Calling girls underage... - GoFuckYourself.com

ItBurnsWhenIpee · 01-21-2006, 05:42 PM

OK so this movie Bully got me thinking about something. Not a bad flick by the way, but that's not the question. The actresses getting naked in the movie are supposed to be 17 and in high school. They are actually a little older, but it just got me thinking, it's legal to tell your audience that the girls are underage?

I don't think the feds would like it very much if, say, in a Little April sample movie, her friend said "I can't believe you're 17 already, April" and then we see her naked. Yet they do this in Hollywood flicks, right?

All the nude shots here are from Bully.

After Shock Media · 01-21-2006, 05:45 PM

Forget the movie "bully". Look up the movie "Pretty baby" and figure out what the feds would do. Though "rambling rose" also is up there.

stickyfingerz · 01-21-2006, 06:34 PM

Look up the movie "13" That really pushed boundries.

mkx · 01-21-2006, 06:36 PM

or even lolita. i think its ok cause it has a story to it / art and its not just obscenity

KMR Stitch · 01-21-2006, 06:43 PM

You willing to roll the dice?

KMR Stitch · 01-21-2006, 06:44 PM

Look at the one site "txt stories" all about c p shit.. Busted raided...ect

biftek · 01-21-2006, 06:50 PM

lolita got banned here in oz , the classification board said it was a pedophile movie , due to the actress playing a part of a teen

RevSand · 01-21-2006, 06:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerzdotnet

Look up the movie "13" That really pushed boundries.

in 13 the girls were actually not much older the 13 and doing the shit.. not older actresses playing younger...

SIDENOTE: Any parents of teen girls NEED to see that movie but not let the teen girl see it... Its really kinda scary and VERY true to life.

mkx · 01-21-2006, 06:56 PM

"kids" was fucked to but atleast it taught you something

chadglni · 01-21-2006, 06:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mkx

"kids" was fucked to but atleast it taught you something

That movie made me feel weird as shit.

mkx · 01-21-2006, 06:59 PM

i didn't appreciate the skateboard scene but i just saw city of god yesterday and nothing compares lol

Fah King · 01-21-2006, 07:31 PM

Yesh 13 freaked me out when I saw it. I didnt know that they were alowed to make movies like that.

Webby · 01-21-2006, 08:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mkx

or even lolita. i think its ok cause it has a story to it / art and its not just obscenity

I can't remember anything in Lolita that was "obscene". Saw it again on TV recently and thought it was damned excellent - strong cast with Mason, Winters and Lyon.

Only my

- but just thought it was damned funny watching the antics and interaction between the three main characters. It's really Oscar material and hardly "pedo" material as we would think of it - but probably risky at the time of production. Hell.. they'd probably jail Stanley Kubrick and call him a pedo if he wanted to make it today

stickyfingerz · 01-22-2006, 10:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RevSand

in 13 the girls were actually not much older the 13 and doing the shit.. not older actresses playing younger...

SIDENOTE: Any parents of teen girls NEED to see that movie but not let the teen girl see it... Its really kinda scary and VERY true to life.

Ya "13" without a doubt was almost a legal kiddy porn movie. Watching it made me very uncomfortable having two girls that will be that age before I know it. Have a 5 year old, and a 1 year old. My wife is Japanese, and I already have shotguns and baseball bats at the door in anticipation of the boys that will be knocking on the door soon.

HorseShit · 01-22-2006, 11:11 AM

iirc 13 didnt even have any nudity

mkx · 01-22-2006, 11:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerzdotnet

My wife is Japanese

Mixed eh? Better learn how to use explosives lol

mkx · 01-22-2006, 11:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Webby

I can't remember anything in Lolita that was "obscene". Saw it again on TV recently and thought it was damned excellent - strong cast with Mason, Winters and Lyon.

Only my

- but just thought it was damned funny watching the antics and interaction between the three main characters. It's really Oscar material and hardly "pedo" material as we would think of it - but probably risky at the time of production. Hell.. they'd probably jail Stanley Kubrick and call him a pedo if he wanted to make it today

The third character was definately pedo material. The actor

SilverTab · 01-22-2006, 11:42 AM

isnt Pretty Baby the movie with Brooke Shield in it? when she was like 12yo??

Persignup Dustin · 01-22-2006, 11:55 AM

Well Lolita didnt have any actual nudity, I dont think...

But wasnt Thora Birch 17 when she showed her tatas in American Beauty?

Dirty Dane · 01-22-2006, 12:21 PM

Legally, I think the difference is the purpose of the movie production and of course if its actual or simulated.

And then its moral and censorship. We still live in a world where Hannibal Lecter is a cool dude, but we are not allowed to be shocked by real stories.... because we are so stupid we can't tell difference

J-$ · 01-22-2006, 01:45 PM

Definitely an interesting question. I had never thought about this shit before. Damn, I'm so high I don't even have an opinion.

Webby · 01-22-2006, 02:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mkx

The third character was definately pedo material. The actor

Not sure the meaning you intended mkx. Sure, Sue Lyon was only 13 when she got the title role, whether that makes her pedo material is no different from any underage person. The movie was not a "sex movie" or something conceived for the gratification of pedos.

I'd be more concerned about pedo activity in real life than a comedy movie based on one, - and also prefer to see the subject matter out in the open than hidden till some victim of a pedo speaks.

Dirty Dane has a valid point in Hannibal Lecter being cool. James Mason as the pedo was sure not portrayed as "cool" but more of ridicule. The Lecters and Humbert Humbert's of this world are, sadly, real. Their victims know that only too well - least if they are still alive in the Lecter instance.

dunefield · 01-22-2006, 03:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mkx

or even lolita. i think its ok cause it has a story to it / art and its not just obscenity

whats wrong with lolita? it's story based not based on actual sex scenes...

