DOJ OBSCENITY, 2257 & SPAM BUST

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Connor
    Confirmed User
    • Feb 2003
    • 1294

    #1

    DOJ OBSCENITY, 2257 & SPAM BUST

    Did you guys see this? First ever 2257 bust... and an obscenity bust, wrapped in a CAN-SPAM violation wrapper.

    http://www.ynot.com/modules.php?op=m...ticle&sid=9704


    YNOT v5 IS NOW LIVE! | SEEN YNOT MAIL YET?
  • xxxjay
    Tube groupie.
    • Aug 2002
    • 13482

    #2
    Interesting...
    http://donttellmehowtoruinmylife.com/ - http://www.jmdigitalmarketing.com/my...s-and-reviews/ - http://www.wouldyouhitit.org - http://shinyobjectreviews.com/

    Comment

    • iBanker
      Confirmed User
      • Dec 2004
      • 2758

      #3
      Whoa 4567
      www.JasonandAlex.com
      Christopher's ICQ: 268-843-170

      Comment

      • Azlord
        Confirmed User
        • Dec 2003
        • 2651

        #4
        totally. but wasn't it spam and obscenity? Not as much as it's the 2257 shit?

        Comment

        • DatingGold
          $6 PER EMAIL JOiN
          • Feb 2003
          • 13185

          #5
          crazy shit
          9 Years of SOLID payouts and conversions!



          ADULT DATING - $100 PPS

          LIVE CAMS - $214 PPS

          WWW.DATINGGOLD.COM

          ICQ: 27442303

          Comment

          • BradShaw
            Confirmed User
            • Oct 2001
            • 7840

            #6
            This has little to do with 2257, so any comment from FSO is way off base.
            Sig too big

            http://www.gofuckyourself.com/gfy_faqs.html

            Want to use a large banner in your sig??? Contact Eric about getting on as an advertiser - eric AT adult.com

            Comment

            • Mako
              Confirmed User
              • Jul 2004
              • 1986

              #7
              Nothing to do with 2257 conner, wake up:

              "According to the indictment, Clason, Kilbride, and Schaffer conspired to engage in sending spam ?for their own personal gain, benefit, profit and advantage.? America Online, Inc. received over 600,000 complaints between January 30, and June 9, 2004 from its users regarding spam allegedly sent by the defendants."

              Gee, ya think that might be the real reason they got pegged?

              Comment

              • jayeff
                Confirmed User
                • May 2001
                • 2944

                #8
                Originally posted by BradShaw
                This has little to do with 2257, so any comment from FSO is way off base.
                I think it's FSC? Although they keep such a low profile, maybe they changed their name and I just didn't notice...

                Comment

                • Connor
                  Confirmed User
                  • Feb 2003
                  • 1294

                  #9
                  It's the first ever federal 2257 charges, and you think it has NOTHING to do with 2257? Hmmm, interesting position. I hope it's okay with you if I disagree. ;)


                  YNOT v5 IS NOW LIVE! | SEEN YNOT MAIL YET?

                  Comment

                  • After Shock Media
                    It's coming look busy
                    • Mar 2001
                    • 35299

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Connor
                    It's the first ever federal 2257 charges, and you think it has NOTHING to do with 2257? Hmmm, interesting position. I hope it's okay with you if I disagree. ;)
                    Yes they did not just toss the book at them, they picked up and threw the whole damn library.

                    [email protected] ICQ:135982156 AIM: Aftershockmed1a MSN: [email protected]

                    Comment

                    • Connor
                      Confirmed User
                      • Feb 2003
                      • 1294

                      #11
                      Originally posted by After Shock Media
                      Yes they did not just toss the book at them, they picked up and threw the whole damn library.
                      It certainly seems that way. Charge-stacking is an effective means for obtaining plea deals.


                      YNOT v5 IS NOW LIVE! | SEEN YNOT MAIL YET?

                      Comment

                      • mardigras
                        Bon temps!
                        • Feb 2003
                        • 14194

                        #12
                        The four counts in the indictment involving interstate transportation of obscene material stem from the transmission of ?hard-core pornographic images of adults engaged in explicit sexual conduct,? images which ?meet the Supreme Court?s test for adult obscenity,? according to the DOJ?s statement.
                        I'd sure like to see those pictures. They often vow to prosecute obscenity but refuse to publicly define it. It would at least be a starting barometer...
                        .

