101 Good Points On A Fucked Up Situation

See my location

<-----------

After almost 59-months, I feel the US will not be able to easily gain what they lost (oil & cash).

Thats true.. he did that at the time America was supporting him... Yet the US didnt seemed to bothered by it...

Well .. cant argue with gut feelings...


*waving the white flag*

The US *did* save a ton of cash by going after the oil in Canada/Alberta. Google for 'NAFTA'.

I'm not a 'true believer', but if there's a hell, Mulrooney surely belongs there for selling out all Canadians on the worst peice of legislation of all time. If you ever wondered why the conservatives seem like they'll never regain power except in the most obscure and right-wingy areas, three words explain the entire situation: "Mulrooney. NAFTA. GST."

A cynical person might even say that the Libs won't repeal the GST simply because its continued existance reminds everyone of how bad a pack of fuckups the Cons are. The "Evil Ken Doll" personna of Steve Harper doesn't hurt either. :2 cents:

I was so glad when the new con party choose Harper as their leader I can't even tell you. At first when the parties merged I got a little nervous, until I saw their leader. Canada isn't going to elect a devout, socially conservative Christian any time soon.

Now they have CAFTA.. same strategy.. going after central america's natural resources... privatise, get US companies in there.. etc... The US also want Venezuela's oil badly.. but Chavez dont want anything to do with the US...

US have agents in Venezuela formenting unrest ... after all, they did it in Iraq with " Scorpions " ....
Then they will clame to liberate the poor venezuelian people ( lol ) that aree getting abused by a venezuelian ruthless marxist ....
History repeats itself, and more so with the US that don't learn from their mistakes ....

You've seen "The Revolution will not be Televised", right?

Yes, it was shown at the EXCENTRIS movie house ...

Also saw L'AGRONOME, same type of situation, but in Haiti ....

Bush convieniantly calls it "spreading freedom and democracy" ... :)

I find it interesting that life and death is just an esoteric debate to you brain-dead western liberals

You deserve to be killed by the muslims...

Road side bomb kills U.S. soldier in Afghanistan

28 minutes ago


http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=stor...n_usa_blast_dc

Read the report, before you talk out of your ass.

The official report determined there were no Nuclear WMD (because saddam did not have the facilities to produce them)
There were no Chemical WMD (because Saddam did not have the facilites to produce them)
but as for biological WMD there were none to be found at the time that they were finally allowed to search (Saddam did have the facilities to produce them because they are the same facilities need to produce vaccines)

You keep avoiding the question

"do you honestly believe that saddam is a nice dictator producing enough vaccine to immunize all of the rebels trying to kill him"

because that the quantity of vaccine they found when the searched his medical facilities.

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

So he had nothing but dirty toughts ...


I sometimes fantasize about a gangbang with the Bush daughters, talking them up the ass ... Will I be arrested ????

When we get another president in 3 years.

How Many Americans will die as a result of running away from Iraq, that is the question.

How many did die when running away from Vietnam? How many had already died there ...

you really think that Iraq = Vietnam?....In Iraq you're dealing with global muslim terrorist...
How many Vietnamese Attacked American Soil?

Vietnamese never said that their target is every crusader and jew on this planet.

No you moron the fact that their was so much vaccine proves that it was always vaccine but live culture killed and turned into vaccine when he realized he would get caught with WMD(assuming you don't believe that saddam is a nice dictator ).

There are only three possiblity

1. Saddam is a nice dictator who produces enough vaccine to immunize every man woman and child in his country including all the rebels who want him dead (my opinion 0% chance)
2. Saddam was producing weapons grade Infuenza to be used against the rebels and enought vaccine to immunize his own army and by sheer dumb luck at the exact instance he was growing the influenza virus as a weapon more than 50% of the US supply of the flu vaccine was tainted. Making the US potentially vulnerable to a Biological attack using that exact weapon. (30% max)
3. Saddam was producing weapons grade influenza and tainting of 535 batches of flu vaccine was deliberate. If he had not been forced to destroy those live cultures, turning them into the huge surplus that was ultimately found, that virus would have been release into the vulnerable US population causing hundreds of thousands of people to drown in their own blood. (70% + chance).

so the question still stands

do you honestly believe that Saddam is a nice dictator who produced enough vaccine for all the rebels trying to kill him. (or do you accept that there is a 0% chance of that being true).

If you have enough common sense to realize that he is not that nice a guy then you have to come to the conclusion that at the time President Bush went in there Saddam had Biological WMD (against the agreed apon UN prohibition).


For you to believe that those WMD were not going to be used against the US. You have to believe that the flu shortage (50%) at the exact same time was just a coinsidence.

I don't believe it is a coincidence because with all the investigations that went into determining the tainted batches they could not trace it back to a single point of failure (1 valve, 1 person, 1 culture cyclinder).

<insert TINFOIL_HAT.jpg >

you still haven't answered the question

trying another way
1. All the Flu Vaccine was always flu vaccine. In which case you have to believe that Saddam is a nice dictator willing to immunize all the rebels who are trying to kill him
2. 80% was flu vaccine (for his troops and the civilian population) and the rest was WMD to be used against the rebels. In which case you have to believe that Saddam is a nice dictator who cares about the lives of the civilian population and is perfectly willing to accidently immunize an rebels who are hiding within the civilian population even tho such an action would nulify the effectiveness of his weapon.
3.50% was Flu Vaccine (for his troops only) and the rest to be used against the rebels. Which means he would be killing the entire civilian population including the children who would be growning up to be his future troops.

Under senerio 2 and 3 it makes more sense for him to export his weapons grade virus to be used in a different country which is vulnerable.

which of those three senerios do you believe to be true.

All your conspiracy FLU VACCINE is based on what. Show a link to a credible source, if it exists ....

http://www.google.ca/search?q=iraq+f...&start=10&sa=N

Until then, no point to address your great FLU VACCINE conspiracy. I am more worried by the red line around Baghdad that wiull release chemical mustard gas when the troops reach it .... :1orglaugh


PS: did you get the flu this year and were pissed that you didn't have vaccine in the USA ....

FLU VACCINE