Photographers: anyone here shoot in RAW ???

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • FelixFlow
    Confirmed User
    • Nov 2004
    • 2779

    #1

    Photographers: anyone here shoot in RAW ???

    shot a few pics in RAW today, first time ever...man those fuckers chew up memory (actually i shot in "Raw + Jpeg(fine)" mode with my canon 20d)


    kinda cool though to have a RAW backup of each jpeg i shoot


    i'm learning how to convert/adjust these images now with that canon "black book" program

    anyone got any tips or advice or whatever about RAW files ???


    ICQ: 643 339 687

  • Juilan
    Sultan of Swing
    • Feb 2004
    • 15141

    #2
    emmm just that you can recover *some lost highlights and shadow areas with it. More exposure control in post with raw. I use it only when doing print. It's cool though to have the RAW option!
    My Best Converting VOD Sponsor |

    Comment

    • FelixFlow
      Confirmed User
      • Nov 2004
      • 2779

      #3
      Originally posted by Juilan
      emmm just that you can recover *some lost highlights and shadow areas with it. More exposure control in post with raw. I use it only when doing print. It's cool though to have the RAW option!


      that is why i shot with RAW today, doing some large banners & posters and wanted to start off with a good quality file


      ICQ: 643 339 687

      Comment

      • imageman
        Confirmed User
        • Jun 2003
        • 1938

        #4
        I always shoot Raw and 16bit

        It produces 140 meg images but the quality is out of this world. Way too much for websites but who knows what you will use images for in the future ?
        With Photoshop CS2 you can make an image look as good as film with a depth that makes images pop ! Sure it takes up huge amounts of space but with hard drives coming down in price its worth the cost and time involved.

        Comment

        • Juilan
          Sultan of Swing
          • Feb 2004
          • 15141

          #5
          oh, if you take the 16 bit tiff to a fuji frontier minilab it will usually choke, I've had to make two trips before, just to downsample to 8bit.
          My Best Converting VOD Sponsor |

          Comment

          • DeanCapture
            Haters & Trolls SUCK!
            • Dec 2002
            • 9275

            #6
            Felix, are you going to start shooting all your material in raw or are you just shooting something specifically for a printed piece?

            Just curious
            Twitter: @DeanCapture
            Instagram: @TheDeanCapture
            DeanCapture "at" Gmail.com

            Comment

            • FelixFlow
              Confirmed User
              • Nov 2004
              • 2779

              #7
              Originally posted by DeanCapture
              Felix, are you going to start shooting all your material in raw or are you just shooting something specifically for a printed piece?

              Just curious


              well, i wanted some pics to do some large poster, and all my pics were taken with the 10d highest jpeg setting (6.2mp cmos)


              so i shot a few stuff in RAW today, but not sure if i got anything worthy enough of printing


              now i'm pissed, cause it would have been really nice to have RAW copies of all my old stuff


              so, i'm debating whether i should get a couple of 2gig or 4gig CF cards and start shooting in RAW+Jpeg from here on out





              ICQ: 643 339 687

              Comment

              • TheMob
                Confirmed User
                • Jan 2003
                • 8584

                #8
                I would shoot in raw.. it's amazing what you can do in post. You can basically stop thinking about lighting and mood while shooting and just concentrate on the actual subject. I love it!

                Comment

                • Paul Waters
                  Confirmed User
                  • Mar 2003
                  • 4402

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Juilan
                  oh, if you take the 16 bit tiff to a fuji frontier minilab it will usually choke, I've had to make two trips before, just to downsample to 8bit.
                  You just need 16 bit for editing. Once you are finished, 8 bit jpeg is fine for printing. That file will still have more information than a printer can handle.


                  Paul

                  Comment

                  • Dax
                    Confirmed User
                    • Apr 2002
                    • 3161

                    #10
                    I always shoot at around 3megs.. which is good enough for medium size posters.. i would do a shoot with the posters in mind.. rather than shoot for the site.. and then try to get posters.. out of them.. only cuz that way u can be i bit pickier with the shots..

                    Comment

                    • DeanCapture
                      Haters & Trolls SUCK!
                      • Dec 2002
                      • 9275

                      #11
                      Originally posted by TheMob
                      You can basically stop thinking about lighting and mood while shooting and just concentrate on the actual subject.
                      I never stop thinking about lighting and mood
                      Twitter: @DeanCapture
                      Instagram: @TheDeanCapture
                      DeanCapture "at" Gmail.com

                      Comment

                      • NaughtyRob
                        Two fresh affiliate progs
                        • Nov 2004
                        • 29602

                        #12
                        We tested them a while back and compared quality. If shooting just for web its a waste of time IMO.
                        [email protected]
                        Skype: 17026955414
                        Vacares Web Hosting - Protect Your Ass with Included Daily Backups

                        Comment

                        • TheMob
                          Confirmed User
                          • Jan 2003
                          • 8584

                          #13
                          Originally posted by GetNaughty
                          We tested them a while back and compared quality. If shooting just for web its a waste of time IMO.
                          Depends, if all you're gonna do is is crop and color correct - yeah. If you want to do more RAW is the way to go.

                          Comment

                          • FelixFlow
                            Confirmed User
                            • Nov 2004
                            • 2779

                            #14
                            for print, not web



                            ICQ: 643 339 687

                            Comment

                            • Red Ezra
                              redezra.com
                              • May 2004
                              • 4678

                              #15
                              I shot RAW the last two days - much more time to process but the control and quality is the trade off - nice - I always shoot raw and jpeg for my stuff

                              Comment

                              • LiveDose
                                Show Yer Tits!
                                • Feb 2002
                                • 25792

                                #16
                                I always shoot raw, thinking about future use. But it definitely slows the camera processing down a bit...

                                Scammer Alert: acer19 acer [email protected] [email protected] Money stolen using PayPal

                                Comment

                                Working...