For those who don't support the Iraq war: What can Bush say to change your mind? - Page 2 - GoFuckYourself.com

dig420 · 11-29-2005, 07:18 PM

edit:

Fifty moronic Maine rich boys in cowboy hats!

mardigras · 11-29-2005, 07:18 PM

50 unchanged minds

dig420 · 11-29-2005, 07:20 PM

"I started this war to distract the gullible while I looted the economy on behalf of my friends at Halliburton and Standard Oil. I knew conservatives would swallow anything if you wrapped it in a flag and served it with a bible. Hell they voted for me, didn't they? It's not like I'm qualified.

My recent physical beating at the hands of John McCain have made me realize however, that people who are not fabulously wealthy at birth are still people nevertheless, and deserve to be treated with fairness and dignity. Although I started this war for purely propagandistic purposes, I will endeavor from now on to bring it to an end in a way that will not result in either a bloody civil war or a militant theocratic government in Iraq."

dig420 · 11-29-2005, 07:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by theking

Try three years left...and because support among the American people for the "war" is taking a nose dive.

god would you just SHUT THE FUCK UP you beer swilling retard?

You're too goddam dumb to even KNOW you're dumb, so please quit posting. It's very frustrating to watch.

sacX · 11-29-2005, 07:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by theking

In addition the UN inspectors that went in after 1541...also stated that they could not find any proof that Iraq had destroyed the remaining 5% of the WMD's/materials that he still possessed after the UN inspectors withdrew in '98...other than Iraq's assertion that they in fact had been destroyed.

The UN inspectors were not given time to finish their brief. The WMD case was an example of faith, the US admin thought Saddam had weapons but didn't have the evidence.

Why they didn't let the UN inspectors finish is speculation, a cynic might suggest it is because they knew they wouldn't find anything, or perhaps they just wanted to invade before Iraq go too hot. I can't think of a 'good' reason for hastening the invasion.

theking · 11-29-2005, 07:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dig420

god would you just SHUT THE FUCK UP you beer swilling retard?

You're too goddam dumb to even KNOW you're dumb, so please quit posting. It's very frustrating to watch.

I do as I choose...not as some drugged out ultra liberal hippy freak would have me do. Have another toke...Danny boy...I have heard that it is supposed to have a calming affect. Maybe you better watch out on the munchies though...as the last picture I saw of you...you were somewhat of a fatass.

theking · 11-29-2005, 07:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sacX

The UN inspectors were not given time to finish their brief. The WMD case was an example of faith, the US admin thought Saddam had weapons but didn't have the evidence.

Why they didn't let the UN inspectors finish is speculation, a cynic might suggest it is because they knew they wouldn't find anything, or perhaps they just wanted to invade before Iraq go too hot. I can't think of a 'good' reason for hastening the invasion.

They had our military poised and could not wait for the sand storm season as well as the heat. As it turned out they actually waited to long into the season and did encounter the sand storms (which I was critical of the delay at the time that the delay was taking place). I have been there and know what the sand storms are like as well as the heat.

theking · 11-29-2005, 07:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by directfiesta

Ex-Powell aide rips Bush on Iraq, detainees

If you support this war, then you might as well say you supported Adolph Hitler ... or would of if you were of age.

The question will be, after you leave Iraq, how much $$$ will you have to pay for war compensation....

You are related to Saddam...aren't you?

pornguy · 11-29-2005, 07:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by theking

Try three years left...and because support among the American people for the "war" is taking a nose dive.

He does not need support. He has the declaration of war, and unless they set up a vote to stop the war, he has free reign.

Sorry about the 3 years. I could not remember. I try not to. But for someone trying so hard to get support, it seems to me that he may be planning a longer stay.

dig420 · 11-29-2005, 07:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by theking

You are related to Saddam...aren't you?

so you're FOR torture? You're FOR curtailing the civil liberties of American citizens? You're FOR less accountability from the executive branch?

why do you hate America? Why don't you just leave and take all the other dimwitted facists who don't even realize they're facists along with you?