                        Comment

                        • MrPinks
                          Registered User
                          • Oct 2003
                          • 1767

                          #13
                          This is scary. I guess the stuff about content before June 2005 being safe is bullshit.

                          Comment

                          • $5 submissions
                            I help you SUCCEED
                            • Nov 2003
                            • 32195

                            #14
                            Originally posted by After Shock Media
                            Yes they did not just toss the book at them, they picked up and threw the whole damn library.
                            That's a lot of books

                            Comment

                            • After Shock Media
                              It's coming look busy
                              • Mar 2001
                              • 35299

                              #15
                              Originally posted by MrPinks
                              This is scary. I guess the stuff about content before June 2005 being safe is bullshit.
                              Do not know where you got the idea it was bullshit.
                              Could it be they sent hardcore material in the email and did not have a 2257 notice in that email? It would work that way afterall.

                              [email protected] ICQ:135982156 AIM: Aftershockmed1a MSN: [email protected]

                              Comment

                              • After Shock Media
                                It's coming look busy
                                • Mar 2001
                                • 35299

                                #16
                                Originally posted by mardigras
                                I'd sure like to see those pictures. They often vow to prosecute obscenity but refuse to publicly define it. It would at least be a starting barometer...
                                To sum it up, they know it when they see it.

                                [email protected] ICQ:135982156 AIM: Aftershockmed1a MSN: [email protected]

                                Comment

                                • Mako
                                  Confirmed User
                                  • Jul 2004
                                  • 1986

                                  #17
                                  Originally posted by MrPinks
                                  This is scary. I guess the stuff about content before June 2005 being safe is bullshit.
                                  No, it's not. Read before posting.

                                  The "grandfather clause" is only a compromise suggestion at this point, it's EXPECTED to become a part of the final revision next month.

                                  Until then, if you're not in the FSC, or not compliant with the NEW requirements (licenses, IDs, releases, etc as a primary producer) then you're in violation.

                                  Cappice?

                                  Comment

                                  • xxxjay
                                    Tube groupie.
                                    • Aug 2002
                                    • 13482

                                    #18
                                    Originally posted by Connor
                                    Did you guys see this? First ever 2257 bust... and an obscenity bust, wrapped in a CAN-SPAM violation wrapper.

                                    http://www.ynot.com/modules.php?op=m...ticle&sid=9704
                                    That's cool that you have Q writing for you - he is one of the most intelligent and articulate guys in this biz - IMHO.
                                    http://donttellmehowtoruinmylife.com/ - http://www.jmdigitalmarketing.com/my...s-and-reviews/ - http://www.wouldyouhitit.org - http://shinyobjectreviews.com/

                                    Comment

                                    • MrPinks
                                      Registered User
                                      • Oct 2003
                                      • 1767

                                      #19
                                      Originally posted by Mako
                                      No, it's not. Read before posting.

                                      The "grandfather clause" is only a compromise suggestion at this point, it's EXPECTED to become a part of the final revision next month.

                                      Until then, if you're not in the FSC, or not compliant with the NEW requirements (licenses, IDs, releases, etc as a primary producer) then you're in violation.

                                      Cappice?
                                      Cappice

                                      Comment

                                      • tony299
                                        lurker
                                        • Aug 2002
                                        • 57021

                                        #20
                                        All these people with email addys for their 2257 or fake info (names ,adresses) this is a wake up call.

                                        Comment

                                        • bigdog
                                          Confirmed User
                                          • Jul 2001
                                          • 6964

                                          #21
                                          i see why programs don't even bother even talking mail traffic too risky

                                          Comment

                                          • Bill8
                                            Confirmed User
                                            • Oct 2001
                                            • 1901

                                            #22
                                            I think it's a good thing.

                                            These bulkers and this email bullshit fuck up the whole industry. Grandma and Grampa America, joe blow citizens, are getting rightfully pissed at the crap in the email.

                                            The 2257 thing is interesting, but it's typical for a bust like this, they throw the book, then drop the charges later.

                                            I'd love to see a ton more bulkers get popped. You guys think you can hide, but the truth is no-one will be able to hide as info tech matures.

                                            Comment

                                            • V_RocKs
                                              Damn Right I Kiss Ass!
                                              • Nov 2003
                                              • 32447

                                              #23
                                              Plenty of programs SAY they don't accept mailer traffic but often not only do, but are the spammers themselves...

                                              More programs than you can count on fingers and toes...

