did anyone else notice this (PIC - Sex.com) - GoFuckYourself.com

KRosh · 01-17-2006, 01:38 PM

the picture of a lightspeed girl Jordan Capri?

Steve did you grant the use of this pic?

last picture on the right side of page!!! www.sex.com

kristin · 01-17-2006, 01:40 PM

Ruh Roh.

Thomas D · 01-17-2006, 01:40 PM

And the second from the right is Kiko Wu.

reginaldo · 01-17-2006, 01:42 PM

haha 200$ front page design = 200$ front page design

Thomas D · 01-17-2006, 01:42 PM

Oh, and their 2257 information lacks the necessary information.

After Shock Media · 01-17-2006, 01:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KRosh

the picture of a lightspeed girl Jordan Capri?

Steve did you grant the use of this pic?

last picture on the right side of page!!! www.sex.com

If you looked in the other thread on sex.com then you would see that he knows about this and is not to happy.

traffic99 · 01-17-2006, 01:43 PM

ha ha

this porn

Lace · 01-17-2006, 01:43 PM

Sig spot..

StuartD · 01-17-2006, 01:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by reginaldo

haha 200$ front page design = 200$ front page design

I'd be surprised if they paid that much... there's some rather bad flaws in that design.

Alphonso · 01-17-2006, 01:44 PM

drama ???

After Shock Media · 01-17-2006, 01:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Thomas D

Oh, and their 2257 information lacks the necessary information.

I do not see a single image on their main page that needs any 2257

KRosh · 01-17-2006, 01:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by After Shock Media

If you looked in the other thread on sex.com then you would see that he knows about this and is not to happy.

that would require me to read through 4 pages

VIPimp · 01-17-2006, 01:51 PM

Why the hell am I seeing the same old sex.com design and not what you guys are seeing?

Thomas D · 01-17-2006, 01:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by After Shock Media

I do not see a single image on their main page that needs any 2257

Good point.

Nevertheless, they do have a 2257 statement, which would imply that they plan to put images on the site that do require one, and they are using one of those generic statements that hold no legal validity whatsoever. So, it's a useless piece of information that serves no purpose.

After Shock Media · 01-17-2006, 02:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Thomas D

Good point.

Nevertheless, they do have a 2257 statement, which would imply that they plan to put images on the site that do require one, and they are using one of those generic statements that hold no legal validity whatsoever. So, it's a useless piece of information that serves no purpose.

Unless of course they figure that since they are not producers they will not be required.

Thomas D · 01-17-2006, 02:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by After Shock Media

Unless of course they figure that since they are not producers they will not be required.

Well, if it's not required, it's useless to put a non-valid notice up. In fact, it may be counterproductive, since it implies that one considers at least some of the content to be sexually explicit. If your main legal standpoint is that your content is not sexually explicit, and thus does not require proper 2257 information, that's a bad idea.

VIPimp · 01-17-2006, 02:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VIPimp

Why the hell am I seeing the same old sex.com design and not what you guys are seeing?

nm I see it when I leave out the www.

pornguy · 01-17-2006, 02:11 PM

This thread is gonna get long with fights.

stevo · 01-17-2006, 02:13 PM

And the top center blonde is Bethany Lorraine from a Playboy photoshoot. The new Sex.com is not off to a good start using other peoples content for their main design.

After Shock Media · 01-17-2006, 02:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pornguy

This thread is gonna get long with fights.

No it isnt.

Matt 26z · 01-17-2006, 02:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Thomas D

Oh, and their 2257 information lacks the necessary information.

Even if it were sexually explicit (which it's not), they still wouldn't need the 2257 info if they are members of the FSC since the injunction was granted for secondary producer members.

By the way.... who puts a useless, incomplete site on a domain like that?

Thomas D · 01-17-2006, 02:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Matt 26z

Even if it were sexually explicit (which it's not), they still wouldn't need the 2257 info if they are members of the FSC since the injunction was granted for secondary producer members.

Absolutely true, but unfortunately there are still many in the industry who are not members of the FSC.