BRISK · 11-29-2005, 08:00 PM

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/019...books&v=glance

2HousePlague · 11-29-2005, 08:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Waters

What if we were seeing photographs such as this one:

2hp

crockett · 11-29-2005, 08:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mardigras

Just sitting here listening to the news and they were talking about the President going on another leg of his "tour" tomorrow including a major speech to drum up support from the American public for the Iraq war.

Is there anything he hasn't already said that he can say now that will bring those of you who have changed your mind about the war or never supported it in the first place to solidly standing behind him and the administration's "strategy" in Iraq?

He could go fuck himself, that might help..

theking · 11-29-2005, 08:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pornguy

He does not need support. He has the declaration of war, and unless they set up a vote to stop the war, he has free reign.

Sorry about the 3 years. I could not remember. I try not to. But for someone trying so hard to get support, it seems to me that he may be planning a longer stay.

What "declaration of war" are you referring to? The US Congress is the only ones that can declare war and they have not done so since the Second World War.

theking · 11-29-2005, 08:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dig420

so you're FOR torture? You're FOR curtailing the civil liberties of American citizens? You're FOR less accountability from the executive branch?

why do you hate America? Why don't you just leave and take all the other dimwitted facists who don't even realize they're facists along with you?

No. No. No. I don't. NO!

tony286 · 11-29-2005, 08:43 PM

THis is not going to end people like the king seem to forget. People in that part of the world have been fighting for thousands of years.

TetsuoIronMan · 11-29-2005, 09:16 PM

The duty of fixing Iraq lies with those who broke it. If USA chickens out now before the job is done it will have serious consequences for a lot of people, Americans most certainly included.

Scootermuze · 11-29-2005, 09:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by theking

Try three years left.......

Or 3 years til he decides to Nuke someone.. or have someone nuke us so he can remain in power... Not so far fetched...

I'm still not convinced the 9/11 incident was a surprise to him...

dig420 · 11-29-2005, 09:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TetsuoIronMan

The duty of fixing Iraq lies with those who broke it. If USA chickens out now before the job is done it will have serious consequences for a lot of people, Americans most certainly included.

I think 200 billion spent on those crazyass camel fuckers is quite enough. Fuck them. Let's leave.

Webby · 11-29-2005, 10:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett

He could go fuck himself, that might help..

He probably don't know how - he'll have to ask Condi

NinoBrown · 11-29-2005, 10:16 PM

you suck

Webby · 11-29-2005, 10:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TetsuoIronMan

The duty of fixing Iraq lies with those who broke it. If USA chickens out now before the job is done it will have serious consequences for a lot of people, Americans most certainly included.

Does that include paying the bill for the damage - without oil contracts?

NinoBrown · 11-29-2005, 10:17 PM

i want gas prices at 1 dollar a gallon whose with me??????????

JasonB · 11-29-2005, 10:19 PM

sure ..he could say
"goodbye cruel world"

Webby · 11-29-2005, 10:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Waters

What if we were seeing photographs such as this one:

Sad shit Paul!

Not sure, but I think that's one of Don McCulloch's pics. I know this guy - last I heard he was on a motorcycle heading for Bagdad when the "shock and awe" started - not bad of a 60 + year old!

Later another friend ended up hand processing a batch of his film stock and - I ain't seen the pics yet, but he says they are amazing stuff.

Don is one of these people who don't do this to earn money (tho he does!). He does it to show the stupidity of people and what lengths they will go. I remember asking what he does when he sees stuff like above - basically keeps shooting then turns away and weeps, - then tries to help if he can.

Don has been on more front lines than any military person - where there is a war, he's there. It's amazing he's still alive.

Webby · 11-29-2005, 10:26 PM

BTW... That little girl is still alive (no longer so little!). She lives in Los Angeles now and still remains in touch with Don

DaddyHalbucks · 11-29-2005, 10:40 PM

All this liberal babble is discouraging.

GWB liberated 30 million people in Iraq. Judge him in the decades to follow, and judge him but what the Iraqi citizens say.

Sure, oil was a factor, and GWB admitted it upfront. Isn't a dictator sitting on the second largest oil deposit in the world a US strategic interest?