                                              Comment

                                              • VeriSexy
                                                Join The Royal Family
                                                • Apr 2002
                                                • 25463

                                                #24
                                                Originally posted by bigdog
                                                i see why programs don't even bother even talking mail traffic too risky

                                                They are greedy and willing to risk
                                                Looking for a KICK ASS TEEN SPONSOR? Check out ROYAL CASH - THE KING OF TEEN!
                                                Incredible webmaster tools FHGs, Morphing Blog and RSS Feeds, Embedded FLV & WMV Videos
                                                .
                                                With TOP RATIO Sites like


                                                ATMovs.com | iTeenVideo.com |
                                                TeenSexMovs.com | TeenSexMania.com


                                                Comment

                                                • nudecanada
                                                  Confirmed User
                                                  • Jan 2004
                                                  • 793

                                                  #25
                                                  Originally posted by After Shock Media
                                                  Do not know where you got the idea it was bullshit.
                                                  Could it be they sent hardcore material in the email and did not have a 2257 notice in that email? It would work that way afterall.
                                                  Bingo, first thing I thought. They embedded non-compliant images in the e-mail and could not produce 2257 records for it when asked.

                                                  Comment

                                                  • baddog
                                                    So Fucking Banned
                                                    • Apr 2001
                                                    • 107089

                                                    #26
                                                    Clason was merely an employee, she is getting screwed here . . . big time.

                                                    Comment

                                                    • After Shock Media
                                                      It's coming look busy
                                                      • Mar 2001
                                                      • 35299

                                                      #27
                                                      Originally posted by baddog
                                                      Clason was merely an employee, she is getting screwed here . . . big time.
                                                      Well when the DOJ did talk 2257 they did toss in that heartstopping conspiracy word.

                                                      [email protected] ICQ:135982156 AIM: Aftershockmed1a MSN: [email protected]

                                                      Comment

                                                      • baddog
                                                        So Fucking Banned
                                                        • Apr 2001
                                                        • 107089

                                                        #28
                                                        Originally posted by After Shock Media
                                                        Well when the DOJ did talk 2257 they did toss in that heartstopping conspiracy word.
                                                        Guess every employee of a major program had better pay heed then. You don't even have to know anything illegal is being done, because they will include you in the indictment . . . even if you don't work there any longer.

                                                        Comment

                                                        • After Shock Media
                                                          It's coming look busy
                                                          • Mar 2001
                                                          • 35299

                                                          #29
                                                          Originally posted by baddog
                                                          Guess every employee of a major program had better pay heed then. You don't even have to know anything illegal is being done, because they will include you in the indictment . . . even if you don't work there any longer.
                                                          Isnt that how a conspiracy ussually works though?
                                                          No idea if they used it of course, but since I did see they were going after assets and such it kind of seemed that way.

                                                          [email protected] ICQ:135982156 AIM: Aftershockmed1a MSN: [email protected]

                                                          Comment

                                                          • TheGoldenChild
                                                            Confirmed User
                                                            • May 2002
                                                            • 6940

                                                            #30
                                                            Originally posted by baddog
                                                            Guess every employee of a major program had better pay heed then. You don't even have to know anything illegal is being done, because they will include you in the indictment . . . even if you don't work there any longer.
                                                            BD- I don't know the girl in question, or at least I don't think I do- however how can you know 100% that this said person didn't have accounts in her name and got paid?

                                                            I know I have been wrong before about a lot of people I thought I knew pretty well...

                                                            Know this much Bad Dog , if the govt named her- she had some shit in her name, period.

                                                            Employees don't get named unless they are accessories- it's pretty rare.

                                                            The guy cleaning their bathroom would have been indicted as well if they were bringing in the hired help...

                                                            Comment

                                                            • Loki
                                                              Confirmed User
                                                              • Feb 2004
                                                              • 4420

                                                              #31
                                                              don't mean to call "bullshit" here, but after reading the entire writeup this had LITTLE to do with a 2257 arrest but more about SPAM, and obscenity. YES they were also brought up on charges reg 2257 (or the lack thereof) but how much would you like to bet if they had not had 200,000, let me repeate that lol 200,000 complaints about their spam, that they would have been found in the wrong reg 2257?

                                                              I know people will bitch about this post, but SO BE IT! it's not hard to take ONE PART of a ENTIRE story and 'spin' it in your own favor.

