GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   2 Pitbulls (aka spic dogs) take on an 2,000 lbs Bull and get severely 0WN3D (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=522879)

com 10-01-2005 06:05 AM

what peeves me most about this is the bullshit thats laid down on pits. i'd like to introduce you to the two pits in that photo... raised by a former debt colector for the hells' angels' former (rest his soul) president Animal. The guy, like the dogs has a mean and rough exterior but by far, the man and those dogs, are the kindest and protective individuals I've ever met. He and I have both been bit seperating those two from the asshole staff which wound up finding another home, by all three dogs. The second they realised they had bit me or "Pitbull", they let go and tucked tail, before going back to the other dogs' throat. If you intend on telling me a dog is destined to be violent by breed, (not to mention spic dogs), then you might as well tell me as an Irishmen, I'm destined the same. Unlike the dogs, I'd kick your sorry ass for talking that kind of libel.

lotusmike 10-01-2005 06:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bringer
what im saying is "pit bull" is nearly always used to describe aggressive dog attacks. when they rarely include pictures in news reports its funny to see what they group into the "pit bull" category. ive seen it all from dobermans to rotts to boxers and nearly every other large dog breed.

The CDC reporting the data on aggressive dog attacks cites pitbulls as an exclusive breed. Wasn't it 800,000 reported pitbull attacks per year?

bringer 10-01-2005 06:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lotusmike
The CDC reporting the data on aggressive dog attacks cites pitbulls as an exclusive breed. Wasn't it 800,000 reported pitbull attacks per year?

no it doesnt. they either use "Pit bull" or Pit bull-type when displaying the number of attacks.

com 10-01-2005 06:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lotusmike
The CDC reporting the data on aggressive dog attacks cites pitbulls as an exclusive breed. Wasn't it 800,000 reported pitbull attacks per year?

I'm going to make it very simple for you. Now pay close attention. If I shoot you with a paintball gun, will that be registered as a firearms related injury? No. If I shoot you with an AK-47, will that be reported as a firearms related injury... Of course! If a poodle attacks you, and manages to get ahold of your lame ass... is that going to be reported? By you, most likely yes, by the rest of us? No! The fucking poodle hardly broke skin.. the pit on the other hand broke bones with each snap. Fuck you.

lotusmike 10-01-2005 06:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bringer
no it doesnt. they either use "Pit bull" or Pit bull-type when displaying the number of attacks.

Page 3 Chart 2

Table 2?Breeds of dogs involved in human dog bite-related fatalities between 1979 and 1998, using death-based and dog-based approaches.

Breed Total
Pit bull-type 66
Rottweiler 39
German Shepherd Dog 17
etc. etc. etc.

http://www.cdc.gov/ncipc/duip/dogbreeds.pdf

Yeah, an unbiased and independant scientific organization like the CDC couldn't possibly have better breed incidence information than an organization with a vested interest in promoting scientific data.

AYRTS? IA?

You = :love2suck AGAIN

com 10-01-2005 06:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lotusmike
Page 3 Chart 2

Table 2?Breeds of dogs involved in human dog bite-related fatalities between 1979 and 1998, using death-based and dog-based approaches.

Breed Total
Pit bull-type 66
Rottweiler 39
German Shepherd Dog 17
etc. etc. etc.

http://www.cdc.gov/ncipc/duip/dogbreeds.pdf

Yeah, an unbiased and independant scientific organization like the CDC couldn't possibly have better breed incidence information than an organization with a vested interest in promoting scientific data.

AYRTS? IA?

You = :love2suck AGAIN

those stats are over 8 to 30 years old. by the way, why have you stopped responding to my posts?

lotusmike 10-01-2005 06:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by com
I'm going to make it very simple for you. Now pay close attention. If I shoot you with a paintball gun, will that be registered as a firearms related injury? No. If I shoot you with an AK-47, will that be reported as a firearms related injury... Of course! If a poodle attacks you, and manages to get ahold of your lame ass... is that going to be reported? By you, most likely yes, by the rest of us? No! The fucking poodle hardly broke skin.. the pit on the other hand broke bones with each snap. Fuck you.

