Google patent and SEO
 

Kinda late... but better late than never, right? Sandbox behavior...

http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-...RS=20050071741

Uh, what am I reading there... ?

Their patent for Search Engine algorithm re pattern detection to prevent SE spam:

Here's the choice cut --

[0039] Consider the example of a document with an inception date of yesterday that is referenced by 10 back links. This document may be scored higher by search engine 125 than a document with an inception date of 10 years ago that is referenced by 100 back links because the rate of link growth for the former is relatively higher than the latter. While a spiky rate of growth in the number of back links may be a factor used by search engine 125 to score documents, it may also signal an attempt to spam search engine 125. Accordingly, in this situation, search engine 125 may actually lower the score of a document(s) to reduce the effect of spamming.

So timing is an issue. In addition to the shit everyone knows already ie., bad neighborhoods, etc.

interesting little read thank you

The length of domain registration is also an issue .. I've read that google thinks you're more likely a spammer if you register the domain for one year only :2 cents: (that hasn't been proven though)

I have actually proven this to myself many times.

I can easily get the top spot on Google for certain things like motherdaughterfuck or mother daughter fuck or spermswap or little summer, etc...

I make a pretty good income doing so...

But after 2 weeks of bliss Google lowers them down to shit.

But if I take a domain I never did anything with and are 2 years old, they will stay at #1 for months.

Ok, thanks for sharing :thumbsup :thumbsup

walla.......

"walla" ? hehe, I think we got another hebrew guy here

What is funny about this one is...

I know a SHITLOAD of webmasters who created Google Sitemaps and submitted them to Google. In trying to get indexed more often they change the time stamps both in the maps and on the server to a newer date to try and trick Google into coming around more often then perhaps it should.

H=L/log(F+2)

HistoryAdjustedLinkScore = LinkScore/DocumentAge (counted backwards, older is lower than newer)

So everytime you tell Google something changed by changing dates around, you actually fuck your score up for the next Google dance...

Suckers...
So

Invest another $40 per domain and get a higher ranking...

[0101] Also, or alternatively, the age, or other information, regarding a name server associated with a domain may be used to predict the legitimacy of the domain. A "good" name server may have a mix of different domains from different registrars and have a history of hosting those domains, while a "bad" name server might host mainly pornography or doorway domains, domains with commercial words (a common indicator of spam), or primarily bulk domains from a single registrar, or might be brand new. The newness of a name server might not automatically be a negative factor in determining the legitimacy of the associated domain, but in combination with other factors, such as ones described herein, it could be.

Lots of good info in that document.