around the building. When and how was this explosive placed in the building without anyone knowing about it. Second, implosion required more than just explosives. Demolition experts spend weeks inside a derelict building planning an event. Many of the beams are cut through by about 90% so that the explosion only has to break a small bit of steel. In this state the building is highly dangerous, and there is no way such a prepared building could still be running day to day like WTC was." Do you have any idea how tight security was in the WTC. No you don't, because my bet is you have never been out of your redneck state, wherever that is. I went thru there on an almost daily basis, and you did not get into the upper areas without passing thru very tight security. Think about the amount of explosives it would have taken to bring those 3 buildings down. You are saying that not one person would have questioned anything.:helpme |
http://www.u-blog.net/COUFFINBAGAY/i...erson-jump.jpg
They should make it a mandatory law that all companies in office buildings this high up provide every employee with emergency evacuation chutes. And don't laugh. This is a real product on the market for only $1485. Its designed for exactly this situation where your only choice is to jump. http://www.lifelinesecurity.com/evacuchute.gif http://www.lifelinesecurity.com/rescuejump.jpg INFO: The EVACUCHUTE Parachute is a last resort means of escaping a building fire or bio attack. We have all seen horrific photos of people jumping out of building windows to escape fire. Well now there is the EVACUCHUTE emergency escape parachute. The EVACUCHUTE is intended for those who live or work in high rise buildings. It is specially designed just for jumping from buildings. Unlike a conventional sport chute that sways back and forth and tends to pull the jumper back toward the building, the EVACUCHUTE has a slow steady forward descent that pushes you away from the building and not back into it. The EVACUCHUTE opens automatically with no cord to pull. Rigorously tested and TSO-C23A certified. Comes complete with parachute, carrying bag, breathing hood and helmet. |
Quote:
false fact after false fact , just pile up as you speak.. I have posted several pictures.. "you even make sure its the only images you posted" so thats a lie.. "You know damn well when posting this shit you would get opposing views," yes and.... .... thats why i posted 3 facts to debate, you havent even started.. im waiting for someone to actually debate the topic posted in the thread.. perhaps you should go look back on page #1 and start from there. So far your still making up theories in your head. i have posted 3 facts that require an investigation , and nobody has given me any reason why they shouldnt be.. they just talk about bush and missiles and etc etc that hasnt been mentioned.. most people dont even read the first thread before they post I'm sorry if you got offended that i am frustrated with people who dont understand basic english , but it gets frustrating teaching people how to comprehend english. Half the people in this thread cant even understand the basic concept of what a conspiracy is.. |
Quote:
I didnt speculate as to what caused the collapse or who or why. All i asked for is an investigation to honour the unanswered question from the official report for the people that died. |
Getting sick of this now...
|
oh and speculating on where someone has been that you have never met is foolish to say the least. nor does it have anything to do with the 3 questions posed in this thread.. NOTHING at all
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sexxxy Sites Flying a small plane is no more difficult than driving a car. Once you learn to fly a small plane learning to fly a large plane (having practiced on a simulator and learning certain characteristics) is no more difficult than flying a small plane. I am out of here. Please point out to me where I stated that "driving a car is the same as a plane"? You have obnoxiously complained about people having a reading comprehension problem when it appears that you have the very same problem. I have driven both a car and various planes. I have not flown a jumbo but I have flown twin engine planes. Once you have flown a small single engine aircraft (which is as easy as driving a car) stepping up to a larger aircraft is a very small step (once you have learned the characteristics of the aircraft). Maybe you do not drive or fly. This is the last statement I will make on this subject as I am not into arguing with an immature board whore. BTW, maybe you deserve the "inbred statement of the year award" rather than I. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Do you speak Martian or are you just drunk? |
Quote:
Quote:
How old are you ? |
Quote:
Your one of the growing number of people who seem to not understand english. You didnt even read the thread but you think you know how i feel ? stop smoking the crack son.. I idnt post any "theories" i posted 3 questions.. none of which you have answered or come close to answering.. |
Quote:
There were a lot of conspiracies involved in that escapade for sure. That's why it cracks me up in some other threads on the immigration issues, where people "This is OUR country!". WTF? The Indians were here long before us and we just came and settled on their land, slaughtered them all, and then forced the ones still alive onto Indian Reservations with some token BS compensation. :1orglaugh |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sexxxy Sites Flying a small plane is no more difficult than driving a car. Once you learn to fly a small plane learning to fly a large plane (having practiced on a simulator and learning certain characteristics) is no more difficult than flying a small plane. You have a reading comprehension problem that you accuse others of having and a problem with word definition. For your edification "easy" and "same" are not synonymous. Over and out as I have work to do. In addition as I have stated I am not into arguing with immature board whores or even mature board whores. |
Quote:
Indians were just asians who crossed the land bridge when it existed.. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
But here we have the only 3 buildings in the history of steel framed that fell due to fire.. All next to each other.. All falling with within a short time span.. All falling in the very same manner (one with only 2 smallish fires) .. melted steel.. concrete turning to dust.. sections of the buildings closed off for cable repair/maintenance a few days before the attacks.. Fema conveniently being in the vicinity for preparedness drills on the day of the attack.. Anyone that gives it much thought can't help but have a few questions.. |
btw what did i spell wrong ? i'm curious now.. i never claimed to be a master speller but might as well point it out now that you have said it..