You sound rather like a Hamas apologist. The discussion is about pitbulls, not non-sequitors or red herrings.

com 10-01-2005 06:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lotusmike
You sound rather like a Hamas apologist. The discussion is about pitbulls, not non-sequitors or red herrings.

and you sound wrather confused.

lotusmike 10-01-2005 06:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by com
those stats are over 8 to 30 years old. by the way, why have you stopped responding to my posts?

Try looking at the totals Mr. shit-for-brains Looking at a single year is meaningless.

It's the aggregate totals over time that is important.

Scientific method much?

You = :love2suck

com 10-01-2005 06:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lotusmike
Try looking at the totals Mr. shit-for-brains Looking at a single year is meaningless.

It's the aggregate totals over time that is important.

Scientific method much?

You = :love2suck

once again... if i shoot you with a gun that leaves no wound... and then i shoot you with a gun that left several deep wound channels... which gun would you classify as the greater evil? personally, the way I see it, I got shot either way. Now granted I'll be in a disposition to dislike the weapon that ripped me up more than the one that simply bruised me. It's not to say that one is more or less evil then the next... one simply delivered a greater devistating effect with the single shot. Am I right or wrong?

Vitasoy 10-01-2005 06:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VeriSexy
That is not a bull, it's just a cow cause it has no horns :)

Looks fake, but yea it's a cow.

com 10-01-2005 06:26 AM

ok so how did i miss fiddy?

DesignWise 10-01-2005 06:26 AM

poor li'l dogs :(

com 10-01-2005 06:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DesignWise
poor li'l dogs :(

indeed, its like that photo of the black dude grabbing the 90 year old ladies purse... it's not the race or breed in question here, it's the upbringing of the person/animal. anyone who denies that is a fool.

Kre8t0r 10-01-2005 06:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bringer
you mean to say pit bull describes several breeds? omgwtf

i found a neat url for you lotusmike
http://pitbulls.jentown.com/WhatisaP...isapitbull.htm
feel free to check out the points made on this site with others on google to ensure its accuracy

Great link bringer! :thumbsup

lotusmike, you sir need to step off your high horse and do some fucking research! At first I thought you were just trying to only use bias facts to back up your weak claims but I see you are just one of the many "It's a pitbull we gotta kill it" mentality idiots out there. Anyone with the IQ of an ant will see this breed has been the scapegoat for many attacks not related to the breed in ANY way. How about a vicious dog law? Now there's some thinking, since the loveable Cocker Spaniel is by far the most prone dog to bite. My experience comes from my ex working in kennels for 9+ years and the only 2 breeds in all that time that bit her were 2 DIFFERENT Cockers Spaniels and a Rottweiler. So I guess real experience plus a bit of reading kinda fucks your "spic dogs should be killed" theroy. I have owned this breed since I was a kid due to the fact the town I grew up in used them for hunting alot (they happen to be great boar hunting dogs). I really wish people wouldn't just go by the 6pm news and open their mind a bit, if you want to go with that mentality then what you do for a living is EVIL too dipshit. Sorry for the jabs but I get a bit steamed when clueless morons try to make a point that can NOT be backed up PERIOD! :(


Now go tell your cat everything will be fine and life will go on with the APBT around. :321GFY

com 10-01-2005 06:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kre8t0r
Great link bringer! :thumbsup

lotusmike, you sir need to step off your high horse and do some fucking research! At first I thought you were just trying to only use bias facts to back up your weak claims but I see you are just one of the many "It's a pitbull we gotta kill it" mentality idiots out there. Anyone with the IQ of an ant will see this breed has been the scapegoat for many attacks not related to the breed in ANY way. How about a vicious dog law? Now there's some thinking, since the loveable Cocker Spaniel is by far the most prone dog to bite. My experience comes from my ex working in kennels for 9+ years and the only 2 breeds in all that time that bit her were 2 DIFFERENT Cockers Spaniels and a Rottweiler. So I guess real experience plus a bit of reading kinda fucks your "spic dogs should be killed" theroy. I have owned this breed since I was a kid due to the fact the town I grew up in used them for hunting alot (they happen to be great boar hunting dogs). I really wish people wouldn't just go by the 6pm news and open their mind a bit, if you want to go with that mentality then what you do for a living is EVIL too dipshit. Sorry for the jabs but I get a bit steamed when clueless morons try to make a point that can NOT be backed up PERIOD! :(


