Quote:
|
Originally Posted by mkx
The third character was definately pedo material. The actor
|
Not sure the meaning you intended mkx. Sure, Sue Lyon was only 13 when she got the title role, whether that makes her pedo material is no different from any underage person. The movie was not a "sex movie" or something conceived for the gratification of pedos.
I'd be more concerned about pedo activity in real life than a comedy movie based on one, - and also prefer to see the subject matter out in the open than hidden till some victim of a pedo speaks.
Dirty Dane has a valid point in Hannibal Lecter being cool. James Mason as the pedo was sure not portrayed as "cool" but more of ridicule. The Lecters and Humbert Humbert's of this world are, sadly, real. Their victims know that only too well - least if they are still alive in the Lecter instance.