                                                              but fuck it what do I know? I'm a 3D toon sponsor lol

                                                              -Loki-
                                                              MAKE MONEY WITH 3D TOONS!
                                                              Need hosting? LokiCa$h Uses Amerinoc and love them!
                                                              Skype: LokiPorn Or Email 3dloki|at|gmail.com

                                                              Comment

                                                              • sltr
                                                                Confirmed User
                                                                • Dec 2002
                                                                • 3191

                                                                #32
                                                                600,000 aol compliants

                                                                Comment

                                                                • baddog
                                                                  So Fucking Banned
                                                                  • Apr 2001
                                                                  • 107089

                                                                  #33
                                                                  Originally posted by kBizzle
                                                                  BD- I don't know the girl in question, or at least I don't think I do- however how can you know 100% that this said person didn't have accounts in her name and got paid?

                                                                  I know I have been wrong before about a lot of people I thought I knew pretty well...

                                                                  Know this much Bad Dog , if the govt named her- she had some shit in her name, period.

                                                                  Employees don't get named unless they are accessories- it's pretty rare.

                                                                  The guy cleaning their bathroom would have been indicted as well if they were bringing in the hired help...

                                                                  I do know her, pretty well. After talking to her I am relatively confident that they just included her because she was on the payroll.

                                                                  Comment

                                                                  • will76
                                                                    Making $$$$ w/ ClickCash
                                                                    • May 2003
                                                                    • 18037

                                                                    #34
                                                                    This is bullshit, its like if you ran over someone with your car on purpose and they slap a no seat belt charge and a speeding charge to the murder charge. They then tell you, if convicted of murder you will spend 20+ years in jail but if you plea guilty to the no seat belt and speeding, then we will gve you probabtion and a fine.

                                                                    It's BS they wouldn't have gone after them if not for the spam, this really doesn't have anything to do with 2257 other then taking advantage of the situation to try to get some precidence on the books.
                                                                    ICQ: 86364801 Email: will [at] innovativeassets [dot] com

                                                                    PROGRAM SHIT LIST - DO NOT PROMOTE (click link for gfy thread)
                                                                    FNCash | Media Revenue

                                                                    Comment

                                                                    • OY
                                                                      Industry Pioneer
                                                                      • Oct 2002
                                                                      • 5401

                                                                      #35
                                                                      Originally posted by Mako
                                                                      Nothing to do with 2257 conner, wake up:

                                                                      "According to the indictment, Clason, Kilbride, and Schaffer conspired to engage in sending spam ?for their own personal gain, benefit, profit and advantage.? America Online, Inc. received over 600,000 complaints between January 30, and June 9, 2004 from its users regarding spam allegedly sent by the defendants."

                                                                      Gee, ya think that might be the real reason they got pegged?
                                                                      Around since 1997, and the company that introduced "Cascading Billing" in MPA3® Affiliate Management and Tracking Software

                                                                      Outsourcing With A Norwegian Twist - NordBits - Inquire within!

                                                                      Comment

                                                                      • marzzo
                                                                        Confirmed User
                                                                        • May 2002
                                                                        • 2134

                                                                        #36
                                                                        Originally posted by vdc-Loki
                                                                        don't mean to call "bullshit" here, but after reading the entire writeup this had LITTLE to do with a 2257 arrest but more about SPAM, and obscenity. YES they were also brought up on charges reg 2257 (or the lack thereof) but how much would you like to bet if they had not had 200,000, let me repeate that lol 200,000 complaints about their spam, that they would have been found in the wrong reg 2257?

                                                                        I know people will bitch about this post, but SO BE IT! it's not hard to take ONE PART of a ENTIRE story and 'spin' it in your own favor.

                                                                        but fuck it what do I know? I'm a 3D toon sponsor lol

                                                                        -Loki-
                                                                        They got Al Capone on tax evasion, but that's not what he's famous for.

                                                                        oh yeah, bump.
                                                                        4 5 zero - 2 2 - nine nine nine

                                                                        Comment

                                                                        • jimmyf
                                                                          OU812
                                                                          • Feb 2001
                                                                          • 12651

                                                                          #37
                                                                          Originally posted by will76
                                                                          This is bullshit, its like if you ran over someone with your car on purpose and they slap a no seat belt charge and a speeding charge to the murder charge. They then tell you, if convicted of murder you will spend 20+ years in jail but if you plea guilty to the no seat belt and speeding, then we will gve you probabtion and a fine.