Now go tell your cat everything will be fine and life will go on with the APBT around. :321GFY


praise on brutha praise on

lotusmike 10-01-2005 06:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kre8t0r
Great link bringer! :thumbsup

lotusmike, you sir need to step off your high horse and do some fucking research! At first I thought you were just trying to only use bias facts to back up your weak claims but I see you are just one of the many "It's a pitbull we gotta kill it" mentality idiots out there. Anyone with the IQ of an ant will see this breed has been the scapegoat for many attacks not related to the breed in ANY way. How about a vicious dog law? Now there's some thinking, since the loveable Cocker Spaniel is by far the most prone dog to bite. My experience comes from my ex working in kennels for 9+ years and the only 2 breeds in all that time that bit her were 2 DIFFERENT Cockers Spaniels and a Rottweiler. So I guess real experience plus a bit of reading kinda fucks your "spic dogs should be killed" theroy. I have owned this breed since I was a kid due to the fact the town I grew up in used them for hunting alot (they happen to be great boar hunting dogs). I really wish people wouldn't just go by the 6pm news and open their mind a bit, if you want to go with that mentality then what you do for a living is EVIL too dipshit. Sorry for the jabs but I get a bit steamed when clueless morons try to make a point that can NOT be backed up PERIOD! :(


Now go tell your cat everything will be fine and life will go on with the APBT around. :321GFY


Pitbull owners <--------------------- very small penis.

It might be amusing to look at total numbers of dogs of each breed in the US to get an aggression index. Wonder which breed would come out on top there.....

:love2suck :action-sm :banana

com 10-01-2005 06:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lotusmike
Pitbull owners <--------------------- very small penis.

It might be amusing to look at total numbers of dogs of each breed in the US to get an aggression index. Wonder which breed would come out on top there.....

:love2suck :action-sm :banana

you have officialy lost any ground you had to stand on. we now know you have a very small penis and spread descrimination without prejudice. You must be North Korean! Shut up and eat your dog, faggot.

Kre8t0r 10-01-2005 06:46 AM

Oh by the way you can also keep an eye on this site,
http://pitbulls.consumer-corp.com/
It will be filled with FACTS about the breed and not the 6pm news hype, or the bias CDC "pitbull-type" bullshit! I plan to setup a pitbull rescue in the near future so dogs that are used by "ganstas" that wanna make their dick look bigger by having a "Mean" dog can have a place to call home without bias or persecution of ignorance....

</rant>

com 10-01-2005 06:47 AM

perhaps you could take the stance of "owning pets in a populated area is dangerous to the wellbeing of others", personally, I plan on picking up a few dogo argentina's as outside dogs, a few pits as inside dogs, and a good ammount of land for them to play on. If you are an uninvited guest, and the signs didn't persuade you to leave, perhaps being eaten alive will. that is all.

lotusmike 10-01-2005 06:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by com
you have officialy lost any ground you had to stand on. we now know you have a very small penis and spread descrimination without prejudice. You must be North Korean! Shut up and eat your dog, faggot.

So what have we learned here today cadets!?

Pitbulls suck :321GFY. Stupid, violent animals deservingly will be exterminated. :winkwink: Owners like 'com' are either power posturing thugs or misguided batshit rescuers.

