GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Since you're all clueless heres some info about the port issue: (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=578928)

GatorB 02-22-2006 10:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimthefiend
Why don't you go back to ButtFuck Community College and study spelling, fractions and government 101.

Thanks.

when you show me a copy of your mensa mebership THEN you can brag about your brains

Dollarmansteve 02-22-2006 10:00 AM

Wow this whole thread is silly. This is not a political issue at all, since when does the government meddle in private business? Here are some facts:

1. All the employees at the ports are American
2. There is no change to security (coast guard, homeland security still runs that)

There are thousands of foreign owned corporations operating in the united states. Are those of you who are so vocal against this transaction also opposed to car plants owned by honda, toyota, BMW, etc.. What about DamilerChrysler? The Germans could be using those plants to build tanks and bombs!!

Anyone who opposes this deal is a xenophobic protectionist and has to skew facts and manufacture lies to support their position.

This should not even be an issue on the US governments radar, the fact that it is is laughable. I thought Americans loved liberty and freedom? Apparently not, you want your government to stick its nose into everyone's business whenever it feels like it. You complain about domestic NSA wiretaps invading privacy.. and then there is support for squashing a private business deal that the government has no business being involved in! lol.. y'all crack me up.

KRL 02-22-2006 10:01 AM

Jim, I assume you are a solid Republican?

chadglni 02-22-2006 10:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KRL
Jim, I assume you are a solid Republican?

Are Republicans usually bad at math? Jim will respond after finishes writing out basic math problems in crayon.

stickyfingerz 02-22-2006 10:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimthefiend
Take your own advice, and don't be stupid. That shipping company has a PERFECT track record with us. They were the FIRST to manually search EVERY outgoing container from the ports they run.

If someone DOES get a dirty bomb into this country, the odds of it coming through a naval port are roughly that of Paris Hilton being elected to the Senate. The security we have in place in our ports is just to tight and too sophisticated. What you SHOULD be worrying about is a bomb coming ashore off a drug smuggling boat, or accross the Mexican or Canadian border.

It is categorically NOT a security issue, it is a political one.

You fucking idiots who decry this administrations lack of concern about security crack me the fuck up.

Why weren't you crying like bitches when Clinton was closing bases, cutting budgets of vital agencies like the CIA or NSA, and saying "nah" to killing Bin Laden when we had several oppurtunities to do so?

Grow the fuck up.

Congress has NO authority to act on this, so skate it off.

I fookin hate agreeing with you Jim. :Oh crap :1orglaugh

broke 02-22-2006 10:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB
We? Meaning terroists sympathizers like yourself?

That's funny -- can't imagine what I'll be next...

A Bush cocksucker, a terrorist sympathizer... maybe an ass-licking sociopath?

"We" are the people that actually follow the news and don't get all worked up by campaign soundbites.

GatorB 02-22-2006 10:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jjjay
god almighty, reading the moronic lefty posts in this thread makes me despair about the future of the US. some people should have been aborted

A) it's the RIGHT that has been in control of everything the last few years.

B) isn't abortion against your beliefs?

Also you don't have to be a "lefty" or a Democrat to be against Bush. I have NEVER been a democrat I have however been a registered republcian. You don't have to be a Bears fan to hate the Green Bay Packers. It's idiots like you that believe you have to belong to one of the two idiot parties out there which is why this country is fucked up. Any TRUE republcian would be voting LIBERTARIAN.

elighten yourself http://lp.org/

broke 02-22-2006 10:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dollarmansteve
This should not even be an issue on the US governments radar, the fact that it is is laughable. I thought Americans loved liberty and freedom? Apparently not, you want your government to stick its nose into everyone's business whenever it feels like it. You complain about domestic NSA wiretaps invading privacy.. and then there is support for squashing a private business deal that the government has no business being involved in! lol.. y'all crack me up.


A-fucking-men!

:thumbsup

GatorB 02-22-2006 10:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chadglni
Are Republicans usually bad at math?

Have you seen the budget the last few years?

broke 02-22-2006 10:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB
Any TRUE republcian would be voting LIBERTARIAN.

elighten yourself http://lp.org/

Didn't know you were one of us...

Both my wife and I voted Badnarik in the last election.

:)

GatorB 02-22-2006 10:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by broke
That's funny -- can't imagine what I'll be next...

A Bush cocksucker, a terrorist sympathizer... maybe an ass-licking sociopath?

"We" are the people that actually follow the news and don't get all worked up by campaign soundbites.

Sure you aren't some liberal elitist? because you sure sound like one.