GWB wasn't the only person who thought Iraq had WMDs. That's what happens in a closed society, such as under a dictatorship, where monitoring such things is very difficult. The UN, CIA, Kerry, Clinton, the US Congress and many many other domestic and foreign governmental agencies and officials all thought Saddam had WMDs. Why point a finger at GWB now and call him a liar? That is ridiculous.

Eastern Europe took 50 years to be set free after WWII. Why does GWB deserve only a tiny fraction of that time to fix Iraq?

Sure, the Baathists thugs and Qaeda terrorists are trying to keep power with violence. Why does this surprise you?

Liberals often ask: how could the US "allow the holocaust!" Well, are we not therefore obligated to fight back against a contemporary Hitler/ holocaust such as Saddam's chemical attacks against the civilians Kurds?

Even amid the violence, 80% of the provinces are back under Iraq control.

A constitution, free elections, and basic democracy have been established. A brutal dictator is removed, and is being tried by his own citizens.

Looks like pretty good progress to me.

I think GWB is a hero. He ended 11 years of waffling, indecision, and hand wringing. He stepped up to the plate. We're lucky to have him.

StickyGreen · 11-29-2005, 10:43 PM

lol @ all you people arguing about bush and the war when you couldn't "round up enough troops" to vote him out of office last time around. just sit back, stfu, and deal with it...you got 3 more years...

directfiesta · 11-29-2005, 10:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaddyHalbucks

All this liberal babble is discouraging.

GWB liberated 30 million people in Iraq. Judge him in the decades to follow, and judge him but what the Iraqi citizens say.

Sure, oil was a factor, and GWB admitted it upfront. Isn't a dictator sitting on the second largest oil deposit in the world a US strategic interest?

GWB wasn't the only person who thought Iraq had WMDs. That's what happens in a closed society, such as under a dictatorship, where monitoring such things is very difficult. The UN, CIA, Kerry, Clinton, the US Congress and many many other domestic and foreign governmental agencies and officials all thought Saddam had WMDs. Why point a finger at GWB now and call him a liar? That is ridiculous.

Eastern Europe took 50 years to be set free after WWII. Why does GWB deserve only a tiny fraction of that time to fix Iraq?

Sure, the Baathists thugs and Qaeda terrorists are trying to keep power with violence. Why does this surprise you?

Liberals often ask: how could the US "allow the holocaust!" Well, are we not therefore obligated to fight back against a contemporary Hitler/ holocaust such as Saddam's chemical attacks against the civilians Kurds?

Even amid the violence, 80% of the provinces are back under Iraq control.

A constitution, free elections, and basic democracy have been established. A brutal dictator is removed, and is being tried by his own citizens.

Looks like pretty good progress to me.

I think GWB is a hero. He ended 11 years of waffling, indecision, and hand wringing. He stepped up to the plate. We're lucky to have him.

Webby · 11-29-2005, 10:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaddyHalbucks

All this liberal babble is discouraging.

I think GWB is a hero. He ended 11 years of waffling, indecision, and hand wringing. He stepped up to the plate. We're lucky to have him.

Oh boy DH!

This misuse use of the word "liberal" is the first clue.

To even think in terms that Bush is a hero in any respect is like an iBill rep asking if the client got a check. The man has been a dismal failure in all aspects of his life - both prior to and during his term of office. (Particularly with money).

If you are serious in thinking the US is "lucky to have him" - well, sometimes it takes longer for reality to hit home

AmateurFlix · 11-29-2005, 10:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tony404

THis is not going to end people like the king seem to forget. People in that part of the world have been fighting for thousands of years.

That's the idea. War profiteers don't make money during times of peace. A permanent war is their wet dream.

dig420 · 11-29-2005, 10:55 PM

Anyone that STILL supports Bush is basically like a Holocaust denier - there's no point in talking to them. All you can do is take them out to the back yard and shoot them.

StickyGreen · 11-29-2005, 10:57 PM

daddyhalbucks seems to be one of the few people thinking logically...