Kre8t0r 10-01-2005 06:50 AM

Well damn! You made me waste my 600th post on this shit! :321GFY

lotusmike 10-01-2005 06:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by com
perhaps you could take the stance of "owning pets in a populated area is dangerous to the wellbeing of others", personally, I plan on picking up a few dogo argentina's as outside dogs, a few pits as inside dogs, and a good ammount of land for them to play on. If you are an uninvited guest, and the signs didn't persuade you to leave, perhaps being eaten alive will. that is all.

see reply #61 above :)

com 10-01-2005 06:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lotusmike
So what have we learned here today cadets!?

Pitbulls suck :321GFY. Stupid, violent animals deservingly will be exterminated. :winkwink: Owners like 'com' are either power posturing thugs or misguided batshit rescuers.

i bet you hate nigg*ers too dontcha. I have never owned a pit myself, altho I do plan on it. I've owned several Great Danes, Malinois, Labs, and Spaniels. I have been raised around pitts, rotts, and the like. If you think I need a dog to flex nuts, you should meet my firearms. If you think one dog is more violent than the next, by breed, I have a few friends I'd like you to meet. If you think your idiocy holds any ground here, I've got a reality check I'd like you to cash.

lotusmike 10-01-2005 07:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by com
i bet you hate nigg*ers too dontcha. I have never owned a pit myself, altho I do plan on it. I've owned several Great Danes, Malinois, Labs, and Spaniels. I have been raised around pitts, rotts, and the like. If you think I need a dog to flex nuts, you should meet my firearms. If you think one dog is more violent than the next, by breed, I have a few friends I'd like you to meet. If you think your idiocy holds any ground here, I've got a reality check I'd like you to cash.

Hey what did I say about you sounding like a Hamas apologist?

Look, I'm sure you've had and will have sweet moments with your Pitts. But the next time leave "Bruto" in a piss mood and it decides to tweak out and rip your daughters face off........

ah fuk it. it's all just fun'n'games.

kosta 10-01-2005 07:14 AM

If you are considering getting a pitbull, you may find the following useful:

"The American Pit Bull Terrier (APBT), or the AmStaff, is certainly not the right pet for everyone. Being a powerful dog, it will require sufficient and adequate control. Some prospective elderly owners or children, will not be able to supply that control... A first-time dog owner, in the minds of many experienced dog breeders, should not buy an APBT or an AmStaff!. An insecure person who wants only an aggressive dog to bolster some personal human inadequacy should never become an owner of one of these dogs. An uncaring or negligent person should not buy an AmStaff or an APBT (or any other dog for that matter)."



:warning

lotusmike 10-01-2005 07:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kosta
If you are considering getting a pitbull, you may find the following useful:

"The American Pit Bull Terrier (APBT), or the AmStaff, is certainly not the right pet for everyone. Being a powerful dog, it will require sufficient and adequate control. Some prospective elderly owners or children, will not be able to supply that control... A first-time dog owner, in the minds of many experienced dog breeders, should not buy an APBT or an AmStaff!. An insecure person who wants only an aggressive dog to bolster some personal human inadequacy should never become an owner of one of these dogs. An uncaring or negligent person should not buy an AmStaff or an APBT (or any other dog for that matter)."

:1orglaugh :winkwink: :anon :costumed- :winkwink:

Kre8t0r 10-01-2005 07:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lotusmike
So what have we learned here today cadets!?

Pitbulls suck :321GFY. Stupid, violent animals deservingly will be exterminated. :winkwink: Owners like 'com' are either power posturing thugs or misguided batshit rescuers.

Misguided????? You really have no clue as to what you are talking about. Please leave this to people with a small clue at least.

Since I missed #600 here's the token ass shot and a pic of one of my babies. :thumbsup

Ass Shot:
http://www.mikes-xxx-links.com/temp/020.jpg

And my buddy Gator:
http://pitbulls.consumer-corp.com/pics/images/021.jpg

:pimp

QuaWee 10-01-2005 07:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lotusmike
You are beyond stupid. I hope your kids get torn apart by a pitbill and save the gene pool from your moronic DNA. Enjoy your extra chromosomes.