GatorB 02-22-2006 10:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by broke
Didn't know you were one of us...

Both my wife and I voted Badnarik in the last election.

:)

Didn't say I was. I'm an idependant thinker. I choose not to be a member of ANY party, though I agree with the libertarian point of view more than the other 2 parties. All I'm saying is that any non-jesus freak republican should NOT be voting for republicans because the republican party of today bares little likeness to it's true beliefs.

jacked 02-22-2006 10:15 AM

the company has been tied to the terrorists that funded 9/11, i live in jersey and they had a whole front page article on it... the long shoremen are pretty pissed they interviewed a lot of them and couldn't even put some of the shit they were saying in the papers the workers are not happy with this move... but it's all about the money... thats what it comes down to...

the thing is though dubai will have not just access at port newark, theres 8 other cities in the country where they will take over control... that could lead to some serious security issues as to whats being brought into this country you never know these days...

jimthefiend 02-22-2006 10:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB
Are you retarded? 2/3 vote needed to override a veto moron. That's 290 votes in the house and 67 in the senate. Do the math.

Hmmm 201 dems and 1 democrat leaning independant. So only 82 of 231 republcians( 35% ) need to vote against this.

Senate 42 Dems and 1 dems leaning independant. So only 24 of 57 republicans( 42% ) need to vote against this.



82 is pretty close to a hundred, and 24 is pretty damn close to being half the republican senate. Arguing a few % points is idiotic.

I stand by what I said, if you think that those kind of numbers would vote to override a Bush veto then you are on crack.

broke 02-22-2006 10:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB
Didn't say I was. I'm an idependant thinker. I choose not to be a member of ANY party, though I agree with the libertarian point of view more than the other 2 parties. All I'm saying is that any non-jesus freak republican should NOT be voting for republicans because the republican party of today bares little likeness to it's true beliefs.

Fair enough.

I sway as well. I'm just in the lp camp right now.

jjjay 02-22-2006 10:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimthefiend
82 is pretty close to a hundred, and 24 is pretty damn close to being half the republican senate. Arguing a few % points is idiotic.

I stand by what I said, if you think that those kind of numbers would vote to override a Bush veto then you are on crack.

he is on crack

only explanation for the drivel he spouts

jacked 02-22-2006 10:18 AM

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/02/17/nyregion/17ports.html

theres a NY times article about it...

GatorB 02-22-2006 10:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimthefiend
82 is pretty close to a hundred, and 24 is pretty damn close to being half the republican senate. Arguing a few % points is idiotic.

I stand by what I said, if you think that those kind of numbers would vote to override a Bush veto then you are on crack.

Um you said HALF. 35% is closer to 33% than 50% moron. In the Senate 42% is 8 away from 50% and 9 away from 33%. So I'd call that a draw.

Pornwolf 02-22-2006 10:36 AM

Why are people so afraid of Jews?

Zionism is at it's premise the belief that there is supposed to be a Jewish homeland in Israel. Personally I don't give shit if they have a homeland in Israel or not. They can be Zionist all they want. If they can duke it out with the Muslims and keep their homeland so be it.

But what I have noticed from my many years in THE MEDIA BUSINESS is that when they are in power positions, which is not all the time mind you, they tend to be more fair than black or white people in similar positions. They are all about green, not advancing thier race. The only time you see a change in policy for them is where Jewish charitable causes are concerned and all races support their own.

jimthefiend 02-22-2006 10:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB
Um you said HALF. 35% is closer to 33% than 50% moron. In the Senate 42% is 8 away from 50% and 9 away from 33%. So I'd call that a draw.




I bet you pee sitting down.

Pornwolf 02-22-2006 10:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimthefiend
Take your own advice, and don't be stupid. That shipping company has a PERFECT track record with us. They were the FIRST to manually search EVERY outgoing container from the ports they run.

If someone DOES get a dirty bomb into this country, the odds of it coming through a naval port are roughly that of Paris Hilton being elected to the Senate. The security we have in place in our ports is just to tight and too sophisticated. What you SHOULD be worrying about is a bomb coming ashore off a drug smuggling boat, or accross the Mexican or Canadian border.

It is categorically NOT a security issue, it is a political one.

You fucking idiots who decry this administrations lack of concern about security crack me the fuck up.
Jim, I hate to break this to you but if you know the 'right' people you can ship your sister and all her skankish 13 year old girlfriends to any foreign country in the world... and recieve 25 asian or russian prostitutes for every head you ship in return... inside of those so called secure containers coming from the ports.

