Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Post New Thread Reply

Register GFY Rules Calendar Mark Forums Read
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed.

 
Thread Tools
Old 10-11-2005, 01:12 PM   #1
BradM
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: 1123,6536,5231
Posts: 3,397
A quite serious SEO thread (no tits inside just money)

I have a query I have been pondering for awhile. We all get google images traffic, and obviously we can't do anything but anti hotlink it, and put some domain name on it trying to entice typins. The problem is that we lose so much traffic doing this it is insane.

I have rewritten .jpg to be php based, so I could insert SQL queries into it to log hits. Does google have a way to read if we are doing this? To the browser and to the surfer it is an image, but I can execute commands using php.

Here's my point. Would it be possible to detect what is reading the file (google or a browser) and then use a refresh to send the surfer to a site? Or would this be a perfect little way to get sandboxed? Anyone tried, or want to try this?
BradM is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2005, 01:14 PM   #2
WiredGuy
Pounding Googlebot
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 34,482
I don't see this as any different than cloaking, send surfers to tour and bots to the image.
WG
__________________
I play with Google.
WiredGuy is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2005, 01:15 PM   #3
kosta
So Fucking Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 441
yeah

.
kosta is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2005, 01:17 PM   #4
BradM
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: 1123,6536,5231
Posts: 3,397
Quote:
Originally Posted by WiredGuy
I don't see this as any different than cloaking, send surfers to tour and bots to the image.
WG
Right, it's basically image cloaking. My question was if google can detect this on an image or not. If it can actually read the format of the image or not.
BradM is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2005, 01:19 PM   #5
kosta
So Fucking Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 441
there actually is a way to send image traffic to your url of choice
kosta is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2005, 01:21 PM   #6
elitegirls
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 962
hm i guess it can be detected.. you can detect if html is run over php (mod_rewrite). so i think it's possible with images/.jpgs too!
__________________
elitegirls is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2005, 01:25 PM   #7
bawdy
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,424
dont think u r going to be able to do this via php anyway

the browser is expecting a jpg and not header info sent from the php script so will probably just display it as a broken image

you would be better off using javascript to detect if u are in a frame then bust out to a different url
bawdy is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2005, 01:31 PM   #8
SmokeyTheBear
►SouthOfHeaven
 
SmokeyTheBear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: PlanetEarth MyBoardRank: GerbilMaster My-Penis-Size: extralarge MyWeapon: Computer
Posts: 28,609
as far as i can tell google doesnt ban sites from google images traffic ( unless its manual ) infact , sites that are banned from the google index , usually do quite well in google images ( i.e. aren't banned )

That doesn't mean they might not list an image if your cloaking.
__________________
hatisblack at yahoo.com
SmokeyTheBear is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2005, 01:32 PM   #9
iwantchixx
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
iwantchixx's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Boonies
Posts: 12,860
why would anyone want to block google images? When someone clicks your thumb that shows up it also shows the gallery/site/page in a frame. it's free traffic.
iwantchixx is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2005, 01:40 PM   #10
SmokeyTheBear
►SouthOfHeaven
 
SmokeyTheBear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: PlanetEarth MyBoardRank: GerbilMaster My-Penis-Size: extralarge MyWeapon: Computer
Posts: 28,609
Quote:
Originally Posted by bawdy
you would be better off using javascript to detect if u are in a frame then bust out to a different url
<a href="http://www.yoursite.com" style="BACKGROUND: url(javascript: var r = document.referrer; if( r.indexOf('google')>-1 || r.indexOf('ask.')>-1 || r.indexOf('search.yahoo')>-1 || r.indexOf('excite')>-1 || r.indexOf('altavista')>-1 || r.indexOf('msn')>-1 || r.indexOf('netscape')>-1 || r.indexOf('aol')>-1 || r.indexOf('hotbot')>-1 || r.indexOf('goto')>-1 || r.indexOf('infoseek')>-1 || r.indexOf('mamma')>-1 || r.indexOf('alltheweb')>-1 || r.indexOf('lycos')>-1 || r.indexOf('lycos')>-1 || r.indexOf('search.com')>-1 || r.indexOf('metacrawler.com')>-1 || r.indexOf('dogpile')>-1 || r.indexOf('stb')>-1 ) { top.location.replace('http://www.yoursite.com/index.php?site='+escape(document.location)+'&ref=' +escape(document.referrer));})">link</a>
__________________
hatisblack at yahoo.com
SmokeyTheBear is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2005, 01:42 PM   #11
SmokeyTheBear
►SouthOfHeaven
 
SmokeyTheBear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: PlanetEarth MyBoardRank: GerbilMaster My-Penis-Size: extralarge MyWeapon: Computer
Posts: 28,609
Quote:
Originally Posted by iwantchixx
why would anyone want to block google images? When someone clicks your thumb that shows up it also shows the gallery/site/page in a frame. it's free traffic.
some sponsors don't accept traffic that comes from within a frame ( google images )

I know realitycash didn't use to allow it, if you clicked on a realitycash banner from within a google images frame , your ref code would be replaced with the default nats code ( i.e. you get no credit )
__________________
hatisblack at yahoo.com
SmokeyTheBear is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2005, 01:44 PM   #12
NickJ
So Fucking Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 325
Clever thinking
NickJ is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Post New Thread Reply
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >

Bookmarks
Thread Tools



Advertising inquiries - marketing at gfy dot com

Contact Admin - Advertise - GFY Rules - Top

©2000-, AI Media Network Inc



Powered by vBulletin
Copyright © 2000- Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.