Xplicit · 01-22-2006, 03:52 PM

I'm surprised no one has mentioned "The Blue Lagooon".

Elli · 01-22-2006, 04:13 PM

Last San Diego gathering the lawyer guy answered a question similar to this. Basically what I got from it was that the studio can prove that nothing ACTUAL involving underage people took place. ie: they put a board across the guy's lap when a girl sits on his knee, it's just blocked out of the scene. They are telling a story, not acting out every part of the story.

In porn, actual sexual situations take place regularly. It would be the burden of the photographer and everyone involved to record and prove that nothing actually sexual took place with underage actors.

stickyfingerz · 01-22-2006, 04:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jdavis

iirc 13 didnt even have any nudity

No outright nudity no, but there were scenes with them stripping down to bra's if I recall, and they tried to seduce the 20 year old neighbor next door and started grinding on him etc. Uncomfortable. lol

01-21-2006, 05:42 PM	#1
ItBurnsWhenIpee Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: The Beach, SoCal Posts: 1,288	Calling girls underage... OK so this movie Bully got me thinking about something. Not a bad flick by the way, but that's not the question. The actresses getting naked in the movie are supposed to be 17 and in high school. They are actually a little older, but it just got me thinking, it's legal to tell your audience that the girls are underage? I don't think the feds would like it very much if, say, in a Little April sample movie, her friend said "I can't believe you're 17 already, April" and then we see her naked. Yet they do this in Hollywood flicks, right? All the nude shots here are from Bully.

01-21-2006, 05:45 PM	#2
After Shock Media It's coming look busy Join Date: Mar 2001 Location: "Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn". Posts: 35,299	Forget the movie "bully". Look up the movie "Pretty baby" and figure out what the feds would do. Though "rambling rose" also is up there. __________________ [email protected] ICQ:135982156 AIM: Aftershockmed1a MSN: [email protected]

01-21-2006, 07:31 PM	#12
Fah King Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: MTL Posts: 676	Yesh 13 freaked me out when I saw it. I didnt know that they were alowed to make movies like that. __________________ "I use SplitInfinity Web Hosting and VOIP services" and its Great!

01-22-2006, 11:42 AM	#18
SilverTab Confirmed User Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: MTL Posts: 5,060	isnt Pretty Baby the movie with Brooke Shield in it? when she was like 12yo?? __________________ mmm my sig was too big... no more cool animation but hey still! need php? ICQ: 94586959

01-22-2006, 11:55 AM	#19
Persignup Dustin Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Just west of Chicago Posts: 871	Well Lolita didnt have any actual nudity, I dont think... But wasnt Thora Birch 17 when she showed her tatas in American Beauty? __________________ AWARD WINNING PATENTED MALE ENHANCEMENT PUBOCOCCYGEUS PC MUSCLE STRENGTH TRAINER SYSTEM 100% ALL NATURAL YOUR SATISFACTION IS ASSURED.

01-21-2006, 06:34 PM	#3
stickyfingerz Doin fine Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2005 Posts: 24,983	Look up the movie "13" That really pushed boundries.

01-21-2006, 06:36 PM	#4
mkx Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Toronto Posts: 4,001	or even lolita. i think its ok cause it has a story to it / art and its not just obscenity

01-21-2006, 06:43 PM	#5
KMR Stitch I am cool Join Date: Jul 2003 Posts: 14,494	You willing to roll the dice?

01-21-2006, 06:44 PM	#6
KMR Stitch I am cool Join Date: Jul 2003 Posts: 14,494	Look at the one site "txt stories" all about c p shit.. Busted raided...ect

01-21-2006, 06:50 PM	#7
biftek So Fucking Banned Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Victoria, Australia Posts: 1,030	lolita got banned here in oz , the classification board said it was a pedophile movie , due to the actress playing a part of a teen

01-21-2006, 06:56 PM	#9
mkx Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Toronto Posts: 4,001	"kids" was fucked to but atleast it taught you something

01-21-2006, 06:59 PM	#11
mkx Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Toronto Posts: 4,001	i didn't appreciate the skateboard scene but i just saw city of god yesterday and nothing compares lol

01-22-2006, 11:11 AM	#15
HorseShit Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Dec 2004 Posts: 17,513	iirc 13 didnt even have any nudity

01-22-2006, 12:21 PM	#20
Dirty Dane Sick Fuck Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: www Posts: 9,491	Legally, I think the difference is the purpose of the movie production and of course if its actual or simulated. And then its moral and censorship. We still live in a world where Hannibal Lecter is a cool dude, but we are not allowed to be shocked by real stories.... because we are so stupid we can't tell difference

01-22-2006, 01:45 PM	#21
J-$ Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2005 Posts: 2,090	Definitely an interesting question. I had never thought about this shit before. Damn, I'm so high I don't even have an opinion. __________________

01-22-2006, 03:52 PM	#24
Xplicit Confirmed User Join Date: May 2003 Location: █◄►█ Posts: 3,558	I'm surprised no one has mentioned "The Blue Lagooon".

01-22-2006, 04:13 PM	#25
Elli Reach for those stars! Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Vancouver, BC Posts: 17,991	Last San Diego gathering the lawyer guy answered a question similar to this. Basically what I got from it was that the studio can prove that nothing ACTUAL involving underage people took place. ie: they put a board across the guy's lap when a girl sits on his knee, it's just blocked out of the scene. They are telling a story, not acting out every part of the story. In porn, actual sexual situations take place regularly. It would be the burden of the photographer and everyone involved to record and prove that nothing actually sexual took place with underage actors. __________________ email: [email protected]