Easy Pic has a CP banner - GoFuckYourself.com

jpv · 04-17-2002, 03:31 PM

I am sick of seeing sites advertising girls under 18 posing nude. Sites with a large traffic base should take a closer look at their advertisers and stop supporting this stuff.

This is great...

"None of the images on this site are illegal. This has been determined by our attorney, whose is an expert in the law pertaining to the First Amendment and images of nudity. MET contains images of nudity only. There are no images of hard-core sexual conduct, i.e., masturbation, intercourse of any type, oral-genital contact, or sadomasochism. There is no obscenity or child pornography to be found on MET. In order for an image to be obscene, it must violate contemporary community standards, appeal to a prurient interest in sex, and be devoid of any artistic, scientific, political or other social value. Nudity alone is not enough for an image to be illegal, as the Supreme Court has stated on many occasions. "Spread" shots of adult women (at least 18 years of age) are legal, as they do not violate contemporary community standards anywhere in the United States. In order for an image to be "child pornography," it must depict a person under the age of 18 (a minor) engaged in "sexually explicit conduct" (i.e., the types of hard-core conduct described above), or a "lascivious exhibition of the genitals or pubic area." Nudity alone is also not enough to make an image "child pornography." U.S. v. 264 Magazines (Jeunes et naturels) (Third Circuit) There are many examples of legal images of nude minors in the United States, for example, in books by Jock Sturges, David Hamilton, Sally Mann and Graham Ovenden, among others. An image of a minor depicts a "lascivious exhibition of the genitals or pubic area" when (1) the minor's genitals or pubic area are the focus of the image, (2) the setting of the depiction is sexually suggestive or a place where sexual activity generally takes place (like a bedroom); (3) the pose or attire of the minor is unnatural or inappropriate given the age of the minor; (4) part of the clothing of the minor is intentionally arranged so as to expose the crotch area; (5) the minor expresses a "come-on" look denoting a willingness to engage in sexual activity; or (6) the image is intended or designed to elicit a sexual response in the viewer. United States v. Dost. In United States v. Villard, the Third Circuit stated that "more than one factor must be present in order to establish lasciviousness." Villard and other cases suggest that whether an image is intended or designed to elicit a sexual response in the viewer should be determined from the intent of the photographer, never the viewer. In those few i mages on MET which may depict models who have not yet reached the age of 18 (there are no images of children posted here), we are extremely careful not to run afoul of these guidelines. You will find that all images on MET of models who are not yet 18 are tasteful and artistic, well within the bounds of legal propriety. In conclusion, you, the viewer, can rest assured that we have carefully reviewed the photographs we are posting -- not just to keep ourselves safe under the law, but to keep you safe as well.
MET Staff"

Yep... its art... its tasteful... they charge $30 per month so you can jerk off to it.

chodadog · 04-17-2002, 03:34 PM

That just ain't right..

Sly_RJ · 04-17-2002, 03:39 PM

Hmm, speaking of art, a lot of strip clubs are legal only because they claim that its an art showcase or whatever. For example, strip clubs are illegal in Iowa, but there are several places to watch chicks dance naked. Hey! It's art!

Weird how some things work...

jpv · 04-17-2002, 03:51 PM

I agree some things like this are art. Like topless Vegas shows. People don't go their to jerk off. The show is more erotic or natural. These shows are art with mature women. Sites like this can also be considered art. If I saw it in a museum or someting. But not 15 year old girls with immature bodies and they are kissing... These sites are SET UP as a porn site.

It is hard to legally go after these sites. This is why we have to take it into are own hands and not advertise for them. Also, ALL hosts should set up AGRESSIVE policies against these erotic teen sites.

Steve · 04-17-2002, 04:13 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by jpv
I agree some things like this are art. Like topless Vegas shows. People don't go their to jerk off.

They DON'T?!

whoops! that explains a lot

boneprone · 04-17-2002, 05:04 PM

i do.
I prefer the popcorn bucket trick

eroswebmaster · 04-17-2002, 05:06 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by boneprone
i do.
I prefer the popcorn bucket trick

With the size of my dick I have to use a milk duds box.

Sly_RJ · 04-17-2002, 05:06 PM

He must be gay.

beemk · 04-17-2002, 10:31 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Sly_RJ
Hmm, speaking of art, a lot of strip clubs are legal only because they claim that its an art showcase or whatever. For example, strip clubs are illegal in Iowa, but there are several places to watch chicks dance naked. Hey! It's art!

Weird how some things work...

its all about how much you pay the cops. a friend of my old boss got his strip club closed down for stupid laws all because he didnt bribe the cops enough. i'm sure it works like that everywhere.

EasyPic · 04-18-2002, 01:48 AM

Dear jpv (joined penis vengeance?),

Ever heard about other countries outside the VS ?
I guess not. In the country that I live in 16 is legal.
And why shouldn't they? Haven't you fucked a 16y girl
when you were 18 ? Or at least you had fantasies
about it ...

lol ... hey, go play somewhere else.
Your presence is not appreciated on this board.

Fletch XXX · 04-18-2002, 01:54 AM

Anyone who knows anything about vegas, knows there aint nothing compared to a Vegas grind.