LOL, you are saying spic and nignog and he's stupid? :1orglaugh

com 10-01-2005 07:22 AM

beautiful pup ya got there :) I miss mine

lotusmike 10-01-2005 07:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kre8t0r
Misguided????? You really have no clue as to what you are talking about. Please leave this to people with a small clue at least.

Since I missed #600 here's the token ass shot and a pic of one of my babies. :thumbsup

Ass Shot:
http://www.mikes-xxx-links.com/temp/020.jpg

And my buddy Gator:
http://pitbulls.consumer-corp.com/pics/images/021.jpg

:pimp

http://surgclerk.med.utoronto.ca/WoundHeal/case1.jpg

Kre8t0r 10-01-2005 07:30 AM

Ok you are really out there now... I'm SURE a pitbull did that damage it had to it's a pitbull afterall... :helpme

Here's my last comment on this to you Mike, notice the breed of dog in the pic, hmmm not a pitbull huh? :321GFY

http://www.mikes-xxx-links.com/temp/stfu.jpg

Thanks for playing, now please read a book!

com 10-01-2005 07:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lotusmike

http://wheelessonline.com/image9/sciat2.jpg
http://news.bbc.co.uk/olmedia/146000...50_shot150.jpg
http://www.ispub.com/xml/journals/ij...gswsi-fig2.png

Perhaps i should start posting DUI fatality photos, or perhaps my own photos of my face bit open. They are as equally relevant.

KingK7 10-01-2005 07:39 AM

It's not the dog that is dangerous, its the fucking human garbage owning them.
The only people that own dogs like that are trash / drug dealers / junkies or a combination.

lotusmike 10-01-2005 07:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by com
http://wheelessonline.com/image9/sciat2.jpg
http://news.bbc.co.uk/olmedia/146000...50_shot150.jpg
http://www.ispub.com/xml/journals/ij...gswsi-fig2.png

Perhaps i should start posting DUI fatality photos, or perhaps my own photos of my face bit open. They are as equally relevant.

You deserve what you got, you stupid fuckwad. Why would you house breeds that have consistently demonstrated their hostility? Natural selection is at work. May your grissle dangle from Bruto's canines.

com 10-01-2005 07:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KingK7
It's not the dog that is dangerous, its the fucking human garbage owning them.
The only people that own dogs like that are trash / drug dealers / junkies or a combination.

Excuse you! That's about as narrow minded as any of the crap lotusmike has spewed out. what gives you the right to classify anyone?

kosta 10-01-2005 07:44 AM

You weak fag pit bull owners are pathetic. Your attempts to bolster your flagging manhood through your pets would be laughable if it weren't such a dangerous combination of stupidity and weakness.

Learn how to protect yourself by yourself, little men. Don't rely on your dogs to do it.

kosta 10-01-2005 07:45 AM

I have this mental image of com sitting in his trailer, smoking Kools and typing furiously on his Web TV.

His wife asks "honey, can you get off the computer, the kids want to watch cartoons" to which he replies "Shut up, Lerlene, I'm defending my dawg!"

com 10-01-2005 07:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lotusmike
You deserve what you got, you stupid fuckwad. Why would you house breeds that have consistently demonstrated their hostility? Natural selection is at work. May your grissle dangle from Bruto's canines.

I was bit in the face by a friend's miniature pinscher, while he was holding it. A dog I had known it's whole life. A common house pet, and not a dog known for it's violent disposition. The dog bit me, with zero pre-emptive action on my part, and out of the blue. And showed no resent for doing so. Anytime I was ever bit by a pit was seperating them fighting eachother, and the second the dog realized it was holding my hand in its mouth, it let go and whent back for the other dog... I was not the intended target, I just put my hand in the mix trying to pry each dogs jaws off the other. Fuck you and your moronic justifications.

KingK7 10-01-2005 07:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by com
Excuse you! That's about as narrow minded as any of the crap lotusmike has spewed out. what gives you the right to classify anyone?

It's a fact.
The only thing more inbred than a pitbull is his owner.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:57 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123