AmateurFlix · 11-29-2005, 10:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by StickyGreen

lol @ all you people arguing about bush and the war when you couldn't "round up enough troops" to vote him out of office last time around. just sit back, stfu, and deal with it...you got 3 more years...

he wasn't voted into office the first time, he lost the popular election

the second time it was disputed and there was widespread election fraud.

don't blame this on the people of the US... plenty of them voted for Bush, but the majority did not

the United Nations even wanted to send in a team to inspect the elections process in the US because of the fraud and were not permitted to do so

directfiesta · 11-30-2005, 12:26 AM

video of words

StickyGreen · 11-30-2005, 12:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AmateurFlix

he wasn't voted into office the first time, he lost the popular election

the second time it was disputed and there was widespread election fraud.

don't blame this on the people of the US... plenty of them voted for Bush, but the majority did not

the United Nations even wanted to send in a team to inspect the elections process in the US because of the fraud and were not permitted to do so

yea but with all that said, who's president for the next 3 years? chuuuuut...

dig420 · 11-30-2005, 01:15 AM

You proudly support the despot of the coup d'etat of your government?

It always strikes me as strange that on every public forum in the WORLD (fark, gfy etc and so on) people are about 150-1 against Bush and everything he does, yet somehow he won the election. Coincidentally the owner of Diebold is a rabid republican.

I think the dems were spineless, if they had kept at it they would have uncovered massive fraud. The elections were stolen. He is not our legitimate President.

mardigras · 11-30-2005, 07:24 AM

About 20 minutes left until the speech...

Iron Star · 11-30-2005, 07:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lawked

How can you support Bush when you know it's wrong?

Everyone that "decided" to go to war, must be tried for war crimes. We have international laws and President Bush killed hundreds of thousands of people. Just because he stands on US Soil does not make his wrongs, right.

Remember, Hitler had crazy support.. doing the samething. Attacking another country...

Remember tho, Bush is not "AMERICA"... he's a corrupt bastard. Slandering Bush is not bashing America.

I am Canadian. Growing up I have been proud to have close ties to the US and be proud of the US in the way they set international laws and respected freedoms. All of a sudden, the US is taking over another country and breaking every law possible. I would not have supported Hitler's camps, and I don't support Bush's terror camps.

Bush is a stain on the United States of America. If the country matters, stand united against this corrupt bastard... If the one person matters over the country... Stand united against America.

I fucking hate President Bush. During his first election I said to everyone... if Bush gets in, US and Iraq will be at war. Funny how things work.

I would probably give Bush more support if he sent his whore daughters over there. If it's right for his daughters, it's right for everyone.

Meanwhile China grows stronger everyday... Building up those military bases/resources.

OUI !! C'EST VRAI...

Paul Waters · 11-30-2005, 05:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by theking

They had our military poised and could not wait for the sand storm season as well as the heat. As it turned out they actually waited to long into the season and did encounter the sand storms (which I was critical of the delay at the time that the delay was taking place). I have been there and know what the sand storms are like as well as the heat.

What is the worst thing that could have happened if they put off the invasion for nine months?

Paul Waters · 11-30-2005, 05:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 2HousePlague

Powerful photograph but its meaning is not clear.

Is it meant to be political?

Paul Waters · 11-30-2005, 05:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TetsuoIronMan

The duty of fixing Iraq lies with those who broke it. If USA chickens out now before the job is done it will have serious consequences for a lot of people, Americans most certainly included.

If the Americans simply left, say over the next 30 days, there would be serious chaos and civil war.

But would not that have happened after Hussein died, or was overthrown from within?

A stable dictatorship offers the advantage of order, and relative peace for those who are not political. The US government has had a policy of embracing stable dictatorships who are friendly to US interests.

Iraq, the Shiites, the Sunis, the Kurds, have no history of democracy. It will not be imposed on them, and certainly not by a western, imperialist, militaristic nation. The pro-democracy puppets that we see on TV are manuovering for position to gain power and the spoils of corruption.

There will be a civil war in Iraq. It is only a question of when.

Peace might be obtained if Iraq divides into three countries, divided by their tribalism. But the oil wealth would be sadly imbalanced, and that would keep civil war alive.

And US oil interests would not be served, and the Haliburton bills must be paid.

Paul Waters · 11-30-2005, 05:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scootermuze

I'm still not convinced the 9/11 incident was a surprise to him...