Let's not go into all the cars, guns, drugs and other things that come i and out of our ports daily. All of this is with US control, now imagine what it's like with foreign control.

jimthefiend 02-22-2006 10:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pornwolf
All of this is with US control, now imagine what it's like with foreign control.




Dude, the company that runs those ports now is a UK one.


We are doing the security now, and will when the Dubai company takes over.

Why aren't people getting this?

Kevsh 02-22-2006 11:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimthefiend
I bet you pee sitting down.

Oh christ, I nearly peed myself when i saw this
:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

For what it's worth, Paris Hilton getting into the senate isn't that far-fetched .. you had an ex-actor as President and you've got Hercules Goes Bananas as your CA governor. And she does have the most important thing anyone needs to get into power ... cash money.

:helpme

Pornwolf 02-22-2006 11:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimthefiend
Dude, the company that runs those ports now is a UK one.


We are doing the security now, and will when the Dubai company takes over.

Why aren't people getting this?

So are you saying it's ok to go from bad to worse? :Oh crap

jimthefiend 02-22-2006 11:21 AM

all your ports are belong to us




meheh

TurboAngel 02-22-2006 11:23 AM

IMO Americans should be watching are own ports.


:2 cents:

jimthefiend 02-22-2006 11:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pornwolf
So are you saying it's ok to go from bad to worse? :Oh crap



Nothing would change ONE iota. What we NEED to be doing is installing land mines along the the Rio Grande. Funny how the people all up in arms over a fucking business deal want rights for illegal aliens; like SSI and student loans and such.

Liberals make my head hurt, and my trigger finger spasm.

jimthefiend 02-22-2006 11:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TurboAngel
IMO Americans should be watching are own ports.


:2 cents:




Jesus on a jumped up chariot. WE Are.




Ok I officially give up.

TurboAngel 02-22-2006 11:26 AM

Not realy but if you want to belive that you can.

:)

jimthefiend 02-22-2006 11:28 AM

Turbo Angel has contagious ass warts and she cheats on her taxes.

TurboAngel 02-22-2006 11:29 AM

Now that wasn't very nice.

jimthefiend 02-22-2006 11:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TurboAngel
Now that wasn't very nice.



:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh
mwah


I need a valium and a nap. My superior intellect is just too large a responsibility at times. :(

TurboAngel 02-22-2006 11:33 AM

I would hook you up with one but you're soooooo far away.

;)

V_RocKs 02-22-2006 04:07 PM

HOW ABOUT THE BIGGER QUESTION...

WHY THE FUCK ARE WE OUTSOURCING THE MANAGEMENT OF OUR PORTS IN THE FUCKING FIRST PLACE????

This is just plain fucking stupid! When the government of the United States is not 'buying American', what do they expect the citizens to do?

Why are we NOT employing Americans to do this job? What losers is allowing this kinda shit to happen and not give a damn?

If you think this is OK, you should be shot for treason!

jjjay 02-22-2006 04:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by V_RocKs
HOW ABOUT THE BIGGER QUESTION...

WHY THE FUCK ARE WE OUTSOURCING THE MANAGEMENT OF OUR PORTS IN THE FUCKING FIRST PLACE????

This is just plain fucking stupid! When the government of the United States is not 'buying American', what do they expect the citizens to do?

Why are we NOT employing Americans to do this job? What losers is allowing this kinda shit to happen and not give a damn?

If you think this is OK, you should be shot for treason!

er, couldn't you say the same about the airports?

would you rather have government workers running all the planes, boats, coaches and push bikes?

Dollarmansteve 02-22-2006 04:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by V_RocKs
HOW ABOUT THE BIGGER QUESTION...

WHY THE FUCK ARE WE OUTSOURCING THE MANAGEMENT OF OUR PORTS IN THE FUCKING FIRST PLACE????

This is just plain fucking stupid! When the government of the United States is not 'buying American', what do they expect the citizens to do?

Why are we NOT employing Americans to do this job? What losers is allowing this kinda shit to happen and not give a damn?

If you think this is OK, you should be shot for treason!

It's not really outsourcing or 'contracted' out work. This is a privately run business.

Every employee who works at the ports IS American, so the above statement is void.

stickyfingerz 02-22-2006 04:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by V_RocKs
HOW ABOUT THE BIGGER QUESTION...

WHY THE FUCK ARE WE OUTSOURCING THE MANAGEMENT OF OUR PORTS IN THE FUCKING FIRST PLACE????