|
did you mean the 1 missing "n" in understand ? thats your whole argument , and you typo'd the complaint AFTER editing it ? LOL grow up
|
There are many,many things I would like to comment on in this thread but I am not going to for 2 reasons:
#1 I don't have the time #2 I will proberbly get beaten by someone.. |
Quote:
Oh well.. I wasn't there, so I can't act like I'm offended and owed.. That'd be like the black folks bitching about being owed because of the slavery days.. which was another chapter in the history books.. |
Quote:
Oh my dear God, you're so full of shit. Not a single non-government engineer has ever said anything close to that on the record. In fact I've heard many tenured professors of physics and engineering say the exact opposite. Keep your head buried in the sand if you're too cowardly to consider anything other than official government explanation, but stop making shit up to make yourself feel better. Makes you look really stupid. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
People in the WTC were exacuated serveral times in the days and weeks before sept 11th. If you're going to argue, at least know what you're arguing about. Saves everyone a lot of time. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Let me make this easy. Do you think that steel stays exactly the same stength while it is being heated UNTIL it hits the magic melting tempeture? Silly silly kids. |
Quote:
As for the man of soul - and I picked on this answer/post because it was the last on the thread at time of writing - I mean dude you seriously consider the above an adaquate response to a reasonable observation? But congrats to you on one thing and that is in two separate threads you have done more to discredit the 'It was the US Govt that did it!' then a whole army of conspiracy doubters!:winkwink: As for good old Smokey. On the whole its been fun smacking you around but you have overplayed it now and people are starting to refuse to join in so give it up dude as it is now a game of diminishing returns! |
Quote:
You are talking shit to someone who does know. Here's a little test for you on you knowledge. How many subway lines stopped at the wtc? What was the name of the donut shop at the wtc? Was there or was there not a McDonalds there? Where was the shopping mall located? My bet is you can't answer any of these questions and are completely full of shit. You are talking about my hood, where I spent a major portion of my life. So yes I do know what I am talking about. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I said come back when you have proof , not more drivel..:1orglaugh Try answering one of the three questions in the beginning of this thread you have failed to address. Bah on sheepboy :) |
Quote:
Then in another reply you give me this: Quote:
You really need to make up your mind about what you believe.. :) |
Quote:
If your calling a "consipiracy" a simple act of two or more people planning and then committing a crime, then yes, this was in fact a conspiracy - A conspiracy commited by over a dozen people who weren't citizens of the United States. I think a consipiracy is much much more than just this simple act. Usually the terms is a reference to the government covering something up. I like this much better: CONSPIRACY Common non-legal usage, is the act of working in secret to obtain some improper goal, generally with negative connotations. Did our Government cover anything up? I find it highly unlikely when the head of a terrorist organization is saying they did it. |
I hate to break it to you fetishtom , but we are on the same side you are just too stupid to realise it yet.
Instead of blathering on with idiotic statements , heres a concept for you.. try making a coherent statement on the 3 questions that i asked.. we are well aware you can type on and on and say nothing but can you actually read comprehend and respond with anything valid..? that has yet to be proven.. |
This has to be the friendliest thread of the month so far.
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
Let me make this easy. Do you think that steel stays exactly the same stength while it is being heated UNTIL it hits the magic melting tempeture? Silly silly kids. |
Quote:
Twenty four thousand gallons is in fact "tens of thousands" of gallons. This all makes perfect sense to me now. There are people on GFY saying they are having horrible ratios. Chances are this is because they can't do third grade math. |
Quote:
You were under a false impression of the meaning of the word, dont feel bad i was under the same false impression until i read the first 9/11 report |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
or did the 9/11 hijackers NOT work in secret to obtain an improper goal with a negative conotation ?
|
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:44 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123