The Payne Stewart question remains unasked, let alone unanswered.

The American people have been abandoned by their press corps.

Libertine · 11-30-2005, 05:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mardigras

Just sitting here listening to the news and they were talking about the President going on another leg of his "tour" tomorrow including a major speech to drum up support from the American public for the Iraq war.

Is there anything he hasn't already said that he can say now that will bring those of you who have changed your mind about the war or never supported it in the first place to solidly standing behind him and the administration's "strategy" in Iraq?

Yes, there is one very simple thing he can do to get me to stand behind his strategy: choose the right strategy.

The decision to start the war was made on the wrong grounds, and on exaggerating clues (and thereby turning suspicions into "evidence" where there was none). Most people now agree on that.

However, leaving now, while the Iraqi government isn't strong enough yet to protect its citizens and itself, would be disastrous.

At this point, the only right thing for the Americans would be to stay the distance. Yes, staying will fuel resentment, but so would leaving ("They invaded, then left us in ruins"). Aside from that, because the invasion has very successfully created the ties between Iraq and Al Qaeda that weren't there before (d'oh!), leaving now would count as a victory for Al Qaeda, the insurgents and Islamic fundamentalism as a whole.

The only sensible thing to do right now is to aid the Iraqi government in any possible way, provide them with much-needed military support and force them to pay attention to the interests of the Sunni minority as well as to the Kurds and the Shia. Only a fair, democratic Iraq will lessen support for fundamentalist terrorism in Iraq now. Any failure to achieve that will result in even more chaos and destruction, and will ultimately lead to a strong increase in support for terrorism.

Libertine · 11-30-2005, 06:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dig420

You proudly support the despot of the coup d'etat of your government?

It always strikes me as strange that on every public forum in the WORLD (fark, gfy etc and so on) people are about 150-1 against Bush and everything he does, yet somehow he won the election. Coincidentally the owner of Diebold is a rabid republican.

I think the dems were spineless, if they had kept at it they would have uncovered massive fraud. The elections were stolen. He is not our legitimate President.

Compare the reader base of forums like fark, gfy, etc with the viewer base of, say, Fox "News". Isn't Fox the most popular news channel in the US right now? And I think it's fairly safe to assume that the average Fox News viewer voted for Bush.

Remember, people intellectually unable to operate computers may still vote in presidential elections.

AmateurFlix · 11-30-2005, 06:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by StickyGreen

yea but with all that said, who's president for the next 3 years? chuuuuut...

sadly, you're probably right... though it really wouldn't surprise me at all if he and cheney were ushered out of office before then either

11-29-2005, 07:18 PM	#51
dig420 Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: May 2001 Posts: 9,240	edit: Fifty moronic Maine rich boys in cowboy hats! Last edited by dig420; 11-29-2005 at 07:19 PM..

11-29-2005, 08:00 PM	#61
BRISK Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Feb 2003 Posts: 12,240	http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/019...books&v=glance __________________ I post on GFY so that when people ask me what I do, I can tell them that I work with the mentally retarded.

11-29-2005, 09:16 PM	#67
TetsuoIronMan Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Sweden Posts: 140	The duty of fixing Iraq lies with those who broke it. If USA chickens out now before the job is done it will have serious consequences for a lot of people, Americans most certainly included. __________________ meh

11-29-2005, 10:17 PM	#73
NinoBrown Registered User Join Date: Nov 2005 Posts: 2	who cares we are already there i want gas prices at 1 dollar a gallon whose with me??????????

11-29-2005, 10:26 PM	#76
Webby Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Far far away - as possible Posts: 14,956	BTW... That little girl is still alive (no longer so little!). She lives in Los Angeles now and still remains in touch with Don __________________ XXX TLD's - Another mosquito to swat.

