Google patent and SEO - GoFuckYourself.com

graphical x · 10-19-2005, 05:41 AM

Kinda late... but better late than never, right? Sandbox behavior...

http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-...RS=20050071741

8 Characters · 10-19-2005, 05:43 AM

Uh, what am I reading there... ?

graphical x · 10-19-2005, 05:45 AM

Their patent for Search Engine algorithm re pattern detection to prevent SE spam:

Here's the choice cut --

[0039] Consider the example of a document with an inception date of yesterday that is referenced by 10 back links. This document may be scored higher by search engine 125 than a document with an inception date of 10 years ago that is referenced by 100 back links because the rate of link growth for the former is relatively higher than the latter. While a spiky rate of growth in the number of back links may be a factor used by search engine 125 to score documents, it may also signal an attempt to spam search engine 125. Accordingly, in this situation, search engine 125 may actually lower the score of a document(s) to reduce the effect of spamming.

graphical x · 10-19-2005, 05:46 AM

So timing is an issue. In addition to the shit everyone knows already ie., bad neighborhoods, etc.

xclusive · 10-19-2005, 05:46 AM

interesting little read thank you

10-19-2005, 05:49 AM

The length of domain registration is also an issue .. I've read that google thinks you're more likely a spammer if you register the domain for one year only

(that hasn't been proven though)

V_RocKs · 10-19-2005, 06:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gasper

The length of domain registration is also an issue .. I've read that google thinks you're more likely a spammer if you register the domain for one year only

(that hasn't been proven though)

I have actually proven this to myself many times.

I can easily get the top spot on Google for certain things like motherdaughterfuck or mother daughter fuck or spermswap or little summer, etc...

I make a pretty good income doing so...

But after 2 weeks of bliss Google lowers them down to shit.

But if I take a domain I never did anything with and are 2 years old, they will stay at #1 for months.

10-19-2005, 06:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by V_RocKs

I have actually proven this to myself many times.

I can easily get the top spot on Google for certain things like motherdaughterfuck or mother daughter fuck or spermswap or little summer, etc...

I make a pretty good income doing so...

But after 2 weeks of bliss Google lowers them down to shit.

But if I take a domain I never did anything with and are 2 years old, they will stay at #1 for months.

Ok, thanks for sharing

V_RocKs · 10-19-2005, 06:13 AM

Quote:

the date that a domain with which a document is registered may be used as an indication of the inception date of the document

walla.......

Zester · 10-19-2005, 06:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by V_RocKs

walla.......

"walla" ? hehe, I think we got another hebrew guy here

V_RocKs · 10-19-2005, 06:19 AM

What is funny about this one is...

I know a SHITLOAD of webmasters who created Google Sitemaps and submitted them to Google. In trying to get indexed more often they change the time stamps both in the maps and on the server to a newer date to try and trick Google into coming around more often then perhaps it should.

H=L/log(F+2)

HistoryAdjustedLinkScore = LinkScore/DocumentAge (counted backwards, older is lower than newer)

So everytime you tell Google something changed by changing dates around, you actually fuck your score up for the next Google dance...

Suckers...
So

V_RocKs · 10-19-2005, 06:39 AM

Quote:

[0099] Certain signals may be used to distinguish between illegitimate and legitimate domains. For example, domains can be renewed up to a period of 10 years. Valuable (legitimate) domains are often paid for several years in advance, while doorway (illegitimate) domains rarely are used for more than a year. Therefore, the date when a domain expires in the future can be used as a factor in predicting the legitimacy of a domain and, thus, the documents associated therewith.

Invest another $40 per domain and get a higher ranking...

Scotty.T · 10-19-2005, 08:00 AM

[0101] Also, or alternatively, the age, or other information, regarding a name server associated with a domain may be used to predict the legitimacy of the domain. A "good" name server may have a mix of different domains from different registrars and have a history of hosting those domains, while a "bad" name server might host mainly pornography or doorway domains, domains with commercial words (a common indicator of spam), or primarily bulk domains from a single registrar, or might be brand new. The newness of a name server might not automatically be a negative factor in determining the legitimacy of the associated domain, but in combination with other factors, such as ones described herein, it could be.

V_RocKs · 10-20-2005, 05:39 PM

Lots of good info in that document.

10-19-2005, 05:45 AM	#3
graphical x Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 316	Their patent for Search Engine algorithm re pattern detection to prevent SE spam: Here's the choice cut -- [0039] Consider the example of a document with an inception date of yesterday that is referenced by 10 back links. This document may be scored higher by search engine 125 than a document with an inception date of 10 years ago that is referenced by 100 back links because the rate of link growth for the former is relatively higher than the latter. While a spiky rate of growth in the number of back links may be a factor used by search engine 125 to score documents, it may also signal an attempt to spam search engine 125. Accordingly, in this situation, search engine 125 may actually lower the score of a document(s) to reduce the effect of spamming. __________________ No sigs needed.

10-19-2005, 05:46 AM	#4
graphical x Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 316	So timing is an issue. In addition to the shit everyone knows already ie., bad neighborhoods, etc. __________________ No sigs needed.

10-19-2005, 05:46 AM	#5
xclusive Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Buffalo, NY Posts: 35,218	interesting little read thank you __________________ I support MediumPimpin.com / Shemp's Outlawtgp.com /

10-19-2005, 08:00 AM	#13
Scotty.T Confirmed User Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Scotland Posts: 1,062	[0101] Also, or alternatively, the age, or other information, regarding a name server associated with a domain may be used to predict the legitimacy of the domain. A "good" name server may have a mix of different domains from different registrars and have a history of hosting those domains, while a "bad" name server might host mainly pornography or doorway domains, domains with commercial words (a common indicator of spam), or primarily bulk domains from a single registrar, or might be brand new. The newness of a name server might not automatically be a negative factor in determining the legitimacy of the associated domain, but in combination with other factors, such as ones described herein, it could be. __________________ .

10-19-2005, 05:41 AM	#1
graphical x Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 316	Google patent and SEO Kinda late... but better late than never, right? Sandbox behavior... http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-...RS=20050071741 __________________ No sigs needed.

10-19-2005, 05:43 AM	#2
8 Characters So Fucking Banned Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: This month's character: Dirty Franck Posts: 2,336	Uh, what am I reading there... ?

10-19-2005, 05:49 AM	#6
Gasper Guest Posts: n/a	The length of domain registration is also an issue .. I've read that google thinks you're more likely a spammer if you register the domain for one year only (that hasn't been proven though)

10-19-2005, 06:19 AM	#11
V_RocKs Damn Right I Kiss Ass! Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Cowtown, USA Posts: 32,422	What is funny about this one is... I know a SHITLOAD of webmasters who created Google Sitemaps and submitted them to Google. In trying to get indexed more often they change the time stamps both in the maps and on the server to a newer date to try and trick Google into coming around more often then perhaps it should. H=L/log(F+2) HistoryAdjustedLinkScore = LinkScore/DocumentAge (counted backwards, older is lower than newer) So everytime you tell Google something changed by changing dates around, you actually fuck your score up for the next Google dance... Suckers... So

10-20-2005, 05:39 PM	#14
V_RocKs Damn Right I Kiss Ass! Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Cowtown, USA Posts: 32,422	Lots of good info in that document.