Rioters who take over embassies etc. - GoFuckYourself.com

kmanrox · 02-09-2006, 10:58 PM

I don't understand how rioters can take over embassies and such. For instance I know every US embassy has a contingent of US Marines with guns whose purpose is to defend the sensitive data. I know they could mow down thousands of raiders in a few minutes at will. Why aren't they allowed to stand their ground and kill mother fuckers trying to raid their sovereign land (Embassy)? How do they take over government buildings?

Maybe I'm a mini-Hitler or something, but I'd just have them killed and then they'd stop trying to attack my embassy and learn their lesson, right?

Am I missing something?

jscott · 02-09-2006, 11:03 PM

i dont get it either, if the rioters are attacking violently to take over the embassy the gaurds should be allowed to gun the fuckers down

Lance69 · 02-10-2006, 10:57 AM

It was probably a Political decision that wasn't made by the people in the embassy. I'm hoping anyway! Personally, I say for every country that attacks an embassy every western country should just pull out all trade and support for them. Who gives a shit about gas prices.
You think if someone started attacking the Saudi, or Syrian Embassy in a western country that the cops wouldn't be there to bust heads? Bitch please these countries could stop the riots "if they wanted to!"

dynastoned · 02-10-2006, 11:08 AM

i agree kmanrox.. but then if that countries embassy does pop off and kill 300 rioters there might be some backlash.. media would eat it up and spit it out as "Country Kills 300 Innocent Protestors!" or something similar just to hit some headlines.

kmanrox · 02-10-2006, 12:03 PM

i say who cares... an embassy is sovereign to that nation (to my knowledge), and if some fuckers were raiding Florida you can bet your ass there'd be some dead twats lying on the beach...
fuckers are lucky i'm not runnin shit up in this beast..

Rochard · 02-10-2006, 12:09 PM

US embassies are protected by a small contingent of US Marines who are lightly armed. They are not prepared to take on a few thousand rioters. Instead, they rely on fear and intimidation to prevent rioters from entering, looting, and setting fire to the place.

Shouldn't the unwarrented invasion of an embassy in a foreign country an act of war, being as the Embassy is really sovereign property of the respective government?

02-09-2006, 10:58 PM	#1
kmanrox aka K-Man Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: The Gutter Posts: 29,295	Rioters who take over embassies etc. I don't understand how rioters can take over embassies and such. For instance I know every US embassy has a contingent of US Marines with guns whose purpose is to defend the sensitive data. I know they could mow down thousands of raiders in a few minutes at will. Why aren't they allowed to stand their ground and kill mother fuckers trying to raid their sovereign land (Embassy)? How do they take over government buildings? Maybe I'm a mini-Hitler or something, but I'd just have them killed and then they'd stop trying to attack my embassy and learn their lesson, right? Am I missing something?

02-09-2006, 11:03 PM	#2
jscott jscizzle Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: Taipei Posts: 25,360	i dont get it either, if the rioters are attacking violently to take over the embassy the gaurds should be allowed to gun the fuckers down __________________ “If you think tough men are dangerous, wait until you see what weak men are capable of.” —Jordan B. Peterson Listen to Pomp tell why is Bitcoin important

02-10-2006, 10:57 AM	#3
Lance69 Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Vancouver BC Posts: 2,266	It was probably a Political decision that wasn't made by the people in the embassy. I'm hoping anyway! Personally, I say for every country that attacks an embassy every western country should just pull out all trade and support for them. Who gives a shit about gas prices. You think if someone started attacking the Saudi, or Syrian Embassy in a western country that the cops wouldn't be there to bust heads? Bitch please these countries could stop the riots "if they wanted to!" __________________ Sonarcash Competitive Content Shooting Handgasm HD Handjobs Janessa Jordan Ultimate Wife Make Money Fucking Blog ICQ: 307 975 028 lance {at} sonarcash {dot} com (<- Need amateur content? Email or ICQ)

02-10-2006, 12:09 PM	#6
Rochard Jägermeister Test Pilot Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: NORCAL Posts: 75,221	US embassies are protected by a small contingent of US Marines who are lightly armed. They are not prepared to take on a few thousand rioters. Instead, they rely on fear and intimidation to prevent rioters from entering, looting, and setting fire to the place. Shouldn't the unwarrented invasion of an embassy in a foreign country an act of war, being as the Embassy is really sovereign property of the respective government? __________________ “The choice is no longer between right or left. The choice is between normal and crazy.” - Sarah Huckabee Sanders

02-10-2006, 11:08 AM	#4
dynastoned mmm yeah! Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: roseville, ca Posts: 5,061	i agree kmanrox.. but then if that countries embassy does pop off and kill 300 rioters there might be some backlash.. media would eat it up and spit it out as "Country Kills 300 Innocent Protestors!" or something similar just to hit some headlines.

02-10-2006, 12:03 PM	#5
kmanrox aka K-Man Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: The Gutter Posts: 29,295	i say who cares... an embassy is sovereign to that nation (to my knowledge), and if some fuckers were raiding Florida you can bet your ass there'd be some dead twats lying on the beach... fuckers are lucky i'm not runnin shit up in this beast..