11-29-2005, 07:18 PM	#52
mardigras Bon temps! Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: down yonder Posts: 14,194	50 unchanged minds

11-29-2005, 07:20 PM	#53
dig420 Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: May 2001 Posts: 9,240	"I started this war to distract the gullible while I looted the economy on behalf of my friends at Halliburton and Standard Oil. I knew conservatives would swallow anything if you wrapped it in a flag and served it with a bible. Hell they voted for me, didn't they? It's not like I'm qualified. My recent physical beating at the hands of John McCain have made me realize however, that people who are not fabulously wealthy at birth are still people nevertheless, and deserve to be treated with fairness and dignity. Although I started this war for purely propagandistic purposes, I will endeavor from now on to bring it to an end in a way that will not result in either a bloody civil war or a militant theocratic government in Iraq."

11-29-2005, 08:43 PM	#66
tony286 lurker Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: atlanta Posts: 57,021	THis is not going to end people like the king seem to forget. People in that part of the world have been fighting for thousands of years.

11-29-2005, 10:16 PM	#71
NinoBrown Registered User Join Date: Nov 2005 Posts: 2	you suck

11-29-2005, 10:19 PM	#74
JasonB Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2001 Posts: 1,183	sure ..he could say "goodbye cruel world"

11-29-2005, 10:40 PM	#77
DaddyHalbucks A freakin' legend! Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Las Vegas, Nevada USA Posts: 18,975	All this liberal babble is discouraging. GWB liberated 30 million people in Iraq. Judge him in the decades to follow, and judge him but what the Iraqi citizens say. Sure, oil was a factor, and GWB admitted it upfront. Isn't a dictator sitting on the second largest oil deposit in the world a US strategic interest? GWB wasn't the only person who thought Iraq had WMDs. That's what happens in a closed society, such as under a dictatorship, where monitoring such things is very difficult. The UN, CIA, Kerry, Clinton, the US Congress and many many other domestic and foreign governmental agencies and officials all thought Saddam had WMDs. Why point a finger at GWB now and call him a liar? That is ridiculous. Eastern Europe took 50 years to be set free after WWII. Why does GWB deserve only a tiny fraction of that time to fix Iraq? Sure, the Baathists thugs and Qaeda terrorists are trying to keep power with violence. Why does this surprise you? Liberals often ask: how could the US "allow the holocaust!" Well, are we not therefore obligated to fight back against a contemporary Hitler/ holocaust such as Saddam's chemical attacks against the civilians Kurds? Even amid the violence, 80% of the provinces are back under Iraq control. A constitution, free elections, and basic democracy have been established. A brutal dictator is removed, and is being tried by his own citizens. Looks like pretty good progress to me. I think GWB is a hero. He ended 11 years of waffling, indecision, and hand wringing. He stepped up to the plate. We're lucky to have him. __________________ Boner Money

11-29-2005, 10:43 PM	#78
StickyGreen . Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2003 Posts: 13,076	lol @ all you people arguing about bush and the war when you couldn't "round up enough troops" to vote him out of office last time around. just sit back, stfu, and deal with it...you got 3 more years... __________________ Refer Cam Girls and Take Home 10% of Everything They Make For Life

11-29-2005, 10:55 PM	#82
dig420 Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: May 2001 Posts: 9,240	Anyone that STILL supports Bush is basically like a Holocaust denier - there's no point in talking to them. All you can do is take them out to the back yard and shoot them.

11-29-2005, 10:57 PM	#83
StickyGreen . Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2003 Posts: 13,076	daddyhalbucks seems to be one of the few people thinking logically... __________________ Refer Cam Girls and Take Home 10% of Everything They Make For Life

11-30-2005, 12:26 AM	#85
directfiesta Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Montreal, Quebec Posts: 29,679	video of words __________________ I know that Asspimple is stoopid ... As he says, it is a FACT ! But I can't figure out how he can breathe or type , at the same time ....

11-30-2005, 01:15 AM	#87
dig420 Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: May 2001 Posts: 9,240	You proudly support the despot of the coup d'etat of your government? It always strikes me as strange that on every public forum in the WORLD (fark, gfy etc and so on) people are about 150-1 against Bush and everything he does, yet somehow he won the election. Coincidentally the owner of Diebold is a rabid republican. I think the dems were spineless, if they had kept at it they would have uncovered massive fraud. The elections were stolen. He is not our legitimate President.

11-30-2005, 07:24 AM	#88
mardigras Bon temps! Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: down yonder Posts: 14,194	About 20 minutes left until the speech...