This is just plain fucking stupid! When the government of the United States is not 'buying American', what do they expect the citizens to do?

Why are we NOT employing Americans to do this job? What losers is allowing this kinda shit to happen and not give a damn?

If you think this is OK, you should be shot for treason!

Its not a Government company that owns the ports currently, in fact its not an American company.

TheSenator 02-22-2006 04:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pornwolf
Jim, I hate to break this to you but if you know the 'right' people you can ship your sister and all her skankish 13 year old girlfriends to any foreign country in the world... and recieve 25 asian or russian prostitutes for every head you ship in return... inside of those so called secure containers coming from the ports.

Let's not go into all the cars, guns, drugs and other things that come i and out of our ports daily. All of this is with US control, now imagine what it's like with foreign control.


I guess you are familiar with the Russian strippers that came in through the Newark ports.
The ports are like the wild west!

A lot of stolen high end cars get shipped out of Newark.

kane 02-22-2006 05:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimthefiend
Take your own advice, and don't be stupid. That shipping company has a PERFECT track record with us. They were the FIRST to manually search EVERY outgoing container from the ports they run.

If someone DOES get a dirty bomb into this country, the odds of it coming through a naval port are roughly that of Paris Hilton being elected to the Senate. The security we have in place in our ports is just to tight and too sophisticated. What you SHOULD be worrying about is a bomb coming ashore off a drug smuggling boat, or accross the Mexican or Canadian border.

It is categorically NOT a security issue, it is a political one.

You fucking idiots who decry this administrations lack of concern about security crack me the fuck up.

Why weren't you crying like bitches when Clinton was closing bases, cutting budgets of vital agencies like the CIA or NSA, and saying "nah" to killing Bin Laden when we had several oppurtunities to do so?

Grow the fuck up.

Congress has NO authority to act on this, so skate it off.

I hate to break it to you on this one but you are wrong. At least about the security of the ports part. Here is why:

Not too long ago the TV show 20/20 did an experiment. they went to Malaysia and put a "sumulated dirty bomb" in an antique chest and shipped it to Los Angeles. The port they chose was in a city that is known for it's pro-terrorist politics and is a known haven for various terrorists. The "bomb" was a good size thing that looked like a bomb and had some old radioactive material in it. It wasn't enough material to do any harm but it was enough that it would set off scanners and get someone's attention.

the ship docked in Los Angeles the crate was unload on the docks and the chest was put into a truck shipped across the country. nobody looked in it, nobody caught it. They then take the tape and all the info to the FBI who, understandably, shit their pants. They were less then happy with 20/20 and the show recieved many letter from various people in charge saying that things were changing and would be getting much better and tighter.

Exactly one year later to the day they did the exact same thing. And they got the exact same results. So to say that our security is too tight for anything to get through is just incorrect.

Now as for the UAE taking over operational control of these ports. Here is why it should not be allowed to stand.

1. Before 9/11 the UAE was both a physical and financial location/training area that some of the 9/11 terrorists used.

2. After 9/11 the UAE and it's finacial insitutions refused to help us track and shut down terrorist bank accounts that may be within their country.

3. Until 9/11 the UAE acknowledged and did business with the Taliban government in Afghanistan.

So you have to ask yourself a question. Was their sudden turn and now strong stance against terrorism something that they really belive, or is it that taking that position and allowing us to build more military bases in their country and working with us is just a good business decission? We can't be sure one way or the other.

Take into consideration this: A guy works for this company that now controls the scheduling and opperation of several of our ports. His family is back in the UAE and a nice little terrorist comes along and tells him in no simple terms that if he doesn't do what they want, they will kill his family. All he has to do is switch a few things around in the schedule and make it easier for a certian crate to bypass any possible inspection. It won't seem like he is doing anything odd, just a normal switch. And that crate has either people in it or a bomb or something to make a bomb. the guy wants to save his family so he does it.

Given my choice I would say it will be more easy to potentially influence a guy who is working in Miami and who's family is living in the UAE than it would be to influence a guy working in Miami who's family is living in either London or a suburb of Miami.

Just my 2cents.

jimthefiend 02-22-2006 05:11 PM

In response to your fucking book:

L.A. is a bad example, since it's NOT a port in question and everyone knows its a shithole as far as security.


I'll say it AGAIN, that company will NEVER be in charge of security at the ports.

If you wanna blame someone then blame our customs people that we have INSPECTING CARGO abroad, BEFORE it even gets on the ship bound for our soil; or the people doing the security once the ship does arrive.

i.e. The Coast Guard or DHS.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:54 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123