Photographers: anyone here shoot in RAW ??? - GoFuckYourself.com

FelixFlow · 10-09-2005, 07:16 PM

shot a few pics in RAW today, first time ever...man those fuckers chew up memory (actually i shot in "Raw + Jpeg(fine)" mode with my canon 20d)

kinda cool though to have a RAW backup of each jpeg i shoot

i'm learning how to convert/adjust these images now with that canon "black book" program

anyone got any tips or advice or whatever about RAW files ???

Juilan · 10-09-2005, 07:18 PM

emmm just that you can recover *some lost highlights and shadow areas with it. More exposure control in post with raw. I use it only when doing print. It's cool though to have the RAW option!

FelixFlow · 10-09-2005, 07:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Juilan

emmm just that you can recover *some lost highlights and shadow areas with it. More exposure control in post with raw. I use it only when doing print. It's cool though to have the RAW option!

that is why i shot with RAW today, doing some large banners & posters and wanted to start off with a good quality file

imageman · 10-09-2005, 07:45 PM

It produces 140 meg images but the quality is out of this world. Way too much for websites but who knows what you will use images for in the future ?
With Photoshop CS2 you can make an image look as good as film with a depth that makes images pop ! Sure it takes up huge amounts of space but with hard drives coming down in price its worth the cost and time involved.

Juilan · 10-09-2005, 07:50 PM

oh, if you take the 16 bit tiff to a fuji frontier minilab it will usually choke, I've had to make two trips before, just to downsample to 8bit.

DeanCapture · 10-09-2005, 07:58 PM

Felix, are you going to start shooting all your material in raw or are you just shooting something specifically for a printed piece?

Just curious

FelixFlow · 10-09-2005, 08:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeanCapture

Felix, are you going to start shooting all your material in raw or are you just shooting something specifically for a printed piece?

Just curious

well, i wanted some pics to do some large poster, and all my pics were taken with the 10d highest jpeg setting (6.2mp cmos)

so i shot a few stuff in RAW today, but not sure if i got anything worthy enough of printing

now i'm pissed, cause it would have been really nice to have RAW copies of all my old stuff

so, i'm debating whether i should get a couple of 2gig or 4gig CF cards and start shooting in RAW+Jpeg from here on out

TheMob · 10-09-2005, 08:16 PM

I would shoot in raw.. it's amazing what you can do in post. You can basically stop thinking about lighting and mood while shooting and just concentrate on the actual subject. I love it!

Paul Waters · 10-09-2005, 08:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Juilan

oh, if you take the 16 bit tiff to a fuji frontier minilab it will usually choke, I've had to make two trips before, just to downsample to 8bit.

You just need 16 bit for editing. Once you are finished, 8 bit jpeg is fine for printing. That file will still have more information than a printer can handle.

Dax · 10-09-2005, 08:26 PM

I always shoot at around 3megs.. which is good enough for medium size posters.. i would do a shoot with the posters in mind.. rather than shoot for the site.. and then try to get posters.. out of them.. only cuz that way u can be i bit pickier with the shots..

DeanCapture · 10-09-2005, 08:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheMob

You can basically stop thinking about lighting and mood while shooting and just concentrate on the actual subject.

I never stop thinking about lighting and mood

NaughtyRob · 10-09-2005, 09:05 PM

We tested them a while back and compared quality. If shooting just for web its a waste of time IMO.

TheMob · 10-09-2005, 09:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GetNaughty

We tested them a while back and compared quality. If shooting just for web its a waste of time IMO.

Depends, if all you're gonna do is is crop and color correct - yeah. If you want to do more RAW is the way to go.

FelixFlow · 10-09-2005, 09:21 PM

for print, not web

Red Ezra · 10-09-2005, 10:03 PM

I shot RAW the last two days - much more time to process but the control and quality is the trade off - nice - I always shoot raw and jpeg for my stuff

LiveDose · 10-09-2005, 10:08 PM

I always shoot raw, thinking about future use. But it definitely slows the camera processing down a bit...

10-09-2005, 07:16 PM	#1
FelixFlow Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2004 Posts: 2,779	Photographers: anyone here shoot in RAW ??? shot a few pics in RAW today, first time ever...man those fuckers chew up memory (actually i shot in "Raw + Jpeg(fine)" mode with my canon 20d) kinda cool though to have a RAW backup of each jpeg i shoot i'm learning how to convert/adjust these images now with that canon "black book" program anyone got any tips or advice or whatever about RAW files ??? __________________ ICQ: 643 339 687

10-09-2005, 07:18 PM	#2
Juilan Sultan of Swing Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: XXXodus Posts: 15,141	emmm just that you can recover some lost highlights and shadow areas with it. More exposure control in post with raw. I use it only when doing print. It's cool though to have the RAW option! __________________ My Best Converting VOD Sponsor* \|

10-09-2005, 07:45 PM	#4
imageman Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2003 Posts: 1,938	I always shoot Raw and 16bit It produces 140 meg images but the quality is out of this world. Way too much for websites but who knows what you will use images for in the future ? With Photoshop CS2 you can make an image look as good as film with a depth that makes images pop ! Sure it takes up huge amounts of space but with hard drives coming down in price its worth the cost and time involved.

10-09-2005, 07:50 PM	#5
Juilan Sultan of Swing Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: XXXodus Posts: 15,141	oh, if you take the 16 bit tiff to a fuji frontier minilab it will usually choke, I've had to make two trips before, just to downsample to 8bit. __________________ My Best Converting VOD Sponsor \|

10-09-2005, 07:58 PM	#6
DeanCapture Haters & Trolls SUCK! Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Los Angeles, CA Posts: 9,275	Felix, are you going to start shooting all your material in raw or are you just shooting something specifically for a printed piece? Just curious __________________ Twitter: @DeanCapture Instagram: @TheDeanCapture DeanCapture "at" Gmail.com

10-09-2005, 08:16 PM	#8
TheMob Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: 2006 Posts: 8,584	I would shoot in raw.. it's amazing what you can do in post. You can basically stop thinking about lighting and mood while shooting and just concentrate on the actual subject. I love it!

10-09-2005, 08:26 PM	#10
Dax Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: USA Posts: 3,161	I always shoot at around 3megs.. which is good enough for medium size posters.. i would do a shoot with the posters in mind.. rather than shoot for the site.. and then try to get posters.. out of them.. only cuz that way u can be i bit pickier with the shots..

10-09-2005, 09:05 PM	#12
NaughtyRob Two fresh affiliate progs Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Inside teen pussy Posts: 29,602	We tested them a while back and compared quality. If shooting just for web its a waste of time IMO. __________________ [email protected] Skype: 17026955414 Vacares Web Hosting - Protect Your Ass with Included Daily Backups

10-09-2005, 09:21 PM	#14
FelixFlow Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2004 Posts: 2,779	for print, not web __________________ ICQ: 643 339 687

10-09-2005, 10:03 PM	#15
Red Ezra redezra.com Industry Role: Join Date: May 2004 Location: Vegas Baby! Posts: 4,680	I shot RAW the last two days - much more time to process but the control and quality is the trade off - nice - I always shoot raw and jpeg for my stuff

10-09-2005, 10:08 PM	#16
LiveDose Show Yer Tits! Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Somewhere Out there... Posts: 25,792	I always shoot raw, thinking about future use. But it definitely slows the camera processing down a bit... __________________ Scammer Alert: acer19 acer [email protected] [email protected] Money stolen using PayPal