However, it seems that the site has not been sold, as was the rumor earlier, and I do expect Gary Kremen to know enough about the industry to be an FSC member.

Honez · 01-17-2006, 03:04 PM

Whoopsies.

SmokeyTheBear · 01-17-2006, 03:14 PM

maybe jordan capri bought sex.com

microdotman · 01-22-2006, 08:38 PM

I have been told that the improperly licensed images that were there for a few days were an honest mistake and are being fixed as fast as possible. I am also told the site will change almost daily until the kinks are cleaned.

avalanche · 01-22-2006, 09:39 PM

Guess all the venture capital got spent on the domain. Probably have to wait for the next round of financing to come through for the design.

01-17-2006, 01:38 PM	#1
KRosh So Fucking Outlawed Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2001 Posts: 5,114	did anyone else notice this (PIC - Sex.com) the picture of a lightspeed girl Jordan Capri? Steve did you grant the use of this pic? last picture on the right side of page!!! www.sex.com __________________ ICQ 115433750

01-17-2006, 01:40 PM	#2
kristin GOO! Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Back Home : ) Posts: 9,768	Ruh Roh. __________________ Vacares rules. "Usually only fat guys have the kind of knowledge and ability that Kristin has."

01-17-2006, 01:43 PM	#7
traffic99 Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2006 Posts: 152	ha ha this porn __________________ FREE advertising program at Quammy.com

01-17-2006, 01:43 PM	#8
Lace Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2004 Posts: 16,116	Sig spot.. __________________ Your Paysite Partner Strength In Numbers! StickyDollars \| RadicalCash \| KennysPennies \| HomegrownCash

01-17-2006, 01:44 PM	#10
Alphonso Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: FARM Posts: 544	drama ??? __________________ MEOWWWWW

01-17-2006, 01:40 PM	#3
Thomas D Registered User Join Date: Jan 2006 Posts: 14	And the second from the right is Kiko Wu.

01-17-2006, 01:42 PM	#4
reginaldo Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2006 Posts: 610	haha 200$ front page design = 200$ front page design

01-17-2006, 01:51 PM	#13
VIPimp Marina WILL have my babies! Industry Role: Join Date: May 2003 Posts: 9,234	Why the hell am I seeing the same old sex.com design and not what you guys are seeing?

01-17-2006, 02:11 PM	#18
pornguy Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Homeless Posts: 62,911	This thread is gonna get long with fights. __________________ PornGuy skype me pornguy_epic AmateurDough The Hottes Shemales online! TChicks.com \| Angeles Cid \| Mariana Cordoba \| MAILERS WELCOME!

01-17-2006, 02:13 PM	#19
stevo Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Orlando, Florida Posts: 2,051	And the top center blonde is Bethany Lorraine from a Playboy photoshoot. The new Sex.com is not off to a good start using other peoples content for their main design. Last edited by stevo; 01-17-2006 at 02:14 PM..

01-17-2006, 03:04 PM	#23
Honez Confirmed Brat Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Colorado Springs, CO Posts: 6,636	Whoopsies. __________________ Your Paysite Partner Hone at YourPaysitePartner dot Com Skype - Stressmonkey

01-17-2006, 03:14 PM	#24
SmokeyTheBear ►SouthOfHeaven Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: PlanetEarth MyBoardRank: GerbilMaster My-Penis-Size: extralarge MyWeapon: Computer Posts: 28,609	maybe jordan capri bought sex.com __________________ hatisblack at yahoo.com

01-22-2006, 08:38 PM	#25
microdotman Registered User Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: US Posts: 18	sex.com images I have been told that the improperly licensed images that were there for a few days were an honest mistake and are being fixed as fast as possible. I am also told the site will change almost daily until the kinks are cleaned.

01-22-2006, 09:39 PM	#26
avalanche Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: SoCal Posts: 1,922	Guess all the venture capital got spent on the domain. Probably have to wait for the next round of financing to come through for the design. __________________ Avalanche CherryPimps - Daily Pornstars, LIVE and more!