did anyone else notice this (PIC - Sex.com)
 

the picture of a lightspeed girl Jordan Capri?

Steve did you grant the use of this pic?

last picture on the right side of page!!! www.sex.com

:2 cents:

Ruh Roh.

And the second from the right is Kiko Wu.

haha 200$ front page design = 200$ front page design

Oh, and their 2257 information lacks the necessary information.

If you looked in the other thread on sex.com then you would see that he knows about this and is not to happy.

ha ha

this porn

Sig spot.. :)

I'd be surprised if they paid that much... there's some rather bad flaws in that design.

drama ???

I do not see a single image on their main page that needs any 2257

that would require me to read through 4 pages :helpme

Why the hell am I seeing the same old sex.com design and not what you guys are seeing?

Good point.

Nevertheless, they do have a 2257 statement, which would imply that they plan to put images on the site that do require one, and they are using one of those generic statements that hold no legal validity whatsoever. So, it's a useless piece of information that serves no purpose.

Unless of course they figure that since they are not producers they will not be required.

Well, if it's not required, it's useless to put a non-valid notice up. In fact, it may be counterproductive, since it implies that one considers at least some of the content to be sexually explicit. If your main legal standpoint is that your content is not sexually explicit, and thus does not require proper 2257 information, that's a bad idea.

nm I see it when I leave out the www.

This thread is gonna get long with fights.

And the top center blonde is Bethany Lorraine from a Playboy photoshoot. The new Sex.com is not off to a good start using other peoples content for their main design.

No it isnt. :321GFY

Even if it were sexually explicit (which it's not), they still wouldn't need the 2257 info if they are members of the FSC since the injunction was granted for secondary producer members.


By the way.... who puts a useless, incomplete site on a domain like that?

Absolutely true, but unfortunately there are still many in the industry who are not members of the FSC.

However, it seems that the site has not been sold, as was the rumor earlier, and I do expect Gary Kremen to know enough about the industry to be an FSC member.

Whoopsies.

maybe jordan capri bought sex.com :1orglaugh

sex.com images
 

I have been told that the improperly licensed images that were there for a few days were an honest mistake and are being fixed as fast as possible. I am also told the site will change almost daily until the kinks are cleaned.

Guess all the venture capital got spent on the domain. Probably have to wait for the next round of financing to come through for the design.