                                                                          It's BS they wouldn't have gone after them if not for the spam, this really doesn't have anything to do with 2257 other then taking advantage of the situation to try to get some precidence on the books.
                                                                          I agree with you 100%. And you got's to be nuts to spam porn if you are in the USA.

                                                                          i wouldn't even do opt-in.. I wouldn't want them 2 even look at my site's... Don't care how careful you are, bet they can find something wrong.
                                                                          Last edited by jimmyf; 08-30-2005, 12:34 PM.
                                                                          Epic CashEpic Cash works for me
                                                                          Solar Cash Paysite Plugin
                                                                          Gallery of the day freesites,POTD,Gallery generator with free hosting

                                                                          Comment

                                                                          • davidd
                                                                            Confirmed User
                                                                            • Jul 2003
                                                                            • 1076

                                                                            #38
                                                                            Originally posted by tony404
                                                                            All these people with email addys for their 2257 or fake info (names ,adresses) this is a wake up call.
                                                                            They were arrested for SPAM first and foremost, money laundering secondly, and they threw the 2257 to stack the indictment.

                                                                            If you have any knowledge of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines, every little thing helps.

                                                                            2257 penalties are zits on the ass of jail sentence, when compared to Money Laundering.

                                                                            Comment

                                                                            • 2257-Ben
                                                                              Confirmed User
                                                                              • Jun 2005
                                                                              • 633

                                                                              #39
                                                                              Originally posted by Connor
                                                                              Did you guys see this? First ever 2257 bust... and an obscenity bust, wrapped in a CAN-SPAM violation wrapper.

                                                                              http://www.ynot.com/modules.php?op=m...ticle&sid=9704
                                                                              .... and unless Judge Miller renders a decision in the next 2 days, you're going to see a lot more 2257 inspections / arrests / prosecutions.
                                                                              2257-Ben
                                                                              www.2257ware.com
                                                                              The BEST, most compliant 2257 record-keeping software available. Period.

                                                                              Comment

                                                                              • bigdog
                                                                                Confirmed User
                                                                                • Jul 2001
                                                                                • 6964

                                                                                #40
                                                                                Originally posted by 2257-Ben
                                                                                .... and unless Judge Miller renders a decision in the next 2 days, you're going to see a lot more 2257 inspections / arrests / prosecutions.

                                                                                i wonder who will the goverment try to go afer, the extreme sites or the teen sites where the girls look underage

                                                                                Comment

                                                                                • sweetcuties
                                                                                  Confirmed User
                                                                                  • Feb 2002
                                                                                  • 5859

                                                                                  #41
                                                                                  fuck spammers

                                                                                  Comment

                                                                                  • baddog
                                                                                    So Fucking Banned
                                                                                    • Apr 2001
                                                                                    • 107089

                                                                                    #42
                                                                                    Originally posted by kBizzle
                                                                                    BD- I don't know the girl in question, or at least I don't think I do- however how can you know 100% that this said person didn't have accounts in her name and got paid?

                                                                                    I know I have been wrong before about a lot of people I thought I knew pretty well...

                                                                                    Know this much Bad Dog , if the govt named her- she had some shit in her name, period.

                                                                                    Employees don't get named unless they are accessories- it's pretty rare.

                                                                                    The guy cleaning their bathroom would have been indicted as well if they were bringing in the hired help...

                                                                                    Well, as a little update, I spoke with my friend and she is in a much better frame of mind. Can't disclose details, but it appears she is going to slide.

                                                                                    Comment

                                                                                    • Mr. Soul
                                                                                      Confirmed User
                                                                                      • Jul 2005
                                                                                      • 1633

                                                                                      #43
                                                                                      600,000 complaints to AOL alone? Well, it's safe to say they'll be able to pay their lawyers.

                                                                                      Comment

                                                                                      • Mr. Soul
                                                                                        Confirmed User
                                                                                        • Jul 2005
                                                                                        • 1633

                                                                                        #44
                                                                                        Originally posted by V_RocKs
                                                                                        Plenty of programs SAY they don't accept mailer traffic but often not only do, but are the spammers themselves...

                                                                                        More programs than you can count on fingers and toes...

                                                                                        Almost everyone used to be, but more and more American based companies are shying away from mailer traffic. A lot of them are either sticklers about the cam spam rules now or they've completely stopped. I expected more to go offshore or up north after the Republicans kept power.

                                                                                        If you're inside the US it's actually pretty stupid to not follow the rules laid out in can spam.

                                                                                        Comment

                                                                                        Working...