04-17-2002, 03:31 PM	#1
jpv Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2001 Posts: 301	Easy Pic has a CP banner I am sick of seeing sites advertising girls under 18 posing nude. Sites with a large traffic base should take a closer look at their advertisers and stop supporting this stuff. This is great... "None of the images on this site are illegal. This has been determined by our attorney, whose is an expert in the law pertaining to the First Amendment and images of nudity. MET contains images of nudity only. There are no images of hard-core sexual conduct, i.e., masturbation, intercourse of any type, oral-genital contact, or sadomasochism. There is no obscenity or child pornography to be found on MET. In order for an image to be obscene, it must violate contemporary community standards, appeal to a prurient interest in sex, and be devoid of any artistic, scientific, political or other social value. Nudity alone is not enough for an image to be illegal, as the Supreme Court has stated on many occasions. "Spread" shots of adult women (at least 18 years of age) are legal, as they do not violate contemporary community standards anywhere in the United States. In order for an image to be "child pornography," it must depict a person under the age of 18 (a minor) engaged in "sexually explicit conduct" (i.e., the types of hard-core conduct described above), or a "lascivious exhibition of the genitals or pubic area." Nudity alone is also not enough to make an image "child pornography." U.S. v. 264 Magazines (Jeunes et naturels) (Third Circuit) There are many examples of legal images of nude minors in the United States, for example, in books by Jock Sturges, David Hamilton, Sally Mann and Graham Ovenden, among others. An image of a minor depicts a "lascivious exhibition of the genitals or pubic area" when (1) the minor's genitals or pubic area are the focus of the image, (2) the setting of the depiction is sexually suggestive or a place where sexual activity generally takes place (like a bedroom); (3) the pose or attire of the minor is unnatural or inappropriate given the age of the minor; (4) part of the clothing of the minor is intentionally arranged so as to expose the crotch area; (5) the minor expresses a "come-on" look denoting a willingness to engage in sexual activity; or (6) the image is intended or designed to elicit a sexual response in the viewer. United States v. Dost. In United States v. Villard, the Third Circuit stated that "more than one factor must be present in order to establish lasciviousness." Villard and other cases suggest that whether an image is intended or designed to elicit a sexual response in the viewer should be determined from the intent of the photographer, never the viewer. In those few i mages on MET which may depict models who have not yet reached the age of 18 (there are no images of children posted here), we are extremely careful not to run afoul of these guidelines. You will find that all images on MET of models who are not yet 18 are tasteful and artistic, well within the bounds of legal propriety. In conclusion, you, the viewer, can rest assured that we have carefully reviewed the photographs we are posting -- not just to keep ourselves safe under the law, but to keep you safe as well. MET Staff" Yep... its art... its tasteful... they charge $30 per month so you can jerk off to it.

04-17-2002, 03:39 PM	#3
Sly_RJ Live Hard - Die Hard Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Ready to leave... Posts: 17,042	Hmm, speaking of art, a lot of strip clubs are legal only because they claim that its an art showcase or whatever. For example, strip clubs are illegal in Iowa, but there are several places to watch chicks dance naked. Hey! It's art! Weird how some things work... __________________ PHAT SERVERS - Quality dedicated hosting at a quality price! sly AT phatservers DOT com - 147479144

04-17-2002, 05:04 PM	#6
boneprone Hall Of Fame Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: Portland Oregon USA Posts: 34,415	i do. I prefer the popcorn bucket trick __________________ Industry Hall Of Fame Legend Mike Jones Bow to the Power - Still BP4L http://gfyawards.com/hall-of-fame Learn about it kids.

04-17-2002, 05:06 PM	#8
Sly_RJ Live Hard - Die Hard Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Ready to leave... Posts: 17,042	He must be gay. __________________ PHAT SERVERS - Quality dedicated hosting at a quality price! sly AT phatservers DOT com - 147479144

04-18-2002, 01:48 AM	#10
EasyPic Registered User Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: Anywhere Posts: 50	Dear jpv (joined penis vengeance?), Ever heard about other countries outside the VS ? I guess not. In the country that I live in 16 is legal. And why shouldn't they? Haven't you fucked a 16y girl when you were 18 ? Or at least you had fantasies about it ... lol ... hey, go play somewhere else. Your presence is not appreciated on this board. __________________ Top Domain For Sale: CamsCamsCams.com - Will take offers OLD SCHOOL WEBMASTERS NEVER DIE...

04-17-2002, 03:34 PM	#2
chodadog Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2002 Posts: 9,736	That just ain't right..

04-17-2002, 03:51 PM	#4
jpv Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2001 Posts: 301	I agree some things like this are art. Like topless Vegas shows. People don't go their to jerk off. The show is more erotic or natural. These shows are art with mature women. Sites like this can also be considered art. If I saw it in a museum or someting. But not 15 year old girls with immature bodies and they are kissing... These sites are SET UP as a porn site. It is hard to legally go after these sites. This is why we have to take it into are own hands and not advertise for them. Also, ALL hosts should set up AGRESSIVE policies against these erotic teen sites.

04-18-2002, 01:54 AM	#11
Fletch XXX GFY HALL OF FAME DAMMIT!!! Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: that 504 Posts: 60,840	Anyone who knows anything about vegas, knows there aint nothing compared to a Vegas grind. __________________ Want an Android App for your tube, membership, or free site? Need banners or promo material? Hit us up (ICQ Fletch: 148841377) or email me fletchxxx at gmail.com - recent work - About me